The year in stoats: 2016 [Stoat]

A vintage year, for which the title must be Oh, and we were Gone / Kings of Oblivion. Something for everyone. Here, after review, is what catches on my mind. But first, my favourite mountain picture of the year.

DSC_5895

Other reviews of the year: ATTP; me in 2015.

* Jan: Science advances one funeral at a time discussed the unlamented death of Robert Carter, somewhat ironically preceded by WATN 2015.
* Feb: CSIRO: science as a public good because of some recent echoes; I’ll probably blog those separately. And The Greatest Liberty Of Subjects, Dependeth On The Silence Of The Law from old Hobbes.
* Mar: And what rough beast, its hour come round at last / Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? on the great issue of Hansen’s paper. Salby-world was quiet in 2016; I suspect that him losing his case is about the last we’ll see of him1.
* Apr: Storelvmo et al. by proxy was a brief foray into the now-unfamiliar world of science, but I quickly returned to easier ground with was to become something of a theme for the year, Yet more Exxon drivel. With Rex Tillerson to be Sec of State, this should run and run.
* May: Climate sensitivity, again mercifully required no great ability to think; unlike Say no to Brexit
* Jun: …which segues onto Boris Johnson is a tosser. Or more interesting, The sea ice post! which was another topic of the year. In the fish-in-a-barrel category is coolfuturesfundsmanagement; remarkably, my link to my blog post is still on their fb page but there’s little other sign of activity there.
* Jul: I spared you the Mays in June even though it was dead exciting, but I don’t see why you’d want to miss the real event; town bumps. Apart from that July was quiet; so I’ll just remind you of my bad beekeeping.
* Aug: I asked Who is the farting three-legged dog in this scenario, you ask? and apparently-presciently reported that Antarctica’s sea ice said to be vulnerable to sudden retreat? But you’d be wrong to think it prescient. Hayek vs Hobbes and the theory of law was my discovery of Hayek and the beginning of a long slow process of reading him; more to come, you lucky and grateful people.
* Sep: Sea ice: dull as expected was reasonably accurate as to the annual minimum, but remarkably un-prescient for the year. Back at the comic relief was A Falconer Uppermost twitting the usual suspects.
* Oct: my valiant attempts to convince the nice lefty folks of obvious truths such as We Don’t Need a ‘War’ on Climate Change, We Need a Revolution? fell on deaf ears, as ever. Don’t worry, I’m not downhearted.
* Nov: Trump am all de rage, so I had A proportionate response to Trump’s climate plans? and response, though neither are really about La Donald. Trump’s Plan to Eliminate NASA Climate Research Is Ill-Informed and Dangerous? is more the kind of entrail-reading we can look forward to.
* Dec: Leak reveals Rex Tillerson was director of Bahamas-based US-Russian oil firm? is a correction of shameless drivel from the Graun, not that they thanked me. Scott Adams is a tosser proves I’m still on the side of Truth and Light. And so as to not end on that, U.S. Needs a Robust Carbon Tax, not an Exxon Carbon Tax? is yet another appeal for sanity from the left.

Notes

1. Yes I know he turned up at Curry’s Pizza Parlour but that’s hardly a claim to fame.



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2hRRW2g

A vintage year, for which the title must be Oh, and we were Gone / Kings of Oblivion. Something for everyone. Here, after review, is what catches on my mind. But first, my favourite mountain picture of the year.

DSC_5895

Other reviews of the year: ATTP; me in 2015.

* Jan: Science advances one funeral at a time discussed the unlamented death of Robert Carter, somewhat ironically preceded by WATN 2015.
* Feb: CSIRO: science as a public good because of some recent echoes; I’ll probably blog those separately. And The Greatest Liberty Of Subjects, Dependeth On The Silence Of The Law from old Hobbes.
* Mar: And what rough beast, its hour come round at last / Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? on the great issue of Hansen’s paper. Salby-world was quiet in 2016; I suspect that him losing his case is about the last we’ll see of him1.
* Apr: Storelvmo et al. by proxy was a brief foray into the now-unfamiliar world of science, but I quickly returned to easier ground with was to become something of a theme for the year, Yet more Exxon drivel. With Rex Tillerson to be Sec of State, this should run and run.
* May: Climate sensitivity, again mercifully required no great ability to think; unlike Say no to Brexit
* Jun: …which segues onto Boris Johnson is a tosser. Or more interesting, The sea ice post! which was another topic of the year. In the fish-in-a-barrel category is coolfuturesfundsmanagement; remarkably, my link to my blog post is still on their fb page but there’s little other sign of activity there.
* Jul: I spared you the Mays in June even though it was dead exciting, but I don’t see why you’d want to miss the real event; town bumps. Apart from that July was quiet; so I’ll just remind you of my bad beekeeping.
* Aug: I asked Who is the farting three-legged dog in this scenario, you ask? and apparently-presciently reported that Antarctica’s sea ice said to be vulnerable to sudden retreat? But you’d be wrong to think it prescient. Hayek vs Hobbes and the theory of law was my discovery of Hayek and the beginning of a long slow process of reading him; more to come, you lucky and grateful people.
* Sep: Sea ice: dull as expected was reasonably accurate as to the annual minimum, but remarkably un-prescient for the year. Back at the comic relief was A Falconer Uppermost twitting the usual suspects.
* Oct: my valiant attempts to convince the nice lefty folks of obvious truths such as We Don’t Need a ‘War’ on Climate Change, We Need a Revolution? fell on deaf ears, as ever. Don’t worry, I’m not downhearted.
* Nov: Trump am all de rage, so I had A proportionate response to Trump’s climate plans? and response, though neither are really about La Donald. Trump’s Plan to Eliminate NASA Climate Research Is Ill-Informed and Dangerous? is more the kind of entrail-reading we can look forward to.
* Dec: Leak reveals Rex Tillerson was director of Bahamas-based US-Russian oil firm? is a correction of shameless drivel from the Graun, not that they thanked me. Scott Adams is a tosser proves I’m still on the side of Truth and Light. And so as to not end on that, U.S. Needs a Robust Carbon Tax, not an Exxon Carbon Tax? is yet another appeal for sanity from the left.

Notes

1. Yes I know he turned up at Curry’s Pizza Parlour but that’s hardly a claim to fame.



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2hRRW2g

Reflecting on a Year of Environmental Achievements

By Sophia Rini

Gowanus Canal

Removing debris from the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, NY.

It’s the season when people often think back over the year’s events and take stock. Here at EPA Region 2, we had a very busy 2016 – from responding to environmental emergencies to successful green jobs training. Below are some highlights of our favorite moments protecting human health and the environment around our region this past year:

  • Major milestones in the cleanup of the Passaic River in New Jersey: We issued a final plan to remove 3.5 million cubic yards of toxic sediment from the lower 8.3 miles of the Passaic River and secured $165 million to perform the engineering and design work needed to begin the cleanup.
  • Updates to the Worker Protection Standard: We visited farms in both New York and New Jersey and held a meeting with agricultural workers in Utuado, Puerto Rico to highlight the important updates to the standard. Working in farm fields day after day should not be a health risk for farmers, farmworkers, or their families. With these updates, the nation’s two million farmworkers are better protected against toxic pesticide exposure.
  • Great progress in Trash Free Waters: This year, as part of our Trash Free Waters program, we awarded a $365,000 grant to the New England Water Pollution Control Commission and awarded grants in New York and New Jersey. We also held a Microplastics/Citizen Science workshop on October 11 in Syracuse and a Caribbean Recycling Summit on December 1 & 2 in San Juan, Puerto Rico. We’re getting the word out and expanding the conversation about plastic pollution.
    Fortune Society

    Graduates of the Fortune Society’s green jobs training.

  • Green Jobs Training: We provided funding for successful green jobs training programs. Forty students graduated from The Fortune Society’s training in Long Island City and we awarded $120,000 to PUSH Buffalo for green jobs training and environmental education.
  • South Jersey Ice emergency response: We safely removed 9,700 pounds of toxic ammonia gas from a storage and refrigeration facility located in a residential neighborhood and protected the public from potential harm.
  • Protecting Clean Water: In 2016, we gave millions of dollars to New York, New Jersey, and the U.S. Virgin Islands for water infrastructure projects. We also provided more than $1.5 million in funding for projects to help support the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative.
  • Cutting Diesel Pollution at the Port of San Juan, Puerto Rico: We gave more than $1.6 million to the University of Puerto Rico for projects to reduce air pollution around the Port of San Juan.
  • Progress in the Gowanus Canal Cleanup: We began debris removal in the first step of a multi-year cleanup process.
  • Millions to Preserve and Protect Long Island Sound: We announced $1.3 million in grants to local governments and community groups to improve the health and ecosystem of Long Island Sound. The projects will restore 27 acres of habitat, improve water quality and reduce pollution in the Long Island Sound watershed, one of our nation’s national treasures.
  • Environmental Champion Awards: We recognize the environmental achievements of committed people in our region every year. In 2016, we awarded six people or groups from New Jersey; 28 individuals or groups from New York; seven individuals and organizations from Puerto Rico; and two organizations from the U.S. Virgin Islands. The dedication and accomplishments of these environmental trailblazers is impressive. We will continue to recognize the hard work of people in our region for their commitment to protect public health and the environment. To nominate somebody for the 2017 Environmental Champion Award, visit our website: http://ift.tt/2ihGtKm.


from The EPA Blog http://ift.tt/2iIBPUG

By Sophia Rini

Gowanus Canal

Removing debris from the Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, NY.

It’s the season when people often think back over the year’s events and take stock. Here at EPA Region 2, we had a very busy 2016 – from responding to environmental emergencies to successful green jobs training. Below are some highlights of our favorite moments protecting human health and the environment around our region this past year:

  • Major milestones in the cleanup of the Passaic River in New Jersey: We issued a final plan to remove 3.5 million cubic yards of toxic sediment from the lower 8.3 miles of the Passaic River and secured $165 million to perform the engineering and design work needed to begin the cleanup.
  • Updates to the Worker Protection Standard: We visited farms in both New York and New Jersey and held a meeting with agricultural workers in Utuado, Puerto Rico to highlight the important updates to the standard. Working in farm fields day after day should not be a health risk for farmers, farmworkers, or their families. With these updates, the nation’s two million farmworkers are better protected against toxic pesticide exposure.
  • Great progress in Trash Free Waters: This year, as part of our Trash Free Waters program, we awarded a $365,000 grant to the New England Water Pollution Control Commission and awarded grants in New York and New Jersey. We also held a Microplastics/Citizen Science workshop on October 11 in Syracuse and a Caribbean Recycling Summit on December 1 & 2 in San Juan, Puerto Rico. We’re getting the word out and expanding the conversation about plastic pollution.
    Fortune Society

    Graduates of the Fortune Society’s green jobs training.

  • Green Jobs Training: We provided funding for successful green jobs training programs. Forty students graduated from The Fortune Society’s training in Long Island City and we awarded $120,000 to PUSH Buffalo for green jobs training and environmental education.
  • South Jersey Ice emergency response: We safely removed 9,700 pounds of toxic ammonia gas from a storage and refrigeration facility located in a residential neighborhood and protected the public from potential harm.
  • Protecting Clean Water: In 2016, we gave millions of dollars to New York, New Jersey, and the U.S. Virgin Islands for water infrastructure projects. We also provided more than $1.5 million in funding for projects to help support the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative.
  • Cutting Diesel Pollution at the Port of San Juan, Puerto Rico: We gave more than $1.6 million to the University of Puerto Rico for projects to reduce air pollution around the Port of San Juan.
  • Progress in the Gowanus Canal Cleanup: We began debris removal in the first step of a multi-year cleanup process.
  • Millions to Preserve and Protect Long Island Sound: We announced $1.3 million in grants to local governments and community groups to improve the health and ecosystem of Long Island Sound. The projects will restore 27 acres of habitat, improve water quality and reduce pollution in the Long Island Sound watershed, one of our nation’s national treasures.
  • Environmental Champion Awards: We recognize the environmental achievements of committed people in our region every year. In 2016, we awarded six people or groups from New Jersey; 28 individuals or groups from New York; seven individuals and organizations from Puerto Rico; and two organizations from the U.S. Virgin Islands. The dedication and accomplishments of these environmental trailblazers is impressive. We will continue to recognize the hard work of people in our region for their commitment to protect public health and the environment. To nominate somebody for the 2017 Environmental Champion Award, visit our website: http://ift.tt/2ihGtKm.


from The EPA Blog http://ift.tt/2iIBPUG

The four biggest mistakes of Einstein’s scientific life (Synopsis) [Starts With A Bang]

“The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything.” -Theodore Roosevelt

Scientists make mistakes. We fail. We have our intuition lead us astray; we synthesize information in ways that lead to catastrophically wrong predictions. Whether we make sloppy, calculational errors, have oversights in what we consider, or whether we simply engage in motivated reasoning to attempt to reach our desired conclusions, even the greatest of us make mistakes. Even Einstein.

Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein together in 1925, engaging in their famous conversations/debates about quantum mechanics. Public domain image.

Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein together in 1925, engaging in their famous conversations/debates about quantum mechanics. Public domain image.

While the mind who brought us special and general relativity, E = mc^2 and some of the greatest advances in quantum and statistical physics might seem unassailable, Einstein had more than his share of mistakes. His sloppiness and stubbornness often blinded him to the reality of the situation, and may be directly responsible for some of the most egregiously held positions regarding the quantum nature of our Universe today.

The particles and forces of the Standard Model. Image credit: Contemporary Physics Education Project / DOE / NSF / LBNL, via http://cpepweb.org/.

The particles and forces of the Standard Model. Image credit: Contemporary Physics Education Project / DOE / NSF / LBNL, via http://cpepweb.org/.

Come learn about the four biggest mistakes of Einstein’s scientific life, and see if you agree!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2hzc1Oq

“The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything.” -Theodore Roosevelt

Scientists make mistakes. We fail. We have our intuition lead us astray; we synthesize information in ways that lead to catastrophically wrong predictions. Whether we make sloppy, calculational errors, have oversights in what we consider, or whether we simply engage in motivated reasoning to attempt to reach our desired conclusions, even the greatest of us make mistakes. Even Einstein.

Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein together in 1925, engaging in their famous conversations/debates about quantum mechanics. Public domain image.

Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein together in 1925, engaging in their famous conversations/debates about quantum mechanics. Public domain image.

While the mind who brought us special and general relativity, E = mc^2 and some of the greatest advances in quantum and statistical physics might seem unassailable, Einstein had more than his share of mistakes. His sloppiness and stubbornness often blinded him to the reality of the situation, and may be directly responsible for some of the most egregiously held positions regarding the quantum nature of our Universe today.

The particles and forces of the Standard Model. Image credit: Contemporary Physics Education Project / DOE / NSF / LBNL, via http://cpepweb.org/.

The particles and forces of the Standard Model. Image credit: Contemporary Physics Education Project / DOE / NSF / LBNL, via http://cpepweb.org/.

Come learn about the four biggest mistakes of Einstein’s scientific life, and see if you agree!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2hzc1Oq

Lightening the Load for Warfighters All Comes Down to Research

160427-N-UJ980-001The Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) conducts research in support of operational readiness and warfighter health using the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN), an immersive virtual reality system. The CAREN is used for studies related to survivability, equipment loads, rehabilitation, and fatigue. (U.S. Navy photo by Regena Kowitz/Released)

By Naval Health Research Center Public Affairs

How fast can you run 50 yards? Now, add an 80 pound backpack and how fast can you run that same distance? Probably not quite as fast.

If you’re a warfighter, running across open ground in battle, adding just one second to your time could be the difference between life and death.

Aside from matters of life and death, the long-term impact of carrying heavy loads may cause wear and tear on bones and muscles, potentially leading to acute and chronic injuries. Finding ways to lighten the load that modern warfighters carry is important to survivability and injury prevention. But doing it right and making sure service members have all the protection and gear they need for their mission while also being able to perform operational tasks is crucial. That’s where science and research come in.

For the past several years, Karen Kelly, Ph.D., a research physiologist at the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC), has studied the effects of load carriage on mobility, performance, and injury trends in U.S. Marines. Her research assesses the relationship between the weight of the loads carried by service members, potential injury, and operational performance.

“Modern warfare requires that warfighters carry large, physical loads into the operational environment to accomplish their mission,” said Kelly. “Body armor has become a necessity in military operations. Unfortunately, it usually consists of several heavy protective plates. And, in addition to body armor, military personnel typically carry essential gear, food, and water, all of which add to the load. Based on self-report surveys, infantry Marines carry, on average, over 85 pounds of mission essential equipment in their combat loads.”

Kelly’s recent studies investigated how different load carriage weights affect the spine and a warfighter’s ability to perform specific operational tasks. Additional research focused on testing and evaluating personal protective equipment (PPE) prototypes to assess their impact on gait, balance, marksmanship, potential for musculoskeletal injury, and subjective feedback such as comfort and perceived exertion.

“Finding the right balance between weight, function, and protection is a challenge,” said Kelly. “Conducting comprehensive testing and evaluation on new equipment and studying how different aspects of load carriage impact warfighter physiology is crucial to minimizing injuries and optimizing performance.”

From the field to the lab, Kelly and her team are doing the research to provide a scientific basis for helping find that balance.

Capt. Rita Simmons (center left), commanding officer at Naval Health Research Center (NHRC), and Jay Heaney (center right) give Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research, Dr. Melissa L. Flagg (left), a tour of the command’s environmental chamber, Oct. 25, 2016). As the DoD's premier deployment health research center, NHRC's cutting-edge research and development is used to optimize the operational health and readiness of the nation's armed forces. (U.S. Navy photo by Mayra A. Conde)

Capt. Rita Simmons (center left), commanding officer at Naval Health Research Center (NHRC), and Jay Heaney (center right) give Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research, Dr. Melissa L. Flagg (left), a tour of the command’s environmental chamber, Oct. 25, 2016). As the DoD’s premier deployment health research center, NHRC’s cutting-edge research and development is used to optimize the operational health and readiness of the nation’s armed forces. (U.S. Navy photo by Mayra A. Conde)

One of Kelly’s first studies to address the issue of load carriage in terms of injury potential and performance was conducted with Marines who were relatively new to the military, having served for less than a year. The study was designed to determine how heavy loads affected the compression of intervertebral discs, movement of the spine, and the ability to perform operational tasks.

Kelly and her team, in collaboration with staff from the orthopedics department at the University of California San Diego, analyzed the spines of the Marines who participated in the study using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while they wore varying weights and assumed different positions, just as they would in the field (sitting, standing, and prone on their elbows). Kelly found that loads greater than 30 percent of an individual’s body weight decreased both performance and marksmanship.

Kelly and her team evaluated the physiological and biomechanical effects of prototype equipment in both a controlled laboratory setting and a field environment to assess the new gear and compare it to legacy equipment. NHRC’s strategic location in San Diego and unique research capabilities makes it the ideal lab for conducting this type of research. Among the many land, air, sea, and special operations units in the region, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton is just over an hour from NHRC, providing NHRC researchers with access to numerous infantry units.

“Evaluating prototype equipment while warfighters wear the gear and perform operational tasks in both a controlled lab environment and out in the field allows us to better assess that gear’s impact on performance and potential for injury,” said Kelly.

To do this, Kelly collaborated with fellow NHRC scientist and biomedical engineer, Pinata Sessoms, Ph.D, to leverage the research capabilities of the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN), an immersive virtual reality system in NHRC’s Warfighter Performance Lab. Sessoms and her team used the CAREN to measure reaction time, head and eye movement, balance behavior, and muscle activation in relation to the prototype gear.

In the field, Kelly and her team analyzed muscle activation, walking speed, spine kinematics (the movement of the spine), range of motion, and cognitive function as well as more subjective data such as how the Marines wearing the gear perceived levels of comfort and exertion during operational tasks.

Researchers then analyzed the data gathered from the lab and field to develop a comprehensive comparison of the prototype equipment against existing PPE.

“The work we do, the whole point of our research, is to improve the operational readiness of our warfighters,” said Kelly. “By using scientific methods to assess how mission essential equipment impacts the musculoskeletal system, optimal performance, and survivability, we are putting vital and validated knowledge into the hands of decision-makers to help them optimize the balance between carriage load and survivability, health, and performance.”

Source

Follow the Department of Defense on Facebook and Twitter!

———

Disclaimer: The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the Department of Defense of this website or the information, products or services contained therein. For other than authorized activities such as military exchanges and Morale, Welfare and Recreation sites, the Department of Defense does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations. Such links are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this DOD website.



from Armed with Science http://ift.tt/2hQxKO3

160427-N-UJ980-001The Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) conducts research in support of operational readiness and warfighter health using the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN), an immersive virtual reality system. The CAREN is used for studies related to survivability, equipment loads, rehabilitation, and fatigue. (U.S. Navy photo by Regena Kowitz/Released)

By Naval Health Research Center Public Affairs

How fast can you run 50 yards? Now, add an 80 pound backpack and how fast can you run that same distance? Probably not quite as fast.

If you’re a warfighter, running across open ground in battle, adding just one second to your time could be the difference between life and death.

Aside from matters of life and death, the long-term impact of carrying heavy loads may cause wear and tear on bones and muscles, potentially leading to acute and chronic injuries. Finding ways to lighten the load that modern warfighters carry is important to survivability and injury prevention. But doing it right and making sure service members have all the protection and gear they need for their mission while also being able to perform operational tasks is crucial. That’s where science and research come in.

For the past several years, Karen Kelly, Ph.D., a research physiologist at the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC), has studied the effects of load carriage on mobility, performance, and injury trends in U.S. Marines. Her research assesses the relationship between the weight of the loads carried by service members, potential injury, and operational performance.

“Modern warfare requires that warfighters carry large, physical loads into the operational environment to accomplish their mission,” said Kelly. “Body armor has become a necessity in military operations. Unfortunately, it usually consists of several heavy protective plates. And, in addition to body armor, military personnel typically carry essential gear, food, and water, all of which add to the load. Based on self-report surveys, infantry Marines carry, on average, over 85 pounds of mission essential equipment in their combat loads.”

Kelly’s recent studies investigated how different load carriage weights affect the spine and a warfighter’s ability to perform specific operational tasks. Additional research focused on testing and evaluating personal protective equipment (PPE) prototypes to assess their impact on gait, balance, marksmanship, potential for musculoskeletal injury, and subjective feedback such as comfort and perceived exertion.

“Finding the right balance between weight, function, and protection is a challenge,” said Kelly. “Conducting comprehensive testing and evaluation on new equipment and studying how different aspects of load carriage impact warfighter physiology is crucial to minimizing injuries and optimizing performance.”

From the field to the lab, Kelly and her team are doing the research to provide a scientific basis for helping find that balance.

Capt. Rita Simmons (center left), commanding officer at Naval Health Research Center (NHRC), and Jay Heaney (center right) give Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research, Dr. Melissa L. Flagg (left), a tour of the command’s environmental chamber, Oct. 25, 2016). As the DoD's premier deployment health research center, NHRC's cutting-edge research and development is used to optimize the operational health and readiness of the nation's armed forces. (U.S. Navy photo by Mayra A. Conde)

Capt. Rita Simmons (center left), commanding officer at Naval Health Research Center (NHRC), and Jay Heaney (center right) give Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research, Dr. Melissa L. Flagg (left), a tour of the command’s environmental chamber, Oct. 25, 2016). As the DoD’s premier deployment health research center, NHRC’s cutting-edge research and development is used to optimize the operational health and readiness of the nation’s armed forces. (U.S. Navy photo by Mayra A. Conde)

One of Kelly’s first studies to address the issue of load carriage in terms of injury potential and performance was conducted with Marines who were relatively new to the military, having served for less than a year. The study was designed to determine how heavy loads affected the compression of intervertebral discs, movement of the spine, and the ability to perform operational tasks.

Kelly and her team, in collaboration with staff from the orthopedics department at the University of California San Diego, analyzed the spines of the Marines who participated in the study using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while they wore varying weights and assumed different positions, just as they would in the field (sitting, standing, and prone on their elbows). Kelly found that loads greater than 30 percent of an individual’s body weight decreased both performance and marksmanship.

Kelly and her team evaluated the physiological and biomechanical effects of prototype equipment in both a controlled laboratory setting and a field environment to assess the new gear and compare it to legacy equipment. NHRC’s strategic location in San Diego and unique research capabilities makes it the ideal lab for conducting this type of research. Among the many land, air, sea, and special operations units in the region, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton is just over an hour from NHRC, providing NHRC researchers with access to numerous infantry units.

“Evaluating prototype equipment while warfighters wear the gear and perform operational tasks in both a controlled lab environment and out in the field allows us to better assess that gear’s impact on performance and potential for injury,” said Kelly.

To do this, Kelly collaborated with fellow NHRC scientist and biomedical engineer, Pinata Sessoms, Ph.D, to leverage the research capabilities of the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN), an immersive virtual reality system in NHRC’s Warfighter Performance Lab. Sessoms and her team used the CAREN to measure reaction time, head and eye movement, balance behavior, and muscle activation in relation to the prototype gear.

In the field, Kelly and her team analyzed muscle activation, walking speed, spine kinematics (the movement of the spine), range of motion, and cognitive function as well as more subjective data such as how the Marines wearing the gear perceived levels of comfort and exertion during operational tasks.

Researchers then analyzed the data gathered from the lab and field to develop a comprehensive comparison of the prototype equipment against existing PPE.

“The work we do, the whole point of our research, is to improve the operational readiness of our warfighters,” said Kelly. “By using scientific methods to assess how mission essential equipment impacts the musculoskeletal system, optimal performance, and survivability, we are putting vital and validated knowledge into the hands of decision-makers to help them optimize the balance between carriage load and survivability, health, and performance.”

Source

Follow the Department of Defense on Facebook and Twitter!

———

Disclaimer: The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the Department of Defense of this website or the information, products or services contained therein. For other than authorized activities such as military exchanges and Morale, Welfare and Recreation sites, the Department of Defense does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations. Such links are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this DOD website.



from Armed with Science http://ift.tt/2hQxKO3

Making the case for safer paint strippers (rerun) [The Pump Handle]

The Pump Handle is on a holiday break. The following, which was originally published on March 9, is one of our favorite posts from 2016.

by Celeste Monforton, DrPH, MPH

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) continues to make the case that consumers and contractors should stay away from paint strippers that contain methylene chloride. The CDPH’s latest effort is a 7-minute video released last week by the agency’s Occupational Health Branch. It features a painter named Jason who nearly died while working with a methylene chloride-based paint stripper. He and two co-workers were removing paint from inside the cabin of a yacht. He explains:

“I became dizzy, light headed, the world was spinning. Next thing I know, I looked over… and one guy was completely unconscious.”

After that he just remembers being revived on the shore.

“I absolutely believe we could have died out there. I think it is amazing that we are still here.”

When methylene chloride (a.k.a. dichloromethane) is inhaled or absorbed through the skin it is metabolized into carbon monoxide (CO). Death from CO poisoning could have been the fate of Jason and his  co-workers.

The CDPH’s Occupational Health Branch has investigated several fatal incidents involving methylene chloride (here, here), as have other occupational health investigators (here.)  It wasn’t too long ago that an issue of the MMWR summarized 13 of these cases. That report focused exclusively on workers who were refinishing bath tubs and died from acute methylene chloride exposure. I can add to that list the death of Jeffrey Lewis, 20. He died in December 2014 while refinishing a bath tub in an apartment in Manhattan, NYC.

The CDPH’s video is the latest in the Occupational Health Branch’s growing collection of digital stories. Jason the painter narrates a re-enactment of his close call. The video also features Robert Dufort. He’s the founder of Magic Brush. a painting contractor based in San Francisco. Dufort says:

“Back in the day, principally we used methylene chloride-based strippers because that was all there was available at the time.  …We really never realized the inherent dangers.  …[There was] a growing, knowing sense that this was not really a material that we wanted to use.”

Regrettably, methylene chloride-based paint strippers are still pretty much what you’ll find on store shelves. And the warning on the front of the container sure doesn’t cut it. Here’s what it says:

DANGER! POISON. May be fatal or cause blindness if swallowed. Eye and skin irritant. Vapor harmful.

Skin irritant? Vapor harmful? What about “Fumes can kill users in minutes!”

Hats off the the CDPH’s Occupational Health Branch for mentioning in the video the utter inadequacy of the warning labels on these products. The narrator is frank:

“The labels mention cancer risk but do not make it clear the possibility of rapid death.”

In the paint aisle at my town’s big box hardware stores, I found products such as Jasco Premium Paint Remover (60-100% methylene chloride) and Klean-Strip Strip X Stripper (30-40% methylene chloride). I was hard pressed to find a product that didn’t contain methylene chloride or NMP (n-methylpyrrolidone) which is not a safer alternative. NMP causes acute and long-term effects on the central nervous system as well as a potential human reproductive toxin.

Telling Jason’s story of nearly losing his life from a deadly paint stripper does not in itself “make the case.” Contractors and consumers need to know what’s the alternative. The video does that well with recommendations for better options.  And for those who need a refresher when they are browsing the paint aisle, the CDPH develop a mobile app guide for choosing a safer alternative paint strippers.

As Robert Dufort says in the video, using a methylene chloride-free paint stripper is a “no brainer.”



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2itQKCQ

The Pump Handle is on a holiday break. The following, which was originally published on March 9, is one of our favorite posts from 2016.

by Celeste Monforton, DrPH, MPH

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) continues to make the case that consumers and contractors should stay away from paint strippers that contain methylene chloride. The CDPH’s latest effort is a 7-minute video released last week by the agency’s Occupational Health Branch. It features a painter named Jason who nearly died while working with a methylene chloride-based paint stripper. He and two co-workers were removing paint from inside the cabin of a yacht. He explains:

“I became dizzy, light headed, the world was spinning. Next thing I know, I looked over… and one guy was completely unconscious.”

After that he just remembers being revived on the shore.

“I absolutely believe we could have died out there. I think it is amazing that we are still here.”

When methylene chloride (a.k.a. dichloromethane) is inhaled or absorbed through the skin it is metabolized into carbon monoxide (CO). Death from CO poisoning could have been the fate of Jason and his  co-workers.

The CDPH’s Occupational Health Branch has investigated several fatal incidents involving methylene chloride (here, here), as have other occupational health investigators (here.)  It wasn’t too long ago that an issue of the MMWR summarized 13 of these cases. That report focused exclusively on workers who were refinishing bath tubs and died from acute methylene chloride exposure. I can add to that list the death of Jeffrey Lewis, 20. He died in December 2014 while refinishing a bath tub in an apartment in Manhattan, NYC.

The CDPH’s video is the latest in the Occupational Health Branch’s growing collection of digital stories. Jason the painter narrates a re-enactment of his close call. The video also features Robert Dufort. He’s the founder of Magic Brush. a painting contractor based in San Francisco. Dufort says:

“Back in the day, principally we used methylene chloride-based strippers because that was all there was available at the time.  …We really never realized the inherent dangers.  …[There was] a growing, knowing sense that this was not really a material that we wanted to use.”

Regrettably, methylene chloride-based paint strippers are still pretty much what you’ll find on store shelves. And the warning on the front of the container sure doesn’t cut it. Here’s what it says:

DANGER! POISON. May be fatal or cause blindness if swallowed. Eye and skin irritant. Vapor harmful.

Skin irritant? Vapor harmful? What about “Fumes can kill users in minutes!”

Hats off the the CDPH’s Occupational Health Branch for mentioning in the video the utter inadequacy of the warning labels on these products. The narrator is frank:

“The labels mention cancer risk but do not make it clear the possibility of rapid death.”

In the paint aisle at my town’s big box hardware stores, I found products such as Jasco Premium Paint Remover (60-100% methylene chloride) and Klean-Strip Strip X Stripper (30-40% methylene chloride). I was hard pressed to find a product that didn’t contain methylene chloride or NMP (n-methylpyrrolidone) which is not a safer alternative. NMP causes acute and long-term effects on the central nervous system as well as a potential human reproductive toxin.

Telling Jason’s story of nearly losing his life from a deadly paint stripper does not in itself “make the case.” Contractors and consumers need to know what’s the alternative. The video does that well with recommendations for better options.  And for those who need a refresher when they are browsing the paint aisle, the CDPH develop a mobile app guide for choosing a safer alternative paint strippers.

As Robert Dufort says in the video, using a methylene chloride-free paint stripper is a “no brainer.”



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2itQKCQ

Eleven Years Of Blogging [Aardvarchaeology]

eleven-clipart-number11-250pxToday is Aard’s tenth anniversary! And 16 December was my eleventh anniversary as a blogger, since I blogged at Blogspot for over a year before I came to Scienceblogs.

2016 has been a good year for the blog’s traffic: about 540 daily readers which is better than 2014 and 2015, very encouraging! It hasn’t been a great year for me professionally though, with a number of really bad disappointments in academia, mostly related to nepotism, and quite a lot of financial worries. The latter luckily turned out to be unfounded. And I’m pleased with having directed my biggest excavation yet and published my first pop-sci book. Also it’s been a really good year for me as a dad.

Of course, many people will remember 2016 for big triumphs of right-wing populism in the UK and US, and for a sad string of celebrity deaths. I say let’s remember that Austria elected a Green president over a Brown one, and Keith Richards is not only still alive but still touring!

As for my blogging plans for 2017, I don’t foresee any particular changes, largely because I have nothing particular planned for other aspects of my life. As far as I know today I’ll spend 2017 finishing a book on the Medieval castles of Östergötland at 75% while editing Fornvännen at 25%. You’ll find me here, Dear Reader.



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2hw4Tkq

eleven-clipart-number11-250pxToday is Aard’s tenth anniversary! And 16 December was my eleventh anniversary as a blogger, since I blogged at Blogspot for over a year before I came to Scienceblogs.

2016 has been a good year for the blog’s traffic: about 540 daily readers which is better than 2014 and 2015, very encouraging! It hasn’t been a great year for me professionally though, with a number of really bad disappointments in academia, mostly related to nepotism, and quite a lot of financial worries. The latter luckily turned out to be unfounded. And I’m pleased with having directed my biggest excavation yet and published my first pop-sci book. Also it’s been a really good year for me as a dad.

Of course, many people will remember 2016 for big triumphs of right-wing populism in the UK and US, and for a sad string of celebrity deaths. I say let’s remember that Austria elected a Green president over a Brown one, and Keith Richards is not only still alive but still touring!

As for my blogging plans for 2017, I don’t foresee any particular changes, largely because I have nothing particular planned for other aspects of my life. As far as I know today I’ll spend 2017 finishing a book on the Medieval castles of Östergötland at 75% while editing Fornvännen at 25%. You’ll find me here, Dear Reader.



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2hw4Tkq

Star of the week: Aldebaran

Compare the size of Aldebaran with our sun. Image via Wikipedia

Best New Year’s gift ever! EarthSky moon calendar for 2017

The reddish star Aldebaran – the fiery eye of the Bull in the constellation Taurus – is an aging star and a huge star! The computed diameter is between 35 and 40 solar diameters. If Aldebaran were placed where the sun is now, its surface would extend almost to the orbit of Mercury. Follow the links below to learn more about this prominent and fascinating star.

Science of star Aldebaran.

How to see Aldebaran.

History and mythology of Aldebaran.

Science of star Aldebaran. This star glows with the orangish color of a K5 giant star. In visible light, it is about 153 times brighter than the sun, although its surface temperature is lower (roughly 4000 kelvins compared to 5800 kelvins for the sun).

Aldebaran is about 65 light-years away, much closer than the stars of the Hyades with which it misleadingly seems associated. The Hyades are about 150 light-years away.

Aldebaran is an erratic variable with minor variations too small to be noticed by the eye. It also has a small, faint companion star, an M-type red dwarf, some 3.5 light-days away. In other words, light from Aldebaran would need to travel for 3.5 days to reach the companion, in contrast to light from our sun, which requires 8 minutes to travel to Earth.

The three medium-bright stars of Orion’s Belt point to reddish Aldebaran. Image via SolarEmpireUK

How to see Aldebaran. Aldebaran is easy to find. Frequently imagined as the fiery eye of Taurus the Bull, Aldebaran is part of a V-shaped star grouping that forms the face of the Bull. This pattern is called the Hyades.

You can also locate Aldebaran using the famous constellation Orion as a guide. Simply locate the three stars of Orion’s Belt. Then draw an imaginary line through the belt to the right. The first bright star you come to will be Aldebaran with its distinctive reddish-orange glow.

Aldebaran is the 14th brightest star, but five of those that outshine it are only barely visible or not visible at all from much of the Northern Hemisphere. Aldebaran is primarily a winter and spring star. At least, that is when this red star is most easily visible in the evening sky. By early December, it rises shortly after sunset and is visible all night. Three months later it is high to the south at sunset, and sets at around midnight. By early May, it hangs low about the western sunset glow – and before the end of the month, it’s lost altogether. It returns to the predawn sky around late June.

By the way, although it appears among them, Aldebaran is not actually a member of the V-shaped Hyades cluster. It is actually much closer to us in space than the actual Hyades stars.

Constellation Taurus. See Aldebaran marked as the Bull’s Eye? View larger.

History and mythology of Aldebaran. Aldebaran is often depicted as the fiery eye of Taurus the Bull. Because it is bright and prominent, Aldebaran was honored as one of the Four Royal Stars in ancient Persia, the other three Royal Stars being Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut.

The name Aldebaran is from the Arabic for “The Follower,” presumably as a hunter following prey, which here likely was the star cluster we call the Pleiades. The latter was often viewed as a flock of birds, perhaps doves. According to Richard Hinckley Allen in his classic book Star Names, the name Aldebaran once was applied to the entire Hyades star cluster, a large loose collection of faint stars.

In Hindu myth, Aldebaran was sometimes identified with a beautiful young woman named Rohini, disguised as an antelope and pursued by her lecherous father, disguised as a deer, Mriga. Apparently several ancient peoples associated the star with rain. The Wikipedia entry notes a Dakota Sioux story in which Aldebaran was a star which had fallen to the Earth and whose killing of a serpent led to the formation of the Mississippi River. Allen notes a number of other alternate names, but precious little mythology is known for Aldebaran separately.

Aldebaran is the name of one of the chariot horses in the movie Ben Hur.

On a different note, astronomer Jack Eddy has suggested a connection with the Big Horn Medicine Wheel, an ancient circle of stones atop a mountain in Wyoming. Eddy wrote that the ancient Americans may have used this site as a sort of observatory to view the rising of Aldebaran just before the sun in June to predict the June solstice.

Interestingly, in about two million years, the American spaceprobe Pioneer 10, now heading out into deep space, will pass Aldebaran.

Aldebaran’s position is RA: 4h 35m 55s, dec: 16°30’35”

Bottom line: The star is so Aldebaran huge that, were it in our sun’s place, its surface would extend almost to the orbit of Mercury.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/Yhp9Em

Compare the size of Aldebaran with our sun. Image via Wikipedia

Best New Year’s gift ever! EarthSky moon calendar for 2017

The reddish star Aldebaran – the fiery eye of the Bull in the constellation Taurus – is an aging star and a huge star! The computed diameter is between 35 and 40 solar diameters. If Aldebaran were placed where the sun is now, its surface would extend almost to the orbit of Mercury. Follow the links below to learn more about this prominent and fascinating star.

Science of star Aldebaran.

How to see Aldebaran.

History and mythology of Aldebaran.

Science of star Aldebaran. This star glows with the orangish color of a K5 giant star. In visible light, it is about 153 times brighter than the sun, although its surface temperature is lower (roughly 4000 kelvins compared to 5800 kelvins for the sun).

Aldebaran is about 65 light-years away, much closer than the stars of the Hyades with which it misleadingly seems associated. The Hyades are about 150 light-years away.

Aldebaran is an erratic variable with minor variations too small to be noticed by the eye. It also has a small, faint companion star, an M-type red dwarf, some 3.5 light-days away. In other words, light from Aldebaran would need to travel for 3.5 days to reach the companion, in contrast to light from our sun, which requires 8 minutes to travel to Earth.

The three medium-bright stars of Orion’s Belt point to reddish Aldebaran. Image via SolarEmpireUK

How to see Aldebaran. Aldebaran is easy to find. Frequently imagined as the fiery eye of Taurus the Bull, Aldebaran is part of a V-shaped star grouping that forms the face of the Bull. This pattern is called the Hyades.

You can also locate Aldebaran using the famous constellation Orion as a guide. Simply locate the three stars of Orion’s Belt. Then draw an imaginary line through the belt to the right. The first bright star you come to will be Aldebaran with its distinctive reddish-orange glow.

Aldebaran is the 14th brightest star, but five of those that outshine it are only barely visible or not visible at all from much of the Northern Hemisphere. Aldebaran is primarily a winter and spring star. At least, that is when this red star is most easily visible in the evening sky. By early December, it rises shortly after sunset and is visible all night. Three months later it is high to the south at sunset, and sets at around midnight. By early May, it hangs low about the western sunset glow – and before the end of the month, it’s lost altogether. It returns to the predawn sky around late June.

By the way, although it appears among them, Aldebaran is not actually a member of the V-shaped Hyades cluster. It is actually much closer to us in space than the actual Hyades stars.

Constellation Taurus. See Aldebaran marked as the Bull’s Eye? View larger.

History and mythology of Aldebaran. Aldebaran is often depicted as the fiery eye of Taurus the Bull. Because it is bright and prominent, Aldebaran was honored as one of the Four Royal Stars in ancient Persia, the other three Royal Stars being Regulus, Antares and Fomalhaut.

The name Aldebaran is from the Arabic for “The Follower,” presumably as a hunter following prey, which here likely was the star cluster we call the Pleiades. The latter was often viewed as a flock of birds, perhaps doves. According to Richard Hinckley Allen in his classic book Star Names, the name Aldebaran once was applied to the entire Hyades star cluster, a large loose collection of faint stars.

In Hindu myth, Aldebaran was sometimes identified with a beautiful young woman named Rohini, disguised as an antelope and pursued by her lecherous father, disguised as a deer, Mriga. Apparently several ancient peoples associated the star with rain. The Wikipedia entry notes a Dakota Sioux story in which Aldebaran was a star which had fallen to the Earth and whose killing of a serpent led to the formation of the Mississippi River. Allen notes a number of other alternate names, but precious little mythology is known for Aldebaran separately.

Aldebaran is the name of one of the chariot horses in the movie Ben Hur.

On a different note, astronomer Jack Eddy has suggested a connection with the Big Horn Medicine Wheel, an ancient circle of stones atop a mountain in Wyoming. Eddy wrote that the ancient Americans may have used this site as a sort of observatory to view the rising of Aldebaran just before the sun in June to predict the June solstice.

Interestingly, in about two million years, the American spaceprobe Pioneer 10, now heading out into deep space, will pass Aldebaran.

Aldebaran’s position is RA: 4h 35m 55s, dec: 16°30’35”

Bottom line: The star is so Aldebaran huge that, were it in our sun’s place, its surface would extend almost to the orbit of Mercury.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/Yhp9Em