How fireflies glow and what signals they’re sending

A firefly lighting up on a leaf.

A firefly’s light is part of its mating strategy. Image via Japan’s Fireworks/Shutterstock.com.

By Clyde Sorenson, North Carolina State University

You might not really be sure you saw what you think you saw when the first one shows up. But you stare in the direction of the flicker of light and there it is again – the first firefly of the evening. If you are in good firefly habitat, soon there are dozens, or even hundreds, of the insects flying about, flashing their mysterious signals.

Fireflies – alternatively known as lightning bugs in much of the United States – are neither flies nor bugs. They’re soft-winged beetles, related to click beetles and others. The most dramatic aspect of their biology is that they can produce light; this ability in a living organism, called bioluminescence, is relatively rare.

I’m an entomologist who does research on, and teaches about, the ecology and biology of insects. Recently, I’ve been trying to understand the diversity and ecology of fireflies in my home state of North Carolina. Fireflies are found widely across North America, including many places in the west, but they are most abundant and diverse in the eastern half of the continent, from Florida to southern Canada.

A lit up firefly, seen from underneath.

A chemical reaction in the beetle’s abdomen gives it its bioluminescence. Image via Cathy Keifer/Shutterstock.com

Bioluminescent beetles

Fireflies produce light in special organs in their abdomens by combining a chemical called luciferin, enzymes called luciferases, oxygen and the fuel for cellular work, ATP. Entomologists think they control their flashing by regulating how much oxygen goes to their light-producing organs.

Fireflies probably originally evolved the ability to light up as a way to ward off predators, but now they mostly use this ability to find mates. Interestingly, not all fireflies produce light; there are several species that are day-flying and apparently rely on the odors of pheromones to find each other.

Each firefly species has its own signaling system. In most North American species, the males fly around at the right height, in the right habitat and at the right time of night for their species, and flash a signal unique to their kind. The females are sitting on the ground or in vegetation, watching for males. When a female sees one making her species’ signal – and doing it well – she flashes back with a species-appropriate flash of her own. Then the two reciprocally signal as the male flies down to her. If everything goes right, they mate.

A good example is Photinus pyralis, a common backyard species often called the Big Dipper. A male flies at dusk about 3 feet (.9 meters) off the ground. Every five seconds or so, he makes a one-second flash as he flies in the shape of a “J.” The female Photinus pyralis sits in low vegetation. If she sees a fellow she likes, she waits two seconds before making a half second flash of her own at the third second.

Some species may “call” for many hours a night, while others flash for only 20 minutes or so right at dusk. Firefly light communication can get much more complicated; some species have multiple signaling systems, and some might use their light organs for other purposes.

Some Tennessee fireflies put on a synchronized show.

While most male fireflies do their own thing and flash independently of other males of the same species, there are those that synchronize their flashes when there are many others around. In North America, the two most famous species that do this are the Photinus carolinus of the Appalachian Mountains, including in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, and the Photuris frontalis that light up places like Congaree National Park in South Carolina.

In both these species, scientists think the males synchronize so everyone has a chance to look for females, and for females to signal males. These displays are spectacular, and the crush of folks wanting to see them at the most famous locations has made it necessary to conduct a lottery for permission to view them. Both species, however, occur over wide geographic ranges, and it might be possible to see them in other, less congested places.

Stinky chemical defenses

Many fireflies protect themselves from predators with chemicals called lucibufagins. These are molecules the insects synthesize from other chemicals they eat in their diet. Lucibufagins are chemically very similar to the toxins toads exude on their skins, and while they are toxic in the right doses, they are also extremely distasteful.

Birds and other predators quickly learn to avoid fireflies. I’ve watched a toad on my back porch eat a firefly and promptly spit it back out; the insect walked away, gooey but apparently unharmed. A colleague of mine once put a firefly in his mouth – and his mouth went numb for an hour!

Mating Photinus pyralis. Image via Clyde Sorenson

Many other insects visually mimic fireflies in order to reap the benefit of looking like something unpleasant to eat and poisonous. Fireflies appear to produce other defensive chemicals, too, some of which may contribute to their distinctive smell.

Many Photuris fireflies can’t manufacture these defensive chemicals. So the females of these big, long-legged lightning bugs do something surprising: Once they’ve mated, they start mimicking the flashes of female Photinus and then eat the males that respond. These femme fatales go on to use the lucibufagins they acquire from ingesting their severely disappointed prey to protect themselves and their eggs from predators. They quickly transfer the chemicals to their blood, and spontaneously bleed if a predator grabs them.

a dark field lit up with fireflies.

Once fireflies lose a pocket of habitat, it’s unlikely they’ll come back. Image via Fer Gregory/Shutterstock.com

No place like home

Most fireflies are habitat specialists, using woodlands, meadows and marshes. They rely on that habitat remaining undisturbed for the year or more it takes them to complete their life cycles. These insects spend most of their lives as larvae preying on earthworms and other animals in the soil or leaf litter – most adults don’t feed at all. If that habitat is disrupted during their youth, populations can be extinguished.

Adding to this vulnerability is the fact that the females of many species – like the famous blue ghosts of the southern Appalachians and elsewhere – are wingless and can’t disperse any further than they can walk. If a population of blue ghosts is destroyed by logging or other disruption, there will be no reestablishment. Habitat destruction is therefore one of the greatest threats to fireflies. Other hazards include light pollution from artificial lights and perhaps insecticide applications for mosquito control.

There is much yet to learn about fireflies. Entomologists like me have identified about 170 or so species in North America, but it is clear that many more species occur here. Pay attention to the fireflies in your neighborhood; observe their flash patterns and behavior. Perhaps you’ll discover one of those new species.

Clyde Sorenson, Professor of Entomology, North Carolina State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Bottom line: Why fireflies, or lightning bugs, light up and what signals they send.

The Conversation



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2LNQG2M
A firefly lighting up on a leaf.

A firefly’s light is part of its mating strategy. Image via Japan’s Fireworks/Shutterstock.com.

By Clyde Sorenson, North Carolina State University

You might not really be sure you saw what you think you saw when the first one shows up. But you stare in the direction of the flicker of light and there it is again – the first firefly of the evening. If you are in good firefly habitat, soon there are dozens, or even hundreds, of the insects flying about, flashing their mysterious signals.

Fireflies – alternatively known as lightning bugs in much of the United States – are neither flies nor bugs. They’re soft-winged beetles, related to click beetles and others. The most dramatic aspect of their biology is that they can produce light; this ability in a living organism, called bioluminescence, is relatively rare.

I’m an entomologist who does research on, and teaches about, the ecology and biology of insects. Recently, I’ve been trying to understand the diversity and ecology of fireflies in my home state of North Carolina. Fireflies are found widely across North America, including many places in the west, but they are most abundant and diverse in the eastern half of the continent, from Florida to southern Canada.

A lit up firefly, seen from underneath.

A chemical reaction in the beetle’s abdomen gives it its bioluminescence. Image via Cathy Keifer/Shutterstock.com

Bioluminescent beetles

Fireflies produce light in special organs in their abdomens by combining a chemical called luciferin, enzymes called luciferases, oxygen and the fuel for cellular work, ATP. Entomologists think they control their flashing by regulating how much oxygen goes to their light-producing organs.

Fireflies probably originally evolved the ability to light up as a way to ward off predators, but now they mostly use this ability to find mates. Interestingly, not all fireflies produce light; there are several species that are day-flying and apparently rely on the odors of pheromones to find each other.

Each firefly species has its own signaling system. In most North American species, the males fly around at the right height, in the right habitat and at the right time of night for their species, and flash a signal unique to their kind. The females are sitting on the ground or in vegetation, watching for males. When a female sees one making her species’ signal – and doing it well – she flashes back with a species-appropriate flash of her own. Then the two reciprocally signal as the male flies down to her. If everything goes right, they mate.

A good example is Photinus pyralis, a common backyard species often called the Big Dipper. A male flies at dusk about 3 feet (.9 meters) off the ground. Every five seconds or so, he makes a one-second flash as he flies in the shape of a “J.” The female Photinus pyralis sits in low vegetation. If she sees a fellow she likes, she waits two seconds before making a half second flash of her own at the third second.

Some species may “call” for many hours a night, while others flash for only 20 minutes or so right at dusk. Firefly light communication can get much more complicated; some species have multiple signaling systems, and some might use their light organs for other purposes.

Some Tennessee fireflies put on a synchronized show.

While most male fireflies do their own thing and flash independently of other males of the same species, there are those that synchronize their flashes when there are many others around. In North America, the two most famous species that do this are the Photinus carolinus of the Appalachian Mountains, including in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, and the Photuris frontalis that light up places like Congaree National Park in South Carolina.

In both these species, scientists think the males synchronize so everyone has a chance to look for females, and for females to signal males. These displays are spectacular, and the crush of folks wanting to see them at the most famous locations has made it necessary to conduct a lottery for permission to view them. Both species, however, occur over wide geographic ranges, and it might be possible to see them in other, less congested places.

Stinky chemical defenses

Many fireflies protect themselves from predators with chemicals called lucibufagins. These are molecules the insects synthesize from other chemicals they eat in their diet. Lucibufagins are chemically very similar to the toxins toads exude on their skins, and while they are toxic in the right doses, they are also extremely distasteful.

Birds and other predators quickly learn to avoid fireflies. I’ve watched a toad on my back porch eat a firefly and promptly spit it back out; the insect walked away, gooey but apparently unharmed. A colleague of mine once put a firefly in his mouth – and his mouth went numb for an hour!

Mating Photinus pyralis. Image via Clyde Sorenson

Many other insects visually mimic fireflies in order to reap the benefit of looking like something unpleasant to eat and poisonous. Fireflies appear to produce other defensive chemicals, too, some of which may contribute to their distinctive smell.

Many Photuris fireflies can’t manufacture these defensive chemicals. So the females of these big, long-legged lightning bugs do something surprising: Once they’ve mated, they start mimicking the flashes of female Photinus and then eat the males that respond. These femme fatales go on to use the lucibufagins they acquire from ingesting their severely disappointed prey to protect themselves and their eggs from predators. They quickly transfer the chemicals to their blood, and spontaneously bleed if a predator grabs them.

a dark field lit up with fireflies.

Once fireflies lose a pocket of habitat, it’s unlikely they’ll come back. Image via Fer Gregory/Shutterstock.com

No place like home

Most fireflies are habitat specialists, using woodlands, meadows and marshes. They rely on that habitat remaining undisturbed for the year or more it takes them to complete their life cycles. These insects spend most of their lives as larvae preying on earthworms and other animals in the soil or leaf litter – most adults don’t feed at all. If that habitat is disrupted during their youth, populations can be extinguished.

Adding to this vulnerability is the fact that the females of many species – like the famous blue ghosts of the southern Appalachians and elsewhere – are wingless and can’t disperse any further than they can walk. If a population of blue ghosts is destroyed by logging or other disruption, there will be no reestablishment. Habitat destruction is therefore one of the greatest threats to fireflies. Other hazards include light pollution from artificial lights and perhaps insecticide applications for mosquito control.

There is much yet to learn about fireflies. Entomologists like me have identified about 170 or so species in North America, but it is clear that many more species occur here. Pay attention to the fireflies in your neighborhood; observe their flash patterns and behavior. Perhaps you’ll discover one of those new species.

Clyde Sorenson, Professor of Entomology, North Carolina State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Bottom line: Why fireflies, or lightning bugs, light up and what signals they send.

The Conversation



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2LNQG2M

See the constellation Scutum the Shield

Tonight, look for one of the most beautiful celestial sights visible at this time of year. Look in a dark country sky, far away from the the glare of city lights. You’ll find a hazy pathway stretched across the sky. This band is the starlit trail of our own Milky Way galaxy. If you see it, you can also find the very small constellation called Scutum the Shield. There are only four to five stars outlining the constellation, but Scutum is noticeable in a dark sky because the Milky Way is so rich here. At late night, look southward from the Northern Hemisphere, or overhead from the Southern Hemisphere – toward the richest part of the Milky Way – to see Scutum.

Last year, in 2018, sky watchers also used the planet Saturn, because this distant planet stays in the same constellation of the zodiac for about 2 1/2 years. Jupiter stays with a given constellation for roughly a year.

Scutum has a fascinating history. The Polish astronomer Johannes Hevelius named it Scutum Sobiescianum, meaning the shield of Sobieski, in 1683. He named it for Jan III Sobieski, a Polish king who led his armies to victory in the Battle of Vienna. The constellation in charts of the era resembles the king’s coat of arms on his shield. Today, you still sometimes hear amateur astronomers refer to this part of the sky as Scutum Sobieski.

Scutum is one of two constellations named after real people. The other one is Coma Berenices, named for an Egyptian queen.

The Shield isn’t big, and it requires a dark sky to be seen, but – to those who find it in dark skies – it provides some very nice views with the unaided eye or binoculars. The very noticeable Teapot of Sagittarius is below Scutum. And the bright star Vega shines high above Scutum.

Sky chart of the constellation Scutum the Shield

Some famous deep-sky objects reside in this part of the sky, too. One is the Wild Duck Cluster, also known as M11. It’s an open star cluster – one of the densest ones ever found – containing some 3,000 stars.

Another open cluster in this part of the sky is M26, discovered by Charles Messier in 1764.

Bottom line: Look for the constellation Scutum the Shield. It’s located in a rich region of the Milky Way and requires a dark sky to be seen.

It’s meteor season. Look here for EarthSky’s meteor shower guide

EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order yours today.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2SJ3B6s

Tonight, look for one of the most beautiful celestial sights visible at this time of year. Look in a dark country sky, far away from the the glare of city lights. You’ll find a hazy pathway stretched across the sky. This band is the starlit trail of our own Milky Way galaxy. If you see it, you can also find the very small constellation called Scutum the Shield. There are only four to five stars outlining the constellation, but Scutum is noticeable in a dark sky because the Milky Way is so rich here. At late night, look southward from the Northern Hemisphere, or overhead from the Southern Hemisphere – toward the richest part of the Milky Way – to see Scutum.

Last year, in 2018, sky watchers also used the planet Saturn, because this distant planet stays in the same constellation of the zodiac for about 2 1/2 years. Jupiter stays with a given constellation for roughly a year.

Scutum has a fascinating history. The Polish astronomer Johannes Hevelius named it Scutum Sobiescianum, meaning the shield of Sobieski, in 1683. He named it for Jan III Sobieski, a Polish king who led his armies to victory in the Battle of Vienna. The constellation in charts of the era resembles the king’s coat of arms on his shield. Today, you still sometimes hear amateur astronomers refer to this part of the sky as Scutum Sobieski.

Scutum is one of two constellations named after real people. The other one is Coma Berenices, named for an Egyptian queen.

The Shield isn’t big, and it requires a dark sky to be seen, but – to those who find it in dark skies – it provides some very nice views with the unaided eye or binoculars. The very noticeable Teapot of Sagittarius is below Scutum. And the bright star Vega shines high above Scutum.

Sky chart of the constellation Scutum the Shield

Some famous deep-sky objects reside in this part of the sky, too. One is the Wild Duck Cluster, also known as M11. It’s an open star cluster – one of the densest ones ever found – containing some 3,000 stars.

Another open cluster in this part of the sky is M26, discovered by Charles Messier in 1764.

Bottom line: Look for the constellation Scutum the Shield. It’s located in a rich region of the Milky Way and requires a dark sky to be seen.

It’s meteor season. Look here for EarthSky’s meteor shower guide

EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order yours today.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2SJ3B6s

2019 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #30

Story of the Week... Toon of the Week... Coming Soon on SkS... Climate Feedback Reviews... SkS Week in Review... Poster of the Week...

Story of the Week...

Global Footprint Network promotes real-world solutions that #MoveTheDate, accelerating the transition to one-planet prosperity

On July 29, humanity will have used nature’s resource budget for the entire year, according to Global Footprint Network, an international sustainability organization that has pioneered the Ecological Footprint. It is Earth Overshoot Day. Its date has moved up two months over the past 20 years to the 29th of July this year, the earliest date ever.

2019 Past Overshoot Days by Global Carbon Footprint 

 

Earth Overshoot Day falling on July 29th means that humanity is currently using nature 1.75 times faster than our planet’s ecosystems can regenerate. This is akin to using 1.75 Earths. Overshoot is possible because we are depleting our natural capital – which compromises humanity’s future resource security. The costs of this global ecological overspending are becoming increasingly evident in the form of deforestation, soil erosion, biodiversity loss, or the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The latter leads to climate change and more frequent extreme weather events.

“We have only got one Earth – this is the ultimately defining context for human existence. We can’t use 1.75 without destructive consequences,” said Mathis Wackernagel, co-inventor of Ecological Footprint accounting and founder of Global Footprint Network.

His just released book, Ecological Footprint: Managing Our Biocapacity Budgetdemonstrates that overshoot can only be temporary. Humanity will eventually have to operate within the means of Earth’s ecological resources, whether that balance is restored by disaster or by design. “Companies and countries that understand and manage the reality of operating in a one-planet context are in a far better position to navigate the challenges of the 21st century,” Wackernagel writes. 

Global Footprint Network promotes real-world solutions that #MoveTheDate, accelerating the transition to one-planet prosperity. Press Release, Global Footprint Network, July 23, 2019


Toon of the Week...

2019 Toon 30 

 

Hat tip to the Stop Climate Science Denial Facebook page. 


Coming Soon on SkS...

  • 'No doubt left' about scientific consensus on global warming, say experts (Jonathan Watts)
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #30 (Doug Bostrom)
  • The 'war on coal' myth (Karin Kirk)
  • What psychotherapy can do for the climate and biodiversity crises (Caroline Hickman)
  • How climate change is making hurricanes more dangerous (Jeff Berardelli)
  • 2019 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #31 (John Hartz)
  • 2019 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #31 (John Hartz)

Climate Feedback Claim Review...

Data shows the Earth is currently warmer globally than at any time in the past 2,000 years

CLAIM:

"A graph of the Earth’s mean temperature over the last 2,000 years shows two previous periods when temperatures were warmer than they are now; from 1–200 A.D., an epoch called the Roman Warm Period, and more recently the Medieval Warm Period from 900–1100 A.D.[…] It is worth noting that both of these climate optima occurred centuries before the discovery of fossil fuels and the invention of the internal combustion engine."

SOURCE:

Apocalyptic Sea-Level Rise—Just a Thing of the Past?, Opinion by Gregory Rummo, Town Hall, July 23, 2019

 VERDICT:

 Inaccurate 

DETAILS:

Factually Inaccurate: Available climate records show that recent global temperatures are likely the highest of the last 2,000 years and there is no data supporting the claim that, globally, the Earth was warmer during the Roman or Medieval eras.

Flawed Reasoning: Natural climate change events in the past do not provide evidence that human emissions of greenhouse gas are incapable of changing the climate today.

KEY TAKE AWAY:

It's not true that the world has been warmer at other times during the last 2,000 years. But even if that were the case, it would not change the fact that human emissions of greenhouse gases are causing Earth's climate to warm.

Data shows the Earth is currently warmer globally than at any time in the past 2,000 years, Edited by Scott Johnson, Claim Reviews, Climate Feedback, July 26, 2019


Poster of the Week...

 2019 Poster 30


SkS Week in Review... 



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2GzhC1J

Story of the Week... Toon of the Week... Coming Soon on SkS... Climate Feedback Reviews... SkS Week in Review... Poster of the Week...

Story of the Week...

Global Footprint Network promotes real-world solutions that #MoveTheDate, accelerating the transition to one-planet prosperity

On July 29, humanity will have used nature’s resource budget for the entire year, according to Global Footprint Network, an international sustainability organization that has pioneered the Ecological Footprint. It is Earth Overshoot Day. Its date has moved up two months over the past 20 years to the 29th of July this year, the earliest date ever.

2019 Past Overshoot Days by Global Carbon Footprint 

 

Earth Overshoot Day falling on July 29th means that humanity is currently using nature 1.75 times faster than our planet’s ecosystems can regenerate. This is akin to using 1.75 Earths. Overshoot is possible because we are depleting our natural capital – which compromises humanity’s future resource security. The costs of this global ecological overspending are becoming increasingly evident in the form of deforestation, soil erosion, biodiversity loss, or the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The latter leads to climate change and more frequent extreme weather events.

“We have only got one Earth – this is the ultimately defining context for human existence. We can’t use 1.75 without destructive consequences,” said Mathis Wackernagel, co-inventor of Ecological Footprint accounting and founder of Global Footprint Network.

His just released book, Ecological Footprint: Managing Our Biocapacity Budgetdemonstrates that overshoot can only be temporary. Humanity will eventually have to operate within the means of Earth’s ecological resources, whether that balance is restored by disaster or by design. “Companies and countries that understand and manage the reality of operating in a one-planet context are in a far better position to navigate the challenges of the 21st century,” Wackernagel writes. 

Global Footprint Network promotes real-world solutions that #MoveTheDate, accelerating the transition to one-planet prosperity. Press Release, Global Footprint Network, July 23, 2019


Toon of the Week...

2019 Toon 30 

 

Hat tip to the Stop Climate Science Denial Facebook page. 


Coming Soon on SkS...

  • 'No doubt left' about scientific consensus on global warming, say experts (Jonathan Watts)
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #30 (Doug Bostrom)
  • The 'war on coal' myth (Karin Kirk)
  • What psychotherapy can do for the climate and biodiversity crises (Caroline Hickman)
  • How climate change is making hurricanes more dangerous (Jeff Berardelli)
  • 2019 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #31 (John Hartz)
  • 2019 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #31 (John Hartz)

Climate Feedback Claim Review...

Data shows the Earth is currently warmer globally than at any time in the past 2,000 years

CLAIM:

"A graph of the Earth’s mean temperature over the last 2,000 years shows two previous periods when temperatures were warmer than they are now; from 1–200 A.D., an epoch called the Roman Warm Period, and more recently the Medieval Warm Period from 900–1100 A.D.[…] It is worth noting that both of these climate optima occurred centuries before the discovery of fossil fuels and the invention of the internal combustion engine."

SOURCE:

Apocalyptic Sea-Level Rise—Just a Thing of the Past?, Opinion by Gregory Rummo, Town Hall, July 23, 2019

 VERDICT:

 Inaccurate 

DETAILS:

Factually Inaccurate: Available climate records show that recent global temperatures are likely the highest of the last 2,000 years and there is no data supporting the claim that, globally, the Earth was warmer during the Roman or Medieval eras.

Flawed Reasoning: Natural climate change events in the past do not provide evidence that human emissions of greenhouse gas are incapable of changing the climate today.

KEY TAKE AWAY:

It's not true that the world has been warmer at other times during the last 2,000 years. But even if that were the case, it would not change the fact that human emissions of greenhouse gases are causing Earth's climate to warm.

Data shows the Earth is currently warmer globally than at any time in the past 2,000 years, Edited by Scott Johnson, Claim Reviews, Climate Feedback, July 26, 2019


Poster of the Week...

 2019 Poster 30


SkS Week in Review... 



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2GzhC1J

2019 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #30

A chronological listing of news articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week, i.e., Sun, July 21 through Sat, July 27, 2019

Editor's Pick

Europe's record heatwave threatens Greenland ice sheet

The hot air moving up from North Africa has not merely broken European temperature records but surpassed them by 2, 3 or 4 degrees Celsius

Greenland

Shutterstock

The hot air that smashed European weather records this week looks set to move towards Greenland and could cause record melting of the world's second largest ice sheet, the United Nations said on Friday.

Clare Nullis, spokeswoman for the U.N. World Meteorological Organization, said the hot air moving up from North Africa had not merely broken European temperature records on Thursday but surpassed them by 2, 3 or 4 degrees Celsius, which she described as "absolutely incredible".

"According to forecasts, and this is of concern, the atmospheric flow is now going to transport that heat towards Greenland," she told a regular U.N. briefing in Geneva.

"This will result in high temperatures and consequently enhanced melting of the Greenland ice sheet," she said. "We don't know yet whether it will beat the 2012 level, but it's close."

Nullis cited data from Denmark's Polar Portal, which measures the daily gains and losses in surface mass of the Greenland Ice Sheet.

"In July alone, it lost 160 billion tonnes of ice through surface melting. That's roughly the equivalent of 64 million Olympic-sized swimming pools. Just in July. Just surface melt - it's not including ocean melt as well."

Europe's record heatwave threatens Greenland ice sheet by Tom Miles, Reuters, July 26, 2019


Links posted on Facebook

Sun July 21, 2019

Mon July 22, 2019

Tue July 23, 2019

Wed July 24, 2019

Thu July 25, 2019

Fri July 26, 2019

Sat July 27, 2019



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2GxVQLV
A chronological listing of news articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week, i.e., Sun, July 21 through Sat, July 27, 2019

Editor's Pick

Europe's record heatwave threatens Greenland ice sheet

The hot air moving up from North Africa has not merely broken European temperature records but surpassed them by 2, 3 or 4 degrees Celsius

Greenland

Shutterstock

The hot air that smashed European weather records this week looks set to move towards Greenland and could cause record melting of the world's second largest ice sheet, the United Nations said on Friday.

Clare Nullis, spokeswoman for the U.N. World Meteorological Organization, said the hot air moving up from North Africa had not merely broken European temperature records on Thursday but surpassed them by 2, 3 or 4 degrees Celsius, which she described as "absolutely incredible".

"According to forecasts, and this is of concern, the atmospheric flow is now going to transport that heat towards Greenland," she told a regular U.N. briefing in Geneva.

"This will result in high temperatures and consequently enhanced melting of the Greenland ice sheet," she said. "We don't know yet whether it will beat the 2012 level, but it's close."

Nullis cited data from Denmark's Polar Portal, which measures the daily gains and losses in surface mass of the Greenland Ice Sheet.

"In July alone, it lost 160 billion tonnes of ice through surface melting. That's roughly the equivalent of 64 million Olympic-sized swimming pools. Just in July. Just surface melt - it's not including ocean melt as well."

Europe's record heatwave threatens Greenland ice sheet by Tom Miles, Reuters, July 26, 2019


Links posted on Facebook

Sun July 21, 2019

Mon July 22, 2019

Tue July 23, 2019

Wed July 24, 2019

Thu July 25, 2019

Fri July 26, 2019

Sat July 27, 2019



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2GxVQLV

The black hole disk that shouldn’t exist

Right, a face-on spiral galaxy. Left, artist's concept of black hole and disk.

Left, a Hubble Space Telescope image of the spiral galaxy NGC 3147, located 130 million light-years away in the direction to the northern constellation Draco. Right, an artist’s illustration of the supermassive black hole residing at the galaxy’s core. This monster black hole weighs about 250 million times the mass of our sun. Yet NGC 3147’s black hole is relatively quiescent, and astronomers did not expect to find a thin disk. Image via NASA (Hubble image: NASA/ ESA/ S. Bianchi, A. Laor, and M. Chiaberge. Illustration: NASA/ ESA/ A. Feild / L. Hustak).

Astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope said earlier this month that they’ve found a thin disk of material that shouldn’t be there, whirling around a supermassive black hole at the heart of a spiral galaxy some 130 million light-years away. The astronomers did not expect to see a disk around the black hole at the center of galaxy NGC 3147. This galaxy was thought to contain a great example of a quiescent supermassive black hole, one that was not “feeding” on massive amounts of material swirling into it from an accompanying disk. Yet, apparently, the disk does exist. It looks like the same sort of disk that – in the case of well-fed black holes in other galaxies – has been seen to produce a brilliant beacon called a quasar. But there’s no quasar here. The central black hole is quiet. And so … a mystery!

The study’s first author, Stefano Bianchi of Università degli Studi Roma Tre, in Rome, Italy (@astrobianchi on Twitter), said:

The type of disk we see is a scaled-down quasar that we did not expect to exist. It’s the same type of disk we see in objects that are 1,000 or even 100,000 times more luminous. The predictions of current models for gas dynamics in very faint active galaxies clearly failed.

Yet the team is excited about this discovery. It gives them a chance to explore the physics of black holes and their disk more thoroughly. Plus, they said, the black hole and its disk offer:

… a unique opportunity to test Albert Einstein’s theories of relativity. General relativity describes gravity as the curvature of space, and special relativity describes the relationship between time and space.

The team’s paper is published July 11, 2019 in the peer-reviewed journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Why didn’t the astronomers expect this black hole disk? Aren’t black holes typically surrounded by disks like this one? Not exactly. Central supermassive black holes in galaxies like NGC 3147 appear to astronomers as “malnourished.” That’s thought to be because there’s not enough gravitationally captured material to feed them regularly. NASA explained:

So, the thin haze of infalling material puffs up like a donut rather than flattening out in a pancake-shaped disk. Therefore, it is very puzzling why there is a thin disk encircling a starving black hole in NGC 3147 that mimics much more powerful disks found in extremely active galaxies with engorged, monster black holes.

The astronomers initially selected this galaxy to validate accepted models explaining galaxies like NGC 3147, those with black holes on a meager diet of material. One of the astronomers involved in the study – Ari Laor of the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology located in Haifa, Israel – commented in a statement:

We thought this was the best candidate to confirm that below certain luminosities, the accretion disk doesn’t exist anymore. What we saw was something completely unexpected. We found gas in motion producing features we can explain only as being produced by material rotating in a thin disk very close to the black hole.

Artist's concept of black hole surrounded by bright swirling disk.

Artist’s concept of the black hole disk around galaxy NGC 3147. Hubble Space Telescope observations of the black hole demonstrate 2 of Einstein’s theories of relativity. Image via NASA.

These astronomers said this galaxy, its black hole and its mysterious disk are giving them an opportunity to use Einstein’s theories of relativity to explore the dynamic processes close to a black hole. The black hole’s mass is thought to be around 250 million suns; that’s in contrast to 4 million suns for the quiescent central black hole at the center of our own Milky Way galaxy. The study’s first author, Stefano Bianchi of Università degli Studi Roma Tre, in Rome, Italy (@astrobianchi on Twitter), said:

This is an intriguing peek at a disk very close to a black hole, so close that the velocities and the intensity of the gravitational pull are affecting how the photons of light look. We cannot understand the data unless we include the theories of relativity.

In the illustration above, the reddish-yellow features swirling around the black hole represent the glow of light from gas trapped by the hole’s powerful gravity. Hubble clocked material whirling around the black hole as moving at more than 10% of the speed of light. NASA explained:

The black hole is embedded deep within its gravitational field, shown by the green grid that illustrates warped space. The gravitational field is so strong that light is struggling to climb out, a principal described in Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Material also is whipping so fast around the black hole that it brightens as it approaches Earth on one side of the disk and gets fainter as it moves away. This effect, called relativistic beaming, was predicted by Einstein’s theory of special relativity.

Team member Marco Chiaberge commented:

We’ve never seen the effects of both general and special relativity in visible light with this much clarity.

Bottom line: Astronomers did not expect to see a thin disk around the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy NGC 3147. They said the discovery helps them probe the physics of black holes and their disks. The velocities involved, and the intensity of the gravitational pull of the hole itself, require Einstein’s theories of relativity to understand what is happening in this distant system, 130 million light-years away.

Source: HST unveils a compact mildly relativistic broad-line region in the candidate true type 2 NGC 3147

Via NASA



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2MkRYlg
Right, a face-on spiral galaxy. Left, artist's concept of black hole and disk.

Left, a Hubble Space Telescope image of the spiral galaxy NGC 3147, located 130 million light-years away in the direction to the northern constellation Draco. Right, an artist’s illustration of the supermassive black hole residing at the galaxy’s core. This monster black hole weighs about 250 million times the mass of our sun. Yet NGC 3147’s black hole is relatively quiescent, and astronomers did not expect to find a thin disk. Image via NASA (Hubble image: NASA/ ESA/ S. Bianchi, A. Laor, and M. Chiaberge. Illustration: NASA/ ESA/ A. Feild / L. Hustak).

Astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope said earlier this month that they’ve found a thin disk of material that shouldn’t be there, whirling around a supermassive black hole at the heart of a spiral galaxy some 130 million light-years away. The astronomers did not expect to see a disk around the black hole at the center of galaxy NGC 3147. This galaxy was thought to contain a great example of a quiescent supermassive black hole, one that was not “feeding” on massive amounts of material swirling into it from an accompanying disk. Yet, apparently, the disk does exist. It looks like the same sort of disk that – in the case of well-fed black holes in other galaxies – has been seen to produce a brilliant beacon called a quasar. But there’s no quasar here. The central black hole is quiet. And so … a mystery!

The study’s first author, Stefano Bianchi of Università degli Studi Roma Tre, in Rome, Italy (@astrobianchi on Twitter), said:

The type of disk we see is a scaled-down quasar that we did not expect to exist. It’s the same type of disk we see in objects that are 1,000 or even 100,000 times more luminous. The predictions of current models for gas dynamics in very faint active galaxies clearly failed.

Yet the team is excited about this discovery. It gives them a chance to explore the physics of black holes and their disk more thoroughly. Plus, they said, the black hole and its disk offer:

… a unique opportunity to test Albert Einstein’s theories of relativity. General relativity describes gravity as the curvature of space, and special relativity describes the relationship between time and space.

The team’s paper is published July 11, 2019 in the peer-reviewed journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Why didn’t the astronomers expect this black hole disk? Aren’t black holes typically surrounded by disks like this one? Not exactly. Central supermassive black holes in galaxies like NGC 3147 appear to astronomers as “malnourished.” That’s thought to be because there’s not enough gravitationally captured material to feed them regularly. NASA explained:

So, the thin haze of infalling material puffs up like a donut rather than flattening out in a pancake-shaped disk. Therefore, it is very puzzling why there is a thin disk encircling a starving black hole in NGC 3147 that mimics much more powerful disks found in extremely active galaxies with engorged, monster black holes.

The astronomers initially selected this galaxy to validate accepted models explaining galaxies like NGC 3147, those with black holes on a meager diet of material. One of the astronomers involved in the study – Ari Laor of the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology located in Haifa, Israel – commented in a statement:

We thought this was the best candidate to confirm that below certain luminosities, the accretion disk doesn’t exist anymore. What we saw was something completely unexpected. We found gas in motion producing features we can explain only as being produced by material rotating in a thin disk very close to the black hole.

Artist's concept of black hole surrounded by bright swirling disk.

Artist’s concept of the black hole disk around galaxy NGC 3147. Hubble Space Telescope observations of the black hole demonstrate 2 of Einstein’s theories of relativity. Image via NASA.

These astronomers said this galaxy, its black hole and its mysterious disk are giving them an opportunity to use Einstein’s theories of relativity to explore the dynamic processes close to a black hole. The black hole’s mass is thought to be around 250 million suns; that’s in contrast to 4 million suns for the quiescent central black hole at the center of our own Milky Way galaxy. The study’s first author, Stefano Bianchi of Università degli Studi Roma Tre, in Rome, Italy (@astrobianchi on Twitter), said:

This is an intriguing peek at a disk very close to a black hole, so close that the velocities and the intensity of the gravitational pull are affecting how the photons of light look. We cannot understand the data unless we include the theories of relativity.

In the illustration above, the reddish-yellow features swirling around the black hole represent the glow of light from gas trapped by the hole’s powerful gravity. Hubble clocked material whirling around the black hole as moving at more than 10% of the speed of light. NASA explained:

The black hole is embedded deep within its gravitational field, shown by the green grid that illustrates warped space. The gravitational field is so strong that light is struggling to climb out, a principal described in Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Material also is whipping so fast around the black hole that it brightens as it approaches Earth on one side of the disk and gets fainter as it moves away. This effect, called relativistic beaming, was predicted by Einstein’s theory of special relativity.

Team member Marco Chiaberge commented:

We’ve never seen the effects of both general and special relativity in visible light with this much clarity.

Bottom line: Astronomers did not expect to see a thin disk around the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy NGC 3147. They said the discovery helps them probe the physics of black holes and their disks. The velocities involved, and the intensity of the gravitational pull of the hole itself, require Einstein’s theories of relativity to understand what is happening in this distant system, 130 million light-years away.

Source: HST unveils a compact mildly relativistic broad-line region in the candidate true type 2 NGC 3147

Via NASA



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2MkRYlg

News digest – smokefree 2030, NICE decision, proton beam therapy and CAR T cell boost in mice

Cigarette burning

Government says England will be ‘smokefree by 2030’

The BBC reported on the now former Government’s newly published ‘green paper’, which lays out the ambition to make England smokefree by 2030, among other targets. It’s a bold goal, with a handful of possible routes to delivering this on the table, including the potential to make tobacco companies pay for the damage they cause. Our blog post has all you need to know.

Also, as an interesting read for the sofa statisticians out there, the BBC looked at the statistics behind how likely you are to smoke. The article points out the socioeconomic divide between smokers and non-smokers, highlighting some of the problems that must be addressed if the Government is to meet its smokefree 2030 target.

Targeted drug will be offered earlier for advanced ovarian cancers

Described as a ‘wonder drug’ in The Sun, and a ‘game changer’ in The Telegraph, the National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended the drug olaparib (Lynparza) be offered earlier for some patients on the NHS in England. With headlines like those it can be hard to figure out what this drug is, who it’s for, and how ‘game changing’ it really is. For everything you need to know about olaparib, check out our news report.

Documentary tracks NHS proton beam therapy centre construction

BBC Horizon followed the NHS through the process of building two new cancer treatment centres that will offer proton beam therapy. The centre at the Christie Hospital in Manchester is open and starting to treat patients, while the one at University College Hospital in London is due to open next year. For everything you need to know about this type of radiotherapy, read our blog post.

New kind of CAR T cell therapy effective in mice with brain tumours

CAR T cell therapy uses cellular engineering to take a patient’s immune cells and turn them into a cancer-fighting treatment. It has been shown to be effective against particular blood cancers in some adults and children, but progress in treating solid tumours has been limited. This week, STAT reported that a newly adapted form of CAR T cells proved effective against a particular type of brain tumour in mice. There is still a long, long way to go for this treatment, but the ingenuity of the approach shows scientists are hard at work in the hunt for progress.

Precision radiotherapy trial helping patients previously considered incurable

The BBC have reported on the phase two clinical trial in Scotland of a high-precision radiotherapy called SABR. The treatment could become a new option for patients with cancer that has spread around their body. If you want to find out a little more about what SABR is, and how it works, check out our blog post.

Doctors say results of at-home genetic testing kits should be treated with caution

The Guardian reported on the growing burden that home genetic testing kits are having on the NHS. Doctors say that the kits are putting pressure on the NHS when people are referred thinking they may carry faulty genes linked to certain diseases. In some cases, follow-up NHS testing is revealing that the results of at-home testing kits are false.

And finally

The Sun, The Telegraph and Mail Online reported on a new observational study that looked at the diets of around 500,000 people and found that eating fish regularly slightly reduced the risk of bowel cancer. But one observational study alone cannot prove that eating fish reduces cancer risk, and more research is needed. For a full explanation on what the study does, and doesn’t mean, take a look at NHS behind the headlines.

Ethan



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog https://ift.tt/2Ok1RlG
Cigarette burning

Government says England will be ‘smokefree by 2030’

The BBC reported on the now former Government’s newly published ‘green paper’, which lays out the ambition to make England smokefree by 2030, among other targets. It’s a bold goal, with a handful of possible routes to delivering this on the table, including the potential to make tobacco companies pay for the damage they cause. Our blog post has all you need to know.

Also, as an interesting read for the sofa statisticians out there, the BBC looked at the statistics behind how likely you are to smoke. The article points out the socioeconomic divide between smokers and non-smokers, highlighting some of the problems that must be addressed if the Government is to meet its smokefree 2030 target.

Targeted drug will be offered earlier for advanced ovarian cancers

Described as a ‘wonder drug’ in The Sun, and a ‘game changer’ in The Telegraph, the National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended the drug olaparib (Lynparza) be offered earlier for some patients on the NHS in England. With headlines like those it can be hard to figure out what this drug is, who it’s for, and how ‘game changing’ it really is. For everything you need to know about olaparib, check out our news report.

Documentary tracks NHS proton beam therapy centre construction

BBC Horizon followed the NHS through the process of building two new cancer treatment centres that will offer proton beam therapy. The centre at the Christie Hospital in Manchester is open and starting to treat patients, while the one at University College Hospital in London is due to open next year. For everything you need to know about this type of radiotherapy, read our blog post.

New kind of CAR T cell therapy effective in mice with brain tumours

CAR T cell therapy uses cellular engineering to take a patient’s immune cells and turn them into a cancer-fighting treatment. It has been shown to be effective against particular blood cancers in some adults and children, but progress in treating solid tumours has been limited. This week, STAT reported that a newly adapted form of CAR T cells proved effective against a particular type of brain tumour in mice. There is still a long, long way to go for this treatment, but the ingenuity of the approach shows scientists are hard at work in the hunt for progress.

Precision radiotherapy trial helping patients previously considered incurable

The BBC have reported on the phase two clinical trial in Scotland of a high-precision radiotherapy called SABR. The treatment could become a new option for patients with cancer that has spread around their body. If you want to find out a little more about what SABR is, and how it works, check out our blog post.

Doctors say results of at-home genetic testing kits should be treated with caution

The Guardian reported on the growing burden that home genetic testing kits are having on the NHS. Doctors say that the kits are putting pressure on the NHS when people are referred thinking they may carry faulty genes linked to certain diseases. In some cases, follow-up NHS testing is revealing that the results of at-home testing kits are false.

And finally

The Sun, The Telegraph and Mail Online reported on a new observational study that looked at the diets of around 500,000 people and found that eating fish regularly slightly reduced the risk of bowel cancer. But one observational study alone cannot prove that eating fish reduces cancer risk, and more research is needed. For a full explanation on what the study does, and doesn’t mean, take a look at NHS behind the headlines.

Ethan



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog https://ift.tt/2Ok1RlG

Astronomy educators to rendezvous in Chile

Radio dishes on a high plain in the Chilean Andes.

The view from the ALMA Webcam – at Chajnantor plateau in the Chilean Andes – on July 14, 2019 via NRAO/ Robert Pettengill.

How crazy does an astronomy group have to be to head to Chile in late July of 2019, missing this month’s July 2 total solar eclipse, also in Chile? The members of the Astronomy in Chile Educator Ambassadors Program (ACEAP) 2019 cadre will be answering that question this July 27 through August 5, as they visit locations in Chile like the ALMA telescope array, above.

Diplomatic license plates are not part of the deal of being an astronomy ambassador; our cars still get towed. We are scientific and cultural ambassadors, a bit like Marco Polo was once for Kublai Khan. The team will have backstage access to the great observatories of Chile and the scientists and staff that keep them running. On our return we share what we’ve learned along with our experiences with the people and country of Chile with the curious public that makes these observatories possible. ACEAP ambassadors include teachers, planetarium educators, and amateur astronomers from across the United States and Chile. Communicating our experiences strengthens the bonds of collaboration and understanding between America and Chile.

Nearly every week we hear of new discoveries made by astronomers with these world class instruments. Chilean President Michelle Bachelet has announced that by next year Chile will host 70% of the worlds astronomical infrastructure. With the darkest skies in the world, Chile is full of opportunities for professional and amateur astronomers. The ACEAP team will see how private observatories cater to growing numbers of amateur astronomers who visit Chile for its dark skies, learn about Chilean culture and aid astronomical educators training the next generation of scientists in Chile.

The 2019 ACEAP team’s travels will range from Santiago to the far north Atacama. Visits to Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO), Gemini South, see the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) under construction, and visit the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) array site at 16,500 feet (5,000 meters). At each location seminars with observatory staff will cover present and future science, public outreach, and access to observational data.

Preparations have included training in communication skills, astrophotography, and high altitude health. The team is very interested in the astrophotography opportunities on the trip and there has been lots of discussion about the photography equipment to bring.

A suitcase full of camera equipment.

Here’s what I’m packing for Chile. Photo by Robert Pettengill.

The preparation is over, and we rendezvous in Santiago on Saturday July 27. You can follow the adventures of the team in near real time on your favorite social media platform. Look for tags #AstroAmbassadors and #ACEAP2019 for adventures of the entire team. I’ll be posting to BadAstroPhotos pages on accounts on FaceBook, Twitter, and Instagram. Follow any of those to see my daily posts.

The Astronomy in Chile Educator Ambassadors Program is a collaboration between Associated Universities Inc., the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, and Gemini Observatory, and is supported by the National Science Foundation. Thanks to Tim Spunk of AUI (PI) and Charles Blue of NRAO (co-PI) and their team for putting this project together and getting us ready.

Bottom line: Members of the Astronomy in Chile Educator Ambassadors Program (ACEAP) 2019 cadre will be touring the great observatories of Chile July 27 through August 5, 2019.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2YqsEwE
Radio dishes on a high plain in the Chilean Andes.

The view from the ALMA Webcam – at Chajnantor plateau in the Chilean Andes – on July 14, 2019 via NRAO/ Robert Pettengill.

How crazy does an astronomy group have to be to head to Chile in late July of 2019, missing this month’s July 2 total solar eclipse, also in Chile? The members of the Astronomy in Chile Educator Ambassadors Program (ACEAP) 2019 cadre will be answering that question this July 27 through August 5, as they visit locations in Chile like the ALMA telescope array, above.

Diplomatic license plates are not part of the deal of being an astronomy ambassador; our cars still get towed. We are scientific and cultural ambassadors, a bit like Marco Polo was once for Kublai Khan. The team will have backstage access to the great observatories of Chile and the scientists and staff that keep them running. On our return we share what we’ve learned along with our experiences with the people and country of Chile with the curious public that makes these observatories possible. ACEAP ambassadors include teachers, planetarium educators, and amateur astronomers from across the United States and Chile. Communicating our experiences strengthens the bonds of collaboration and understanding between America and Chile.

Nearly every week we hear of new discoveries made by astronomers with these world class instruments. Chilean President Michelle Bachelet has announced that by next year Chile will host 70% of the worlds astronomical infrastructure. With the darkest skies in the world, Chile is full of opportunities for professional and amateur astronomers. The ACEAP team will see how private observatories cater to growing numbers of amateur astronomers who visit Chile for its dark skies, learn about Chilean culture and aid astronomical educators training the next generation of scientists in Chile.

The 2019 ACEAP team’s travels will range from Santiago to the far north Atacama. Visits to Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO), Gemini South, see the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) under construction, and visit the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) array site at 16,500 feet (5,000 meters). At each location seminars with observatory staff will cover present and future science, public outreach, and access to observational data.

Preparations have included training in communication skills, astrophotography, and high altitude health. The team is very interested in the astrophotography opportunities on the trip and there has been lots of discussion about the photography equipment to bring.

A suitcase full of camera equipment.

Here’s what I’m packing for Chile. Photo by Robert Pettengill.

The preparation is over, and we rendezvous in Santiago on Saturday July 27. You can follow the adventures of the team in near real time on your favorite social media platform. Look for tags #AstroAmbassadors and #ACEAP2019 for adventures of the entire team. I’ll be posting to BadAstroPhotos pages on accounts on FaceBook, Twitter, and Instagram. Follow any of those to see my daily posts.

The Astronomy in Chile Educator Ambassadors Program is a collaboration between Associated Universities Inc., the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, and Gemini Observatory, and is supported by the National Science Foundation. Thanks to Tim Spunk of AUI (PI) and Charles Blue of NRAO (co-PI) and their team for putting this project together and getting us ready.

Bottom line: Members of the Astronomy in Chile Educator Ambassadors Program (ACEAP) 2019 cadre will be touring the great observatories of Chile July 27 through August 5, 2019.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2YqsEwE