aads

Ask Ethan: How Small Is An Elementary Particle? (Synopsis) [Starts With A Bang]


“When we think about the present, we veer wildly between the belief in chance and the evidence in favour of determinism. When we think about the past, however, it seems obvious that everything happened in the way that it was intended.” -Michel Houellebecq

If you take anything in the Universe and want to know what its size is, you simply take something whose length is known and compare. On microscopic scales, it isn’t much different: take something of a known wavelength — like light or another matter particle — and compare. If your wavelength is too big, you’ll pass right through; if your wavelength is the right size or smaller, you’ll interact.

Visible (left) and infrared (right) views of the dust-rich Bok globule, Barnard 68. The infrared light is not blocked, as the dust grains are too small to interact with the long-wavelength light. Images credit: ESO.

Visible (left) and infrared (right) views of the dust-rich Bok globule, Barnard 68. The infrared light is not blocked, as the dust grains are too small to interact with the long-wavelength light. Images credit: ESO.

This concept of deep inelastic scattering has been successful at measuring the sizes of molecules atoms, atomic nuclei, and individual protons and neutrons. It’s discovered what we consider to be truly fundamental particles: the particles of the Standard Model. But are they truly fundamental? Are they truly point-like? Or is there an actual size to them, after all?

The sizes of composite and elementary particles, with possibly smaller ones lying inside what's known. Image credit: Fermilab, via http://ift.tt/2cRtqgw.

The sizes of composite and elementary particles, with possibly smaller ones lying inside what’s known. Image credit: Fermilab, via http://ift.tt/2cRtqgw.

Find out what we know to the limits of the frontiers of physics on this week’s Ask Ethan!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2d8oWo8

“When we think about the present, we veer wildly between the belief in chance and the evidence in favour of determinism. When we think about the past, however, it seems obvious that everything happened in the way that it was intended.” -Michel Houellebecq

If you take anything in the Universe and want to know what its size is, you simply take something whose length is known and compare. On microscopic scales, it isn’t much different: take something of a known wavelength — like light or another matter particle — and compare. If your wavelength is too big, you’ll pass right through; if your wavelength is the right size or smaller, you’ll interact.

Visible (left) and infrared (right) views of the dust-rich Bok globule, Barnard 68. The infrared light is not blocked, as the dust grains are too small to interact with the long-wavelength light. Images credit: ESO.

Visible (left) and infrared (right) views of the dust-rich Bok globule, Barnard 68. The infrared light is not blocked, as the dust grains are too small to interact with the long-wavelength light. Images credit: ESO.

This concept of deep inelastic scattering has been successful at measuring the sizes of molecules atoms, atomic nuclei, and individual protons and neutrons. It’s discovered what we consider to be truly fundamental particles: the particles of the Standard Model. But are they truly fundamental? Are they truly point-like? Or is there an actual size to them, after all?

The sizes of composite and elementary particles, with possibly smaller ones lying inside what's known. Image credit: Fermilab, via http://ift.tt/2cRtqgw.

The sizes of composite and elementary particles, with possibly smaller ones lying inside what’s known. Image credit: Fermilab, via http://ift.tt/2cRtqgw.

Find out what we know to the limits of the frontiers of physics on this week’s Ask Ethan!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2d8oWo8

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire

adds 2