Black Moon on September 30?

Image at top, new moon, via U.S. Naval Observatory

Tonight – September 30, 2016 – you probably won’t see the moon because it’s at the new moon phase. Depending on where you live worldwide, this new moon is either the second of two new moons in September 2016, or the first of two new moons in October 2016. The second of two new moons in a single calendar month is sometimes called a Black Moon.

A new moon, by the way, is just a moon that’s traveling more or less between the Earth and sun. New moon is part of every monthly orbit of the moon. Black Moon is just a name, like Blue Moon, or Harvest Moon, or any moon name (although nearly all refer to full moons). It doesn’t mean the moon is literally black, although the moon isn’t shining for us now either. Because it’s between the Earth and sun, the moon’s lighted side faces away from us now, and the moon is traveling across the sky with the sun during the day.

The moon turns new on October 1 at 0011 Translate to your time zone. Although the new moon happens at the same instant all over the world, the clock time varies by time zone. At our U.S. time zones, the new moon comes on September 30, at 8:11 p.m. EDT, 7:11 p.m CDT, 6:11 p.m MDT and 5:11 p.m PDT. So, for our part of the world, the upcoming new moon on September 30 counts as the second of two September 2016 new moons.

For the world’s Eastern Hemisphere, where the moon turns new on October 1, the upcoming new moon is the first of two October 2016 new moons.

In another day or two, the moon will appear as an extremely slender waxing crescent in the western sky after sunset, to mark the birth of the Jewish New Year 5777 A.M. and the Muslim New Year 1438 A.H.

Bottom line: A Black Moon is the second of two new moons in a single calendar month. Whether you have one depends on your location on the globe. The Western Hemisphere has a Black Moon in September 2016. The Eastern Hemisphere has a Black Moon in October 2016.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2dc5toc

Image at top, new moon, via U.S. Naval Observatory

Tonight – September 30, 2016 – you probably won’t see the moon because it’s at the new moon phase. Depending on where you live worldwide, this new moon is either the second of two new moons in September 2016, or the first of two new moons in October 2016. The second of two new moons in a single calendar month is sometimes called a Black Moon.

A new moon, by the way, is just a moon that’s traveling more or less between the Earth and sun. New moon is part of every monthly orbit of the moon. Black Moon is just a name, like Blue Moon, or Harvest Moon, or any moon name (although nearly all refer to full moons). It doesn’t mean the moon is literally black, although the moon isn’t shining for us now either. Because it’s between the Earth and sun, the moon’s lighted side faces away from us now, and the moon is traveling across the sky with the sun during the day.

The moon turns new on October 1 at 0011 Translate to your time zone. Although the new moon happens at the same instant all over the world, the clock time varies by time zone. At our U.S. time zones, the new moon comes on September 30, at 8:11 p.m. EDT, 7:11 p.m CDT, 6:11 p.m MDT and 5:11 p.m PDT. So, for our part of the world, the upcoming new moon on September 30 counts as the second of two September 2016 new moons.

For the world’s Eastern Hemisphere, where the moon turns new on October 1, the upcoming new moon is the first of two October 2016 new moons.

In another day or two, the moon will appear as an extremely slender waxing crescent in the western sky after sunset, to mark the birth of the Jewish New Year 5777 A.M. and the Muslim New Year 1438 A.H.

Bottom line: A Black Moon is the second of two new moons in a single calendar month. Whether you have one depends on your location on the globe. The Western Hemisphere has a Black Moon in September 2016. The Eastern Hemisphere has a Black Moon in October 2016.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2dc5toc

Need details on SpaceX’s Mars mission?

What the view of Mars might look like from inside the Interplanetary Transport System. Image via SpaceX.

What the view of Mars might look like from inside the Interplanetary Transport System. Image via SpaceX.

I cruised around West Texas for nearly a week – internet-less – in the magical deserts of Big Bend National Park. And (speaking of deserts) that’s why I missed Elon Musk’s September 27, 2016 announcement about SpaceX’s plan to make human life multi-planetary by building a self-sustaining, one-million-person civilization on Mars. Here’s a short synopsis, with a few links to great, long, detailed articles written this week by others, plus some photos and videos, including the two-hour video from SpaceX of Musk’s actual announcement at the 2016 International Astronautical Congress in Guadalajara, Mexico.

Before reading on, watch the four-minute video below. It’ll give you the flavor of Musk’s plan:

Elon Musk is SpaceX’s Founder, CEO, and Lead Designer. His vision – announced in what Eric Berger at arstechnica.com called “the naked baring of his soul” – is to ferry 100 people at a time to Mars in a skyscraper-sized rocket. These aren’t free trips. No one is going to send you to Mars. But your ticket to Mars would be within reach, according to Musk’s plan, for less than US$200,000, or about the median cost of a house in the U.S.

The big SpaceX rocket booster for the Mars plan is said to be nearly four times as powerful as the mighty Saturn V booster that lifted the first astronauts to the moon. Those first moon shots, as you’ll recall, carried fewer than a handful of people each. SpaceX has vastly bigger ideas and used the name Interplanetary Transport System for its rocket, although it hasn’t settled on an official name yet. Musk described it as:

… by far the biggest flying object ever.

While en route to Mars, would-be colonists will play zero-g games, float around, go to movies and lectures and eat in a restaurant, Musk said. More good news. In Musk’s vision, future Mars colonists – using rockets like this one, and SpaceX’s proven ability not only to launch rockets but also land them successfully back on Earth – would be able to come back to Earth if they want (assuming they can afford the ticket price). Here’s what really got me going, though, as a long-time skywatcher: Musk is linking specific parts of his initial plan to upcoming Mars oppositions, once-every-two-year events when Earth and Mars are on the same side of the sun. As Mars brightens in our sky in the coming years, will we also be able to imagine SpaceX ships there and the beginnings of a colonization effort? The info below, from Wait But Why, outlines the next few steps:

Upcoming Mars Oppositions – and what SpaceX is planning for each

July, 2018: Send a Dragon spacecraft (the Falcon 9’s SUV-size spacecraft) to Mars with cargo

October, 2020: Send multiple Dragons with more cargo

December, 2022: Maiden [Interplanetary Transport System] voyage to Mars. Carrying only cargo. This is the spaceship Elon wants to call Heart of Gold [a nod to the fictional spacecraft A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy].

January, 2025: First people-carrying … voyage to Mars.

Did you catch that?

If things go to plan, the Neil Armstrong of Mars will touch down about eight years from now.

Okay, so here are some links that you should check out for more details:

Reusability: The Key to Making Human Life Multi-Planetary, from SpaceX

A very readable and understandable post (albeit profanity-laden) with context on the Mars plan, from Wait But Why

A dissection of the technical and financial feasibility of SpaceX’s plan, from Eric Berger at arstechnica.com.

Musk says travel to Mars will be like Battlestar Galactica, cost around $100,000, from New Atlas

The biggest lingering questions about SpaceX’s Mars colonization plans, from The Verge

The video just below (nearly two hours) is the complete announcement by Elon Musk on September 27. The talk itself starts about 20 minutes in.

SpaceX's big rocket. Image via Wait But Why.

Artist’s concept of SpaceX’s big rocket. Image via Wait But Why.

The SpaceX Mars rocket has 2 parts: a spaceship and a booster. Image via Wait But Why.

Musk said he likes the word “system” for his Interplanetary Transport System because it has 4 parts: a rocket and spaceship, shown here, plus a fueling tanker and propellant depots. Image via Wait But Why.

Artist's concept of SpaceX's rocket, upright in the city of Boston. It's as big as a skyscraper, by far the biggest rocket ever built. Image via Wait But Why.

Artist’s concept of SpaceX’s rocket, upright in the city of Boston. It’s as big as a skyscraper, by far the biggest rocket ever built. Image via Wait But Why.

Artist's concept of Space X Interplanetary Transport System at Cape Canaveral, ready for launch. Image via SpaceX.

Artist’s concept of Space X Interplanetary Transport System at Cape Canaveral, ready for launch. Image via SpaceX.

Lift off! One hundred Mars wayfarers would be aboard. Image via SpaceX.

Lift off! One hundred Mars wayfarers would be aboard. Image via SpaceX.

The rocket booster would detach and return to Earth, pick up a fuel tank, and head back to Earth orbit, where the Mars colonists would be waiting.

The rocket booster would detach and return to Earth, pick up a fuel tank (liquid oxygen and methane), and head back to Earth orbit, where the Mars ship would be waiting.

Once carried to space by the booster, the fuel and original rocket would dock,

Once carried to space by the booster, the fuel tank and original rocket would connect like 2 orcas holding hands” as the fuel is transferred. This happens again … and again … until the Mars craft has enough fuel to get to Mars in only about 3 months.

Imagine the excitement aboard the ship as Mars looms ahead. Image via SpaceX.

Imagine the excitement aboard the ship as Mars looms ahead. Image via SpaceX.

Artist's concept of future Mars colonists facing their new world. Image via SpaceX.

Artist’s concept of future Mars colonists facing their new world. Image via SpaceX.

It's not all dreams and artist's concepts. Here's The

It’s not all dreams and artist’s concepts. Here’s the “big” composite tank used to contain pressurized liquid oxygen that Musk revealed on September 27. Image via arstechnica.com.

Bottom line: Elon Musk of SpaceX said on September 27, 2016 that he wants to make humans a multiplanetary species, beginning with a million people in a Mars colony by the end of this century.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2cZre51
What the view of Mars might look like from inside the Interplanetary Transport System. Image via SpaceX.

What the view of Mars might look like from inside the Interplanetary Transport System. Image via SpaceX.

I cruised around West Texas for nearly a week – internet-less – in the magical deserts of Big Bend National Park. And (speaking of deserts) that’s why I missed Elon Musk’s September 27, 2016 announcement about SpaceX’s plan to make human life multi-planetary by building a self-sustaining, one-million-person civilization on Mars. Here’s a short synopsis, with a few links to great, long, detailed articles written this week by others, plus some photos and videos, including the two-hour video from SpaceX of Musk’s actual announcement at the 2016 International Astronautical Congress in Guadalajara, Mexico.

Before reading on, watch the four-minute video below. It’ll give you the flavor of Musk’s plan:

Elon Musk is SpaceX’s Founder, CEO, and Lead Designer. His vision – announced in what Eric Berger at arstechnica.com called “the naked baring of his soul” – is to ferry 100 people at a time to Mars in a skyscraper-sized rocket. These aren’t free trips. No one is going to send you to Mars. But your ticket to Mars would be within reach, according to Musk’s plan, for less than US$200,000, or about the median cost of a house in the U.S.

The big SpaceX rocket booster for the Mars plan is said to be nearly four times as powerful as the mighty Saturn V booster that lifted the first astronauts to the moon. Those first moon shots, as you’ll recall, carried fewer than a handful of people each. SpaceX has vastly bigger ideas and used the name Interplanetary Transport System for its rocket, although it hasn’t settled on an official name yet. Musk described it as:

… by far the biggest flying object ever.

While en route to Mars, would-be colonists will play zero-g games, float around, go to movies and lectures and eat in a restaurant, Musk said. More good news. In Musk’s vision, future Mars colonists – using rockets like this one, and SpaceX’s proven ability not only to launch rockets but also land them successfully back on Earth – would be able to come back to Earth if they want (assuming they can afford the ticket price). Here’s what really got me going, though, as a long-time skywatcher: Musk is linking specific parts of his initial plan to upcoming Mars oppositions, once-every-two-year events when Earth and Mars are on the same side of the sun. As Mars brightens in our sky in the coming years, will we also be able to imagine SpaceX ships there and the beginnings of a colonization effort? The info below, from Wait But Why, outlines the next few steps:

Upcoming Mars Oppositions – and what SpaceX is planning for each

July, 2018: Send a Dragon spacecraft (the Falcon 9’s SUV-size spacecraft) to Mars with cargo

October, 2020: Send multiple Dragons with more cargo

December, 2022: Maiden [Interplanetary Transport System] voyage to Mars. Carrying only cargo. This is the spaceship Elon wants to call Heart of Gold [a nod to the fictional spacecraft A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy].

January, 2025: First people-carrying … voyage to Mars.

Did you catch that?

If things go to plan, the Neil Armstrong of Mars will touch down about eight years from now.

Okay, so here are some links that you should check out for more details:

Reusability: The Key to Making Human Life Multi-Planetary, from SpaceX

A very readable and understandable post (albeit profanity-laden) with context on the Mars plan, from Wait But Why

A dissection of the technical and financial feasibility of SpaceX’s plan, from Eric Berger at arstechnica.com.

Musk says travel to Mars will be like Battlestar Galactica, cost around $100,000, from New Atlas

The biggest lingering questions about SpaceX’s Mars colonization plans, from The Verge

The video just below (nearly two hours) is the complete announcement by Elon Musk on September 27. The talk itself starts about 20 minutes in.

SpaceX's big rocket. Image via Wait But Why.

Artist’s concept of SpaceX’s big rocket. Image via Wait But Why.

The SpaceX Mars rocket has 2 parts: a spaceship and a booster. Image via Wait But Why.

Musk said he likes the word “system” for his Interplanetary Transport System because it has 4 parts: a rocket and spaceship, shown here, plus a fueling tanker and propellant depots. Image via Wait But Why.

Artist's concept of SpaceX's rocket, upright in the city of Boston. It's as big as a skyscraper, by far the biggest rocket ever built. Image via Wait But Why.

Artist’s concept of SpaceX’s rocket, upright in the city of Boston. It’s as big as a skyscraper, by far the biggest rocket ever built. Image via Wait But Why.

Artist's concept of Space X Interplanetary Transport System at Cape Canaveral, ready for launch. Image via SpaceX.

Artist’s concept of Space X Interplanetary Transport System at Cape Canaveral, ready for launch. Image via SpaceX.

Lift off! One hundred Mars wayfarers would be aboard. Image via SpaceX.

Lift off! One hundred Mars wayfarers would be aboard. Image via SpaceX.

The rocket booster would detach and return to Earth, pick up a fuel tank, and head back to Earth orbit, where the Mars colonists would be waiting.

The rocket booster would detach and return to Earth, pick up a fuel tank (liquid oxygen and methane), and head back to Earth orbit, where the Mars ship would be waiting.

Once carried to space by the booster, the fuel and original rocket would dock,

Once carried to space by the booster, the fuel tank and original rocket would connect like 2 orcas holding hands” as the fuel is transferred. This happens again … and again … until the Mars craft has enough fuel to get to Mars in only about 3 months.

Imagine the excitement aboard the ship as Mars looms ahead. Image via SpaceX.

Imagine the excitement aboard the ship as Mars looms ahead. Image via SpaceX.

Artist's concept of future Mars colonists facing their new world. Image via SpaceX.

Artist’s concept of future Mars colonists facing their new world. Image via SpaceX.

It's not all dreams and artist's concepts. Here's The

It’s not all dreams and artist’s concepts. Here’s the “big” composite tank used to contain pressurized liquid oxygen that Musk revealed on September 27. Image via arstechnica.com.

Bottom line: Elon Musk of SpaceX said on September 27, 2016 that he wants to make humans a multiplanetary species, beginning with a million people in a Mars colony by the end of this century.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2cZre51

Dark matter faces its biggest challenge of all (Synopsis) [Starts With A Bang]

“Nothing in the standard cosmological model predicts this, and it is almost impossible to imagine how that model could be modified to explain it, without discarding the dark matter hypothesis completely.” -David Merritt

Dark matter is a hugely successful theory for explaining a whole slew of observations about the Universe. Just by adding this one ingredient to the mix, we can successfully simulate and reproduce the large-scale structure, CMB fluctuations, galaxy clustering and cluster collision properties observed in our Universe. Without dark matter, there’s no other way known to make the Universe work in line with what we see.

A clumpy dark matter halo with varying densities and a very large, diffuse structure, as predicted by simulations, with the luminous part of the galaxy shown for scale. Image credit: NASA, ESA, and T. Brown and J. Tumlinson (STScI).

A clumpy dark matter halo with varying densities and a very large, diffuse structure, as predicted by simulations, with the luminous part of the galaxy shown for scale. Image credit: NASA, ESA, and T. Brown and J. Tumlinson (STScI).

And yet, if you go down to the small scales of individual galaxies, dark matter predicts a dark matter halo of a specific profile with specific rotation properties. When we look at the actual galaxies, those rotation properties don’t match! Even worse, they appear to be correlated solely with the normal matter content of the galaxies, and have no dependence on whether the galaxy is rich-or-poor in dark matter.

he correlation between gravitational acceleration (y-axis) and the normal, baryonic matter (x-axis) visible in an assembly of 153 galaxies. The blue points show each individual galaxy, while the red show binned data. Image credit: The Radial Acceleration Relation in Rotationally Supported Galaxies, Stacy McGaugh, Federico Lelli and Jim Schombert, 2016. From http://ift.tt/2ddyA87.

he correlation between gravitational acceleration (y-axis) and the normal, baryonic matter (x-axis) visible in an assembly of 153 galaxies. The blue points show each individual galaxy, while the red show binned data. Image credit: The Radial Acceleration Relation in Rotationally Supported Galaxies, Stacy McGaugh, Federico Lelli and Jim Schombert, 2016. From http://ift.tt/2ddyA87.

Could this observation be the demise of dark matter? No matter what, it’s a challenge that even the most robust theory must face!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2dDoRGb

“Nothing in the standard cosmological model predicts this, and it is almost impossible to imagine how that model could be modified to explain it, without discarding the dark matter hypothesis completely.” -David Merritt

Dark matter is a hugely successful theory for explaining a whole slew of observations about the Universe. Just by adding this one ingredient to the mix, we can successfully simulate and reproduce the large-scale structure, CMB fluctuations, galaxy clustering and cluster collision properties observed in our Universe. Without dark matter, there’s no other way known to make the Universe work in line with what we see.

A clumpy dark matter halo with varying densities and a very large, diffuse structure, as predicted by simulations, with the luminous part of the galaxy shown for scale. Image credit: NASA, ESA, and T. Brown and J. Tumlinson (STScI).

A clumpy dark matter halo with varying densities and a very large, diffuse structure, as predicted by simulations, with the luminous part of the galaxy shown for scale. Image credit: NASA, ESA, and T. Brown and J. Tumlinson (STScI).

And yet, if you go down to the small scales of individual galaxies, dark matter predicts a dark matter halo of a specific profile with specific rotation properties. When we look at the actual galaxies, those rotation properties don’t match! Even worse, they appear to be correlated solely with the normal matter content of the galaxies, and have no dependence on whether the galaxy is rich-or-poor in dark matter.

he correlation between gravitational acceleration (y-axis) and the normal, baryonic matter (x-axis) visible in an assembly of 153 galaxies. The blue points show each individual galaxy, while the red show binned data. Image credit: The Radial Acceleration Relation in Rotationally Supported Galaxies, Stacy McGaugh, Federico Lelli and Jim Schombert, 2016. From http://ift.tt/2ddyA87.

he correlation between gravitational acceleration (y-axis) and the normal, baryonic matter (x-axis) visible in an assembly of 153 galaxies. The blue points show each individual galaxy, while the red show binned data. Image credit: The Radial Acceleration Relation in Rotationally Supported Galaxies, Stacy McGaugh, Federico Lelli and Jim Schombert, 2016. From http://ift.tt/2ddyA87.

Could this observation be the demise of dark matter? No matter what, it’s a challenge that even the most robust theory must face!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2dDoRGb

Flicking the switch on cancer’s immaturity

A cell dividing

Cancers are often born from just one cell that became faulty, developing into a tumour by copying itself over and over again.

But if you were to peer inside a tumour, you wouldn’t be faced with an army of cellular clones. Instead, tumours are made up of collections of cells that are surprisingly diverse.

So if a tumour comes from a single rogue cell, what’s responsible for the variety that can be seen with a microscope or hidden in a cell’s DNA? New research from Dr Paola Scaffidi, based at the Francis Crick Institute and funded by Cancer Research UK, is helping to answer this conundrum.

Published in the journal Science, Scaffidi’s latest study found that tweaks to a certain gene allowed cancer cells to divide without tiring themselves out, continually adding fuel to the growing tumour’s fire.

And crucially, the team was able to reverse this process in the lab, a discovery that could have implications for cancer treatment.

“Cancer cells naturally change as the tumour grows, which can affect the cells’ ability to divide,” says Scaffidi.

“Some of this is genetic, with the cells acquiring new genetic faults. But we’ve now shown that there is an additional layer of diversity which is non-genetic and, importantly, reversible.”

And if scientists can find a way to exploit this process, the discovery could potentially lead to new treatments.

Keeping genes under wrap

The team’s discovery began with a question: why do some cancer cells get stuck in a ‘youthful’ state and continue dividing, while others mature and tire out?

The troublesome ‘young’ cancer cells – so-called cancer stem cells – act as the tumour’s lifeline, offering a constant supply of cells to maintain the cancer’s growth.

And it’s these cells that have been the focus of Scaffidi’s work.

“I wanted to understand the processes behind the ability of these cells to keep growing,” she says.

I wanted to understand the processes behind the ability of these cells to keep growing

Dr Paola Scaffidi, Francis Crick Institute

And her team’s ultimate goal is to use this knowledge in the hunt for new treatments that could “make the cells become tired and stop dividing.”

In their latest study, the team looked for different genetic patterns in tumours from mice, comparing cells that divide continuously to those that don’t. Of the patterns that stood out, the team’s attention was drawn to a gene called H1.0, which was unusually quiet in the continually dividing cells.

The gene carries the recipe for a molecule called a histone, which acts like a spool for threads of DNA, keeping our genetic information packed in neat little bundles inside the cell. And the gene is usually highly active in tissues throughout the body, churning out lots of the histone molecule.

So why was the gene’s activity dampened down in those youthful cancer cells?

Loosening the knot

Interests piqued, the team looked at levels of gene activity in samples taken from patients with an aggressive type of brain tumour called glioblastoma multiforme, which characteristically contains lots of cancer stem cells that help the tumour grow rapidly.

They discovered that the activity of the gene was much lower in these cells compared with other tumour cells in the sample and normal brain cells. And when they looked at samples from several other common types of cancer – including prostate and breast cancer – the team found that gene activity levels weren’t even across the tumour. While in healthy cells from the same organ, the gene activity was stable across the tissue.

So if cells usually have the H1.0 gene switched on, what’s going on in these youthful cancer cells? It turns out that in these immature tumour cells, the H1.0 gene has a molecule tagged onto it which switches it off, blocking production of the H1.0 molecule.

DNA helix

The loss of the H1.0 protein causes DNA to unravel

“We’re not certain of how exactly this tag stops the H1.0 protein being made,” says Scaffidi.

“It may well be that the tag gets in the way of other molecules that are needed for the gene to be ‘read’ and turned into a protein.

“Or it could be that the tag alters the shape of the DNA, adding kinks or folds that physically block access to the gene.”

But what they do know is that a lack of the H1.0 molecule kicks off a series of changes that help the cells keep dividing. As its levels drop, bits of DNA begin to unravel like a tumbling ball of yarn, freeing up access to certain genes which then get switched on when they shouldn’t be.

Importantly, some of these genes are commonly faulty in cancer and in this case they act like an elixir of youth, keeping the cell in an immature state so that it can keep dividing.

Lost but not forgotten

Just as molecular tags can be added to bits of DNA, they can also be removed. This means that, at least in cancer cells, eternal youth might just be reversible.

In fact, when the team switched H1.0 back on in cancer cells in the lab, they were forced to mature and lost their ability to continue dividing – a discovery that could have implications for the development of new treatments.

“If we can find a way to reactivate H1.0 in cancer patients, then we might be able to stop tumour growth,” Scaffidi says.

“We’re looking for molecules which can boost H1.0 that are already used in patients, so we know they’re safe.

“We would also be restoring something that was already in the cell, rather than interfering with a particular process like many other drugs, so in theory the chances of side effects should be lower,” she adds.

And since the team found that having the gene switched off was linked with a poorer outlook in a number of different cancers, the ability to switch it back on again could potentially have benefits for multiple types of cancer.

“All cancers are different, which is why researchers are pursuing personalised medicine,” says Scaffidi. “But there are some basic principles that are shared between cancers, and reducing H1.0 levels may be one of these.”

Dr Duncan Odom, a Cancer Research UK scientist specialising in genetics, believes a link between H1.0 and multiple cancers could prove “interesting.”

“I think it’s cool that they found H1.0 appears to play a specialised role, especially in cancer biology,” he says. “But the work needs to be repeated in other labs to see if this is something that is truly widespread among cancers.”

So while the work is still in its infancy, by igniting further research it could potentially grow into something that one day impacts the lives of people affected by cancer.

Justine

Morales Torres, C. et al. (2016). The linker histone H1.0 generates epigenetic and functional intratumoral heterogeneity. Science.



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog http://ift.tt/2daBqgz
A cell dividing

Cancers are often born from just one cell that became faulty, developing into a tumour by copying itself over and over again.

But if you were to peer inside a tumour, you wouldn’t be faced with an army of cellular clones. Instead, tumours are made up of collections of cells that are surprisingly diverse.

So if a tumour comes from a single rogue cell, what’s responsible for the variety that can be seen with a microscope or hidden in a cell’s DNA? New research from Dr Paola Scaffidi, based at the Francis Crick Institute and funded by Cancer Research UK, is helping to answer this conundrum.

Published in the journal Science, Scaffidi’s latest study found that tweaks to a certain gene allowed cancer cells to divide without tiring themselves out, continually adding fuel to the growing tumour’s fire.

And crucially, the team was able to reverse this process in the lab, a discovery that could have implications for cancer treatment.

“Cancer cells naturally change as the tumour grows, which can affect the cells’ ability to divide,” says Scaffidi.

“Some of this is genetic, with the cells acquiring new genetic faults. But we’ve now shown that there is an additional layer of diversity which is non-genetic and, importantly, reversible.”

And if scientists can find a way to exploit this process, the discovery could potentially lead to new treatments.

Keeping genes under wrap

The team’s discovery began with a question: why do some cancer cells get stuck in a ‘youthful’ state and continue dividing, while others mature and tire out?

The troublesome ‘young’ cancer cells – so-called cancer stem cells – act as the tumour’s lifeline, offering a constant supply of cells to maintain the cancer’s growth.

And it’s these cells that have been the focus of Scaffidi’s work.

“I wanted to understand the processes behind the ability of these cells to keep growing,” she says.

I wanted to understand the processes behind the ability of these cells to keep growing

Dr Paola Scaffidi, Francis Crick Institute

And her team’s ultimate goal is to use this knowledge in the hunt for new treatments that could “make the cells become tired and stop dividing.”

In their latest study, the team looked for different genetic patterns in tumours from mice, comparing cells that divide continuously to those that don’t. Of the patterns that stood out, the team’s attention was drawn to a gene called H1.0, which was unusually quiet in the continually dividing cells.

The gene carries the recipe for a molecule called a histone, which acts like a spool for threads of DNA, keeping our genetic information packed in neat little bundles inside the cell. And the gene is usually highly active in tissues throughout the body, churning out lots of the histone molecule.

So why was the gene’s activity dampened down in those youthful cancer cells?

Loosening the knot

Interests piqued, the team looked at levels of gene activity in samples taken from patients with an aggressive type of brain tumour called glioblastoma multiforme, which characteristically contains lots of cancer stem cells that help the tumour grow rapidly.

They discovered that the activity of the gene was much lower in these cells compared with other tumour cells in the sample and normal brain cells. And when they looked at samples from several other common types of cancer – including prostate and breast cancer – the team found that gene activity levels weren’t even across the tumour. While in healthy cells from the same organ, the gene activity was stable across the tissue.

So if cells usually have the H1.0 gene switched on, what’s going on in these youthful cancer cells? It turns out that in these immature tumour cells, the H1.0 gene has a molecule tagged onto it which switches it off, blocking production of the H1.0 molecule.

DNA helix

The loss of the H1.0 protein causes DNA to unravel

“We’re not certain of how exactly this tag stops the H1.0 protein being made,” says Scaffidi.

“It may well be that the tag gets in the way of other molecules that are needed for the gene to be ‘read’ and turned into a protein.

“Or it could be that the tag alters the shape of the DNA, adding kinks or folds that physically block access to the gene.”

But what they do know is that a lack of the H1.0 molecule kicks off a series of changes that help the cells keep dividing. As its levels drop, bits of DNA begin to unravel like a tumbling ball of yarn, freeing up access to certain genes which then get switched on when they shouldn’t be.

Importantly, some of these genes are commonly faulty in cancer and in this case they act like an elixir of youth, keeping the cell in an immature state so that it can keep dividing.

Lost but not forgotten

Just as molecular tags can be added to bits of DNA, they can also be removed. This means that, at least in cancer cells, eternal youth might just be reversible.

In fact, when the team switched H1.0 back on in cancer cells in the lab, they were forced to mature and lost their ability to continue dividing – a discovery that could have implications for the development of new treatments.

“If we can find a way to reactivate H1.0 in cancer patients, then we might be able to stop tumour growth,” Scaffidi says.

“We’re looking for molecules which can boost H1.0 that are already used in patients, so we know they’re safe.

“We would also be restoring something that was already in the cell, rather than interfering with a particular process like many other drugs, so in theory the chances of side effects should be lower,” she adds.

And since the team found that having the gene switched off was linked with a poorer outlook in a number of different cancers, the ability to switch it back on again could potentially have benefits for multiple types of cancer.

“All cancers are different, which is why researchers are pursuing personalised medicine,” says Scaffidi. “But there are some basic principles that are shared between cancers, and reducing H1.0 levels may be one of these.”

Dr Duncan Odom, a Cancer Research UK scientist specialising in genetics, believes a link between H1.0 and multiple cancers could prove “interesting.”

“I think it’s cool that they found H1.0 appears to play a specialised role, especially in cancer biology,” he says. “But the work needs to be repeated in other labs to see if this is something that is truly widespread among cancers.”

So while the work is still in its infancy, by igniting further research it could potentially grow into something that one day impacts the lives of people affected by cancer.

Justine

Morales Torres, C. et al. (2016). The linker histone H1.0 generates epigenetic and functional intratumoral heterogeneity. Science.



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog http://ift.tt/2daBqgz

Indoor Chemical Exposure: Novel Research for the 21st Century

By Meridith M. Fry, Ph.D.

While it is widely known that nearly every consumer product contains chemicals, have you ever wondered what chemicals lurk inside your home or office building?  Semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) are chemicals found indoors in the air and on surfaces that come from cleaning products, personal care products, pesticides, furnishings, and electronics. They are released slowly into the air and can attach to surfaces or airborne particles, allowing them to enter the body by inhalation, ingestion, or absorption through the skin.  Because SVOCs can persist indoors for weeks to years, they also may contribute to prolonged human exposure. In fact, individuals in the US have measureable levels of more than 100 SVOCs in their body at any given time.

cleaning equipment isolated on white backgroundThe health effects from exposure to SVOCs vary depending on the particular SVOC, the length of exposure, and personal susceptibility. SVOCs have been associated with allergies, asthma, endocrine and thyroid disruption, reproductive toxicity, and fetal and child development delays. Given the significance of these health effects, we’re funding research to learn more about SVOC exposure and how we can reduce it.

Through our Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Grants for New Methods in 21st Century Exposure Science, researchers from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and the University of Michigan are making great strides in developing new methods for measuring indoor exposure to SVOCs:

  • A new, simple method has been developed by researchers from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University to determine vapor pressure, an important yet uncertain chemical property of SVOCs. Vapor pressure is a measure of the tendency of these chemicals to escape (from a liquid or solid) into the air.  With better vapor pressure estimates, our understanding of how SVOCs move indoors will greatly improve.
  • Researchers from the University of Michigan are also developing a novel, portable device to rapidly measure hundreds of SVOCs indoors. This research has already spurred applications for three new patents and resulted in four peer-reviewed publications.  Milestones include the development of a micro-photoionization detector (PID) to identify which chemicals are present in the air, a miniaturized helium discharge PID that also offers rapid measurement, low power consumption, and a fast warm-up time, and an automated, portable gas chromatography system to measure chemicals in water.  These new instruments can be easily carried in the field and used on-site, revolutionizing current measurement technology which tends to be bulky and non-portable.

The research and findings from these STAR grants will continue to shape exposure science in the 21st Century, and increase our knowledge about SVOCs and how they affect our everyday lives.  STAR grantees from the University of California Davis, Duke University, and University of California San Francisco also are making substantial contributions to our understanding of SVOC exposure such as developing new methods to measure SVOCs in indoor dust, exposures in children, and exposures in pregnant women.  We are eager to continue sharing these groundbreaking achievements as they become available.

References:

Weschler, C.J. and W.W. Nazaroff, Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor environments. Atmospheric Environment, 2008. 42(40): p. 9018-9040.

Xu, Y. and J. Zhang, Understanding SVOCs. ASHRAE Journal, 2011. 53(12): p. 121-125.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Indoor Environment Group, SVOCs and Health, 2016. Available: http://ift.tt/2dHAtuH

About the Author:  Meridith Fry is an Environmental Engineer and Project Officer in EPA’s National Center for Environmental Research, Chemical Safety for Sustainability Research Program.

 



from The EPA Blog http://ift.tt/2debqwL

By Meridith M. Fry, Ph.D.

While it is widely known that nearly every consumer product contains chemicals, have you ever wondered what chemicals lurk inside your home or office building?  Semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) are chemicals found indoors in the air and on surfaces that come from cleaning products, personal care products, pesticides, furnishings, and electronics. They are released slowly into the air and can attach to surfaces or airborne particles, allowing them to enter the body by inhalation, ingestion, or absorption through the skin.  Because SVOCs can persist indoors for weeks to years, they also may contribute to prolonged human exposure. In fact, individuals in the US have measureable levels of more than 100 SVOCs in their body at any given time.

cleaning equipment isolated on white backgroundThe health effects from exposure to SVOCs vary depending on the particular SVOC, the length of exposure, and personal susceptibility. SVOCs have been associated with allergies, asthma, endocrine and thyroid disruption, reproductive toxicity, and fetal and child development delays. Given the significance of these health effects, we’re funding research to learn more about SVOC exposure and how we can reduce it.

Through our Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Grants for New Methods in 21st Century Exposure Science, researchers from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and the University of Michigan are making great strides in developing new methods for measuring indoor exposure to SVOCs:

  • A new, simple method has been developed by researchers from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University to determine vapor pressure, an important yet uncertain chemical property of SVOCs. Vapor pressure is a measure of the tendency of these chemicals to escape (from a liquid or solid) into the air.  With better vapor pressure estimates, our understanding of how SVOCs move indoors will greatly improve.
  • Researchers from the University of Michigan are also developing a novel, portable device to rapidly measure hundreds of SVOCs indoors. This research has already spurred applications for three new patents and resulted in four peer-reviewed publications.  Milestones include the development of a micro-photoionization detector (PID) to identify which chemicals are present in the air, a miniaturized helium discharge PID that also offers rapid measurement, low power consumption, and a fast warm-up time, and an automated, portable gas chromatography system to measure chemicals in water.  These new instruments can be easily carried in the field and used on-site, revolutionizing current measurement technology which tends to be bulky and non-portable.

The research and findings from these STAR grants will continue to shape exposure science in the 21st Century, and increase our knowledge about SVOCs and how they affect our everyday lives.  STAR grantees from the University of California Davis, Duke University, and University of California San Francisco also are making substantial contributions to our understanding of SVOC exposure such as developing new methods to measure SVOCs in indoor dust, exposures in children, and exposures in pregnant women.  We are eager to continue sharing these groundbreaking achievements as they become available.

References:

Weschler, C.J. and W.W. Nazaroff, Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor environments. Atmospheric Environment, 2008. 42(40): p. 9018-9040.

Xu, Y. and J. Zhang, Understanding SVOCs. ASHRAE Journal, 2011. 53(12): p. 121-125.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Indoor Environment Group, SVOCs and Health, 2016. Available: http://ift.tt/2dHAtuH

About the Author:  Meridith Fry is an Environmental Engineer and Project Officer in EPA’s National Center for Environmental Research, Chemical Safety for Sustainability Research Program.

 



from The EPA Blog http://ift.tt/2debqwL

Is Ecotourism Helping or Hurting Our National Parks?

This post is part of KQED’s Do Now U project. Do Now U is a biweekly activity for students and the public to engage and respond to current issues using social media. Do Now U aims to build civic engagement and digital literacy for learners of all ages. This Read More …

Source:: DoNow Science



from QUEST http://ift.tt/2duyNWM

This post is part of KQED’s Do Now U project. Do Now U is a biweekly activity for students and the public to engage and respond to current issues using social media. Do Now U aims to build civic engagement and digital literacy for learners of all ages. This Read More …

Source:: DoNow Science



from QUEST http://ift.tt/2duyNWM

Mercury is tectonically active, says study

It’s small, it’s hot, and it’s shrinking. Surprising new NASA-funded research suggests that Mercury is contracting even today, joining Earth as a tectonically active planet. Image via NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington/USGS/Arizona State University

It’s small, it’s hot, and it’s shrinking. Surprising new NASA-funded research suggests that Mercury is contracting even today, joining Earth as a tectonically active planet. Image via NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington/USGS/Arizona State University

New research suggests that tiny planet Mercury is contracting, joining Earth as a tectonically active planet. That means Mercury might be the only other planet in the solar system to experience earthquakes – or, in this case, “mercuryquakes.”

The study, published in the online edition of Nature Geoscience on September 26, 2016, is based on images obtained by NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft. The images reveal previously undetected small fault scarps — cliff-like landforms that resemble stair steps. These scarps are small enough that scientists believe they must be geologically young, which suggests that Mercury is still contracting and that Earth is not the only tectonically active planet in our solar system, as previously thought.

Tom Watters, Smithsonian senior scientist at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. is the study lead author. Watters said in a statement:

The young age of the small scarps means that Mercury joins Earth as a tectonically active planet, with new faults likely forming today as Mercury’s interior continues to cool and the planet contracts.

Large fault scarps on Mercury were first discovered in the flybys of Mariner 10 spacecraft in the mid-1970s. The large scarps were formed as Mercury’s interior cooled, say scientists, causing the planet to contract and the crust to break and thrust upward along faults making cliffs up to hundreds of miles long and some more than a mile (over 1.5 kilometers) high.

Small graben, or narrow linear troughs, have been found associated with small fault scarps (lower white arrows) on Mercury, and on Earth’s moon. The small troughs, only tens of meters wide (inset box and upper white arrows), likely resulted from the bending of the crust as it was uplifted, and must be very young to survive continuous meteoroid bombardment. Image via NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington/Smithsonian Institution

Small graben, or narrow linear troughs, have been found associated with small fault scarps (lower white arrows) on Mercury, and on Earth’s moon. The small troughs, only tens of meters wide (inset box and upper white arrows), likely resulted from the bending of the crust as it was uplifted, and must be very young to survive continuous meteoroid bombardment. Image via NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington/Smithsonian Institution

During the last 18 months of the MESSENGER mission, the spacecraft descended closer to Mercury, helping it to snap pictures of the planet’s surface in greater detail. These low-altitude images revealed small fault scarps that are orders of magnitude smaller than the larger scarps first spotted by Mariner 10. The small scarps had to be very young, investigators say, to survive the steady bombardment of meteoroids and comets.

According to a NASA statement:

This active faulting is consistent with the recent finding that Mercury’s global magnetic field has existed for billions of years and with the slow cooling of Mercury’s still hot outer core. It’s likely that the smallest of the terrestrial planets also experiences Mercury-quakes—something that may one day be confirmed by seismometers.

Jim Green is NASA Planetary Science Director at Headquarters in Washington, D.C. Green said:

This is why we explore. For years, scientists believed that Mercury’s tectonic activity was in the distant past. It’s exciting to consider that this small planet – not much larger than Earth’s moon – is active even today.

MESSENGER launched August 3, 2004 and began orbiting Mercury March 18, 2011. The mission ended with a planned impact on the surface of Mercury on April 30, 2015. Scientists continue to study the data collected by the probe.

Bottom line: Images collected by the MESSENGER spacecraft suggest Mercury is contracting, and might be the only other planet in the solar system to experience earthquakes – or “mercuryquakes.”

Read more from NASA



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2cO0ebi
It’s small, it’s hot, and it’s shrinking. Surprising new NASA-funded research suggests that Mercury is contracting even today, joining Earth as a tectonically active planet. Image via NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington/USGS/Arizona State University

It’s small, it’s hot, and it’s shrinking. Surprising new NASA-funded research suggests that Mercury is contracting even today, joining Earth as a tectonically active planet. Image via NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington/USGS/Arizona State University

New research suggests that tiny planet Mercury is contracting, joining Earth as a tectonically active planet. That means Mercury might be the only other planet in the solar system to experience earthquakes – or, in this case, “mercuryquakes.”

The study, published in the online edition of Nature Geoscience on September 26, 2016, is based on images obtained by NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft. The images reveal previously undetected small fault scarps — cliff-like landforms that resemble stair steps. These scarps are small enough that scientists believe they must be geologically young, which suggests that Mercury is still contracting and that Earth is not the only tectonically active planet in our solar system, as previously thought.

Tom Watters, Smithsonian senior scientist at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. is the study lead author. Watters said in a statement:

The young age of the small scarps means that Mercury joins Earth as a tectonically active planet, with new faults likely forming today as Mercury’s interior continues to cool and the planet contracts.

Large fault scarps on Mercury were first discovered in the flybys of Mariner 10 spacecraft in the mid-1970s. The large scarps were formed as Mercury’s interior cooled, say scientists, causing the planet to contract and the crust to break and thrust upward along faults making cliffs up to hundreds of miles long and some more than a mile (over 1.5 kilometers) high.

Small graben, or narrow linear troughs, have been found associated with small fault scarps (lower white arrows) on Mercury, and on Earth’s moon. The small troughs, only tens of meters wide (inset box and upper white arrows), likely resulted from the bending of the crust as it was uplifted, and must be very young to survive continuous meteoroid bombardment. Image via NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington/Smithsonian Institution

Small graben, or narrow linear troughs, have been found associated with small fault scarps (lower white arrows) on Mercury, and on Earth’s moon. The small troughs, only tens of meters wide (inset box and upper white arrows), likely resulted from the bending of the crust as it was uplifted, and must be very young to survive continuous meteoroid bombardment. Image via NASA/JHUAPL/Carnegie Institution of Washington/Smithsonian Institution

During the last 18 months of the MESSENGER mission, the spacecraft descended closer to Mercury, helping it to snap pictures of the planet’s surface in greater detail. These low-altitude images revealed small fault scarps that are orders of magnitude smaller than the larger scarps first spotted by Mariner 10. The small scarps had to be very young, investigators say, to survive the steady bombardment of meteoroids and comets.

According to a NASA statement:

This active faulting is consistent with the recent finding that Mercury’s global magnetic field has existed for billions of years and with the slow cooling of Mercury’s still hot outer core. It’s likely that the smallest of the terrestrial planets also experiences Mercury-quakes—something that may one day be confirmed by seismometers.

Jim Green is NASA Planetary Science Director at Headquarters in Washington, D.C. Green said:

This is why we explore. For years, scientists believed that Mercury’s tectonic activity was in the distant past. It’s exciting to consider that this small planet – not much larger than Earth’s moon – is active even today.

MESSENGER launched August 3, 2004 and began orbiting Mercury March 18, 2011. The mission ended with a planned impact on the surface of Mercury on April 30, 2015. Scientists continue to study the data collected by the probe.

Bottom line: Images collected by the MESSENGER spacecraft suggest Mercury is contracting, and might be the only other planet in the solar system to experience earthquakes – or “mercuryquakes.”

Read more from NASA



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2cO0ebi