Mars closest to Earth on July 30-31

Image at top via NASATumblr

On July 30-31, 2018, Mars and Earth are closer than since their historically close approach in 2003. Mars was closer in 2003 than in some 60,000 years, and it’s now only slightly farther from Earth now than then. It’s some 35.78 million miles (57.59 million km) away at its closest on July 31 at 8 UTC. That time places Mars’ closest approach before sunrise on July 31 for North American time zones – and on July 30 at 10 p.m. Hawaiian Time.

This July 30-31, 2018 close encounter between the Earth and Mars is the closest until around the time of the Martian opposition on September 15, 2035.

Read more: The cycle of close and far Mars oppositions

Mars is closest in spite of the fact that Earth passed between Mars and the sun (the Martian opposition) on July 27. Read more about why below.

How about viewing Mars through a telescope now? Is it a good time? Is this a great time to look at Mars through a telescope? It should be because Mars is larger in our sky now, as illustrated below:

So put Mars viewing on your calendar for 2016. You won’t see Mars this size again until 2018, when Mars will put on an even better show. Illustration via nasa.tumblr.com.

Mars last came to opposition in 2016. It appeared smaller in our sky then, in comparison to 2018, as viewed through a telescope. Illustration via nasa.tumblr.com.

The telescopic view of Mars hasn’t been so great. Why not?

The answer is that planet-wide dust storms tend to spring up on the red planet around the time Mars is closest to the sun. Mars closest point to the sun happens on September 16, 2018. Dust storms on Mars began kicking up a few months ago, and the dust storms went global on Mars in early June.

That’s why most telescopic images of Mars we’ve seen this summer have looked like those below:

Jim Powell wrote: “Mars at 3 a.m. July 15, 2018. Only 12 days away from opposition, and it looks like those dust storms are starting to calm down a little bit. I’m seeing more detail today than I did 9 days ago when I last observed Mars.” Click here for updates on the Opportunity rover on Mars; it went silent in June due to Mars dust.

Rob Pettengill in Austin, Texas captured this image of Mars on July 23, 2018. He wrote: “Dusty Mars captured with a small telescope. Good seeing conditions in Austin gave me a chance to capture hints of surface detail and the south polar cap for the first time during this dust obscured opposition.”

Animation illustrating the effects of dust on our view of the Red Planet, via NASATumblr.

Why aren’t we closest to Mars on the day we pass between it and the sun? If both the Earth and Mars circled the sun in perfect circles, and on the same exact plane, the distance between Earth and Mars would always be least on the day of Mars’ opposition. But we don’t live in such a symmetrical universe. All planets have elliptical orbits and a perihelion (closest point) and aphelion (farthest point) from the sun.

Mars’ orbit around the sun takes 687 days in contrast to 365 days for Earth. It has a year nearly twice as long as ours. Earth’s closest point to the sun comes yearly, in January. Mars will be closest to the sun next on September 16.

At its opposition on July 27 – when Earth was directly between Mars and the sun – Mars was still drawing closer to the sun. And that is how its distance from us is smaller on July 31 than when Earth passed between the sun and Mars.

The time interval between a Mars’ opposition and its least distance from Earth can be as long as 8.5 days (1969), or as little as 10 minutes (2208 and 2232).

Generally speaking, Mars is brightest in 2018 from about July 7 to September 7. It is now shining more brilliantly than the planet Jupiter, and it’s not very often that Mars outshines the king planet!

View larger. | On July 24, 2018, in Kalispell, Montana, John Ashley captured the images to make this composite. The bright object here is the moon, and the 2nd-brightest is Mars. You can see Jupiter in the top right, and Saturn just below the moon. Notice Mars is brighter than both Jupiter and Saturn! Read more about this image.

Is Mars brightest when it’s closest? Not necessarily.

You might think Mars should be brighter when closest to Earth on July 30-31 than at opposition on July 27. But it’s not (although it’s still plenty bright).

Mars is a tiny bit fainter now than at its July 27 opposition. That’s because of something known as opposition surge. Mars most directly reflects sunlight back to Earth at opposition. This directness accentuates Mars’ brilliance. Before and after opposition, sunlight is reflected at a slightly slanted angle relative to Earth, thereby reducing Mars’ brightness.

Artist's illustration of the orbits of Earth and Mars, via NASA.

Artist’s illustration of the orbits of Earth and Mars, via NASA.

Earth swings between Mars and the sun every other year, at progressively later dates. Earth will next lap Mars on October 13, 2020. Its closest approach to Earth that year will be October 6. After that, Earth will next lap Mars on December 8, 2022, but its closest approach will come one week earlier, on December 1, 2022. At both of those oppositions of Mars – and at every opposition for some years to come – Mars will appear fainter, and fainter, in our sky. That’s because those oppositions will happen farther and farther from Mars’ perihelion date.

So enjoy Mars in 2018! You won’t see it this bright again for many years.

Mars is out almost all night long now. It looks like a bright reddish “star,” shining with a steadier light than the true stars. In late July and August, 2018, for Mars in the east at nightfall – highest in the sky near midnight – and in the west as morning dawn starts to light the sky.

Clouded out tonight? Look tomorrow or the next night! Mars will remain very bright in our sky until about early September. Then its fabulous 2018 appearance in our sky will be done, and Mars will begin to fade. We’ll have to wait until 2035 to see it this bright again!

Read more: The cycle of close and far Martian oppositions

Mars will still be visible after July and August, 2018, but each month it will shrink in apparent size as Earth rushes ahead of Mars in our smaller, faster orbit around the sun. As telescopes show Mars smaller in apparent sky, our unaided eyes will see Mars fade in brightness. Image via NASATumblr.

Bottom line: The Mars opposition – when Earth flew between the sun and Mars – was July 27, 2018. But the distance between Mars and Earth is least on July 30-31, 2018.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2AlJ56y

Image at top via NASATumblr

On July 30-31, 2018, Mars and Earth are closer than since their historically close approach in 2003. Mars was closer in 2003 than in some 60,000 years, and it’s now only slightly farther from Earth now than then. It’s some 35.78 million miles (57.59 million km) away at its closest on July 31 at 8 UTC. That time places Mars’ closest approach before sunrise on July 31 for North American time zones – and on July 30 at 10 p.m. Hawaiian Time.

This July 30-31, 2018 close encounter between the Earth and Mars is the closest until around the time of the Martian opposition on September 15, 2035.

Read more: The cycle of close and far Mars oppositions

Mars is closest in spite of the fact that Earth passed between Mars and the sun (the Martian opposition) on July 27. Read more about why below.

How about viewing Mars through a telescope now? Is it a good time? Is this a great time to look at Mars through a telescope? It should be because Mars is larger in our sky now, as illustrated below:

So put Mars viewing on your calendar for 2016. You won’t see Mars this size again until 2018, when Mars will put on an even better show. Illustration via nasa.tumblr.com.

Mars last came to opposition in 2016. It appeared smaller in our sky then, in comparison to 2018, as viewed through a telescope. Illustration via nasa.tumblr.com.

The telescopic view of Mars hasn’t been so great. Why not?

The answer is that planet-wide dust storms tend to spring up on the red planet around the time Mars is closest to the sun. Mars closest point to the sun happens on September 16, 2018. Dust storms on Mars began kicking up a few months ago, and the dust storms went global on Mars in early June.

That’s why most telescopic images of Mars we’ve seen this summer have looked like those below:

Jim Powell wrote: “Mars at 3 a.m. July 15, 2018. Only 12 days away from opposition, and it looks like those dust storms are starting to calm down a little bit. I’m seeing more detail today than I did 9 days ago when I last observed Mars.” Click here for updates on the Opportunity rover on Mars; it went silent in June due to Mars dust.

Rob Pettengill in Austin, Texas captured this image of Mars on July 23, 2018. He wrote: “Dusty Mars captured with a small telescope. Good seeing conditions in Austin gave me a chance to capture hints of surface detail and the south polar cap for the first time during this dust obscured opposition.”

Animation illustrating the effects of dust on our view of the Red Planet, via NASATumblr.

Why aren’t we closest to Mars on the day we pass between it and the sun? If both the Earth and Mars circled the sun in perfect circles, and on the same exact plane, the distance between Earth and Mars would always be least on the day of Mars’ opposition. But we don’t live in such a symmetrical universe. All planets have elliptical orbits and a perihelion (closest point) and aphelion (farthest point) from the sun.

Mars’ orbit around the sun takes 687 days in contrast to 365 days for Earth. It has a year nearly twice as long as ours. Earth’s closest point to the sun comes yearly, in January. Mars will be closest to the sun next on September 16.

At its opposition on July 27 – when Earth was directly between Mars and the sun – Mars was still drawing closer to the sun. And that is how its distance from us is smaller on July 31 than when Earth passed between the sun and Mars.

The time interval between a Mars’ opposition and its least distance from Earth can be as long as 8.5 days (1969), or as little as 10 minutes (2208 and 2232).

Generally speaking, Mars is brightest in 2018 from about July 7 to September 7. It is now shining more brilliantly than the planet Jupiter, and it’s not very often that Mars outshines the king planet!

View larger. | On July 24, 2018, in Kalispell, Montana, John Ashley captured the images to make this composite. The bright object here is the moon, and the 2nd-brightest is Mars. You can see Jupiter in the top right, and Saturn just below the moon. Notice Mars is brighter than both Jupiter and Saturn! Read more about this image.

Is Mars brightest when it’s closest? Not necessarily.

You might think Mars should be brighter when closest to Earth on July 30-31 than at opposition on July 27. But it’s not (although it’s still plenty bright).

Mars is a tiny bit fainter now than at its July 27 opposition. That’s because of something known as opposition surge. Mars most directly reflects sunlight back to Earth at opposition. This directness accentuates Mars’ brilliance. Before and after opposition, sunlight is reflected at a slightly slanted angle relative to Earth, thereby reducing Mars’ brightness.

Artist's illustration of the orbits of Earth and Mars, via NASA.

Artist’s illustration of the orbits of Earth and Mars, via NASA.

Earth swings between Mars and the sun every other year, at progressively later dates. Earth will next lap Mars on October 13, 2020. Its closest approach to Earth that year will be October 6. After that, Earth will next lap Mars on December 8, 2022, but its closest approach will come one week earlier, on December 1, 2022. At both of those oppositions of Mars – and at every opposition for some years to come – Mars will appear fainter, and fainter, in our sky. That’s because those oppositions will happen farther and farther from Mars’ perihelion date.

So enjoy Mars in 2018! You won’t see it this bright again for many years.

Mars is out almost all night long now. It looks like a bright reddish “star,” shining with a steadier light than the true stars. In late July and August, 2018, for Mars in the east at nightfall – highest in the sky near midnight – and in the west as morning dawn starts to light the sky.

Clouded out tonight? Look tomorrow or the next night! Mars will remain very bright in our sky until about early September. Then its fabulous 2018 appearance in our sky will be done, and Mars will begin to fade. We’ll have to wait until 2035 to see it this bright again!

Read more: The cycle of close and far Martian oppositions

Mars will still be visible after July and August, 2018, but each month it will shrink in apparent size as Earth rushes ahead of Mars in our smaller, faster orbit around the sun. As telescopes show Mars smaller in apparent sky, our unaided eyes will see Mars fade in brightness. Image via NASATumblr.

Bottom line: The Mars opposition – when Earth flew between the sun and Mars – was July 27, 2018. But the distance between Mars and Earth is least on July 30-31, 2018.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2AlJ56y

Being diagnosed with a brain tumour – Mary’s story

Brain tumours are hard to treat and survival remains stubbornly low. That’s why brain tumour research is one of our top priorities. In this series, 3 people share their experience of the disease, starting with Mary and her diagnosis.

The headaches began about 6 months before I was diagnosed, when I was 30. They were really bad in the morning and I felt like I had pressure in my head. Any kind of strain like laughing, sneezing or crying made the pressure feel worse.

I went to the doctor a couple of times, and she thought it could be neck tension headaches. I’d started a new job and was getting stressed so I thought that could be the case. She prescribed me painkillers and I tried meditation to help stop the tension, but the headaches didn’t go away. Nothing helped. At times it was just unbearable; I’d be sitting with my hands over my head because the pressure felt so bad.

One morning I woke up and the headache was worse than it had ever been. I had double vision for a couple of minutes and thought that something wasn’t right. I called my sister and told her, and she told me I had to go to A&E. I said that I would be fine, but she pushed me to go. I’m so glad she did, or it could have been a different story.

Everything happened so fast

After I was seen at A&E, the doctor thought it was likely a migraine. I just wanted something to stop the pain in my head. I don’t know what happened, but another doctor explained that they were going to send me for a CT scan.

I had the scan on the same day, and after I came out they told me that I had a mass in my brain. I couldn’t believe it. I didn’t know what they meant by a mass, but they told me there was something in my brain that shouldn’t be there. Then everything happened so fast.

I was so shocked. I never thought in a million years that it was a brain tumour.

I was transferred to a different hospital, Charing Cross, where they did an MRI scan the next day. That’s when I was diagnosed with a brain tumour. I was so shocked. I don’t know what I thought, but I never thought in a million years that it was a brain tumour.

The surgeon came and spoke to me and said that they were going to operate. He explained that the surgery would be very high risk because of where the tumour was located. It was near the cerebellum on the left side of my brain, at the back of my head. He said that there was a risk I wouldn’t wake up from the surgery, or that I could be paralysed. But if they didn’t operate, the tumour would grow bigger and block the fluid going into my spine.

There was so much to take in.

Preparing for the worst

I was in hospital for a few days before I could go home for the weekend. I had a lumbar puncture, where they take a sample from your spine, and so many blood tests. For one test, they had to check how my kidneys were working. I needed to start at 8 o’clock in the morning, and have blood taken every 4 hours. That was a very long day.

I had my surgery on July 11th 2016. The surgeon said that they couldn’t remove all of it because of its position in my brain, and that they had sent off a sample to be analysed. That would tell if the tumour was benign or cancerous.

I stayed in hospital to recover and had to wait for my results. That week was awful. I couldn’t sleep and I couldn’t really eat. I mentally prepared myself for the fact that it could be cancer. So, when I was called in for my appointment, and my doctor told me it was, I didn’t cry. I just said: “OK, what can we do?”

He told me that I had a very rare type of tumour called a medulloblastoma, which commonly affects children. I wondered whether the fact that it was so rare meant that they wouldn’t be able to do anything. But he said the 2 or 3 adults with this tumour he’d seen in his lifetime were alive and in remission.

Understanding what lies ahead

My doctor explained that I’d be treated the same way as a child would, with chemotherapy and radiotherapy to treat the remainder of the tumour. I was given lots of books to read about the treatments and the side effects, but I wanted to know more. So, I went on Google straight away but I couldn’t find much information about adults with medulloblastoma; most of the information was about children.

Mary having treatment

When I was having the chemotherapy and radiotherapy, most of the other people around me having treatment were also much older. I felt alone. So, I joined different forums online to find people who were like me, the same age and with the same type of tumour. And I was doing research all the time, using websites like Cancer Research UK’s to find out anything and everything I could.

I just got through it each day, but going online really did help me understand what’s ahead.

I finished my treatment in April 2017 and my scans have been clear. I don’t say that I’m in remission, I’m just glad that the tumour is still gone and hasn’t returned.

What I’ve learnt is that it’s so good to talk to others. There are people out there going through the same thing, and they’ll be able to understand what you’re going through. There’s always someone to talk to if you need to.

If you’ve been affected by cancer and would like to speak to someone, you can call our nurses on freephone 0808 800 4040, 9am until 5pm Monday to Friday. Alternatively, you can join our friendly and supportive discussion forum, Cancer Chat.



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog https://ift.tt/2NUHyGe

Brain tumours are hard to treat and survival remains stubbornly low. That’s why brain tumour research is one of our top priorities. In this series, 3 people share their experience of the disease, starting with Mary and her diagnosis.

The headaches began about 6 months before I was diagnosed, when I was 30. They were really bad in the morning and I felt like I had pressure in my head. Any kind of strain like laughing, sneezing or crying made the pressure feel worse.

I went to the doctor a couple of times, and she thought it could be neck tension headaches. I’d started a new job and was getting stressed so I thought that could be the case. She prescribed me painkillers and I tried meditation to help stop the tension, but the headaches didn’t go away. Nothing helped. At times it was just unbearable; I’d be sitting with my hands over my head because the pressure felt so bad.

One morning I woke up and the headache was worse than it had ever been. I had double vision for a couple of minutes and thought that something wasn’t right. I called my sister and told her, and she told me I had to go to A&E. I said that I would be fine, but she pushed me to go. I’m so glad she did, or it could have been a different story.

Everything happened so fast

After I was seen at A&E, the doctor thought it was likely a migraine. I just wanted something to stop the pain in my head. I don’t know what happened, but another doctor explained that they were going to send me for a CT scan.

I had the scan on the same day, and after I came out they told me that I had a mass in my brain. I couldn’t believe it. I didn’t know what they meant by a mass, but they told me there was something in my brain that shouldn’t be there. Then everything happened so fast.

I was so shocked. I never thought in a million years that it was a brain tumour.

I was transferred to a different hospital, Charing Cross, where they did an MRI scan the next day. That’s when I was diagnosed with a brain tumour. I was so shocked. I don’t know what I thought, but I never thought in a million years that it was a brain tumour.

The surgeon came and spoke to me and said that they were going to operate. He explained that the surgery would be very high risk because of where the tumour was located. It was near the cerebellum on the left side of my brain, at the back of my head. He said that there was a risk I wouldn’t wake up from the surgery, or that I could be paralysed. But if they didn’t operate, the tumour would grow bigger and block the fluid going into my spine.

There was so much to take in.

Preparing for the worst

I was in hospital for a few days before I could go home for the weekend. I had a lumbar puncture, where they take a sample from your spine, and so many blood tests. For one test, they had to check how my kidneys were working. I needed to start at 8 o’clock in the morning, and have blood taken every 4 hours. That was a very long day.

I had my surgery on July 11th 2016. The surgeon said that they couldn’t remove all of it because of its position in my brain, and that they had sent off a sample to be analysed. That would tell if the tumour was benign or cancerous.

I stayed in hospital to recover and had to wait for my results. That week was awful. I couldn’t sleep and I couldn’t really eat. I mentally prepared myself for the fact that it could be cancer. So, when I was called in for my appointment, and my doctor told me it was, I didn’t cry. I just said: “OK, what can we do?”

He told me that I had a very rare type of tumour called a medulloblastoma, which commonly affects children. I wondered whether the fact that it was so rare meant that they wouldn’t be able to do anything. But he said the 2 or 3 adults with this tumour he’d seen in his lifetime were alive and in remission.

Understanding what lies ahead

My doctor explained that I’d be treated the same way as a child would, with chemotherapy and radiotherapy to treat the remainder of the tumour. I was given lots of books to read about the treatments and the side effects, but I wanted to know more. So, I went on Google straight away but I couldn’t find much information about adults with medulloblastoma; most of the information was about children.

Mary having treatment

When I was having the chemotherapy and radiotherapy, most of the other people around me having treatment were also much older. I felt alone. So, I joined different forums online to find people who were like me, the same age and with the same type of tumour. And I was doing research all the time, using websites like Cancer Research UK’s to find out anything and everything I could.

I just got through it each day, but going online really did help me understand what’s ahead.

I finished my treatment in April 2017 and my scans have been clear. I don’t say that I’m in remission, I’m just glad that the tumour is still gone and hasn’t returned.

What I’ve learnt is that it’s so good to talk to others. There are people out there going through the same thing, and they’ll be able to understand what you’re going through. There’s always someone to talk to if you need to.

If you’ve been affected by cancer and would like to speak to someone, you can call our nurses on freephone 0808 800 4040, 9am until 5pm Monday to Friday. Alternatively, you can join our friendly and supportive discussion forum, Cancer Chat.



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog https://ift.tt/2NUHyGe

An easier way to search for life on Europa

Diagram depicting how radiation can destroy organic molecules on the surface of Europa. New research now shows scientists how to find the best places to look on Europa where such organics could still be intact and able to be sampled. Image via NASA/JPL-Caltech.

When it comes to the question of what places in the solar system would be the best to search for alien life, Europa immediately comes to mind. This small moon of Jupiter seems to have everything necessary – a global subsurface ocean and likely sources of heat and chemical nutrients on the ocean floor. But looking for evidence isn’t easy; the ocean lies beneath a fairly thick crust of ice, making it difficult to access. That would require drilling through many meters or even several kilometers of ice, depending on the location.

But there may be ways around that problem. It is almost certain now that plumes of water vapor can erupt from the surface, originating from the ocean below, where they could be sampled and analyzed by a flyby or orbiting probe. And now there is another potential solution – a new study, described in Space.com on July 23, 2018, shows that a lander on Europa (now in preliminary concept studies) might only have to dig a few inches/centimeters into the ice to search for evidence of active or past biology, such as amino acids.

It all depends on radiation, which Europa receives a lot of, from Jupiter. The study, led by NASA scientist Tom Nordheim, modeled the radiation environment on Europa in detail, showing how it varies from location to location. That data was then combined with other data from laboratory experiments documenting how quickly various radiation doses destroy amino acids.

Europa as seen by NASA’s Galileo spacecraft. Image via NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute.

The results, published in a new paper in Nature Astronomy, showed that equatorial regions receive about 10 times more radiation dosage than middle or high latitudes. The harshest radiation zones appear as oval-shaped regions, connected at the narrow ends, that cover more than half of Europa.

According to Chris Paranicas, a paper co-author from the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland:

This is the first prediction of radiation levels at each point on Europa’s surface and is important information for future Europa missions.

The good news from this is that a lander in the least-radiated locations would only have to dig about 0.4 inches (1 centimeter) into the ice to find viable amino acids. In more radiated areas, the lander would need to dig about 4 to 8 inches (10 to 20 cm). Even if any organisms were dead, the amino acids would still be recognizable. As Nordheim told Space.com:

Even in the harshest radiation zones on Europa, you really don’t have to do more than scratch beneath the surface to find material that isn’t heavily modified or damaged by radiation.

Artist’s conception of a future lander on Europa. Image via NASA/JPL-Caltech.

As Nordheim also noted:

If we want to understand what’s going on at the surface of Europa and how that links to the ocean underneath, we need to understand the radiation. When we examine materials that have come up from the subsurface, what are we looking at? Does this tell us what is in the ocean, or is this what happened to the materials after they have been radiated?

Kevin Hand, another co-author of the new research and project scientist for the potential Europa lander mission, elaborated a bit more:

The radiation that bombards Europa’s surface leaves a fingerprint. If we know what that fingerprint looks like, we can better understand the nature of any organics and possible biosignatures that might be detected with future missions, be they spacecraft that fly by or land on Europa.

Europa Clipper’s mission team is examining possible orbit paths, and proposed routes pass over many regions of Europa that experience lower levels of radiation. That’s good news for looking at potentially fresh ocean material that has not been heavily modified by the fingerprint of radiation.

Data from the Hubble Space Telescope in 2013 showing the location of a water vapor plume. Image via NASA/ESA/L. Roth/SWRI/University of Cologne.

Nordheim and his team used data from the old Galileo mission (1995-2003) and electron measurements from the even older Voyager 1 mission (Jupiter flyby in 1979).

Since material from the subsurface ocean is thought to be able to come up to the surface through cracks or weaker areas of ice, it should be possible to sample it right on the surface without needing to drill. That would be a huge advantage, and it would be possible to send a lander to a location where there is a relatively fresh deposit not yet completely degraded by radiation. Right now, the images of Europa’s surface are not high enough resolution, but the ones from the upcoming Europa Clipper mission will be. As noted by Nordheim:

When we get the Clipper reconnaissance, the high-resolution images – it’s just going to be a completely different picture. That Clipper reconnaissance is really key.

Artist’s conception of the Europa Clipper mission at Europa. Image via NASA.

Europa Clipper is tentatively scheduled to launch sometime in the early 2020s, and will be the first mission back to Europa since Galileo. It will perform dozens of close flybys of the moon, studying both the surface and the ocean below. Mission concepts for the lander to follow Europa Clipper are also being devised, using data from Clipper to select a landing spot. Both missions should be able to bring us closer to knowing if any kind of life exists in Europa’s dark ocean.

Bottom line: Europa’s subsurface ocean offers the tantalizing possibility of alien life elsewhere in our solar system. Drilling through the thick ice crust on top of it for a sample would be difficult though. But now new research shows that a future lander might only have to “scratch the surface” to access any organic molecules deposited from the ocean below, in areas where there is less radiation exposure. Looking for life on Europa may actually be easier than we thought.

Source: Preservation of potential biosignatures in the shallow subsurface of Europa

Space.com / Via NASA

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2LWnVwV

Diagram depicting how radiation can destroy organic molecules on the surface of Europa. New research now shows scientists how to find the best places to look on Europa where such organics could still be intact and able to be sampled. Image via NASA/JPL-Caltech.

When it comes to the question of what places in the solar system would be the best to search for alien life, Europa immediately comes to mind. This small moon of Jupiter seems to have everything necessary – a global subsurface ocean and likely sources of heat and chemical nutrients on the ocean floor. But looking for evidence isn’t easy; the ocean lies beneath a fairly thick crust of ice, making it difficult to access. That would require drilling through many meters or even several kilometers of ice, depending on the location.

But there may be ways around that problem. It is almost certain now that plumes of water vapor can erupt from the surface, originating from the ocean below, where they could be sampled and analyzed by a flyby or orbiting probe. And now there is another potential solution – a new study, described in Space.com on July 23, 2018, shows that a lander on Europa (now in preliminary concept studies) might only have to dig a few inches/centimeters into the ice to search for evidence of active or past biology, such as amino acids.

It all depends on radiation, which Europa receives a lot of, from Jupiter. The study, led by NASA scientist Tom Nordheim, modeled the radiation environment on Europa in detail, showing how it varies from location to location. That data was then combined with other data from laboratory experiments documenting how quickly various radiation doses destroy amino acids.

Europa as seen by NASA’s Galileo spacecraft. Image via NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute.

The results, published in a new paper in Nature Astronomy, showed that equatorial regions receive about 10 times more radiation dosage than middle or high latitudes. The harshest radiation zones appear as oval-shaped regions, connected at the narrow ends, that cover more than half of Europa.

According to Chris Paranicas, a paper co-author from the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland:

This is the first prediction of radiation levels at each point on Europa’s surface and is important information for future Europa missions.

The good news from this is that a lander in the least-radiated locations would only have to dig about 0.4 inches (1 centimeter) into the ice to find viable amino acids. In more radiated areas, the lander would need to dig about 4 to 8 inches (10 to 20 cm). Even if any organisms were dead, the amino acids would still be recognizable. As Nordheim told Space.com:

Even in the harshest radiation zones on Europa, you really don’t have to do more than scratch beneath the surface to find material that isn’t heavily modified or damaged by radiation.

Artist’s conception of a future lander on Europa. Image via NASA/JPL-Caltech.

As Nordheim also noted:

If we want to understand what’s going on at the surface of Europa and how that links to the ocean underneath, we need to understand the radiation. When we examine materials that have come up from the subsurface, what are we looking at? Does this tell us what is in the ocean, or is this what happened to the materials after they have been radiated?

Kevin Hand, another co-author of the new research and project scientist for the potential Europa lander mission, elaborated a bit more:

The radiation that bombards Europa’s surface leaves a fingerprint. If we know what that fingerprint looks like, we can better understand the nature of any organics and possible biosignatures that might be detected with future missions, be they spacecraft that fly by or land on Europa.

Europa Clipper’s mission team is examining possible orbit paths, and proposed routes pass over many regions of Europa that experience lower levels of radiation. That’s good news for looking at potentially fresh ocean material that has not been heavily modified by the fingerprint of radiation.

Data from the Hubble Space Telescope in 2013 showing the location of a water vapor plume. Image via NASA/ESA/L. Roth/SWRI/University of Cologne.

Nordheim and his team used data from the old Galileo mission (1995-2003) and electron measurements from the even older Voyager 1 mission (Jupiter flyby in 1979).

Since material from the subsurface ocean is thought to be able to come up to the surface through cracks or weaker areas of ice, it should be possible to sample it right on the surface without needing to drill. That would be a huge advantage, and it would be possible to send a lander to a location where there is a relatively fresh deposit not yet completely degraded by radiation. Right now, the images of Europa’s surface are not high enough resolution, but the ones from the upcoming Europa Clipper mission will be. As noted by Nordheim:

When we get the Clipper reconnaissance, the high-resolution images – it’s just going to be a completely different picture. That Clipper reconnaissance is really key.

Artist’s conception of the Europa Clipper mission at Europa. Image via NASA.

Europa Clipper is tentatively scheduled to launch sometime in the early 2020s, and will be the first mission back to Europa since Galileo. It will perform dozens of close flybys of the moon, studying both the surface and the ocean below. Mission concepts for the lander to follow Europa Clipper are also being devised, using data from Clipper to select a landing spot. Both missions should be able to bring us closer to knowing if any kind of life exists in Europa’s dark ocean.

Bottom line: Europa’s subsurface ocean offers the tantalizing possibility of alien life elsewhere in our solar system. Drilling through the thick ice crust on top of it for a sample would be difficult though. But now new research shows that a future lander might only have to “scratch the surface” to access any organic molecules deposited from the ocean below, in areas where there is less radiation exposure. Looking for life on Europa may actually be easier than we thought.

Source: Preservation of potential biosignatures in the shallow subsurface of Europa

Space.com / Via NASA

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2LWnVwV

Every point is a galaxy

See a larger image.

In the image above, from Herschel Space Observatory, every single point of light is a distant galaxy. According to a European Space Agency (ESA) statement, each of these minute marks represents the ‘heat’ emanating from dust grains lying between the stars of each galaxy. This radiation has taken many billions of years to reach us, and in most cases was emitted well before the solar system and the Earth had even formed.

This frame shows a map of the North Galactic Pole. As on Earth, astronomers define locations on a cosmic scale using a coordinate system. For the Milky Way galaxy, this coordinate system is spherical, with the sun at its center, and provides values for longitude and latitude on the sky with respect to our galaxy.

Here’s what ESA said about the image:

The North Galactic Pole lies far from the cluttered disc of the Milky Way, and offers a clean, clear view of the distant universe beyond our home galaxy. In the sky, it is located somewhere in the northern constellation of Coma Berenices (Berenice’s Hair), a region that also contains an especially rich galaxy cluster known as the Coma Cluster. Serendipitously, the Coma Cluster is included in this map, adding over 1000 points of light to the tally of individual galaxies.

Herschel was active from 2009 to 2013, and used its instruments to study the sky in the far infrared.

Bottom line: Herschel Space Observatory image of the North Galactic Pole.

Read more from ESA



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2AfWMDO

See a larger image.

In the image above, from Herschel Space Observatory, every single point of light is a distant galaxy. According to a European Space Agency (ESA) statement, each of these minute marks represents the ‘heat’ emanating from dust grains lying between the stars of each galaxy. This radiation has taken many billions of years to reach us, and in most cases was emitted well before the solar system and the Earth had even formed.

This frame shows a map of the North Galactic Pole. As on Earth, astronomers define locations on a cosmic scale using a coordinate system. For the Milky Way galaxy, this coordinate system is spherical, with the sun at its center, and provides values for longitude and latitude on the sky with respect to our galaxy.

Here’s what ESA said about the image:

The North Galactic Pole lies far from the cluttered disc of the Milky Way, and offers a clean, clear view of the distant universe beyond our home galaxy. In the sky, it is located somewhere in the northern constellation of Coma Berenices (Berenice’s Hair), a region that also contains an especially rich galaxy cluster known as the Coma Cluster. Serendipitously, the Coma Cluster is included in this map, adding over 1000 points of light to the tally of individual galaxies.

Herschel was active from 2009 to 2013, and used its instruments to study the sky in the far infrared.

Bottom line: Herschel Space Observatory image of the North Galactic Pole.

Read more from ESA



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2AfWMDO

Watch for a daytime moon this week

Jeff Hagan in Yakima, Washington wrote on July 10, 2017: “I woke up early and stepped onto the deck at our house in Yakima to check the weather. I was just in time to watch the full moon set over Mt. Adams, a 12,300-foot glaciated volcano in the Cascade Mountains. The moon appeared to be rolling down the north ridge of the mountain.”

Photo top of post: Moon just past full by Peter Lowenstein – morning of January 13, 2017 – from Mutare, Zimbabwe.

This week – beginning Monday morning, June 30, 2018 – watch for the daytime moon. No matter where you are on Earth, look generally westward after sunrise to see the moon in a clear blue daytime sky.

Why can you see the moon in the daytime now? The full moon took place just a few days ago. That means the moon is now in a waning gibbous phase, rising after nightfall and setting in a westward direction after sunrise.

If you look for the moon at the same time every morning, you’ll see it appearing higher and higher in the western sky each early morning, all week long. To understand why, think about where the sun is in early morning. The moon is moving in its orbit around Earth, drawing closer and closer to the Earth-sun line.

By August 4, the moon will be at the last quarter phase – rising around midnight and southward around dawn. Then the moon will turn new on August 11, giving us deliciously dark skies for the upcoming Perseid meteor shower.

Jeff Hagan in Yakima, Washington wrote on July 10, 2017: “I woke up early and stepped onto the deck to check the weather. I was just in time to watch the full moon set over Mt. Adams, a 12,300-foot glaciated volcano in the Cascade Mountains. The moon appeared to be rolling down the north ridge of the mountain.”

People love to see the daytime moon. They wonder about it, and ask about it. Once, a reader in Kansas City wrote in with the name “children’s moon” to describe a moon visible during the day. She said this name stemmed from the idea that children can’t stay up at night late enough to see the moon when it appears only in darkness.

That story prompted another reader to send in an alternate version for the origin of the name children’s moon. She wrote:

I heard a daytime moon was called a ‘children’s moon’ because their eyes were sharp enough to pick it out, where the old folks, with fading vision, could not tell it from the clouds.

Can you see the daytime moon in the next few mornings?

Simulation of the moon’s phase for July 11, 2017 via the US Naval Observatory.

Bottom line: In the days after every full moon, the moon appears in the west after sunrise, in a blue sky. Watch for it.

A planisphere is virtually indispensable for beginning stargazers. Order your EarthSky planisphere today.

Four keys to understanding moon phases

Total eclipse of sun: August 21, 2017



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2t3Y7VJ

Jeff Hagan in Yakima, Washington wrote on July 10, 2017: “I woke up early and stepped onto the deck at our house in Yakima to check the weather. I was just in time to watch the full moon set over Mt. Adams, a 12,300-foot glaciated volcano in the Cascade Mountains. The moon appeared to be rolling down the north ridge of the mountain.”

Photo top of post: Moon just past full by Peter Lowenstein – morning of January 13, 2017 – from Mutare, Zimbabwe.

This week – beginning Monday morning, June 30, 2018 – watch for the daytime moon. No matter where you are on Earth, look generally westward after sunrise to see the moon in a clear blue daytime sky.

Why can you see the moon in the daytime now? The full moon took place just a few days ago. That means the moon is now in a waning gibbous phase, rising after nightfall and setting in a westward direction after sunrise.

If you look for the moon at the same time every morning, you’ll see it appearing higher and higher in the western sky each early morning, all week long. To understand why, think about where the sun is in early morning. The moon is moving in its orbit around Earth, drawing closer and closer to the Earth-sun line.

By August 4, the moon will be at the last quarter phase – rising around midnight and southward around dawn. Then the moon will turn new on August 11, giving us deliciously dark skies for the upcoming Perseid meteor shower.

Jeff Hagan in Yakima, Washington wrote on July 10, 2017: “I woke up early and stepped onto the deck to check the weather. I was just in time to watch the full moon set over Mt. Adams, a 12,300-foot glaciated volcano in the Cascade Mountains. The moon appeared to be rolling down the north ridge of the mountain.”

People love to see the daytime moon. They wonder about it, and ask about it. Once, a reader in Kansas City wrote in with the name “children’s moon” to describe a moon visible during the day. She said this name stemmed from the idea that children can’t stay up at night late enough to see the moon when it appears only in darkness.

That story prompted another reader to send in an alternate version for the origin of the name children’s moon. She wrote:

I heard a daytime moon was called a ‘children’s moon’ because their eyes were sharp enough to pick it out, where the old folks, with fading vision, could not tell it from the clouds.

Can you see the daytime moon in the next few mornings?

Simulation of the moon’s phase for July 11, 2017 via the US Naval Observatory.

Bottom line: In the days after every full moon, the moon appears in the west after sunrise, in a blue sky. Watch for it.

A planisphere is virtually indispensable for beginning stargazers. Order your EarthSky planisphere today.

Four keys to understanding moon phases

Total eclipse of sun: August 21, 2017



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2t3Y7VJ

2018 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #30

A chronological listing of news articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week.

Editor's Pick

How Did the End of the World Become Old News?

Wildfire Arctic Circle Sweden July 2018 

The fire this time (in Sweden). Photo: Mats Andersson/AFP/Getty Images

There has been a lot of burning lately. Last week, wildfires broke out in the Arctic Circle, where temperatures reached almost 90 degrees; they are still roiling northern Sweden, 21 of them. And this week, wildfires swept through the Greek seaside, outside Athens, killing at least 80 and hospitalizing almost 200. At one resort, dozens of guests tried to escape the flames by descending a narrow stone staircase into the Aegean, only to be engulfed along the way, dying literally in each other’s arms.

Last July, I wrote a much-talked-over magazine cover story considering the worst-case scenarios for climate change — much talked over, in part, because it was so terrifying, which made some of the scenarios a bit hard to believe. Those worst-case scenarios are still quite unlikely, since they require both that we do nothing to alter our emissions path, which is still arcing upward, and that those unabated emissions bring us to climate outcomes on the far end of what’s possible by 2100.

But, this July, we already seem much farther along on those paths than even the most alarmist climate observers — e.g., me — would have predicted a year ago. In a single week earlier this month, dozens of places around the world were hit with record temperatures in what was, effectively, an unprecedented, planet-encompassing heat wave: from Denver to Burlington to Ottawa; from Glasgow to Shannon to Belfast; from Tbilisi, in Georgia, and Yerevan, in Armenia, to whole swaths of southern Russia. The temperature of one city in Oman, where the daytime highs had reached 122 degrees Fahrenheit, did not drop below 108 all night; in Montreal, Canada, 50 died from the heat. That same week, 30 major wildfires burned in the American West, including one, in California, that grew at the rate of 10,000 football fields each hour, and another, in Colorado, that produced a volcano-like 300-foot eruption of flames, swallowing an entire subdivision and inventing a new term — “fire tsunami” — along the way. On the other side of the planet, biblical rains flooded Japan, where 1.2 million were evacuated from their homes. The following week, the heat struck there, killing dozens. The following week. 

How Did the End of the World Become Old News? by David Wallace-Wells, The Daily Intelligencer, New York Magazine. July 26, 2018


Links posted on Facebook

Sun July 22, 2018

Mon July 23, 2018

Tue July 24, 2018

Wed July 25, 2018

Thu July 26, 2018

Fri July 27, 2018

Sat July 28, 2018



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2vfLgCI
A chronological listing of news articles posted on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week.

Editor's Pick

How Did the End of the World Become Old News?

Wildfire Arctic Circle Sweden July 2018 

The fire this time (in Sweden). Photo: Mats Andersson/AFP/Getty Images

There has been a lot of burning lately. Last week, wildfires broke out in the Arctic Circle, where temperatures reached almost 90 degrees; they are still roiling northern Sweden, 21 of them. And this week, wildfires swept through the Greek seaside, outside Athens, killing at least 80 and hospitalizing almost 200. At one resort, dozens of guests tried to escape the flames by descending a narrow stone staircase into the Aegean, only to be engulfed along the way, dying literally in each other’s arms.

Last July, I wrote a much-talked-over magazine cover story considering the worst-case scenarios for climate change — much talked over, in part, because it was so terrifying, which made some of the scenarios a bit hard to believe. Those worst-case scenarios are still quite unlikely, since they require both that we do nothing to alter our emissions path, which is still arcing upward, and that those unabated emissions bring us to climate outcomes on the far end of what’s possible by 2100.

But, this July, we already seem much farther along on those paths than even the most alarmist climate observers — e.g., me — would have predicted a year ago. In a single week earlier this month, dozens of places around the world were hit with record temperatures in what was, effectively, an unprecedented, planet-encompassing heat wave: from Denver to Burlington to Ottawa; from Glasgow to Shannon to Belfast; from Tbilisi, in Georgia, and Yerevan, in Armenia, to whole swaths of southern Russia. The temperature of one city in Oman, where the daytime highs had reached 122 degrees Fahrenheit, did not drop below 108 all night; in Montreal, Canada, 50 died from the heat. That same week, 30 major wildfires burned in the American West, including one, in California, that grew at the rate of 10,000 football fields each hour, and another, in Colorado, that produced a volcano-like 300-foot eruption of flames, swallowing an entire subdivision and inventing a new term — “fire tsunami” — along the way. On the other side of the planet, biblical rains flooded Japan, where 1.2 million were evacuated from their homes. The following week, the heat struck there, killing dozens. The following week. 

How Did the End of the World Become Old News? by David Wallace-Wells, The Daily Intelligencer, New York Magazine. July 26, 2018


Links posted on Facebook

Sun July 22, 2018

Mon July 23, 2018

Tue July 24, 2018

Wed July 25, 2018

Thu July 26, 2018

Fri July 27, 2018

Sat July 28, 2018



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2vfLgCI

Full moon eclipse and Mars

Prabhakaran A wrote from Trichy, India: “The full moon on the night of July 27-28, 2018 presented the longest and darkest total lunar eclipse of the 21st century. Totality spanned 1 hour 42 minutes and 57 seconds. The most distant and smallest full moon of the year passed through the center of the Earth’s dark umbral shadow which reached its maximum length and width for the year. This beautiful eclipse happened on the same night of Mars opposition.”

Tracey Slaven captured the moon and Mars from Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Canon 600D
600 Tamron lens.

Full moon eclipse with Mars nearby, a view from the Rheinwiesen in Düsseldorf, Germany from Radhika Mohan.

Total lunar eclipse as seen from jaipur, India from Priyanka Chobey.

Tom Thrasher wrote: “Shot from my level 4 floor balcony which is looking west out over the Indian Ocean ‘towards South Africa,’ as we say. Had to be very patient for clouds to pass over, but then sky opened up very clear. I cropped out Mars as it was so bright in photo and therefore appear blurred. Fantastic early morning experience. I read EarthSky every day and look up info using Star Walk 2 or Solar Walk 2.” That’s a great way to use EarthSky, Tom! We also hear good things about the online planetarium software Stellarium.

Stages of lunar eclipse from Abhishek Bethanabotla in Hyderabad, India.

Bottom line: Photos of the total lunar eclipse of July 27, 2018 – longest lunar eclipse of the 21st century – from the EarthSky community. During this eclipse, the planet Mars was near the moon and brighter than it had been since 2003.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2uXmmIS

Prabhakaran A wrote from Trichy, India: “The full moon on the night of July 27-28, 2018 presented the longest and darkest total lunar eclipse of the 21st century. Totality spanned 1 hour 42 minutes and 57 seconds. The most distant and smallest full moon of the year passed through the center of the Earth’s dark umbral shadow which reached its maximum length and width for the year. This beautiful eclipse happened on the same night of Mars opposition.”

Tracey Slaven captured the moon and Mars from Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Canon 600D
600 Tamron lens.

Full moon eclipse with Mars nearby, a view from the Rheinwiesen in Düsseldorf, Germany from Radhika Mohan.

Total lunar eclipse as seen from jaipur, India from Priyanka Chobey.

Tom Thrasher wrote: “Shot from my level 4 floor balcony which is looking west out over the Indian Ocean ‘towards South Africa,’ as we say. Had to be very patient for clouds to pass over, but then sky opened up very clear. I cropped out Mars as it was so bright in photo and therefore appear blurred. Fantastic early morning experience. I read EarthSky every day and look up info using Star Walk 2 or Solar Walk 2.” That’s a great way to use EarthSky, Tom! We also hear good things about the online planetarium software Stellarium.

Stages of lunar eclipse from Abhishek Bethanabotla in Hyderabad, India.

Bottom line: Photos of the total lunar eclipse of July 27, 2018 – longest lunar eclipse of the 21st century – from the EarthSky community. During this eclipse, the planet Mars was near the moon and brighter than it had been since 2003.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2uXmmIS