When you’re looking at images of cratered worlds taken from spacecraft, do you see domes, bumps or mounds instead of craters? That’s because our brains are used to perceiving images as lit from above. This optical illusion is called the crater-dome illusion, or relief inversion. One quick way to try to get the images to “pop” into their correct relief is to rotate the two-dimensional images until the light source is from above.
In the example above, do you see the two images of Victoria Crater on Mars as a dome in one and a crater in the other? Or maybe two craters or two domes? Perhaps they even switch while you’re looking at them. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter captured these images of the 1/2 mile-wide crater in 2006. It’s an impact crater with sand dunes on the crater floor.
Inverted view of Earth
The same illusion happens when we look at satellite images from Earth as well. We often see images of Earth with north at the top. But when the image is of the Northern Hemisphere, the angle of sunlight is coming from below, and we can experience relief inversion. So it can happen with more than just craters. Below is an image of the vast canyonland area of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in the United States. The first shows the view with north up, like you would see on a map. But the view is lit from below.
Does the second image, rotated so that north is down, look more like a canyon system to you?
Tricky landscape
Usually we know if something is a crater versus, say, a volcano. But bizarre landscapes can be misleading. The image below shows pink sand dunes and white salt flats. But at first blush, with north up, it looks as if it’s pinkish canyons.
The crater-dome illusion on the moon
Below is a relatively recent crater on the moon. Again, we see the image on the left looks more like a raised dome, possibly a volcanic feature. But in reality, the landform is a crater.
More examples
Here are two more examples. Remember, if you want to invert the view, try rotating it!
Try the next one yourself. Don’t feel bad if you can’t make it stop looking like a bump. Once your brain sees it as such, it will try to hold onto that view!
Bottom line: The crater-dome illusion happens when you look at an image of a crater and the angle of the light causes it to appear as a dome, bump or mound instead of a crater.
When you’re looking at images of cratered worlds taken from spacecraft, do you see domes, bumps or mounds instead of craters? That’s because our brains are used to perceiving images as lit from above. This optical illusion is called the crater-dome illusion, or relief inversion. One quick way to try to get the images to “pop” into their correct relief is to rotate the two-dimensional images until the light source is from above.
In the example above, do you see the two images of Victoria Crater on Mars as a dome in one and a crater in the other? Or maybe two craters or two domes? Perhaps they even switch while you’re looking at them. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter captured these images of the 1/2 mile-wide crater in 2006. It’s an impact crater with sand dunes on the crater floor.
Inverted view of Earth
The same illusion happens when we look at satellite images from Earth as well. We often see images of Earth with north at the top. But when the image is of the Northern Hemisphere, the angle of sunlight is coming from below, and we can experience relief inversion. So it can happen with more than just craters. Below is an image of the vast canyonland area of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in the United States. The first shows the view with north up, like you would see on a map. But the view is lit from below.
Does the second image, rotated so that north is down, look more like a canyon system to you?
Tricky landscape
Usually we know if something is a crater versus, say, a volcano. But bizarre landscapes can be misleading. The image below shows pink sand dunes and white salt flats. But at first blush, with north up, it looks as if it’s pinkish canyons.
The crater-dome illusion on the moon
Below is a relatively recent crater on the moon. Again, we see the image on the left looks more like a raised dome, possibly a volcanic feature. But in reality, the landform is a crater.
More examples
Here are two more examples. Remember, if you want to invert the view, try rotating it!
Try the next one yourself. Don’t feel bad if you can’t make it stop looking like a bump. Once your brain sees it as such, it will try to hold onto that view!
Bottom line: The crater-dome illusion happens when you look at an image of a crater and the angle of the light causes it to appear as a dome, bump or mound instead of a crater.
Planets form in spinning disks of gas and dust around stars as material slowly clumps together. Scientists predicted this as early as the 18th century, but observational evidence didn’t arrive until 1984, when astronomers using the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) spotted a strange excess of infrared light surrounding the bright star Vega. They interpreted this as a disk of planet-forming material. It was the first of many debris disks now identified around stars. Many of these disks contain ring-shaped gaps, likely carved out by exoplanets. Now, astronomers at the University of Arizona have used the Webb and Hubble space telescopes to study Vega’s legendary debris disk. Surprisingly, the disk is almost totally smooth: they found no evidence of any planets.
Andras Gáspár, a member of the research team from the University of Arizona, said:
Between the Hubble and Webb telescopes, you get this very clear view of Vega. It’s a mysterious system because it’s unlike other circumstellar disks we’ve looked at. The Vega disk is smooth, ridiculously smooth.
Newly forming stars accrete material from a disk of dust and gas around them. That disk is the flattened remnant of the cloud from which they are forming. In the mid-1990s, Hubble found disks around many newly forming stars. The disks are likely sites of planet formation, migration and sometimes destruction.
Fully matured stars like Vega have dusty disks enriched by ongoing “bumper car” collisions among orbiting asteroids and debris from evaporating comets. These are primordial bodies that have survived up to the present 450-million-year age of Vega (our sun is approximately 10 times older than Vega).
Dust within our solar system also gets replenished by minor orbiting bodies, which eject dust at a rate of about 10 tons per second.
Planets shove around this dust. This provides a strategy for detecting planets around other stars without seeing them directly. We just have to look for the effects they have on the dust.
But the scientists didn’t see these effects around Vega. Schuyler Wolff of the University of Arizona, lead author of the paper presenting the Hubble findings, said:
The architecture of the Vega system is markedly different from our own solar system, where giant planets like Jupiter and Saturn are keeping the dust from spreading the way it does with Vega.
A smooth disk suggests no planets
For comparison, nearby star Fomalhaut is about the same distance, age and temperature as Vega. But Fomalhaut’s disk is very different from Vega’s. Fomalhaut has three distinct belts of debris, which scientists think were carved out by the gravity of orbiting planets. Though no planets have been positively identified yet around Fomalhaut, it’s thought planets must have shepherded the dust into these rings.
No such rings can be seen around Vega, apart from a subtle gap around 60 times farther from the star as Earth is from the sun. The Vega disk is very smooth all the way in, until the glare of the star obscures it. According to the researchers, this shows there are no planets down to at least Neptune’s mass (17 times the mass of Earth) circulating in large orbits around the star.
The discovery has only spawned more questions. Research team member George Rieke of the University of Arizona said:
Given the physical similarity between the stars of Vega and Fomalhaut, why does Fomalhaut seem to have been able to form planets and Vega didn’t?
And Wolff added:
What’s the difference? Did the circumstellar environment, or the star itself, create that difference? What’s puzzling is that the same physics is at work in both.
Hubble and Webb both observed Vega
Why did it take both Hubble and Webb to make these observations? Webb observed the infrared glow from a disk of particles the size of sand grains swirling around Vega. Hubble, on the other hand, captured an outer halo of this disk, where debris the size of smoke particles are reflecting starlight.
The dust in Vega’s debris disk is distributed in this order because the pressure of starlight pushes out the smaller grains faster than larger grains. Wolff explained:
Different types of physics will locate different-sized particles at different locations. The fact that we’re seeing dust particle sizes sorted out can help us understand the underlying dynamics in circumstellar disks.
Together, the telescopes provided an unprecedentedly detailed view of Vega’s dust disk. Kate Su of the University of Arizona, lead author of the paper presenting the Webb findings, said:
We’re seeing in detail how much variety there is among circumstellar disks, and how that variety is tied into the underlying planetary systems. We’re finding a lot out about the planetary systems – even when we can’t see what might be hidden planets.
Bottom line: Scientists studying the disk of debris around bright star Vega have found it to be almost totally smooth, with no signs of any planets.
Planets form in spinning disks of gas and dust around stars as material slowly clumps together. Scientists predicted this as early as the 18th century, but observational evidence didn’t arrive until 1984, when astronomers using the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) spotted a strange excess of infrared light surrounding the bright star Vega. They interpreted this as a disk of planet-forming material. It was the first of many debris disks now identified around stars. Many of these disks contain ring-shaped gaps, likely carved out by exoplanets. Now, astronomers at the University of Arizona have used the Webb and Hubble space telescopes to study Vega’s legendary debris disk. Surprisingly, the disk is almost totally smooth: they found no evidence of any planets.
Andras Gáspár, a member of the research team from the University of Arizona, said:
Between the Hubble and Webb telescopes, you get this very clear view of Vega. It’s a mysterious system because it’s unlike other circumstellar disks we’ve looked at. The Vega disk is smooth, ridiculously smooth.
Newly forming stars accrete material from a disk of dust and gas around them. That disk is the flattened remnant of the cloud from which they are forming. In the mid-1990s, Hubble found disks around many newly forming stars. The disks are likely sites of planet formation, migration and sometimes destruction.
Fully matured stars like Vega have dusty disks enriched by ongoing “bumper car” collisions among orbiting asteroids and debris from evaporating comets. These are primordial bodies that have survived up to the present 450-million-year age of Vega (our sun is approximately 10 times older than Vega).
Dust within our solar system also gets replenished by minor orbiting bodies, which eject dust at a rate of about 10 tons per second.
Planets shove around this dust. This provides a strategy for detecting planets around other stars without seeing them directly. We just have to look for the effects they have on the dust.
But the scientists didn’t see these effects around Vega. Schuyler Wolff of the University of Arizona, lead author of the paper presenting the Hubble findings, said:
The architecture of the Vega system is markedly different from our own solar system, where giant planets like Jupiter and Saturn are keeping the dust from spreading the way it does with Vega.
A smooth disk suggests no planets
For comparison, nearby star Fomalhaut is about the same distance, age and temperature as Vega. But Fomalhaut’s disk is very different from Vega’s. Fomalhaut has three distinct belts of debris, which scientists think were carved out by the gravity of orbiting planets. Though no planets have been positively identified yet around Fomalhaut, it’s thought planets must have shepherded the dust into these rings.
No such rings can be seen around Vega, apart from a subtle gap around 60 times farther from the star as Earth is from the sun. The Vega disk is very smooth all the way in, until the glare of the star obscures it. According to the researchers, this shows there are no planets down to at least Neptune’s mass (17 times the mass of Earth) circulating in large orbits around the star.
The discovery has only spawned more questions. Research team member George Rieke of the University of Arizona said:
Given the physical similarity between the stars of Vega and Fomalhaut, why does Fomalhaut seem to have been able to form planets and Vega didn’t?
And Wolff added:
What’s the difference? Did the circumstellar environment, or the star itself, create that difference? What’s puzzling is that the same physics is at work in both.
Hubble and Webb both observed Vega
Why did it take both Hubble and Webb to make these observations? Webb observed the infrared glow from a disk of particles the size of sand grains swirling around Vega. Hubble, on the other hand, captured an outer halo of this disk, where debris the size of smoke particles are reflecting starlight.
The dust in Vega’s debris disk is distributed in this order because the pressure of starlight pushes out the smaller grains faster than larger grains. Wolff explained:
Different types of physics will locate different-sized particles at different locations. The fact that we’re seeing dust particle sizes sorted out can help us understand the underlying dynamics in circumstellar disks.
Together, the telescopes provided an unprecedentedly detailed view of Vega’s dust disk. Kate Su of the University of Arizona, lead author of the paper presenting the Webb findings, said:
We’re seeing in detail how much variety there is among circumstellar disks, and how that variety is tied into the underlying planetary systems. We’re finding a lot out about the planetary systems – even when we can’t see what might be hidden planets.
Bottom line: Scientists studying the disk of debris around bright star Vega have found it to be almost totally smooth, with no signs of any planets.
The EarthSky community has many talented astrophotographers who capture stunning images of the deep sky. We gathered some of our favorite deep-sky photos we received in October 2024 for you to enjoy. Do you have some of your own deep-sky images to share? You can submit them to us here. We love to see them!
Deep-sky photos of diffuse nebulae
The Orion Nebula
Deep-sky photos of star clusters
And a handful of external galaxies
Deep-sky video for October
Bottom line: Enjoy this gallery of deep-sky photos for October 2024 from our EarthSky community. If you have a great photo to share, send it in, too. We love to see them!
The EarthSky community has many talented astrophotographers who capture stunning images of the deep sky. We gathered some of our favorite deep-sky photos we received in October 2024 for you to enjoy. Do you have some of your own deep-sky images to share? You can submit them to us here. We love to see them!
Deep-sky photos of diffuse nebulae
The Orion Nebula
Deep-sky photos of star clusters
And a handful of external galaxies
Deep-sky video for October
Bottom line: Enjoy this gallery of deep-sky photos for October 2024 from our EarthSky community. If you have a great photo to share, send it in, too. We love to see them!
You might see South Taurid meteors anytime from about September 10 to November 20. The North Taurids stem from a nearby, but slightly different stream. They’re active from about October 20 to December 10. Both showers produce about five meteors per hour (10 total when they overlap) and some of them are fireballs.
Predicted peak: The South Taurids’ predicted** peak is 7 UTC on November 5, 2024. The North Taurids’ predicted** peak is November 12, 2024, at 6 UTC. Both the South and North Taurids don’t have very definite peaks. They ramble along in October and November and are especially noticeable from late October into early November, when they overlap. When to watch: Best around midnight, and on the days around November 5 when the moon won’t interfere. Overall duration of shower: The South Taurids run from about September 23 to November 12. North Taurids are active from about October 13 to December 2. Radiant: Rises in early evening, highest in the sky around midnight. See chart below. Nearest moon phases: In 2024, the first quarter moon falls at 5:55 UTC on November 9. The new moon is at 12:47 UTC on November 1, and it’s before the predicted peak of the South Taurids on November 5, so the days around then will be the best days to watch for Taurid meteors. However, the waxing gibbous moon – 3 days before a full moon at 21:29 UTC on November 15 – will interfere with most meteors around the November 12 peak of the North Taurids. You’ll catch Taurid meteors throughout October and November. Visit Sunrise Sunset Calendars to see moon rising times for your location. Be sure to check the moon rising time box. Expected meteors at peak, under ideal conditions: Under dark skies with no moon, both the South and North Taurid meteor showers produce about five meteors per hour (10 total when they overlap). Also, watch for fireballs. Note:Taurid meteors tend to be slow-moving but sometimes very bright. The showers sometimes produce fireballs, which made their cyclical reappearance in 2022. The American Meteor Society pointed to “a seven-year periodicity” with Taurid fireballs. 2008 and 2015 both produced them. 2022 did as well. The Taurid fireball display, in 2015, was really fun! Photos and video of 2015 Taurid fireballs here.
The object responsible for the Northern Taurid meteor shower is believed to be an asteroid. And that asteroid is related to a comet.
The asteroid is named 2004 TG10. The Spacewatch program discovered it on October 8, 2004. Its orbit around the sun closely matches that of periodic Comet Encke (officially known as 2P/Encke). Scientists believe this asteroid was once part of a much larger object known as the Encke Complex.
The most widely accepted theory is that about 20,000 years ago, a much larger object broke up, creating Comet Encke and several asteroids and meteor showers. Scientists named this group of resultant objects after the most prominent member of the group: Comet Encke. Hence, the Encke Complex.
No single asteroid produces Taurid meteors
A recent study indicates that the asteroid 2004 TG10 is only one of 10 related asteroids that may be responsible for this meteor shower. If that is true, then no single asteroid is producing the material causing the Northern Taurid meteors.
How is a mystery like this solved? Time and teamwork. Special night-time video cameras record incoming meteors, and computers calculate the orbit almost immediately. Scientists compare these orbits to known objects, such as comets and asteroids. A direct match is unlikely, because any piece of material ejected from a comet or asteroid – perhaps hundreds of years ago – has been subjected to solar radiation and planetary perturbations, changing its path around the sun. So, its final orbit, just before it enters our atmosphere, is likely different than the orbit it originated from. Astronomers who specialize in celestial mechanics will be the ones to bring us the solution.
Cameras and computers are likely to give us a better picture and a more thorough understanding of the Northern Taurids meteor shower.
The material we see as meteors from the Southern Taurids radiant comes from the comet known as Encke’s Comet. Officially known as 2P/Encke, this comet was discovered four times before it received its name.
The French comet hunter Pierre Mechian discovered it on January 17, 1786. He observed the comet for only three days and did not calculate its orbit. Next up was Caroline Herschel of England, who found it on November 7, 1795, 10 years later. She tracked it for 23 days but did not calculate an accurate orbit. Ten years later, Frenchman Jean-Louis Pons, the greatest visual comet hunter of all time, picked it up on October 20, 1805. Within hours of Pons’ discovery, Hofrath Huth of Germany and Bovard in Paris picked it up too. This time they followed it for 32 days.
Enter Johann Franz Encke. Using these positions, he calculated an orbit for this comet and predicted that it would return. End of story? No, because he predicted it would return in 12.12 years. And it didn’t.
Tracking a new comet
Then, on November 26, 1818, Pons picked up a comet and tracked it for 48 days. Encke calculated an orbit for this one, and using some new computing techniques, came up with an orbital solution suggesting the comet takes only 3.3 years to go around the sun once. After six weeks of work, he was also able to link this comet to the comets of 1786, 1795 and 1805. He then correctly predicted that it would return in 1822. Based upon his work correctly calculating the comet’s orbit, the comet received the name Encke.
Comet Encke has the shortest orbital period of any major comet in our solar system. At its closest, it gets as close to the sun as does the planet Mercury, the planet closest to the sun. The orbit is stable, and the comet has probably been in the same orbit for thousands of years.
Was Comet Encke once part of a larger comet?
A recent theory is that Comet Encke was once part of a larger comet that broke up about 20,000 years ago. This event produced several small asteroids and debris that now forms this meteor shower. And there are more. Scientists attribute at least three other meteor showers to Comet Encke. One stream of material might have delivered the object responsible for the Tunguska meteor event of 1908. This whole system is known as the Encke Complex.
The next return of Comet Encke will be in October 2023. Observers in the Northern Hemisphere will have a good view of the comet in the morning sky, where it might get as bright as magnitude seven, meaning you will need binoculars to see it. The fireballs left behind by the comet are much brighter and much more interesting.
What about Taurid fireballs?
The American Meteor Society said in 2022:
When the two showers are active simultaneously in late October and early November, there is sometimes a notable increase in the fireball activity. There seems to be a seven-year periodicity with these fireballs. 2008 and 2015 both produced remarkable fireball activity. 2022 may be the next opportunity.
And they were right! There were lots of fireball sightings in 2022. The next opportunity may be in 2029.
Why don’t the dates agree for Taurid meteors?
The story of the predicted peaks for the Taurids – which vary from place to place across the internet – is interesting.
For the most part, we count on the American Meteor Society and the Observer’s Handbook, from the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, to provide us with the peak dates for the year’s major meteor showers.
The Observer’s Handbook 2023 lists 1 UTC on November 6 as the peak for the South Taurids, for example. And the American Meteor Society (AMS) lists the peak overnight on November 5-6.
Yet another trusted source gives a different date for the South Taurids peak. The International Meteor Organization (IMO) lists the peak in 2023 as overnight on October 9-10.
Best time to watch South Taurid meteors
It’s not super important because, as mentioned above, the best time to watch the South Taurids in 2024 is probably late October into early November. That’s partly because the 1st quarter moon falls on November 9, 2024. And it’s partly because the South and North Taurids overlap in late October and early November, so you’re likely to see more of them then.
Different peak dates
But why are the listed peak dates different? A big reason is that astronomers are always learning new things. In 2021, for example, the American Meteor Society listed the peak date of the South Taurids in early November. But evidence from the IMO – based on observed and reported rates by amateur astronomers – suggested for some years that the South Taurids, rather than reaching a peak in early November (as long believed), has its peak in October instead. And apparently the AMS has finally decided to agree.
See what we mean? There are subtleties here. It’s nature! We don’t have it entirely pinned down.
Bottom line: You might see a South Taurid meteor anytime from about September 10 to November 20. That’s when Earth is plowing through the meteor stream – the stream of comet debris in space – that creates this meteor shower. The North Taurids stem from a nearby, but slightly different stream. They’re active from about October 20 to December 10. Both showers produce about five meteors per hour (10 total when they overlap).
**Predicted peak times and dates for 2024 meteor showers are from the American Meteor Society. Note that meteor shower peak times can vary.
You might see South Taurid meteors anytime from about September 10 to November 20. The North Taurids stem from a nearby, but slightly different stream. They’re active from about October 20 to December 10. Both showers produce about five meteors per hour (10 total when they overlap) and some of them are fireballs.
Predicted peak: The South Taurids’ predicted** peak is 7 UTC on November 5, 2024. The North Taurids’ predicted** peak is November 12, 2024, at 6 UTC. Both the South and North Taurids don’t have very definite peaks. They ramble along in October and November and are especially noticeable from late October into early November, when they overlap. When to watch: Best around midnight, and on the days around November 5 when the moon won’t interfere. Overall duration of shower: The South Taurids run from about September 23 to November 12. North Taurids are active from about October 13 to December 2. Radiant: Rises in early evening, highest in the sky around midnight. See chart below. Nearest moon phases: In 2024, the first quarter moon falls at 5:55 UTC on November 9. The new moon is at 12:47 UTC on November 1, and it’s before the predicted peak of the South Taurids on November 5, so the days around then will be the best days to watch for Taurid meteors. However, the waxing gibbous moon – 3 days before a full moon at 21:29 UTC on November 15 – will interfere with most meteors around the November 12 peak of the North Taurids. You’ll catch Taurid meteors throughout October and November. Visit Sunrise Sunset Calendars to see moon rising times for your location. Be sure to check the moon rising time box. Expected meteors at peak, under ideal conditions: Under dark skies with no moon, both the South and North Taurid meteor showers produce about five meteors per hour (10 total when they overlap). Also, watch for fireballs. Note:Taurid meteors tend to be slow-moving but sometimes very bright. The showers sometimes produce fireballs, which made their cyclical reappearance in 2022. The American Meteor Society pointed to “a seven-year periodicity” with Taurid fireballs. 2008 and 2015 both produced them. 2022 did as well. The Taurid fireball display, in 2015, was really fun! Photos and video of 2015 Taurid fireballs here.
The object responsible for the Northern Taurid meteor shower is believed to be an asteroid. And that asteroid is related to a comet.
The asteroid is named 2004 TG10. The Spacewatch program discovered it on October 8, 2004. Its orbit around the sun closely matches that of periodic Comet Encke (officially known as 2P/Encke). Scientists believe this asteroid was once part of a much larger object known as the Encke Complex.
The most widely accepted theory is that about 20,000 years ago, a much larger object broke up, creating Comet Encke and several asteroids and meteor showers. Scientists named this group of resultant objects after the most prominent member of the group: Comet Encke. Hence, the Encke Complex.
No single asteroid produces Taurid meteors
A recent study indicates that the asteroid 2004 TG10 is only one of 10 related asteroids that may be responsible for this meteor shower. If that is true, then no single asteroid is producing the material causing the Northern Taurid meteors.
How is a mystery like this solved? Time and teamwork. Special night-time video cameras record incoming meteors, and computers calculate the orbit almost immediately. Scientists compare these orbits to known objects, such as comets and asteroids. A direct match is unlikely, because any piece of material ejected from a comet or asteroid – perhaps hundreds of years ago – has been subjected to solar radiation and planetary perturbations, changing its path around the sun. So, its final orbit, just before it enters our atmosphere, is likely different than the orbit it originated from. Astronomers who specialize in celestial mechanics will be the ones to bring us the solution.
Cameras and computers are likely to give us a better picture and a more thorough understanding of the Northern Taurids meteor shower.
The material we see as meteors from the Southern Taurids radiant comes from the comet known as Encke’s Comet. Officially known as 2P/Encke, this comet was discovered four times before it received its name.
The French comet hunter Pierre Mechian discovered it on January 17, 1786. He observed the comet for only three days and did not calculate its orbit. Next up was Caroline Herschel of England, who found it on November 7, 1795, 10 years later. She tracked it for 23 days but did not calculate an accurate orbit. Ten years later, Frenchman Jean-Louis Pons, the greatest visual comet hunter of all time, picked it up on October 20, 1805. Within hours of Pons’ discovery, Hofrath Huth of Germany and Bovard in Paris picked it up too. This time they followed it for 32 days.
Enter Johann Franz Encke. Using these positions, he calculated an orbit for this comet and predicted that it would return. End of story? No, because he predicted it would return in 12.12 years. And it didn’t.
Tracking a new comet
Then, on November 26, 1818, Pons picked up a comet and tracked it for 48 days. Encke calculated an orbit for this one, and using some new computing techniques, came up with an orbital solution suggesting the comet takes only 3.3 years to go around the sun once. After six weeks of work, he was also able to link this comet to the comets of 1786, 1795 and 1805. He then correctly predicted that it would return in 1822. Based upon his work correctly calculating the comet’s orbit, the comet received the name Encke.
Comet Encke has the shortest orbital period of any major comet in our solar system. At its closest, it gets as close to the sun as does the planet Mercury, the planet closest to the sun. The orbit is stable, and the comet has probably been in the same orbit for thousands of years.
Was Comet Encke once part of a larger comet?
A recent theory is that Comet Encke was once part of a larger comet that broke up about 20,000 years ago. This event produced several small asteroids and debris that now forms this meteor shower. And there are more. Scientists attribute at least three other meteor showers to Comet Encke. One stream of material might have delivered the object responsible for the Tunguska meteor event of 1908. This whole system is known as the Encke Complex.
The next return of Comet Encke will be in October 2023. Observers in the Northern Hemisphere will have a good view of the comet in the morning sky, where it might get as bright as magnitude seven, meaning you will need binoculars to see it. The fireballs left behind by the comet are much brighter and much more interesting.
What about Taurid fireballs?
The American Meteor Society said in 2022:
When the two showers are active simultaneously in late October and early November, there is sometimes a notable increase in the fireball activity. There seems to be a seven-year periodicity with these fireballs. 2008 and 2015 both produced remarkable fireball activity. 2022 may be the next opportunity.
And they were right! There were lots of fireball sightings in 2022. The next opportunity may be in 2029.
Why don’t the dates agree for Taurid meteors?
The story of the predicted peaks for the Taurids – which vary from place to place across the internet – is interesting.
For the most part, we count on the American Meteor Society and the Observer’s Handbook, from the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, to provide us with the peak dates for the year’s major meteor showers.
The Observer’s Handbook 2023 lists 1 UTC on November 6 as the peak for the South Taurids, for example. And the American Meteor Society (AMS) lists the peak overnight on November 5-6.
Yet another trusted source gives a different date for the South Taurids peak. The International Meteor Organization (IMO) lists the peak in 2023 as overnight on October 9-10.
Best time to watch South Taurid meteors
It’s not super important because, as mentioned above, the best time to watch the South Taurids in 2024 is probably late October into early November. That’s partly because the 1st quarter moon falls on November 9, 2024. And it’s partly because the South and North Taurids overlap in late October and early November, so you’re likely to see more of them then.
Different peak dates
But why are the listed peak dates different? A big reason is that astronomers are always learning new things. In 2021, for example, the American Meteor Society listed the peak date of the South Taurids in early November. But evidence from the IMO – based on observed and reported rates by amateur astronomers – suggested for some years that the South Taurids, rather than reaching a peak in early November (as long believed), has its peak in October instead. And apparently the AMS has finally decided to agree.
See what we mean? There are subtleties here. It’s nature! We don’t have it entirely pinned down.
Bottom line: You might see a South Taurid meteor anytime from about September 10 to November 20. That’s when Earth is plowing through the meteor stream – the stream of comet debris in space – that creates this meteor shower. The North Taurids stem from a nearby, but slightly different stream. They’re active from about October 20 to December 10. Both showers produce about five meteors per hour (10 total when they overlap).
**Predicted peak times and dates for 2024 meteor showers are from the American Meteor Society. Note that meteor shower peak times can vary.
Are you a fan of daylight saving time? Ready or not, the U.S. and Canada continue to use daylight saving time. So at 2 a.m. on Sunday November 3, 2024, clocks in most U.S. states and Canadian provinces are due to be turned back one hour (European countries already changed last weekend). So, fall back, clock-watchers!
And, once again, Daylight Time ends for many of us. It’ll begin again on Sunday, March 9, 2025.
The memory tool for your clocks is spring forward, fall back. Easy to do with clocks. Less easy – for many – with our own bodies. According to WebMD, in general, “gaining” an hour in the fall is easier than “losing” an hour in the spring. But many report feeling groggy or off kilter in the week following both the spring and fall time changes.
Didn’t the U.S. Congress vote on to change that?
Also you may remember, a bill to make daylight saving time permanent was passed by the U.S. Senate in 2022. However, it was never voted on by the U.S. House of Representatives.
And the bill was introduced again in 2023, Reuters said:
The legislation, introduced by a bipartisan group of senators, was passed by the Senate in 2022 but stalled in the U.S. House of Representatives because lawmakers could not agree on whether to keep standard time or permanent daylight saving time.
So until congress addresses what to do about daylight saving time, here are seven tips to help you adjust to the time change.
1. Get at least seven hours of sleep (for adults) or eight hours of sleep (for teens) per night before and after the time change. You can use the American Academy of Sleep Medicine’s bedtime calculator to identify an appropriate nightly bedtime.
2. Gradually adjust your sleep and wake times. Shift your bedtime 15 to 20 minutes earlier each night for a few nights before the spring time change, or 15 to 20 minutes later each night for a few nights before the fall time change. (If you are experiencing chronic insufficient sleep, you should avoid shifting your bedtime later before the fall time change; you will benefit from getting an “extra” hour of sleep on the night when you “fall back” to standard time.)
3. Adjust other daily routines – such as mealtimes – to match your new schedule prior to the time change.
4. Set your clocks to the new time on Saturday evening, and go to bed at your normal bedtime.
5. Use light and darkness to help your body adjust. In the spring, head outside for some sunlight on Sunday morning and dim the lights in the evening. In the fall, minimize light exposure until your target morning wake time.
6. Adjusting your exposure to light and darkness will help set your body clock, which regulates the timing of sleep and alertness.
7. Get plenty of sleep on Sunday night to ensure you’re rested and ready for the week ahead.
Good luck!
Bottom line: Daylight Time ends on November 3, 2024, in North America. Here are 7 tips from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine to help you adjust.
Are you a fan of daylight saving time? Ready or not, the U.S. and Canada continue to use daylight saving time. So at 2 a.m. on Sunday November 3, 2024, clocks in most U.S. states and Canadian provinces are due to be turned back one hour (European countries already changed last weekend). So, fall back, clock-watchers!
And, once again, Daylight Time ends for many of us. It’ll begin again on Sunday, March 9, 2025.
The memory tool for your clocks is spring forward, fall back. Easy to do with clocks. Less easy – for many – with our own bodies. According to WebMD, in general, “gaining” an hour in the fall is easier than “losing” an hour in the spring. But many report feeling groggy or off kilter in the week following both the spring and fall time changes.
Didn’t the U.S. Congress vote on to change that?
Also you may remember, a bill to make daylight saving time permanent was passed by the U.S. Senate in 2022. However, it was never voted on by the U.S. House of Representatives.
And the bill was introduced again in 2023, Reuters said:
The legislation, introduced by a bipartisan group of senators, was passed by the Senate in 2022 but stalled in the U.S. House of Representatives because lawmakers could not agree on whether to keep standard time or permanent daylight saving time.
So until congress addresses what to do about daylight saving time, here are seven tips to help you adjust to the time change.
1. Get at least seven hours of sleep (for adults) or eight hours of sleep (for teens) per night before and after the time change. You can use the American Academy of Sleep Medicine’s bedtime calculator to identify an appropriate nightly bedtime.
2. Gradually adjust your sleep and wake times. Shift your bedtime 15 to 20 minutes earlier each night for a few nights before the spring time change, or 15 to 20 minutes later each night for a few nights before the fall time change. (If you are experiencing chronic insufficient sleep, you should avoid shifting your bedtime later before the fall time change; you will benefit from getting an “extra” hour of sleep on the night when you “fall back” to standard time.)
3. Adjust other daily routines – such as mealtimes – to match your new schedule prior to the time change.
4. Set your clocks to the new time on Saturday evening, and go to bed at your normal bedtime.
5. Use light and darkness to help your body adjust. In the spring, head outside for some sunlight on Sunday morning and dim the lights in the evening. In the fall, minimize light exposure until your target morning wake time.
6. Adjusting your exposure to light and darkness will help set your body clock, which regulates the timing of sleep and alertness.
7. Get plenty of sleep on Sunday night to ensure you’re rested and ready for the week ahead.
Good luck!
Bottom line: Daylight Time ends on November 3, 2024, in North America. Here are 7 tips from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine to help you adjust.
Healing continues in the atmosphere over the Antarctic. A hole that opens annually in the ozone layer over Earth’s southern pole was relatively small in 2024 in contrast to other years. NOAA and NASA scientists project the ozone layer could fully recover by 2066.
During the peak of ozone depletion season from September 7 through October 13, the 2024 area of the ozone hole ranked the 7th-smallest since recovery began in 1992. That’s when the Montreal Protocol, a landmark international agreement to phase out ozone-depleting chemicals, started to take effect.
At almost 8 million square miles (20 million square kilometers), the monthly average ozone-depleted region in the Antarctic this year was nearly three times the size of the contiguous U.S. The hole reached its greatest one-day extent for the year on September 28 at 8.5 million square miles (22.4 million square kilometers).
2024 Antarctic ozone hole
The improvement this year is due to a combination of continuing declines in chlorofluorocarbons, an ozone-depleting chemical phased out by the Montreal Protocol. Plus, there was an unexpected infusion of ozone carried by air currents from north of the Antarctic, scientists said. Paul Newman, leader of NASA’s ozone research team and chief scientist for Earth sciences at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said:
The 2024 Antarctic hole is smaller than ozone holes seen in the early 2000s. The gradual improvement we’ve seen in the past two decades shows that international efforts that curbed ozone-destroying chemicals are working.
In previous years, NOAA and NASA have reported the ozone hole ranking using a time period dating back to 1979, when scientists started tracking Antarctic ozone levels with satellite data. Using that longer record, which includes the years prior to recovery spurred by the Montreal Protocol, this year’s hole ranked 20th-smallest in area across 45 years of observations.
We need Earth’s ozone layer
The ozone-rich layer high in the atmosphere acts as a planetary sunscreen that helps shield us from harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun. Areas with depleted ozone allow more UV radiation through, resulting in increased cases of skin cancer and cataracts. Excessive exposure to UV light can also reduce agricultural yields as well as damage aquatic plants and animals in vital ecosystems.
Scientists were alarmed in the 1970s at the prospect that chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) chemicals could eat away at atmospheric ozone. By the mid-1980s, the ozone layer had been depleted so much that a broad swath of the Antarctic stratosphere was essentially devoid of ozone by early October each year. Sources of damaging CFCs included coolants in refrigerators and air conditioners, as well as aerosols in hairspray, antiperspirant and spray paint. CFCs were also released in the manufacture of insulating foams and as components of industrial fire suppression systems.
The Montreal Protocol was signed in 1987 to phase out CFC-based products and processes. Countries worldwide agreed to replace the chemicals with more environmentally-friendly alternatives by 2010. The release of CFC compounds has dramatically decreased due to the Montreal Protocol. But CFCs already in the air will take many decades to break down. As existing CFC levels gradually decline, ozone in the upper atmosphere will rebound globally, and ozone holes will shrink. Stephen Montzka, senior scientist with NOAA’s Global Monitoring Laboratory, said:
For 2024, we can see that the ozone hole’s severity is below average compared to other years in the past three decades, but the ozone layer is still far from being fully healed.
What will happen next?
Scientists expect atmospheric ozone to return to levels that eliminate holes over the poles in the second half of this century.
Researchers rely on a combination of systems to monitor the ozone layer. They include instruments on NASA’s Aura satellite, and NOAA’s polar orbiting satellites.
NOAA scientists also release instrumented weather balloons from the South Pole Baseline Atmospheric Observatory. They observe ozone concentrations directly overhead in a measurement called Dobson Units. The 2024 concentration reached its lowest value of 109 Dobson Units on October 5. The lowest value ever recorded over the South Pole was 92 Dobson Units in October 2006.
NASA and NOAA satellite observations of ozone concentrations cover the entire ozone hole, which can produce a slightly smaller value for the lowest Dobson Unit measurement. Bryan Johnson, a NOAA Research Chemist, said:
This is well below the 225 Dobson Units that was typical of the ozone cover above the Antarctic in 1979. So, there’s still a long way to go before atmospheric ozone is back to the levels before the advent of widespread CFC pollution.
Bottom line: Scientists reported this week on the extent of the 2024 Antarctic ozone hole, saying it was the 7th-smallest since recovery began in 1992.
Healing continues in the atmosphere over the Antarctic. A hole that opens annually in the ozone layer over Earth’s southern pole was relatively small in 2024 in contrast to other years. NOAA and NASA scientists project the ozone layer could fully recover by 2066.
During the peak of ozone depletion season from September 7 through October 13, the 2024 area of the ozone hole ranked the 7th-smallest since recovery began in 1992. That’s when the Montreal Protocol, a landmark international agreement to phase out ozone-depleting chemicals, started to take effect.
At almost 8 million square miles (20 million square kilometers), the monthly average ozone-depleted region in the Antarctic this year was nearly three times the size of the contiguous U.S. The hole reached its greatest one-day extent for the year on September 28 at 8.5 million square miles (22.4 million square kilometers).
2024 Antarctic ozone hole
The improvement this year is due to a combination of continuing declines in chlorofluorocarbons, an ozone-depleting chemical phased out by the Montreal Protocol. Plus, there was an unexpected infusion of ozone carried by air currents from north of the Antarctic, scientists said. Paul Newman, leader of NASA’s ozone research team and chief scientist for Earth sciences at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said:
The 2024 Antarctic hole is smaller than ozone holes seen in the early 2000s. The gradual improvement we’ve seen in the past two decades shows that international efforts that curbed ozone-destroying chemicals are working.
In previous years, NOAA and NASA have reported the ozone hole ranking using a time period dating back to 1979, when scientists started tracking Antarctic ozone levels with satellite data. Using that longer record, which includes the years prior to recovery spurred by the Montreal Protocol, this year’s hole ranked 20th-smallest in area across 45 years of observations.
We need Earth’s ozone layer
The ozone-rich layer high in the atmosphere acts as a planetary sunscreen that helps shield us from harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun. Areas with depleted ozone allow more UV radiation through, resulting in increased cases of skin cancer and cataracts. Excessive exposure to UV light can also reduce agricultural yields as well as damage aquatic plants and animals in vital ecosystems.
Scientists were alarmed in the 1970s at the prospect that chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) chemicals could eat away at atmospheric ozone. By the mid-1980s, the ozone layer had been depleted so much that a broad swath of the Antarctic stratosphere was essentially devoid of ozone by early October each year. Sources of damaging CFCs included coolants in refrigerators and air conditioners, as well as aerosols in hairspray, antiperspirant and spray paint. CFCs were also released in the manufacture of insulating foams and as components of industrial fire suppression systems.
The Montreal Protocol was signed in 1987 to phase out CFC-based products and processes. Countries worldwide agreed to replace the chemicals with more environmentally-friendly alternatives by 2010. The release of CFC compounds has dramatically decreased due to the Montreal Protocol. But CFCs already in the air will take many decades to break down. As existing CFC levels gradually decline, ozone in the upper atmosphere will rebound globally, and ozone holes will shrink. Stephen Montzka, senior scientist with NOAA’s Global Monitoring Laboratory, said:
For 2024, we can see that the ozone hole’s severity is below average compared to other years in the past three decades, but the ozone layer is still far from being fully healed.
What will happen next?
Scientists expect atmospheric ozone to return to levels that eliminate holes over the poles in the second half of this century.
Researchers rely on a combination of systems to monitor the ozone layer. They include instruments on NASA’s Aura satellite, and NOAA’s polar orbiting satellites.
NOAA scientists also release instrumented weather balloons from the South Pole Baseline Atmospheric Observatory. They observe ozone concentrations directly overhead in a measurement called Dobson Units. The 2024 concentration reached its lowest value of 109 Dobson Units on October 5. The lowest value ever recorded over the South Pole was 92 Dobson Units in October 2006.
NASA and NOAA satellite observations of ozone concentrations cover the entire ozone hole, which can produce a slightly smaller value for the lowest Dobson Unit measurement. Bryan Johnson, a NOAA Research Chemist, said:
This is well below the 225 Dobson Units that was typical of the ozone cover above the Antarctic in 1979. So, there’s still a long way to go before atmospheric ozone is back to the levels before the advent of widespread CFC pollution.
Bottom line: Scientists reported this week on the extent of the 2024 Antarctic ozone hole, saying it was the 7th-smallest since recovery began in 1992.
What’s the scariest star in the sky? If you were one of the early stargazers, you might have chosen Algol in the constellation Perseus. Early astronomers nicknamed it Algol the Demon Star for its strange behavior. Shivers!
When you look at Algol, it doesn’t appear any scarier than any other star, at least not at first. But, in skylore, the star is associated with a mythical scary monster – the Gorgon Medusa – who had snakes for hair. Legend said that her appearance was so terrifying that if anyone even looked at her, they would turn to stone.
The star Algol takes its name from an Arabic word meaning the Demon’s Head or, literally the Ghoul. It represents the terrifying snaky head of the Medusa monster.
But why? Why did the early stargazers associate the star Algol with the Goron Medusa? It seems the ancients might have associated this star’s variable brightness with the evil, winking eye of the Medusa.
What’s so scary about it?
In skylore, Perseus was a great hero often depicted mounted on Pegasus the Flying Horse. In the mythology of the skies, Perseus slew Medusa. Then, he used Medusa’s head to his advantage, showing it to Cetus the Sea-monster to turn him into stone.
All of these constellations are in the sky at this time of year.
And Algol is a known variable star, which waxes and wanes in brightness.
The early stargazers surely knew about its changing brightness. This probably led them to name the strangely behaving star in the sky for a mythological demon.
Algol is a variable star
There are many variable stars known throughout the heavens. But Algol might be the most famous of them. That’s because the Demon Star brightens and dims with clockwork regularity. It completes one cycle in 2 days, 20 hours and 49 minutes.
Plus, you can view its entire cycle with your eye alone.
At its brightest, Algol shines about three times more brightly than at its faintest. When it reaches maximum brilliance, Algol matches the brightness of the nearby second-magnitude star Almach. At minimum, Algol’s light output fades to that of the star Epsilon Persei.
Modern-day astronomy has unlocked the secret of Algol’s mood swings. It’s an eclipsing binary star. This kind of binary star is composed of two stars, with each star revolving around the other. From Earth, we see the orbital plane of this binary star almost exactly edge-on. Therefore, when the dimmer of the two stars swings in front of the brighter star, we see Algol at minimum brightness.
How to find Algol the Demon Star
Luckily, the Demon Star is easy to find. Our sky chart shows the northeastern sky for autumn evenings, especially around Halloween.
First, look for the conspicuous W or M-shaped constellation Cassiopeia. It’ll enable you to star-hop to Perseus. Then, look below Cassiopeia toward the horizon to spot the dangling icicle shape of Perseus. Off to the right of the icicle is Algol. At mid-northern latitudes, the Demon Star appears for at least part of the night all year round. But it’s best seen in the evening sky from autumn to spring. It’s visible in the northeast sky in autumn, shines high overhead in winter, then swings to the northwest sky by spring.
Bottom line: Algol has the nickname the Demon Star because it represents the head of Medusa. This variable star probably intrigued the ancients with its fluctuating behavior.
What’s the scariest star in the sky? If you were one of the early stargazers, you might have chosen Algol in the constellation Perseus. Early astronomers nicknamed it Algol the Demon Star for its strange behavior. Shivers!
When you look at Algol, it doesn’t appear any scarier than any other star, at least not at first. But, in skylore, the star is associated with a mythical scary monster – the Gorgon Medusa – who had snakes for hair. Legend said that her appearance was so terrifying that if anyone even looked at her, they would turn to stone.
The star Algol takes its name from an Arabic word meaning the Demon’s Head or, literally the Ghoul. It represents the terrifying snaky head of the Medusa monster.
But why? Why did the early stargazers associate the star Algol with the Goron Medusa? It seems the ancients might have associated this star’s variable brightness with the evil, winking eye of the Medusa.
What’s so scary about it?
In skylore, Perseus was a great hero often depicted mounted on Pegasus the Flying Horse. In the mythology of the skies, Perseus slew Medusa. Then, he used Medusa’s head to his advantage, showing it to Cetus the Sea-monster to turn him into stone.
All of these constellations are in the sky at this time of year.
And Algol is a known variable star, which waxes and wanes in brightness.
The early stargazers surely knew about its changing brightness. This probably led them to name the strangely behaving star in the sky for a mythological demon.
Algol is a variable star
There are many variable stars known throughout the heavens. But Algol might be the most famous of them. That’s because the Demon Star brightens and dims with clockwork regularity. It completes one cycle in 2 days, 20 hours and 49 minutes.
Plus, you can view its entire cycle with your eye alone.
At its brightest, Algol shines about three times more brightly than at its faintest. When it reaches maximum brilliance, Algol matches the brightness of the nearby second-magnitude star Almach. At minimum, Algol’s light output fades to that of the star Epsilon Persei.
Modern-day astronomy has unlocked the secret of Algol’s mood swings. It’s an eclipsing binary star. This kind of binary star is composed of two stars, with each star revolving around the other. From Earth, we see the orbital plane of this binary star almost exactly edge-on. Therefore, when the dimmer of the two stars swings in front of the brighter star, we see Algol at minimum brightness.
How to find Algol the Demon Star
Luckily, the Demon Star is easy to find. Our sky chart shows the northeastern sky for autumn evenings, especially around Halloween.
First, look for the conspicuous W or M-shaped constellation Cassiopeia. It’ll enable you to star-hop to Perseus. Then, look below Cassiopeia toward the horizon to spot the dangling icicle shape of Perseus. Off to the right of the icicle is Algol. At mid-northern latitudes, the Demon Star appears for at least part of the night all year round. But it’s best seen in the evening sky from autumn to spring. It’s visible in the northeast sky in autumn, shines high overhead in winter, then swings to the northwest sky by spring.
Bottom line: Algol has the nickname the Demon Star because it represents the head of Medusa. This variable star probably intrigued the ancients with its fluctuating behavior.