Astronomers detect earliest hydrogen

Hydrogen – whose atomic number is 1 – is the simplest element, the lightest element and the most abundant element in the universe. Shortly after the Big Bang, our universe is thought to have been made of mostly hydrogen, with a little helium and not much else. Not surprisingly, most stars are made mostly of hydrogen. So hydrogen is a key element in our universe, and in the theories of astronomers. That’s why it’s important to astronomers that they’ve now directly detected faint signals of hydrogen gas – via a table-sized radio antenna in a remote region of western Australia – in the universe as it existed only 100 million years after the Big Bang.

The study outlining this discovery is published February 28, 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature.

Astronomers said it’s the earliest evidence of hydrogen yet.

They said they found this hydrogen in a state that would have been possible only in the presence of the very first stars. Their statement explained:

These stars, blinking on for the first time in a universe that was previously devoid of light, emitted ultraviolet radiation that interacted with the surrounding hydrogen gas. As a result, hydrogen atoms across the universe began to absorb background radiation — a pivotal change that the scientists were able to detect in the form of radio waves.

The findings provide evidence that the first stars may have started turning on around 180 million years after the Big Bang.

Alan Rogers at MIT’s Haystack Observatory is a co-author on the new study. He said:

This is the first real signal that stars are starting to form, and starting to affect the [interstellar] medium around them. What’s happening in this period is that some of the radiation from the very first stars is starting to allow hydrogen to be seen. It’s causing hydrogen to start absorbing the background radiation, so you start seeing it in silhouette, at particular radio frequencies.

A key part of this study for scientists is what it reveals about the early universe. According to these astronomers’ statement:

Certain characteristics in the detected radio waves also suggest that hydrogen gas, and the universe as a whole, must have been twice as cold as scientists previously estimated, with a temperature of about 3 kelvins, or –454 degrees Fahrenheit. Rogers and his colleagues are unsure precisely why the early universe was so much colder, but some researchers have suggested that interactions with dark matter may have played some role.

Colin Lonsdale, director of Haystack Observatory, commented:

These results require some changes in our current understanding of the early evolution of the universe. It would affect cosmological models and require theorists to put their thinking caps back on to figure out how that would happen.

The scientists detected the primordial hydrogen gas using EDGES (Experiment to Detect Global EoR Signature), a small ground-based radio antenna located in western Australia. Rogers and his colleagues have been using EDGES to try to detect hydrogen that existed during the very early evolution of the universe, in order to pinpoint when the first stars turned on.

The researchers say this new detection lifts the curtain on a previously obscure phase in the evolution of the universe. Lonsdale said:

This is exciting because it is the first look into a particularly important period in the universe, when the first stars and galaxies were beginning to form. This is the first time anybody’s had any direct observational data from that epoch.

Artist’s concept of the early universe from Physics World.

Bottom line: Astronomers have made the earliest-yet detection of hydrogen in our universe, from a time only 180 million years after the Big Bang.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2Fbu4Fz

Hydrogen – whose atomic number is 1 – is the simplest element, the lightest element and the most abundant element in the universe. Shortly after the Big Bang, our universe is thought to have been made of mostly hydrogen, with a little helium and not much else. Not surprisingly, most stars are made mostly of hydrogen. So hydrogen is a key element in our universe, and in the theories of astronomers. That’s why it’s important to astronomers that they’ve now directly detected faint signals of hydrogen gas – via a table-sized radio antenna in a remote region of western Australia – in the universe as it existed only 100 million years after the Big Bang.

The study outlining this discovery is published February 28, 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature.

Astronomers said it’s the earliest evidence of hydrogen yet.

They said they found this hydrogen in a state that would have been possible only in the presence of the very first stars. Their statement explained:

These stars, blinking on for the first time in a universe that was previously devoid of light, emitted ultraviolet radiation that interacted with the surrounding hydrogen gas. As a result, hydrogen atoms across the universe began to absorb background radiation — a pivotal change that the scientists were able to detect in the form of radio waves.

The findings provide evidence that the first stars may have started turning on around 180 million years after the Big Bang.

Alan Rogers at MIT’s Haystack Observatory is a co-author on the new study. He said:

This is the first real signal that stars are starting to form, and starting to affect the [interstellar] medium around them. What’s happening in this period is that some of the radiation from the very first stars is starting to allow hydrogen to be seen. It’s causing hydrogen to start absorbing the background radiation, so you start seeing it in silhouette, at particular radio frequencies.

A key part of this study for scientists is what it reveals about the early universe. According to these astronomers’ statement:

Certain characteristics in the detected radio waves also suggest that hydrogen gas, and the universe as a whole, must have been twice as cold as scientists previously estimated, with a temperature of about 3 kelvins, or –454 degrees Fahrenheit. Rogers and his colleagues are unsure precisely why the early universe was so much colder, but some researchers have suggested that interactions with dark matter may have played some role.

Colin Lonsdale, director of Haystack Observatory, commented:

These results require some changes in our current understanding of the early evolution of the universe. It would affect cosmological models and require theorists to put their thinking caps back on to figure out how that would happen.

The scientists detected the primordial hydrogen gas using EDGES (Experiment to Detect Global EoR Signature), a small ground-based radio antenna located in western Australia. Rogers and his colleagues have been using EDGES to try to detect hydrogen that existed during the very early evolution of the universe, in order to pinpoint when the first stars turned on.

The researchers say this new detection lifts the curtain on a previously obscure phase in the evolution of the universe. Lonsdale said:

This is exciting because it is the first look into a particularly important period in the universe, when the first stars and galaxies were beginning to form. This is the first time anybody’s had any direct observational data from that epoch.

Artist’s concept of the early universe from Physics World.

Bottom line: Astronomers have made the earliest-yet detection of hydrogen in our universe, from a time only 180 million years after the Big Bang.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2Fbu4Fz

Emory team vies for best social bot via Amazon's Alexa Prize

Team leader Zihao Wang (center, bottom row) and faculty advisor Eugene Agichtein (far right) with the Mathematics and Computer Science student team who are working on creating a social bot to compete in Amazon's Alexa Prize. (Photo by Ann Borden, Emory Photo/Video)

By Carol Clark

“Alexa, when will you learn to chat with me like people I might meet at a party or a pub?”

“I couldn’t say.”

Alexa may be a popular talking bot, but she has not yet acquired the “social” skills to turn that query into a conversation. A team of Emory students from the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science are trying to help her develop those skills sooner, rather than later. They are among eight university teams selected from around the world to create a social bot and compete for this year’s Alexa Prize. Amazon is sponsoring the $3.5 million university challenge in order to advance the conversational capabilities of bots such as Alexa — Amazon’s “personal assistant” software that responds to voice commands through a growing list of devices.

“Conversational AI is one of the most difficult problems in the field of artificial intelligence,” says Zihao Wang, a graduate student and the leader of the Emory team. “Human language is so rich. We use combinations of words to form different expressions and idioms. It’s difficult to represent them in computer language.”

Wang’s teammates include Ali Ahmadvand, Sergey Volokhin and Harshita Sahijwani — all graduate students — and senior Mingyang Sun. The team’s faculty advisor is Eugene Agichtein, an associate professor of Mathematics and Computer Science.

Each of the university teams received a $250,000 research grant, Alexa-enabled devices, and other tools, data and support from Amazon. A $500,000 prize will be given next November to the team that creates the best social bot, while second- and third-place teams will receive $100,000 and $50,000.

Additionally, a $1 million research grant will be awarded to the winning team’s university if their social bot achieves the grand challenge — conversing coherently and engagingly with humans for 20 minutes with a user rating of 4.0 or higher.

“The contest is a wonderful way for students to get hands-on experience developing a social bot using state-of-the-art technology,” Agichtein says. “Their work will be tested out by millions of real-world consumers through Amazon. And Amazon provides support and training so they can get experience with data and computing environments that are usually only accessible to those within major corporations.”

Agichtein’s IR Lab is developing new techniques for intelligent information access, including Web search and automated question answering. Conversational search capabilities are a key emerging trend, he says.

He notes that his children love asking Alexa trivia questions or about music and sports. “It’s natural for them to talk to devices instead of having to type in a question because they’re growing up amid this technology,” Agichtein says. “And as time goes on, it’s clear that voice-based communication devices are going to keep improving and become more ubiquitous.”

Wang is a native of China who earned his master’s in civil engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. A robotics project sparked his interest in information retrieval powered by machine learning, leading him to Emory and Agichtein’s lab to work on his PhD.

“Machine learning is widely applied in the real world,” Wang says. “It’s changing peoples’ lives in every way.”

Autonomous vehicles, drones, online shopping mechanisms and robots designed to detect and remove dangerous objects are just a few examples of how machine learning is being applied.

 “The idea is to train an algorithm to ‘learn’ patterns embedded in data,” Wang explains.

While a machine learning algorithm to simulate natural, human conversation is a difficult challenge, Wang says it’s one well worth pursuing.

Possible healthcare uses for conversational social bots include providing companionship to isolated seniors, serving as therapeutic agents for people suffering from depression and conducting patient interviews to streamline admissions to a medical clinic.

Wang also led an Emory team in the inaugural Alexa contest last year, but the team did not make it to the finals. “We learned a lot from the experience,” he says.

The working title for the Emory social bot this year is IRIS, which stands for information retrieval and informative suggestion agent. “Our focus will be on the accuracy and usefulness of information that we provide to users,” Wang says. “And we will add conversational functionality to our design to make the responses as natural and engaging as possible.”

IRIS will incorporate “ideas from each member of the team,” he adds. “That’s one of the most fun things about the contest, is working as a team.”

Starting in May, the public can access competing bots to provide feedback and rate them by saying, “Alexa, lets chat,” to an Echo device, or to the Amazon mobile app. The bots will be randomly assigned and remain anonymous, so that people providing feedback cannot identify the university that generated them.

By August, Amazon will have used this feedback to winnow the contestants down to three finalists that will continue to get more consumer feedback until the winner is announced in November.

Other university teams competing this year include: Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, Scotland, Czech Technical University in Prague, Brigham Young University, UC Davis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, UC Santa Cruz, and Carnegie Mellon.

Related:
Raising IQ of web searches
Mouse trail leads to online shoppers

from eScienceCommons http://ift.tt/2oEymLs
Team leader Zihao Wang (center, bottom row) and faculty advisor Eugene Agichtein (far right) with the Mathematics and Computer Science student team who are working on creating a social bot to compete in Amazon's Alexa Prize. (Photo by Ann Borden, Emory Photo/Video)

By Carol Clark

“Alexa, when will you learn to chat with me like people I might meet at a party or a pub?”

“I couldn’t say.”

Alexa may be a popular talking bot, but she has not yet acquired the “social” skills to turn that query into a conversation. A team of Emory students from the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science are trying to help her develop those skills sooner, rather than later. They are among eight university teams selected from around the world to create a social bot and compete for this year’s Alexa Prize. Amazon is sponsoring the $3.5 million university challenge in order to advance the conversational capabilities of bots such as Alexa — Amazon’s “personal assistant” software that responds to voice commands through a growing list of devices.

“Conversational AI is one of the most difficult problems in the field of artificial intelligence,” says Zihao Wang, a graduate student and the leader of the Emory team. “Human language is so rich. We use combinations of words to form different expressions and idioms. It’s difficult to represent them in computer language.”

Wang’s teammates include Ali Ahmadvand, Sergey Volokhin and Harshita Sahijwani — all graduate students — and senior Mingyang Sun. The team’s faculty advisor is Eugene Agichtein, an associate professor of Mathematics and Computer Science.

Each of the university teams received a $250,000 research grant, Alexa-enabled devices, and other tools, data and support from Amazon. A $500,000 prize will be given next November to the team that creates the best social bot, while second- and third-place teams will receive $100,000 and $50,000.

Additionally, a $1 million research grant will be awarded to the winning team’s university if their social bot achieves the grand challenge — conversing coherently and engagingly with humans for 20 minutes with a user rating of 4.0 or higher.

“The contest is a wonderful way for students to get hands-on experience developing a social bot using state-of-the-art technology,” Agichtein says. “Their work will be tested out by millions of real-world consumers through Amazon. And Amazon provides support and training so they can get experience with data and computing environments that are usually only accessible to those within major corporations.”

Agichtein’s IR Lab is developing new techniques for intelligent information access, including Web search and automated question answering. Conversational search capabilities are a key emerging trend, he says.

He notes that his children love asking Alexa trivia questions or about music and sports. “It’s natural for them to talk to devices instead of having to type in a question because they’re growing up amid this technology,” Agichtein says. “And as time goes on, it’s clear that voice-based communication devices are going to keep improving and become more ubiquitous.”

Wang is a native of China who earned his master’s in civil engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. A robotics project sparked his interest in information retrieval powered by machine learning, leading him to Emory and Agichtein’s lab to work on his PhD.

“Machine learning is widely applied in the real world,” Wang says. “It’s changing peoples’ lives in every way.”

Autonomous vehicles, drones, online shopping mechanisms and robots designed to detect and remove dangerous objects are just a few examples of how machine learning is being applied.

 “The idea is to train an algorithm to ‘learn’ patterns embedded in data,” Wang explains.

While a machine learning algorithm to simulate natural, human conversation is a difficult challenge, Wang says it’s one well worth pursuing.

Possible healthcare uses for conversational social bots include providing companionship to isolated seniors, serving as therapeutic agents for people suffering from depression and conducting patient interviews to streamline admissions to a medical clinic.

Wang also led an Emory team in the inaugural Alexa contest last year, but the team did not make it to the finals. “We learned a lot from the experience,” he says.

The working title for the Emory social bot this year is IRIS, which stands for information retrieval and informative suggestion agent. “Our focus will be on the accuracy and usefulness of information that we provide to users,” Wang says. “And we will add conversational functionality to our design to make the responses as natural and engaging as possible.”

IRIS will incorporate “ideas from each member of the team,” he adds. “That’s one of the most fun things about the contest, is working as a team.”

Starting in May, the public can access competing bots to provide feedback and rate them by saying, “Alexa, lets chat,” to an Echo device, or to the Amazon mobile app. The bots will be randomly assigned and remain anonymous, so that people providing feedback cannot identify the university that generated them.

By August, Amazon will have used this feedback to winnow the contestants down to three finalists that will continue to get more consumer feedback until the winner is announced in November.

Other university teams competing this year include: Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, Scotland, Czech Technical University in Prague, Brigham Young University, UC Davis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, UC Santa Cruz, and Carnegie Mellon.

Related:
Raising IQ of web searches
Mouse trail leads to online shoppers

from eScienceCommons http://ift.tt/2oEymLs

This asteroid will pass closer than the moon on Friday

Near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1 will have an extremely close encounter with Earth on March 2, 2018. It will pass only 65,000 miles (105,000 km) above the Earth’s surface. That’s about one-third of the moon’s average distance from Earth. And it’s in contrast to last Sunday’s close approach of another asteroid, 2018 DU, which swept past at about 175,000 miles (284,000 km). No, there is nothing unusual happening, no swarm of asteroids striking Earth or about to strike. Like Sunday’s passage of 2018 DU, this asteroid will pass safely, astronomers say.

The fact is that small asteroids pass us all the time, and have been passing us for billions of years. 2018 DV1 will be the 18th known asteroid to flyby Earth within 1 lunar distance since the start of 2018 and 6th closest.

We’re just hearing about them more now, because astronomers are getting much better at detecting and reporting these relatively small space rocks. 2018 DV1 has an estimated diameter in the range of about 20 to 40 feet (5.6 to 12 meters). That means it will be visible only with powerful-enough telescopes.

The Virtual Telescope Project and Tenagra Observatories will show 2018 DV1 to you live, using the 16-inch robotic telescope available at Tenagra Observatories in Arizona.

Click here to visit Virtual Telescope Project’s viewing page

The Mt. Lemmon Survey in Arizona discovered near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1. The Minor Planet Center announced it on February 27, 2018.

Small asteroids don’t always just pass closely. They also sometimes whoosh into Earth’s atmosphere, creating atom-bomb-scale impacts. Fortunately, our atmosphere does a good job of protecting us from these events, although there are sometimes human effects as with the February 15, 2015 explosion of a small asteroid over Russia.

Bottom line: Information and links to live viewing of near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1, which will pass at about one-third of the moon’s distance on March 2, 2018.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2BYBASn

Near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1 will have an extremely close encounter with Earth on March 2, 2018. It will pass only 65,000 miles (105,000 km) above the Earth’s surface. That’s about one-third of the moon’s average distance from Earth. And it’s in contrast to last Sunday’s close approach of another asteroid, 2018 DU, which swept past at about 175,000 miles (284,000 km). No, there is nothing unusual happening, no swarm of asteroids striking Earth or about to strike. Like Sunday’s passage of 2018 DU, this asteroid will pass safely, astronomers say.

The fact is that small asteroids pass us all the time, and have been passing us for billions of years. 2018 DV1 will be the 18th known asteroid to flyby Earth within 1 lunar distance since the start of 2018 and 6th closest.

We’re just hearing about them more now, because astronomers are getting much better at detecting and reporting these relatively small space rocks. 2018 DV1 has an estimated diameter in the range of about 20 to 40 feet (5.6 to 12 meters). That means it will be visible only with powerful-enough telescopes.

The Virtual Telescope Project and Tenagra Observatories will show 2018 DV1 to you live, using the 16-inch robotic telescope available at Tenagra Observatories in Arizona.

Click here to visit Virtual Telescope Project’s viewing page

The Mt. Lemmon Survey in Arizona discovered near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1. The Minor Planet Center announced it on February 27, 2018.

Small asteroids don’t always just pass closely. They also sometimes whoosh into Earth’s atmosphere, creating atom-bomb-scale impacts. Fortunately, our atmosphere does a good job of protecting us from these events, although there are sometimes human effects as with the February 15, 2015 explosion of a small asteroid over Russia.

Bottom line: Information and links to live viewing of near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1, which will pass at about one-third of the moon’s distance on March 2, 2018.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2BYBASn

Eating Disorders, Disordered Eating: A Look Into the Personal Struggle for Balance

Eating disorders, which are a mix of psychological, physiological, and behavioral factors, can affect every system in the body. This National Eating Disorders Awareness Week, learn a little more about the complex issues sufferers face.

from http://ift.tt/2BWgZxH
Eating disorders, which are a mix of psychological, physiological, and behavioral factors, can affect every system in the body. This National Eating Disorders Awareness Week, learn a little more about the complex issues sufferers face.

from http://ift.tt/2BWgZxH

Moon’s water might be widespread

Waxing moon – February 26, 2018 – via Vidhyacharan HR in Waltham, Massachusetts. If the moon has enough water, and if it’s reasonably convenient to access, future explorers might be able to use it as a resource.

Any liquid water on the moon’s surface would be quickly lost to outer space. But since the 1960s, scientists have suggested that water ice might exist in cold, permanently shadowed craters at the moon’s poles. Since then, scientists have been searching for lunar water via specially designed instruments aboard various space missions. Now a new study suggests that the moon’s water is widely distributed across its surface and not confined to a particular region or type of terrain. The water appears to be present day and night … but it’s not necessarily easily accessible. The study took the form of an analysis of data from two lunar missions. It was published February 12, 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Geoscience.

According to the researchers, the findings could help determine the origin of the moon’s water, and how easy it might be to use as a resource for future astronauts. If the moon has enough water, and if it’s reasonably convenient to access, future explorers might be able to use it as drinking water or to convert it into hydrogen and oxygen for rocket fuel or oxygen to breathe.

Joshua Bandfield is a senior research scientist with the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, and lead author of the new study. Bandfield said in a statement:

We find that it doesn’t matter what time of day or which latitude we look at, the signal indicating water always seems to be present. The presence of water doesn’t appear to depend on the composition of the surface, and the water sticks around.

The results contradict some earlier studies, which had suggested that more water was detected at the moon’s polar latitudes and that the strength of the water signal waxes and wanes according to the lunar day (29.5 Earth days). According to a NASA statement:

Taking these together, some researchers proposed that water molecules can “hop” across the lunar surface until they enter cold traps in the dark reaches of craters near the north and south poles. In planetary science, a cold trap is a region that’s so cold, the water vapor and other volatiles which come into contact with the surface will remain stable for an extended period of time, perhaps up to several billion years.

The new finding of widespread and relatively immobile water suggests that it may be present primarily as OH, a more reactive relative of H2O that is made of one oxygen atom and one hydrogen atom. OH, also called hydroxyl, doesn’t stay on its own for long, preferring to attack molecules or attach itself chemically to them. Hydroxyl would therefore have to be extracted from minerals in order to be used.

The research also suggests that any H2O present on the moon isn’t loosely attached to the surface. Michael Poston of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, said:

By putting some limits on how mobile the water or the OH on the surface is, we can help constrain how much water could reach the cold traps in the polar regions.

The researchers are still discussing what the findings tell them about the source of the moon’s water. They suggest that the OH and/or H2O might be created by the solar wind hitting the lunar surface, though the team didn’t rule out that OH and/or H2O could come from the moon itself, slowly released from deep inside minerals where it has been locked since the moon was formed.

Read more about this study from NASA

Bottom line: The moon’s water is widely distributed across its surface, says a new study.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2F8DOAy

Waxing moon – February 26, 2018 – via Vidhyacharan HR in Waltham, Massachusetts. If the moon has enough water, and if it’s reasonably convenient to access, future explorers might be able to use it as a resource.

Any liquid water on the moon’s surface would be quickly lost to outer space. But since the 1960s, scientists have suggested that water ice might exist in cold, permanently shadowed craters at the moon’s poles. Since then, scientists have been searching for lunar water via specially designed instruments aboard various space missions. Now a new study suggests that the moon’s water is widely distributed across its surface and not confined to a particular region or type of terrain. The water appears to be present day and night … but it’s not necessarily easily accessible. The study took the form of an analysis of data from two lunar missions. It was published February 12, 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Geoscience.

According to the researchers, the findings could help determine the origin of the moon’s water, and how easy it might be to use as a resource for future astronauts. If the moon has enough water, and if it’s reasonably convenient to access, future explorers might be able to use it as drinking water or to convert it into hydrogen and oxygen for rocket fuel or oxygen to breathe.

Joshua Bandfield is a senior research scientist with the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, and lead author of the new study. Bandfield said in a statement:

We find that it doesn’t matter what time of day or which latitude we look at, the signal indicating water always seems to be present. The presence of water doesn’t appear to depend on the composition of the surface, and the water sticks around.

The results contradict some earlier studies, which had suggested that more water was detected at the moon’s polar latitudes and that the strength of the water signal waxes and wanes according to the lunar day (29.5 Earth days). According to a NASA statement:

Taking these together, some researchers proposed that water molecules can “hop” across the lunar surface until they enter cold traps in the dark reaches of craters near the north and south poles. In planetary science, a cold trap is a region that’s so cold, the water vapor and other volatiles which come into contact with the surface will remain stable for an extended period of time, perhaps up to several billion years.

The new finding of widespread and relatively immobile water suggests that it may be present primarily as OH, a more reactive relative of H2O that is made of one oxygen atom and one hydrogen atom. OH, also called hydroxyl, doesn’t stay on its own for long, preferring to attack molecules or attach itself chemically to them. Hydroxyl would therefore have to be extracted from minerals in order to be used.

The research also suggests that any H2O present on the moon isn’t loosely attached to the surface. Michael Poston of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, said:

By putting some limits on how mobile the water or the OH on the surface is, we can help constrain how much water could reach the cold traps in the polar regions.

The researchers are still discussing what the findings tell them about the source of the moon’s water. They suggest that the OH and/or H2O might be created by the solar wind hitting the lunar surface, though the team didn’t rule out that OH and/or H2O could come from the moon itself, slowly released from deep inside minerals where it has been locked since the moon was formed.

Read more about this study from NASA

Bottom line: The moon’s water is widely distributed across its surface, says a new study.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2F8DOAy

How naked mole rats stay cancer-free

If you like cute, naked mole rats might not be your favorite rodent. They have large buck teeth and wrinkled, hairless bodies. But researchers find them intriguing. That’s because naked mole rats have the longest lifespan of any rodent (average is 30 years), they’re resistant to a variety of age-related diseases – such as cancer – and tend to remain fit and active until very advanced ages. What’s their secret?

A new paper published December 28, 2017, in the journal PNAS suggests part of the answer might lie in an anticancer mechanism called cellular senescence, which, the researchers suggest, operates in a special way in mole rats.

Image via redbrick.

Cellular senescence is an evolutionary adaptation that prevents damaged cells from dividing out of control and developing into full-blown cancer. However, senescence has a negative side too: by stopping cell division in order to prevent potential tumors, it also accelerates aging.

Previous studies have indicated that when cells that had undergone senescence were removed from mice, the mice were less frail in advanced age as compared to mice that aged naturally with senescent cells intact.

But is eliminating senescence actually the key to preventing or reversing age-related diseases, namely cancer? Vera Gorbunov of the University of Rochester is a study author. She said in a statement:

In humans, as in mice, aging and cancer have competing interests. In order to prevent cancer, you need to stop cells from dividing. However, to prevent aging, you want to keep cells dividing in order to replenish tissues.

For the study, the researchers compared the senescence response of naked mole rats to that of mice, which live a tenth as long — only about two to three years. Researcher Andrei Seluanov is a University of Rochester biology professor. Seluanov said:

We wanted to look at these animals that pretty much don’t age and see if they also had senescent cells or if they evolved to get rid of cell senescence.

Their unexpected discovery? Naked mole rats do experience cellular senescence, yet they continue to live long, healthy lives; eliminating the senescence mechanism is not the key to their long life span. Gorbunova said:

It was surprising to us that despite its remarkable longevity the naked mole rat has cells that undergo senescence like mouse cells.

The researchers found that although naked mole rats exhibited cellular senescence similar to mice, their senescent cells also displayed unique features that may contribute to their cancer resistance and longevity.

The cellular senescence mechanism permanently arrests a cell to prevent it from dividing, but the cell still continues to metabolize. The researchers found that naked mole rats are able to more strongly inhibit the metabolic process of the senescent cells, resulting in higher resistance to the damaging effects of senescence. Gorbunova said:

In naked mole rats, senescent cells are better behaved. When you compare the signals from the mouse versus from the naked mole rat, all the genes in the mouse are a mess. In the naked mole rat, everything is more organized. The naked mole rat didn’t get rid of the senescence, but maybe it made it a bit more structured.

Although evolution of a long life span does not eliminate senescence, the more structured response to senescence may have an evolutionary basis, said Yang Zhao, lead author of the study.

We believe there was some strategy during the evolution of naked mole rats that allowed them to have more systematic changes in their genes and have more orchestrated pathways being regulated. We believe this is beneficial for longevity and cancer resistance.

Bottom line: New research into the puzzle of how naked mole rats stay so cancer-free.

Read more from the University of Rochester



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ovDS3t

If you like cute, naked mole rats might not be your favorite rodent. They have large buck teeth and wrinkled, hairless bodies. But researchers find them intriguing. That’s because naked mole rats have the longest lifespan of any rodent (average is 30 years), they’re resistant to a variety of age-related diseases – such as cancer – and tend to remain fit and active until very advanced ages. What’s their secret?

A new paper published December 28, 2017, in the journal PNAS suggests part of the answer might lie in an anticancer mechanism called cellular senescence, which, the researchers suggest, operates in a special way in mole rats.

Image via redbrick.

Cellular senescence is an evolutionary adaptation that prevents damaged cells from dividing out of control and developing into full-blown cancer. However, senescence has a negative side too: by stopping cell division in order to prevent potential tumors, it also accelerates aging.

Previous studies have indicated that when cells that had undergone senescence were removed from mice, the mice were less frail in advanced age as compared to mice that aged naturally with senescent cells intact.

But is eliminating senescence actually the key to preventing or reversing age-related diseases, namely cancer? Vera Gorbunov of the University of Rochester is a study author. She said in a statement:

In humans, as in mice, aging and cancer have competing interests. In order to prevent cancer, you need to stop cells from dividing. However, to prevent aging, you want to keep cells dividing in order to replenish tissues.

For the study, the researchers compared the senescence response of naked mole rats to that of mice, which live a tenth as long — only about two to three years. Researcher Andrei Seluanov is a University of Rochester biology professor. Seluanov said:

We wanted to look at these animals that pretty much don’t age and see if they also had senescent cells or if they evolved to get rid of cell senescence.

Their unexpected discovery? Naked mole rats do experience cellular senescence, yet they continue to live long, healthy lives; eliminating the senescence mechanism is not the key to their long life span. Gorbunova said:

It was surprising to us that despite its remarkable longevity the naked mole rat has cells that undergo senescence like mouse cells.

The researchers found that although naked mole rats exhibited cellular senescence similar to mice, their senescent cells also displayed unique features that may contribute to their cancer resistance and longevity.

The cellular senescence mechanism permanently arrests a cell to prevent it from dividing, but the cell still continues to metabolize. The researchers found that naked mole rats are able to more strongly inhibit the metabolic process of the senescent cells, resulting in higher resistance to the damaging effects of senescence. Gorbunova said:

In naked mole rats, senescent cells are better behaved. When you compare the signals from the mouse versus from the naked mole rat, all the genes in the mouse are a mess. In the naked mole rat, everything is more organized. The naked mole rat didn’t get rid of the senescence, but maybe it made it a bit more structured.

Although evolution of a long life span does not eliminate senescence, the more structured response to senescence may have an evolutionary basis, said Yang Zhao, lead author of the study.

We believe there was some strategy during the evolution of naked mole rats that allowed them to have more systematic changes in their genes and have more orchestrated pathways being regulated. We believe this is beneficial for longevity and cancer resistance.

Bottom line: New research into the puzzle of how naked mole rats stay so cancer-free.

Read more from the University of Rochester



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ovDS3t

When is the next leap year?

Earthly calendars have to work hard to stay in synch with the natural rhythms of Earth's orbit around the sun.

Earthly calendars have to work hard to stay in sync with the natural rhythms of Earth’s orbit around the sun.

The last leap year was 2016, and the next one is 2020! Leap days are extra days added to the calendar to help synchronize it with Earth’s orbit around the sun and the actual passing of the seasons. Why do we need them? Blame Earth’s orbit around the sun, which takes approximately 365.25 days. It’s that .25 that creates the need for a leap year every four years.

During non-leap years aka common years – like 2018 – the calendar doesn’t take into account the extra quarter of a day actually required by Earth to complete a single orbit around the sun. In essence, the calendar year, which is a human artifact, is faster than the actual solar year, or year as defined by our planet’s motion through space.

Over time and without correction, the calendar year would drift away from the solar year and the drift would add up quickly. For example, without correction the calendar year would be off by about one day after four years. It’d be off by about 25 days after 100 years. You can see that, if even more time were to pass without the leap year as a calendar correction, eventually February would be a summer month in the Northern Hemisphere.

During leap years, a leap day is added to the calendar to slow down and synchronize the calendar year with the seasons. Leap days were first added to the Julian Calendar in 46 B.C. by Julius Caesar at the advice of Sosigenes, an Alexandrian astronomer.

Celebrating the leap year? Take a moment to thank Christopher Clavius (1538 - 1612). This German mathematician and astronomer figured out how and where to place them in the Gregorian calendar. Image via Wikimedia Commons.

In 1582, Pope Gregory XIII revised the Julian calendar by creating the Gregorian calendar with the assistance of Christopher Clavius, a German mathematician and astronomer. The Gregorian calendar further stated that leap days should not be added in years ending in “00” unless that year is also divisible by 400. This additional correction was added to stabilize the calendar over a period of thousands of years and was necessary because solar years are actually slightly less than 365.25 days. In fact, a solar year occurs over a period of 365.2422 days.

Hence, according to the rules set forth in the Gregorian calendar leap years have occurred or will occur during the following years:

1600 1604 1608 1612 1616 1620 1624 1628 1632 1636 1640 1644 1648 1652 1656 1660 1664 1668 1672 1676 1680 1684 1688 1692 1696 1704 1708 1712 1716 1720 1724 1728 1732 1736 1740 1744 1748 1752 1756 1760 1764 1768 1772 1776 1780 1784 1788 1792 1796 1804 1808 1812 1816 1820 1824 1828 1832 1836 1840 1844 1848 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 2044 2048 2052 2056 2060 2064 2068 2072 2076 2080 2084 2088 2092 2096 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 2124 2128 2132 2136 2140 2144 2148 2152.

Notice that 2000 was a leap year because it is divisible by 400, but that 1900 was not a leap year.

Since 1582, the Gregorian calendar has been gradually adopted as a “civil” international standard for many countries around the world.

Bottom line: 2018 isn’t a leap year, because it isn’t evenly divisible by 4. The next leap day will be added to the calendar on February 29, 2020.

A fixed-date calendar and no time zones, researchers say

Should the leap second be abolished?



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1Df6OwH
Earthly calendars have to work hard to stay in synch with the natural rhythms of Earth's orbit around the sun.

Earthly calendars have to work hard to stay in sync with the natural rhythms of Earth’s orbit around the sun.

The last leap year was 2016, and the next one is 2020! Leap days are extra days added to the calendar to help synchronize it with Earth’s orbit around the sun and the actual passing of the seasons. Why do we need them? Blame Earth’s orbit around the sun, which takes approximately 365.25 days. It’s that .25 that creates the need for a leap year every four years.

During non-leap years aka common years – like 2018 – the calendar doesn’t take into account the extra quarter of a day actually required by Earth to complete a single orbit around the sun. In essence, the calendar year, which is a human artifact, is faster than the actual solar year, or year as defined by our planet’s motion through space.

Over time and without correction, the calendar year would drift away from the solar year and the drift would add up quickly. For example, without correction the calendar year would be off by about one day after four years. It’d be off by about 25 days after 100 years. You can see that, if even more time were to pass without the leap year as a calendar correction, eventually February would be a summer month in the Northern Hemisphere.

During leap years, a leap day is added to the calendar to slow down and synchronize the calendar year with the seasons. Leap days were first added to the Julian Calendar in 46 B.C. by Julius Caesar at the advice of Sosigenes, an Alexandrian astronomer.

Celebrating the leap year? Take a moment to thank Christopher Clavius (1538 - 1612). This German mathematician and astronomer figured out how and where to place them in the Gregorian calendar. Image via Wikimedia Commons.

In 1582, Pope Gregory XIII revised the Julian calendar by creating the Gregorian calendar with the assistance of Christopher Clavius, a German mathematician and astronomer. The Gregorian calendar further stated that leap days should not be added in years ending in “00” unless that year is also divisible by 400. This additional correction was added to stabilize the calendar over a period of thousands of years and was necessary because solar years are actually slightly less than 365.25 days. In fact, a solar year occurs over a period of 365.2422 days.

Hence, according to the rules set forth in the Gregorian calendar leap years have occurred or will occur during the following years:

1600 1604 1608 1612 1616 1620 1624 1628 1632 1636 1640 1644 1648 1652 1656 1660 1664 1668 1672 1676 1680 1684 1688 1692 1696 1704 1708 1712 1716 1720 1724 1728 1732 1736 1740 1744 1748 1752 1756 1760 1764 1768 1772 1776 1780 1784 1788 1792 1796 1804 1808 1812 1816 1820 1824 1828 1832 1836 1840 1844 1848 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 2044 2048 2052 2056 2060 2064 2068 2072 2076 2080 2084 2088 2092 2096 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 2124 2128 2132 2136 2140 2144 2148 2152.

Notice that 2000 was a leap year because it is divisible by 400, but that 1900 was not a leap year.

Since 1582, the Gregorian calendar has been gradually adopted as a “civil” international standard for many countries around the world.

Bottom line: 2018 isn’t a leap year, because it isn’t evenly divisible by 4. The next leap day will be added to the calendar on February 29, 2020.

A fixed-date calendar and no time zones, researchers say

Should the leap second be abolished?



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1Df6OwH