Why don’t poison frogs poison themselves?

The phantasmal poison frog, Epipedobates anthonyi, is the original source of epibatidine, discovered by John Daly in 1974. Epibatidine has not been found in any animal outside of Ecuador, and its ultimate source, proposed to be an arthropod, remains unknown. This frog was captured at a banana plantation in the Azuay province in southern Ecuador in August 2017. Image via Rebecca Tarvin/University of Texas at Austin.

By Marc Airhart

Don’t let their appearance fool you: Thimble-sized, dappled in cheerful colors and squishy, poison frogs in fact harbor some of the most potent neurotoxins we know. With a new paper published in the journal Science, scientists are a step closer to resolving a related head-scratcher — how do these frogs keep from poisoning themselves? And the answer has potential consequences for the fight against pain and addiction.

The new research, led by scientists at The University of Texas at Austin, answers this question for a subgroup of poison frogs that use the toxin epibatidine. To keep predators from eating them, the frogs use the toxin, which binds to receptors in an animal’s nervous system and can cause hypertension, seizures, and even death. The researchers discovered that a small genetic mutation in the frogs — a change in just three of the 2,500 amino acids that make up the receptor — prevents the toxin from acting on the frogs’ own receptors, making them resistant to its lethal effects. Not only that, but precisely the same change appeared independently three times in the evolution of these frogs.

Rebecca Tarvin is a postdoctoral researcher at UT Austin and a co-first author on the paper. She said:

Being toxic can be good for your survival — it gives you an edge over predators.So why aren’t more animals toxic? Our work is showing that a big constraint is whether organisms can evolve resistance to their own toxins. We found evolution has hit upon this same exact change in three different groups of frogs, and that, to me, is quite beautiful.

The phantasmal poison frog (Epipedobates tricolor) lives in small rocky streams with shallow running water. Photographed in Cotopaxi Province, Ecuador in August 2017 by David Cannatella. Image via David Cannatella/University of Texas at Austin

There are hundreds of species of poisonous frogs, each of which uses dozens of different neurotoxins. Tarvin is part of a team of researchers, including professors David Cannatella and Harold Zakon in the Department of Integrative Biology, who have been studying how these frogs evolved toxic resistance.

For decades, medical researchers have known that this toxin, epibatidine, also can act as a powerful nonaddictive painkiller. They’ve developed hundreds of compounds from the frogs’ toxin, including one that advanced in the drug-development process to human trials before being ruled out due to other side effects.

The new research — showing how certain poison frogs evolved to block the toxin while retaining use of receptors the brain needs — gives scientists information about epibatidine that could eventually prove helpful in designing drugs such as new pain relievers or drugs to fight nicotine addiction.

Cecilia Borghese is another co-first author of the paper and a research associate in the university’s Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research. She said:

Every bit of information we can gather on how these receptors are interacting with the drugs gets us a step closer to designing better drugs.

The phantasmal poison frog (Epipedobates tricolor) lives in small rocky streams with shallow running water. Photographed in Bolívar Province, Ecuador in August 2017 by Rebecca Tarvin. Image via Rebecca Tarvin/University of Texas at Austin.

Changing the lock

A receptor is a type of protein on the outside of cells that transmits signals between the outside and the inside. Receptors are like locks that stay shut until they encounter the correct key. When a molecule with just the right shape comes along, the receptor gets activated and sends a signal.

The receptor that Tarvin and her colleagues studied sends signals in processes like learning and memory, but usually only when a compound that is the healthy “key” comes into contact with it. Unfortunately for the frogs’ predators, toxic epibatidine also works, like a powerful skeleton key, on the receptor, hijacking cells and triggering a dangerous burst of activity.

The researchers found that poison frogs that use epibatidine have developed a small genetic mutation that prevents the toxin from binding to their receptors. In a sense, they’ve blocked the skeleton key. They also have managed, through evolution, to retain a way for the real key to continue to work, thanks to a second genetic mutation. In the frogs, the lock became more selective.

Fighting disease

The way that the lock changed suggests possible new ways to develop drugs to fight human disease.

The researchers found that the changes that give the frogs resistance to the toxin without changing healthy functioning occur in parts of the receptor that are close to, but don’t even touch epibatidine. Borghese and Wiebke Sachs, a visiting student, studied the function of human and frog receptors in the lab of Adron Harris, another author on the paper and associate director of the Waggoner Center. Borghese said:

The most exciting thing is how these amino acids that are not even in direct contact with the drug can modify the function of the receptor in such a precise way. The healthy compound, she continued, “keeps working as usual, no problem at all, and now the receptor is resistant to epibatidine. That for me was fascinating.

Understanding how those very small changes affect the behavior of the receptor might be exploited by scientists trying to design drugs that act on it. Because the same receptor in humans is also involved in pain and nicotine addiction, this study might suggest ways to develop new medications to block pain or help smokers break the habit.

Retracing Evolution

Working with partners in Ecuador, the researchers collected tissue samples from 28 species of frogs — including those that use epibatidine, those that use other toxins and those that are not toxic. Tarvin and her colleagues Juan C. Santos from St. John’s University and Lauren O’Connell from Stanford University sequenced the gene that encodes the particular receptor in each species. She then compared subtle differences to build an evolutionary tree representing how the gene evolved.

This represents the second time that Cannatella, Zakon, Tarvin and Santos have played a role in discovering mechanisms that prevent frogs from poisoning themselves. In January 2016, the team identified a set of genetic mutations that they suggested might protect another subgroup of poison frogs from a different neurotoxin, batrachotoxin. Research published this month was built on their finding and conducted by researchers from the State University of New York at Albany, confirming that one of UT Austin’s proposed mutations protects that set of poison frogs from the toxin.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Donate to EarthSky: Your support means the world to us

Bottom line: New research on why poison frogs do not poison themselves.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2fDLhge

The phantasmal poison frog, Epipedobates anthonyi, is the original source of epibatidine, discovered by John Daly in 1974. Epibatidine has not been found in any animal outside of Ecuador, and its ultimate source, proposed to be an arthropod, remains unknown. This frog was captured at a banana plantation in the Azuay province in southern Ecuador in August 2017. Image via Rebecca Tarvin/University of Texas at Austin.

By Marc Airhart

Don’t let their appearance fool you: Thimble-sized, dappled in cheerful colors and squishy, poison frogs in fact harbor some of the most potent neurotoxins we know. With a new paper published in the journal Science, scientists are a step closer to resolving a related head-scratcher — how do these frogs keep from poisoning themselves? And the answer has potential consequences for the fight against pain and addiction.

The new research, led by scientists at The University of Texas at Austin, answers this question for a subgroup of poison frogs that use the toxin epibatidine. To keep predators from eating them, the frogs use the toxin, which binds to receptors in an animal’s nervous system and can cause hypertension, seizures, and even death. The researchers discovered that a small genetic mutation in the frogs — a change in just three of the 2,500 amino acids that make up the receptor — prevents the toxin from acting on the frogs’ own receptors, making them resistant to its lethal effects. Not only that, but precisely the same change appeared independently three times in the evolution of these frogs.

Rebecca Tarvin is a postdoctoral researcher at UT Austin and a co-first author on the paper. She said:

Being toxic can be good for your survival — it gives you an edge over predators.So why aren’t more animals toxic? Our work is showing that a big constraint is whether organisms can evolve resistance to their own toxins. We found evolution has hit upon this same exact change in three different groups of frogs, and that, to me, is quite beautiful.

The phantasmal poison frog (Epipedobates tricolor) lives in small rocky streams with shallow running water. Photographed in Cotopaxi Province, Ecuador in August 2017 by David Cannatella. Image via David Cannatella/University of Texas at Austin

There are hundreds of species of poisonous frogs, each of which uses dozens of different neurotoxins. Tarvin is part of a team of researchers, including professors David Cannatella and Harold Zakon in the Department of Integrative Biology, who have been studying how these frogs evolved toxic resistance.

For decades, medical researchers have known that this toxin, epibatidine, also can act as a powerful nonaddictive painkiller. They’ve developed hundreds of compounds from the frogs’ toxin, including one that advanced in the drug-development process to human trials before being ruled out due to other side effects.

The new research — showing how certain poison frogs evolved to block the toxin while retaining use of receptors the brain needs — gives scientists information about epibatidine that could eventually prove helpful in designing drugs such as new pain relievers or drugs to fight nicotine addiction.

Cecilia Borghese is another co-first author of the paper and a research associate in the university’s Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research. She said:

Every bit of information we can gather on how these receptors are interacting with the drugs gets us a step closer to designing better drugs.

The phantasmal poison frog (Epipedobates tricolor) lives in small rocky streams with shallow running water. Photographed in Bolívar Province, Ecuador in August 2017 by Rebecca Tarvin. Image via Rebecca Tarvin/University of Texas at Austin.

Changing the lock

A receptor is a type of protein on the outside of cells that transmits signals between the outside and the inside. Receptors are like locks that stay shut until they encounter the correct key. When a molecule with just the right shape comes along, the receptor gets activated and sends a signal.

The receptor that Tarvin and her colleagues studied sends signals in processes like learning and memory, but usually only when a compound that is the healthy “key” comes into contact with it. Unfortunately for the frogs’ predators, toxic epibatidine also works, like a powerful skeleton key, on the receptor, hijacking cells and triggering a dangerous burst of activity.

The researchers found that poison frogs that use epibatidine have developed a small genetic mutation that prevents the toxin from binding to their receptors. In a sense, they’ve blocked the skeleton key. They also have managed, through evolution, to retain a way for the real key to continue to work, thanks to a second genetic mutation. In the frogs, the lock became more selective.

Fighting disease

The way that the lock changed suggests possible new ways to develop drugs to fight human disease.

The researchers found that the changes that give the frogs resistance to the toxin without changing healthy functioning occur in parts of the receptor that are close to, but don’t even touch epibatidine. Borghese and Wiebke Sachs, a visiting student, studied the function of human and frog receptors in the lab of Adron Harris, another author on the paper and associate director of the Waggoner Center. Borghese said:

The most exciting thing is how these amino acids that are not even in direct contact with the drug can modify the function of the receptor in such a precise way. The healthy compound, she continued, “keeps working as usual, no problem at all, and now the receptor is resistant to epibatidine. That for me was fascinating.

Understanding how those very small changes affect the behavior of the receptor might be exploited by scientists trying to design drugs that act on it. Because the same receptor in humans is also involved in pain and nicotine addiction, this study might suggest ways to develop new medications to block pain or help smokers break the habit.

Retracing Evolution

Working with partners in Ecuador, the researchers collected tissue samples from 28 species of frogs — including those that use epibatidine, those that use other toxins and those that are not toxic. Tarvin and her colleagues Juan C. Santos from St. John’s University and Lauren O’Connell from Stanford University sequenced the gene that encodes the particular receptor in each species. She then compared subtle differences to build an evolutionary tree representing how the gene evolved.

This represents the second time that Cannatella, Zakon, Tarvin and Santos have played a role in discovering mechanisms that prevent frogs from poisoning themselves. In January 2016, the team identified a set of genetic mutations that they suggested might protect another subgroup of poison frogs from a different neurotoxin, batrachotoxin. Research published this month was built on their finding and conducted by researchers from the State University of New York at Albany, confirming that one of UT Austin’s proposed mutations protects that set of poison frogs from the toxin.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Donate to EarthSky: Your support means the world to us

Bottom line: New research on why poison frogs do not poison themselves.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2fDLhge

Night sky from sea caves

View larger. | Jack Fusco Photography captured this image on September 23, from a sea cave in Malibu, California. Notice the glow on the ocean; it’s bioluminescence, a biochemical light from sea creatures, the sea-going equivalent of firefly light.

Jack Fusco wrote:

It was an incredible night that I won’t soon forget. Two years ago, thoughts of catching the Milky Way from inside a sea cave and getting a photo of bioluminescence were two separate dreams.

I never imagined that I’d be lucky enough to have it all come together in a single exposure.

Swing by Jack’s site to find out more about his experience.

View larger. | Mimi Ditchie captured this image on September 23, too, a couple of hundred miles away, at Shell Beach, California.

Mimi Ditchie wrote:

I met up with a group of photographers to shoot the Milky Way from the California coast. The weather was predicted to be clear. Along the beach there is a ‘cave,’ which is really just a recessed area into the cliff. Several of us scooted way back in the cave while a third person, a fellow photographer, can be seen the left of the cave. To the right is the setting moon can be seen as well as some of the lights from Avila Beach.

Check out Mimi’s photograhy collections here.

Bottom line: Photos from Mimi Ditchie and Jack Fusco, from California sea caves.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ycVGqH

View larger. | Jack Fusco Photography captured this image on September 23, from a sea cave in Malibu, California. Notice the glow on the ocean; it’s bioluminescence, a biochemical light from sea creatures, the sea-going equivalent of firefly light.

Jack Fusco wrote:

It was an incredible night that I won’t soon forget. Two years ago, thoughts of catching the Milky Way from inside a sea cave and getting a photo of bioluminescence were two separate dreams.

I never imagined that I’d be lucky enough to have it all come together in a single exposure.

Swing by Jack’s site to find out more about his experience.

View larger. | Mimi Ditchie captured this image on September 23, too, a couple of hundred miles away, at Shell Beach, California.

Mimi Ditchie wrote:

I met up with a group of photographers to shoot the Milky Way from the California coast. The weather was predicted to be clear. Along the beach there is a ‘cave,’ which is really just a recessed area into the cliff. Several of us scooted way back in the cave while a third person, a fellow photographer, can be seen the left of the cave. To the right is the setting moon can be seen as well as some of the lights from Avila Beach.

Check out Mimi’s photograhy collections here.

Bottom line: Photos from Mimi Ditchie and Jack Fusco, from California sea caves.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ycVGqH

Cancer blood tests and learning from HIV – our latest Pioneer Awards

Our latest round of Pioneer Award winners are tackling some of the biggest questions in cancer research, submitted to our panel of experts in a short and snappy pitch.

In our 6th round we’ve funded 4 new projects, and here’s what they will be investigating.

Drawing parallels between HIV and lung cancer – Professor Charles Swanton and Dr Jonathan Hare

HIV and cancer may seem like very different medical challenges. But probe a little deeper and similarities come to light, particularly in how they each escape and exhaust the body’s immune system.

“Some rules of nature are universal across different diseases,” explains Swanton. “Both HIV and cancers evolve, and we want to look at them side-by-side.”

Professor Swanton and Dr Hare

In both situations, the immune system has to adapt in response to changing cancer cells or infection with the virus. And some of these adaptations may be shared in response to cancer and HIV infection.

Using a new computer algorithm, together with data from Swanton’s TRACERx lung cancer study and Hare’s work with HIV, they hope to find these shared adaptations, potentially unearthing new targets for drugs.

“We’re breaking down the barriers between the two diseases,” says Hare. “Now we’re beginning to connect the dots to help both cancer patients and people with HIV.”

Stopping cancer at inception – Dr Yi Feng

Healthy cells in the body sometimes undergo changes, which can be an early step towards cancer.

Dr Feng

But research in zebrafish and flies has revealed that rather than alerting the immune system, these changes can instead make immune cells take on a nurturing role, helping the pre-cancerous cells grow and develop into cancerous tumours.

At the University of Edinburgh, Dr Yi Feng has been working with zebrafish to spy on how immune cells and pre-cancerous cells interact.

“Zebrafish are very similar to humans in the way their immune system works,” explains Feng. “We hope that using these fish could be a way to help identify potential drugs to stop pre-cancerous cells becoming cancerous in the first place, by testing thousands or even tens of thousands of drugs.”

Feng hopes the approach reveals potential new ways to prevent cancer developing.

Killing liver cancer cells with experimental gene therapy – Dr Carin Ingemarsdotter and Professor Andrew Lever

Liver cancer is a big challenge, particularly in advanced cases where drugs can stop working.

At the University of Cambridge, Dr Carin Ingemarsdotter and Professor Andrew Lever are trying to find a way to overcome this.

“We want to insert a gene into liver cancer cells to make them susceptible to a specific drug,” explains Lever.

Professor Lever and Dr Ingemarsdotter

And to do this, they are adapting a gene editing technology in the lab in liver cancer cells. They are designing a technique that will allow them to insert a particular gene into liver cancer cells, and avoid affecting healthy cells.

Once they have developed the technique in the laboratory, the next steps will be to test it in different models of disease. But they also plan to look beyond that disease.

“We hope the technique we develop may one day help people with liver cancer, but also be a potential therapy for many other cancers too,” says Lever.

Developing a blood ‘nanotest’ for cancer – Professor Kostas Kostarelos

Blood samples offer an easy way to access a potential goldmine of information about our health, particularly in relation to cancer. But our blood contains so much information it can be hard to sift out the most important parts.

Professor Kostas Kostarelos

Professor Kostas Kostarelos and Research Fellow Marilena Hadjidemetriou, in collaboration with Professor Caroline Dive, all based at the University of Manchester, have joined a global push to find new ways of mining blood samples for information about cancer. And to do this his team is going to be using tiny nanoparticles.

“We want to amplify cancer signals in the blood that would otherwise be buried among all this other information,” says Kostarelos.

His team will be looking for molecules that stick to the nanoparticles in blood samples from mice with cancer. Kostarelos then plans to “fish out” the nanoparticles and study the sticky molecules for signals from the growing cancer.

Their team hopes the molecules they find will point to early warning signs, or ‘biomarkers’, of cancer that could one day be developed in to a test.

Catherine

  • These projects are examples of those funded by our Pioneer Award. Applications are welcomed to the Pioneer Award scheme from any scientist, regardless of discipline, career stage or track record.
  • You can read about our previous Pioneer Awards, funded since November 2015 here: Round 1, Round 2, Round 3, Round 4 and Round 5.
  • If you’re a researcher you can find out more about this award on our website.

Catherine



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog http://ift.tt/2x0xGXJ

Our latest round of Pioneer Award winners are tackling some of the biggest questions in cancer research, submitted to our panel of experts in a short and snappy pitch.

In our 6th round we’ve funded 4 new projects, and here’s what they will be investigating.

Drawing parallels between HIV and lung cancer – Professor Charles Swanton and Dr Jonathan Hare

HIV and cancer may seem like very different medical challenges. But probe a little deeper and similarities come to light, particularly in how they each escape and exhaust the body’s immune system.

“Some rules of nature are universal across different diseases,” explains Swanton. “Both HIV and cancers evolve, and we want to look at them side-by-side.”

Professor Swanton and Dr Hare

In both situations, the immune system has to adapt in response to changing cancer cells or infection with the virus. And some of these adaptations may be shared in response to cancer and HIV infection.

Using a new computer algorithm, together with data from Swanton’s TRACERx lung cancer study and Hare’s work with HIV, they hope to find these shared adaptations, potentially unearthing new targets for drugs.

“We’re breaking down the barriers between the two diseases,” says Hare. “Now we’re beginning to connect the dots to help both cancer patients and people with HIV.”

Stopping cancer at inception – Dr Yi Feng

Healthy cells in the body sometimes undergo changes, which can be an early step towards cancer.

Dr Feng

But research in zebrafish and flies has revealed that rather than alerting the immune system, these changes can instead make immune cells take on a nurturing role, helping the pre-cancerous cells grow and develop into cancerous tumours.

At the University of Edinburgh, Dr Yi Feng has been working with zebrafish to spy on how immune cells and pre-cancerous cells interact.

“Zebrafish are very similar to humans in the way their immune system works,” explains Feng. “We hope that using these fish could be a way to help identify potential drugs to stop pre-cancerous cells becoming cancerous in the first place, by testing thousands or even tens of thousands of drugs.”

Feng hopes the approach reveals potential new ways to prevent cancer developing.

Killing liver cancer cells with experimental gene therapy – Dr Carin Ingemarsdotter and Professor Andrew Lever

Liver cancer is a big challenge, particularly in advanced cases where drugs can stop working.

At the University of Cambridge, Dr Carin Ingemarsdotter and Professor Andrew Lever are trying to find a way to overcome this.

“We want to insert a gene into liver cancer cells to make them susceptible to a specific drug,” explains Lever.

Professor Lever and Dr Ingemarsdotter

And to do this, they are adapting a gene editing technology in the lab in liver cancer cells. They are designing a technique that will allow them to insert a particular gene into liver cancer cells, and avoid affecting healthy cells.

Once they have developed the technique in the laboratory, the next steps will be to test it in different models of disease. But they also plan to look beyond that disease.

“We hope the technique we develop may one day help people with liver cancer, but also be a potential therapy for many other cancers too,” says Lever.

Developing a blood ‘nanotest’ for cancer – Professor Kostas Kostarelos

Blood samples offer an easy way to access a potential goldmine of information about our health, particularly in relation to cancer. But our blood contains so much information it can be hard to sift out the most important parts.

Professor Kostas Kostarelos

Professor Kostas Kostarelos and Research Fellow Marilena Hadjidemetriou, in collaboration with Professor Caroline Dive, all based at the University of Manchester, have joined a global push to find new ways of mining blood samples for information about cancer. And to do this his team is going to be using tiny nanoparticles.

“We want to amplify cancer signals in the blood that would otherwise be buried among all this other information,” says Kostarelos.

His team will be looking for molecules that stick to the nanoparticles in blood samples from mice with cancer. Kostarelos then plans to “fish out” the nanoparticles and study the sticky molecules for signals from the growing cancer.

Their team hopes the molecules they find will point to early warning signs, or ‘biomarkers’, of cancer that could one day be developed in to a test.

Catherine

  • These projects are examples of those funded by our Pioneer Award. Applications are welcomed to the Pioneer Award scheme from any scientist, regardless of discipline, career stage or track record.
  • You can read about our previous Pioneer Awards, funded since November 2015 here: Round 1, Round 2, Round 3, Round 4 and Round 5.
  • If you’re a researcher you can find out more about this award on our website.

Catherine



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog http://ift.tt/2x0xGXJ

Every visible star is within Milky Way

The image at top, showing a campfire under the Milky Way, is by Ben Coffman Photography in Oregon. He wrote:

These good folks – co-workers from one of the resorts on Mt Hood, if I remember correctly – let me take their photo on the beach near Cape Kiwanda [a state natural area near in Pacific City, Oregon]. They looked like they were having fun.

And so they do. What could be better than a beautiful night under the Milky Way? But did you know that every night of your life is a night under the Milky Way? By that we mean … every individual star you can see with the unaided eye, in all parts of the sky, lies within the confines of our Milky Way galaxy.

Our galaxy – seen in Ben’s photo above as a bright and hazy band of stars – is estimated to be some 100,000 light-years wide and only about 1,000 light-years thick. That’s why the starlit band of the Milky Way, which is visible in the evening this month, appears so well defined in our sky. Gazing into it, we’re really looking edgewise into the thin plane of our own galaxy.

A planisphere is virtually indispensable for beginning stargazers. Order your EarthSky planisphere from our store.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Image Credit: Digital Sky LLC

The image above gives you an idea of the awesome beauty of our Milky Way galaxy in the night sky. It’s mosaic of multiple shots on large-format film. It comprises all 360 degrees of the galaxy from our vantage point. Photography was done in Ft. Davis, Texas for the northern hemisphere shots and from Broken Hill, New South Wales, Australia, for the southern portions. Note the dust lanes, which obscure our view of some features beyond them. Note that the galaxy is brightest at its center, where most of the stars – and a possible hidden giant black hole – reside. This image shows stars down to 11th magnitude – fainter than the eye alone can see. Still, if you’re standing under a clear, dark night sky, you’ll see the Milky Way clearly as a band of stars stretched across the sky on late summer evenings.

The band of the Milky Way is tough to see unless you’re far from the artificial lights of the city and you’re looking on a night when the moon is down. At present, the waxing gibbous moon is washing the fainter stars of the Milky Way from the night sky After today – September 29, 2017 – the waxing moon will stay out longer each night, until the full Harvest Moon arrives on October 5. By October 10 or thereabouts, the waning moon will provide moon-free skies for an evening view of the Milky Way.

If you do look in a dark country sky, you’ll easily spot the Milky Way. And, assuming you’re looking from the Northern Hemisphere, you’ll notice that it gets broader and richer in the southern part of the sky, in the direction of the constellations Scorpius and Sagittarius. This is the direction toward the galaxy’s center. If you’re in the Southern Hemisphere, the galactic center is still in the direction of Sagittarius. But from the southern part of Earth’s globe, this constellation is closer to overhead.

Bottom line: If you look in a dark country sky, you’ll easily spot the starlit band of our huge, flat Milky Way galaxy. Every star in our night sky that’s visible to the unaided eye lies inside this galaxy.

Help support EarthSky! Check out the EarthSky store for fun astronomy gifts and tools for all ages!

Donate: Your support means the world to us



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1maRmYp

The image at top, showing a campfire under the Milky Way, is by Ben Coffman Photography in Oregon. He wrote:

These good folks – co-workers from one of the resorts on Mt Hood, if I remember correctly – let me take their photo on the beach near Cape Kiwanda [a state natural area near in Pacific City, Oregon]. They looked like they were having fun.

And so they do. What could be better than a beautiful night under the Milky Way? But did you know that every night of your life is a night under the Milky Way? By that we mean … every individual star you can see with the unaided eye, in all parts of the sky, lies within the confines of our Milky Way galaxy.

Our galaxy – seen in Ben’s photo above as a bright and hazy band of stars – is estimated to be some 100,000 light-years wide and only about 1,000 light-years thick. That’s why the starlit band of the Milky Way, which is visible in the evening this month, appears so well defined in our sky. Gazing into it, we’re really looking edgewise into the thin plane of our own galaxy.

A planisphere is virtually indispensable for beginning stargazers. Order your EarthSky planisphere from our store.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Image Credit: Digital Sky LLC

The image above gives you an idea of the awesome beauty of our Milky Way galaxy in the night sky. It’s mosaic of multiple shots on large-format film. It comprises all 360 degrees of the galaxy from our vantage point. Photography was done in Ft. Davis, Texas for the northern hemisphere shots and from Broken Hill, New South Wales, Australia, for the southern portions. Note the dust lanes, which obscure our view of some features beyond them. Note that the galaxy is brightest at its center, where most of the stars – and a possible hidden giant black hole – reside. This image shows stars down to 11th magnitude – fainter than the eye alone can see. Still, if you’re standing under a clear, dark night sky, you’ll see the Milky Way clearly as a band of stars stretched across the sky on late summer evenings.

The band of the Milky Way is tough to see unless you’re far from the artificial lights of the city and you’re looking on a night when the moon is down. At present, the waxing gibbous moon is washing the fainter stars of the Milky Way from the night sky After today – September 29, 2017 – the waxing moon will stay out longer each night, until the full Harvest Moon arrives on October 5. By October 10 or thereabouts, the waning moon will provide moon-free skies for an evening view of the Milky Way.

If you do look in a dark country sky, you’ll easily spot the Milky Way. And, assuming you’re looking from the Northern Hemisphere, you’ll notice that it gets broader and richer in the southern part of the sky, in the direction of the constellations Scorpius and Sagittarius. This is the direction toward the galaxy’s center. If you’re in the Southern Hemisphere, the galactic center is still in the direction of Sagittarius. But from the southern part of Earth’s globe, this constellation is closer to overhead.

Bottom line: If you look in a dark country sky, you’ll easily spot the starlit band of our huge, flat Milky Way galaxy. Every star in our night sky that’s visible to the unaided eye lies inside this galaxy.

Help support EarthSky! Check out the EarthSky store for fun astronomy gifts and tools for all ages!

Donate: Your support means the world to us



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1maRmYp

Did dino-killing asteroid speed bird evolution?

Resplendent quetzal in the Costa Rican cloud forest of San Gerardo de Dota. Photo by Tyohar Kastiel.

A new study suggests that the asteroid-induced mass extinction 66 million years ago that wiped out the dinosaurs – known as the K-Pg event – led to an acceleration in the rate of genetic evolution among birds, the dinosaurs’ only remaining descendants.

But these avian survivors looked to be about 80 percent smaller than their pre-extinction relatives. And when the researchers examined an extensive avian family tree, they noticed a clear link between body size and rates of genetic evolution: Small birds evolve much faster than large ones.

Size reductions after mass extinctions have occurred in many groups of organisms, a phenomenon dubbed the “Lilliput effect” by paleontologists — a nod to the classic tale Gulliver’s Travels.

Cornell ecology and evolutionary biology doctoral student Jacob Berv is coauthor of the study, published July 13, 2017 in Systematic Biology. Berv said in a statement:

There is good evidence that size reductions after mass extinctions may have occurred in many groups of organisms. All of the new evidence we have reviewed is also consistent with a Lilliput effect affecting birds across the K-Pg mass extinction.

Molecular clocks suggest birds are much older than we know from the fossil record, but the discrepancy may be due to an underestimate of the pace of evolution. Image via Jillian Ditner/Cornell University.

Study coauthor Daniel Field is a fellow at the University of Bath. He said:

Smaller birds tend to have faster metabolic rates and shorter generation times. Our hypothesis is that these important biological characters, which affect the rate of DNA evolution, may have been influenced by the K-Pg event.

The bottom line is that, by speeding up avian genetic evolution, the K-Pg mass extinction may have substantially altered the rate of the avian molecular clock. Similar processes may have influenced the evolution of many groups across this extinction event, like plants, mammals and other forms of life.

The study suggests that the speedier rate of genetic evolution may have helped stimulate an explosion of avian diversity soon after the K-Pg extinction event.

The researchers jumped into this line of inquiry, they said, because of the long-running “rocks and clocks” debate. Different studies often report substantial discrepancies between age estimates for groups of organisms implied by the fossil record and estimates generated by molecular clocks.

Molecular clocks use the rate at which DNA sequences change to estimate how long ago new species arose, assuming a relatively steady rate of genetic evolution. But if the K-Pg extinction caused avian molecular clocks to temporarily speed up, the researchers say this could explain at least some of the mismatch. Berv said:

Size reductions across the K-Pg extinction would be predicted to do exactly that.

Snowy owl in flight photographed by Diane McAllister. Image via the Great Backyard Bird Count.

The researchers suggest that human activities could trigger an altered pattern of evolution similar to what occurred 66 million years ago. They say that human activity might even be driving a similar Lilliput-like pattern in the modern world, as more and more large animals go extinct because of hunting, habitat destruction, and climate change. Berv said:

Right now, the planet’s large animals are being decimated—the big cats, elephants, rhinos, and whales. We need to start thinking about conservation not just in terms of functional biodiversity loss, but about how our actions will affect the future of evolution itself.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Donate to EarthSky: Your support means the world to us

Bottom line: A study suggests the extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago increased the pace of evolution in birds, their only remaining descendants.

Read more from Cornell University



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2xHnsdo

Resplendent quetzal in the Costa Rican cloud forest of San Gerardo de Dota. Photo by Tyohar Kastiel.

A new study suggests that the asteroid-induced mass extinction 66 million years ago that wiped out the dinosaurs – known as the K-Pg event – led to an acceleration in the rate of genetic evolution among birds, the dinosaurs’ only remaining descendants.

But these avian survivors looked to be about 80 percent smaller than their pre-extinction relatives. And when the researchers examined an extensive avian family tree, they noticed a clear link between body size and rates of genetic evolution: Small birds evolve much faster than large ones.

Size reductions after mass extinctions have occurred in many groups of organisms, a phenomenon dubbed the “Lilliput effect” by paleontologists — a nod to the classic tale Gulliver’s Travels.

Cornell ecology and evolutionary biology doctoral student Jacob Berv is coauthor of the study, published July 13, 2017 in Systematic Biology. Berv said in a statement:

There is good evidence that size reductions after mass extinctions may have occurred in many groups of organisms. All of the new evidence we have reviewed is also consistent with a Lilliput effect affecting birds across the K-Pg mass extinction.

Molecular clocks suggest birds are much older than we know from the fossil record, but the discrepancy may be due to an underestimate of the pace of evolution. Image via Jillian Ditner/Cornell University.

Study coauthor Daniel Field is a fellow at the University of Bath. He said:

Smaller birds tend to have faster metabolic rates and shorter generation times. Our hypothesis is that these important biological characters, which affect the rate of DNA evolution, may have been influenced by the K-Pg event.

The bottom line is that, by speeding up avian genetic evolution, the K-Pg mass extinction may have substantially altered the rate of the avian molecular clock. Similar processes may have influenced the evolution of many groups across this extinction event, like plants, mammals and other forms of life.

The study suggests that the speedier rate of genetic evolution may have helped stimulate an explosion of avian diversity soon after the K-Pg extinction event.

The researchers jumped into this line of inquiry, they said, because of the long-running “rocks and clocks” debate. Different studies often report substantial discrepancies between age estimates for groups of organisms implied by the fossil record and estimates generated by molecular clocks.

Molecular clocks use the rate at which DNA sequences change to estimate how long ago new species arose, assuming a relatively steady rate of genetic evolution. But if the K-Pg extinction caused avian molecular clocks to temporarily speed up, the researchers say this could explain at least some of the mismatch. Berv said:

Size reductions across the K-Pg extinction would be predicted to do exactly that.

Snowy owl in flight photographed by Diane McAllister. Image via the Great Backyard Bird Count.

The researchers suggest that human activities could trigger an altered pattern of evolution similar to what occurred 66 million years ago. They say that human activity might even be driving a similar Lilliput-like pattern in the modern world, as more and more large animals go extinct because of hunting, habitat destruction, and climate change. Berv said:

Right now, the planet’s large animals are being decimated—the big cats, elephants, rhinos, and whales. We need to start thinking about conservation not just in terms of functional biodiversity loss, but about how our actions will affect the future of evolution itself.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Donate to EarthSky: Your support means the world to us

Bottom line: A study suggests the extinction event that wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago increased the pace of evolution in birds, their only remaining descendants.

Read more from Cornell University



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2xHnsdo

A Family’s Smile: How Walter Reed Specialists Repaired Infant’s Cleft Palate

Craniofacial team at Walter Reed repairs baby's lip and provides comfort to a military family.

from http://ift.tt/2wYHLzo
Craniofacial team at Walter Reed repairs baby's lip and provides comfort to a military family.

from http://ift.tt/2wYHLzo

Is the Milky Way a normal galaxy?

The starlit Milky Way, edgewise view into our own galaxy, via Manish Mamtani Photography.

In countless studies, astronomers have used our home galaxy, the Milky Way, as the classic example of a normal or typical galaxy. But a new study suggests our Milky Way might not be typical. Early results from a survey of our Milky Way’s satellite galaxies – and of other small satellite galaxies orbiting eight other, distant galaxies – indicate that Milky Way satellites are unusually tranquil. The survey is called SAGA (Satellites Around Galactic Analogs). According to a September 20, 2017 statement from Yale, it has found that – although the satellites of other galaxies similar to our Milky Way are “actively pumping out new stars” – the Milky Way’s satellites are “mostly inert.”

Several dozen smaller galaxy satellites orbit the Milky Way’s center. Astronomers have long found them useful in understanding the Milky Way itself. But why are the Milky Way’s satellite galaxies not producing as many new stars as other satellite galaxies we see, orbiting distant galaxies? Astronomers find this extremely bothersome, because models depicting what we know about the universe rely on galaxies behaving in a fashion similar to our Milky Way.

Yale astrophysicist Marla Geha is lead author of the new paper, which is published in the peer-reviewed Astrophysical Journal. She said in a statement:

We use the Milky Way and its surroundings to study absolutely everything. Hundreds of studies come out every year about dark matter, cosmology, star formation, and galaxy formation, using the Milky Way as a guide. But it’s possible that the Milky Way is an outlier.

The SAGA Survey began five years ago with a goal of studying the satellite galaxies around 100 Milky Way siblings – sometimes called Milky Way analogs – galaxies that are similar to our galaxy in size, structure and environment. Thus far it has studied eight other Milky Way sibling systems, which the researchers say is too small of a sample to come to any definitive conclusions. SAGA expects to have studied 25 Milky Way siblings in the next two years.

Yet the survey already has people talking. At a recent conference where Geha presented some of SAGA’s initial findings, another researcher told her:

You’ve just thrown a monkey wrench into what we know about how small galaxies form.

SAGA researcher Risa Wechsler, an astrophysicist at the Kavli Institute at Stanford University, said:

Our work puts the Milky Way into a broader context. The SAGA Survey will provide a critical new understanding of galaxy formation and of the nature of dark matter.

Wechsler, Geha, and their team said they will continue to improve the efficiency of finding satellites around Milky Way siblings. Geha said:

I really want to know the answer to whether the Milky Way is unique, or totally normal. By studying our siblings, we learn more about ourselves.

A three-color optical image of a Milky Way sibling. Image via Sloan Digital Sky Survey/ Yale News.

Bottom line:

Via Yale News



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ftZita

The starlit Milky Way, edgewise view into our own galaxy, via Manish Mamtani Photography.

In countless studies, astronomers have used our home galaxy, the Milky Way, as the classic example of a normal or typical galaxy. But a new study suggests our Milky Way might not be typical. Early results from a survey of our Milky Way’s satellite galaxies – and of other small satellite galaxies orbiting eight other, distant galaxies – indicate that Milky Way satellites are unusually tranquil. The survey is called SAGA (Satellites Around Galactic Analogs). According to a September 20, 2017 statement from Yale, it has found that – although the satellites of other galaxies similar to our Milky Way are “actively pumping out new stars” – the Milky Way’s satellites are “mostly inert.”

Several dozen smaller galaxy satellites orbit the Milky Way’s center. Astronomers have long found them useful in understanding the Milky Way itself. But why are the Milky Way’s satellite galaxies not producing as many new stars as other satellite galaxies we see, orbiting distant galaxies? Astronomers find this extremely bothersome, because models depicting what we know about the universe rely on galaxies behaving in a fashion similar to our Milky Way.

Yale astrophysicist Marla Geha is lead author of the new paper, which is published in the peer-reviewed Astrophysical Journal. She said in a statement:

We use the Milky Way and its surroundings to study absolutely everything. Hundreds of studies come out every year about dark matter, cosmology, star formation, and galaxy formation, using the Milky Way as a guide. But it’s possible that the Milky Way is an outlier.

The SAGA Survey began five years ago with a goal of studying the satellite galaxies around 100 Milky Way siblings – sometimes called Milky Way analogs – galaxies that are similar to our galaxy in size, structure and environment. Thus far it has studied eight other Milky Way sibling systems, which the researchers say is too small of a sample to come to any definitive conclusions. SAGA expects to have studied 25 Milky Way siblings in the next two years.

Yet the survey already has people talking. At a recent conference where Geha presented some of SAGA’s initial findings, another researcher told her:

You’ve just thrown a monkey wrench into what we know about how small galaxies form.

SAGA researcher Risa Wechsler, an astrophysicist at the Kavli Institute at Stanford University, said:

Our work puts the Milky Way into a broader context. The SAGA Survey will provide a critical new understanding of galaxy formation and of the nature of dark matter.

Wechsler, Geha, and their team said they will continue to improve the efficiency of finding satellites around Milky Way siblings. Geha said:

I really want to know the answer to whether the Milky Way is unique, or totally normal. By studying our siblings, we learn more about ourselves.

A three-color optical image of a Milky Way sibling. Image via Sloan Digital Sky Survey/ Yale News.

Bottom line:

Via Yale News



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ftZita