Magellanic Clouds and more


Justin Ng of Singapore contributed this beautiful photo of the Magellanic Clouds, taken from Mount Bromo, an active volcano in Indonesia. He wrote:


The Milky Way, Large and Small Magellanic Clouds and bright star Canopus can be seen in this image taken at sunrise over East Java’s Mount Bromo. September is one of the best months to see four galaxies — Large Magellanic Cloud, Small Magellanic Cloud, Andromeda Galaxy and Milky Way Galaxy in the Southern Hemisphere — within one night in Bromo.

The brightest star in the Southern Hemisphere, Canopus, can also be found between our Milky Way galaxy (dense area of stars toward the left) and the Large Magellanic Cloud.

The dense area of stars toward the left is actually the Orion Arm of the Milky Way galaxy.

This is a composite image of the sky and the foreground taken at the same location but at different time and I blended the images taken at different dynamic ranges manually in post processing.


Thank you, Justin!





from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1ATxOTk

Justin Ng of Singapore contributed this beautiful photo of the Magellanic Clouds, taken from Mount Bromo, an active volcano in Indonesia. He wrote:


The Milky Way, Large and Small Magellanic Clouds and bright star Canopus can be seen in this image taken at sunrise over East Java’s Mount Bromo. September is one of the best months to see four galaxies — Large Magellanic Cloud, Small Magellanic Cloud, Andromeda Galaxy and Milky Way Galaxy in the Southern Hemisphere — within one night in Bromo.

The brightest star in the Southern Hemisphere, Canopus, can also be found between our Milky Way galaxy (dense area of stars toward the left) and the Large Magellanic Cloud.

The dense area of stars toward the left is actually the Orion Arm of the Milky Way galaxy.

This is a composite image of the sky and the foreground taken at the same location but at different time and I blended the images taken at different dynamic ranges manually in post processing.


Thank you, Justin!





from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1ATxOTk

Moon still close to Mars as darkness falls on November 26


View larger Nicknamed
View larger Nicknamed “Black Beauty,” the Martian meteorite weighs approximately 11 ounces (320 grams). Image credit: NASA


On sale! 25% off EarthSky lunar calendars. We’re giving thanks for all of you.

Tonight … November 26, 2014 … the waxing crescent moon and planet Mars still appear close together in the evening sky. On this date, the twosome will be found near the sunset point as darkness begins to fall.

Did you know that some fragments from the moon and Mars have actually landed on Earth as meteorites? To review our terminology, a space rock that vaporizes in the Earth’s upper atmosphere is called a meteor. If the meteor survives its fiery plunge and lands on the Earth’s surface intact, it is called a meteorite.

Most meteorites originate from the asteroid belt lying in between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. Colliding asteroids forcefully eject fragments that occasionally land on Earth. Also, a powerful meteorite impact on Mars or the moon can send bits and pieces of these worlds flying off into space, and – in rare instances – onward to Earth. We provide a list of known Martian meteorites and lunar meteorites.

When looking at the moon and Mars this evening, imagine that rocks ejected from these worlds could actually make it to Earth without hitching a ride in a rocket ship.

Bottom line: On the night of November 26, 2014, the waxing crescent moon and the planet Mars still appear close together in the evening sky. The twosome will be found near the sunset point as darkness falls.

EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order today from the EarthSky store





from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1y07gin

View larger Nicknamed
View larger Nicknamed “Black Beauty,” the Martian meteorite weighs approximately 11 ounces (320 grams). Image credit: NASA


On sale! 25% off EarthSky lunar calendars. We’re giving thanks for all of you.

Tonight … November 26, 2014 … the waxing crescent moon and planet Mars still appear close together in the evening sky. On this date, the twosome will be found near the sunset point as darkness begins to fall.

Did you know that some fragments from the moon and Mars have actually landed on Earth as meteorites? To review our terminology, a space rock that vaporizes in the Earth’s upper atmosphere is called a meteor. If the meteor survives its fiery plunge and lands on the Earth’s surface intact, it is called a meteorite.

Most meteorites originate from the asteroid belt lying in between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. Colliding asteroids forcefully eject fragments that occasionally land on Earth. Also, a powerful meteorite impact on Mars or the moon can send bits and pieces of these worlds flying off into space, and – in rare instances – onward to Earth. We provide a list of known Martian meteorites and lunar meteorites.

When looking at the moon and Mars this evening, imagine that rocks ejected from these worlds could actually make it to Earth without hitching a ride in a rocket ship.

Bottom line: On the night of November 26, 2014, the waxing crescent moon and the planet Mars still appear close together in the evening sky. The twosome will be found near the sunset point as darkness falls.

EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order today from the EarthSky store





from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1y07gin

'Captain, There Be Planets Here!'


About 450 light-years from Earth, in the constellation Taurus, a dense, dark, interstellar cloud has slowly started to reveal its secrets. It happens to be a very active nursery for young stars resembling our own sun about 4.6 billion years ago. Embedded in this cloud, which has been carefully studied by the Hubble Space Telescope, are very young stars called HL Tau and XZ Tau, each no more than 1 million years old, give or take. You can easily see the nebulae formed by the complex blobs of gas ejected by the young stars.
2014-11-20-XZTauri.jpg
HL Tauri and surroundings (credit: NASA/HST)
The star HL Tau (more properly called HL Tauri) is 10,000 times too faint for you to see with your naked eye. Even a large telescope has a hard time seeing it clearly through all the dust and gas blocking the view. But other kinds of telescopes can easily pierce the light-years of dust clouds. Since 1975, astronomers had known that HL Tau had some kind of disk of gas orbiting it. The disk is about 40 times the diameter of our solar system. Later on, astronomers studied HL Tau using radio telescopes and detected a dense knot of carbon monoxide molecules centered on the star. Caltech astronomers Anneila Sargent and Steven Beckwith were able to study this clump in more detail and discovered it really was a disk-like region rotating in the same way that planets orbit our sun: faster toward the center and slower toward the edge. Based on observations made in 1986 from the Millimeter Wave Interferometer of the Owens Valley Radio Observatory, it was determined that the disk had about 10-percent as much mass as our sun. Though not enough to build a second companion star, it would be plenty to make a lot of planets, with dust and gas to spare and throw away into the surrounding Taurus dust cloud.
In addition to dust and carbon monoxide molecules, astronomers had also detected water ice in 1975, and micron-sized silicate ("beach sand") dust grains in 1985. Searches for methane ice in the very cold outer limits of the disk haven't turned up anything yet. HL Tau's disk seems to be pretty bland in terms of interesting pre-life molecules! But its boringly simple, or absent, chemistry is countered by the disk being a very complex and active region of space. Along the axis of the spinning disk, small nebulae called Herbig-Haro objects can be seen several light-years away, such as HH-150 and six cloud clumps aligned along a jet called HH-151. These gas clouds are like puffs of smoke being ejected at very high speeds by events happening as the HL Tau interacts with its surrounding disk. We still don't know exactly what is going on after all these years. Could magnetic fields be involved?
Recent studies of the magnetic field of this disk by astronomers Ian Stephens and Leslie Looney led to a surprising result: Instead of the field oriented with a distinct axis pointing along the HH151 jet, the field was much more complex. It was always thought that the blobs of gas would be ejected along some well-defined axis provided by the magnetic field, like the barrel of a cannon. In the absence of an ordered "poloidal" magnetic field to define a unique direction, the cause of the cloud alignment in the jet remains a mystery. To make matters more interesting, in 2007, astronomer Michihiro Takami, using the Subaru Telescope, detected the faint emission from a counter-jet also aligned with the HH-151 jet and HL Tau. So whatever the events that are occurring in this disk of gas and dust, it tends to favor ejecting two streams of matter in a symmetric way along the polar axis of the disk.
Once astronomers caught the scent of the nearby HL Tau dust disk, there was only one direction to go: higher resolution to see more details and how the disk is actually shaped. By 2011, astronomers Woojin Kwon, Leslie Looney and Lee Mundy had used the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy and detected a flattened shape. It is not face-on but tilted so it looks like an ellipse inclined slightly downwards to the line of sight. The measurements also suggested that the larger dust grains in the disk, possibly as big as sand grains, had settled toward the plane of the disk and a halo of finer micron-sized dust grains probably engulfs the whole disk. The disk is also gravitationally unstable, but they were not able to see any details of the kinds of shapes that result.
Then, in 2014, astronomers used the even higher-resolution capabilities of the new Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) to create the now-famous image you have seen on the nightly news. What it confirms is all the previous observations about the size, shape and tilt of the dust disk, but it also could begin to see some of the details of its internal shape. What astronomers found was simply amazing. As many as eight dark bands concentric with the star can easily be seen! The gaps are about 450 million to 1 billion miles wide. What are they?
2014-11-20-HLTauRings.jpg
The HL Tauri protoplanetary disk (credit: ESA/ALMA)
The system is less than 1 million years old, and this seems too short a time to form planets within these dark rings -- but who knows? Could you really form Jupiter-sized, dust vacuum cleaners in less than a million years? Some calculations using gravitational instabilities in the disk have predicted Jupiter formation times as short as 100,000 years! This is not the first time such rings have been seen. In 2005, the Hubble Space Telescope found a dark ring in the disk surrounding the star TW Hydraelocated 176 light-years from Earth. The ring is 2 billion miles wide and 8 billion miles from its star and, like HL Tau's rings, may eventually reveal a forming Jupiter-sized planet.
Meanwhile, Hubble has just completed a survey of debris disks orbiting a number of stars that are no longer enshrouded by dust clouds. The collection of 23 stars reveals some interesting clues to how these disks evolve in time between 10 million and 1 billion years after planet formation has probably stopped. The large planet seen by Hubble orbiting inside the debris disk of the bright star Fomalhaut is probably the last stages of such a planet-forming disk system. Meanwhile, the disk irregularities observed around the star HD 181327 resemble a huge spray of debris possibly caused by the recent collision of two bodies. When our infant Earth was struck by a Mars-sized planet to form our Moon, a similar spray of debris probably formed!
2014-11-20-FomalhautDisk.jpg
Fomalhaut debris disk and planet (credit: NASA/HST)
Theoretical Work: A Story in Progress
For decades, astronomers have worked with supercomputer simulations of the basic laws of gravity, fluid and gas dynamics and radiation transport to create physically consistent models of what these protoplanetary disks should look like as they evolve over time. The mechanism of planet formation has also been explored through a variety of calculations and physics-based models. For example, astronomers Phil Armitage at the University of Colorado and Wilhelm Kley at Tubingen University have arrived at similar models for how a massive planet like Jupiter forms from such a disk and excavates a swept-out ring that resembles the HL Tau rings. The models show how the planet attracts mass from the edges of the ring, and how the process develops spiral "gravity waves" in the disk that then cause the orbit of the forming planet to change over time. Other simulations like the ones by Ken Rice at the University of California, Riverside, show that for much more massive disks, gravitational instabilities can lead to very rapid large-planet formation and the creation of a strong spiral wave resembling what you see in the shape of a spiral galaxy.
2014-11-20-DiskModel2.gif
A forming planet and ring (credit: Wilkelm Kley/Tubingen)
So the addition of new high-resolution data like that for HL Tau is at long last allowing astronomers to see the hidden details of planet and disk formation and, from this, create the next-generation physics-based models for how planets form. The rings are still something of a mystery and may not actually involve planet sweeping. Until we can detect an actual planet inside one of these rings, this connection is still an unproven theoretical possibility.
Stay tuned for new discoveries and more clues to how our own solar system formed!

About 450 light-years from Earth, in the constellation Taurus, a dense, dark, interstellar cloud has slowly started to reveal its secrets. It happens to be a very active nursery for young stars resembling our own sun about 4.6 billion years ago. Embedded in this cloud, which has been carefully studied by the Hubble Space Telescope, are very young stars called HL Tau and XZ Tau, each no more than 1 million years old, give or take. You can easily see the nebulae formed by the complex blobs of gas ejected by the young stars.
2014-11-20-XZTauri.jpg
HL Tauri and surroundings (credit: NASA/HST)
The star HL Tau (more properly called HL Tauri) is 10,000 times too faint for you to see with your naked eye. Even a large telescope has a hard time seeing it clearly through all the dust and gas blocking the view. But other kinds of telescopes can easily pierce the light-years of dust clouds. Since 1975, astronomers had known that HL Tau had some kind of disk of gas orbiting it. The disk is about 40 times the diameter of our solar system. Later on, astronomers studied HL Tau using radio telescopes and detected a dense knot of carbon monoxide molecules centered on the star. Caltech astronomers Anneila Sargent and Steven Beckwith were able to study this clump in more detail and discovered it really was a disk-like region rotating in the same way that planets orbit our sun: faster toward the center and slower toward the edge. Based on observations made in 1986 from the Millimeter Wave Interferometer of the Owens Valley Radio Observatory, it was determined that the disk had about 10-percent as much mass as our sun. Though not enough to build a second companion star, it would be plenty to make a lot of planets, with dust and gas to spare and throw away into the surrounding Taurus dust cloud.
In addition to dust and carbon monoxide molecules, astronomers had also detected water ice in 1975, and micron-sized silicate ("beach sand") dust grains in 1985. Searches for methane ice in the very cold outer limits of the disk haven't turned up anything yet. HL Tau's disk seems to be pretty bland in terms of interesting pre-life molecules! But its boringly simple, or absent, chemistry is countered by the disk being a very complex and active region of space. Along the axis of the spinning disk, small nebulae called Herbig-Haro objects can be seen several light-years away, such as HH-150 and six cloud clumps aligned along a jet called HH-151. These gas clouds are like puffs of smoke being ejected at very high speeds by events happening as the HL Tau interacts with its surrounding disk. We still don't know exactly what is going on after all these years. Could magnetic fields be involved?
Recent studies of the magnetic field of this disk by astronomers Ian Stephens and Leslie Looney led to a surprising result: Instead of the field oriented with a distinct axis pointing along the HH151 jet, the field was much more complex. It was always thought that the blobs of gas would be ejected along some well-defined axis provided by the magnetic field, like the barrel of a cannon. In the absence of an ordered "poloidal" magnetic field to define a unique direction, the cause of the cloud alignment in the jet remains a mystery. To make matters more interesting, in 2007, astronomer Michihiro Takami, using the Subaru Telescope, detected the faint emission from a counter-jet also aligned with the HH-151 jet and HL Tau. So whatever the events that are occurring in this disk of gas and dust, it tends to favor ejecting two streams of matter in a symmetric way along the polar axis of the disk.
Once astronomers caught the scent of the nearby HL Tau dust disk, there was only one direction to go: higher resolution to see more details and how the disk is actually shaped. By 2011, astronomers Woojin Kwon, Leslie Looney and Lee Mundy had used the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy and detected a flattened shape. It is not face-on but tilted so it looks like an ellipse inclined slightly downwards to the line of sight. The measurements also suggested that the larger dust grains in the disk, possibly as big as sand grains, had settled toward the plane of the disk and a halo of finer micron-sized dust grains probably engulfs the whole disk. The disk is also gravitationally unstable, but they were not able to see any details of the kinds of shapes that result.
Then, in 2014, astronomers used the even higher-resolution capabilities of the new Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) to create the now-famous image you have seen on the nightly news. What it confirms is all the previous observations about the size, shape and tilt of the dust disk, but it also could begin to see some of the details of its internal shape. What astronomers found was simply amazing. As many as eight dark bands concentric with the star can easily be seen! The gaps are about 450 million to 1 billion miles wide. What are they?
2014-11-20-HLTauRings.jpg
The HL Tauri protoplanetary disk (credit: ESA/ALMA)
The system is less than 1 million years old, and this seems too short a time to form planets within these dark rings -- but who knows? Could you really form Jupiter-sized, dust vacuum cleaners in less than a million years? Some calculations using gravitational instabilities in the disk have predicted Jupiter formation times as short as 100,000 years! This is not the first time such rings have been seen. In 2005, the Hubble Space Telescope found a dark ring in the disk surrounding the star TW Hydraelocated 176 light-years from Earth. The ring is 2 billion miles wide and 8 billion miles from its star and, like HL Tau's rings, may eventually reveal a forming Jupiter-sized planet.
Meanwhile, Hubble has just completed a survey of debris disks orbiting a number of stars that are no longer enshrouded by dust clouds. The collection of 23 stars reveals some interesting clues to how these disks evolve in time between 10 million and 1 billion years after planet formation has probably stopped. The large planet seen by Hubble orbiting inside the debris disk of the bright star Fomalhaut is probably the last stages of such a planet-forming disk system. Meanwhile, the disk irregularities observed around the star HD 181327 resemble a huge spray of debris possibly caused by the recent collision of two bodies. When our infant Earth was struck by a Mars-sized planet to form our Moon, a similar spray of debris probably formed!
2014-11-20-FomalhautDisk.jpg
Fomalhaut debris disk and planet (credit: NASA/HST)
Theoretical Work: A Story in Progress
For decades, astronomers have worked with supercomputer simulations of the basic laws of gravity, fluid and gas dynamics and radiation transport to create physically consistent models of what these protoplanetary disks should look like as they evolve over time. The mechanism of planet formation has also been explored through a variety of calculations and physics-based models. For example, astronomers Phil Armitage at the University of Colorado and Wilhelm Kley at Tubingen University have arrived at similar models for how a massive planet like Jupiter forms from such a disk and excavates a swept-out ring that resembles the HL Tau rings. The models show how the planet attracts mass from the edges of the ring, and how the process develops spiral "gravity waves" in the disk that then cause the orbit of the forming planet to change over time. Other simulations like the ones by Ken Rice at the University of California, Riverside, show that for much more massive disks, gravitational instabilities can lead to very rapid large-planet formation and the creation of a strong spiral wave resembling what you see in the shape of a spiral galaxy.
2014-11-20-DiskModel2.gif
A forming planet and ring (credit: Wilkelm Kley/Tubingen)
So the addition of new high-resolution data like that for HL Tau is at long last allowing astronomers to see the hidden details of planet and disk formation and, from this, create the next-generation physics-based models for how planets form. The rings are still something of a mystery and may not actually involve planet sweeping. Until we can detect an actual planet inside one of these rings, this connection is still an unproven theoretical possibility.
Stay tuned for new discoveries and more clues to how our own solar system formed!

'Embrace engineering's creative side' to fix skills crisis



Engineers should embrace the arts, Sir John O'Reilly, a fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology, argued in a lecture.
About 59% of engineering companies in the IET's 2014 survey feared skill shortages could threaten business.
"There is nothing as creative as engineering," Sir John told BBC News.
He says science, technology, engineering and mathematics - often known as "Stem" subjects, are vital for a modern knowledge economy.
But there is a massive shortfall in the number of recruits - with a recent study by the Royal Academy of Engineering saying the UK needs to increase by as much as 50% the number of Stem graduates it produces.
Competitiveness
Delivering this year's Mountbatten Lecture at the Royal Institution, Sir John argued that engineers should recognise the role of the arts in their work - among other benefits, this could attract more people into the profession.
The lecture, Full Steam Ahead for Growth, advocated adoption of a wider acronym - Steam, or science, technology, engineering, arts and maths.
Engineers should embrace the arts as being key to creativity and an important component of innovation, crucial to creating new products and boosting future competitiveness, he argued.
"Engineering and technology is an increasingly diverse and creative domain," said Sir John.
Some university engineering departments already collaborated with art schools to develop understanding, he told BBC News.
In particular he mentioned Cranfield University's Centre for Creative Competitive Design and Imperial College's work with the Royal College of Art.
Woman engineer at work  Engineering is keen to widen the pool of recruits to the profession
The two sets of people could work well together and more emphasis on the creative side of engineering could improve the success of products, he said.
"Aesthetics is part of it," he told BBC News, adding that Apple's iPod was not the first digital media player, nor the only one that worked - but it came to dominate the market "because it was nice to have".
Sir John said he was not suggesting universities started requiring A-level art from engineering applicants - the key subjects for admission would continue to be maths and the sciences. But an emphasis on creative skills would help "broaden the pool and attract more people in".
The IET's skills survey raised concerns not only about the number of recruits to engineering, but about the diversity of the workforce, with only 6% being women.
A report last week by the Wise campaign to promote women in science and engineering found too many young women felt engineering was "not for people like me".
Wise director Helen Wollaston commented: "People who are creative and imaginative are good at working out how to improve products, making them more useful and attractive to customers.
"Advertising for people with these characteristics would be a good way to attract more girls and women into science, technology and engineering."
National Union of Teachers general secretary Christine Blower said Sir John's comments illustrated the educational importance of arts subjects "to ensure students have a range of skills and knowledge to equip them for their future careers".

from bbc.com


Engineers should embrace the arts, Sir John O'Reilly, a fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology, argued in a lecture.
About 59% of engineering companies in the IET's 2014 survey feared skill shortages could threaten business.
"There is nothing as creative as engineering," Sir John told BBC News.
He says science, technology, engineering and mathematics - often known as "Stem" subjects, are vital for a modern knowledge economy.
But there is a massive shortfall in the number of recruits - with a recent study by the Royal Academy of Engineering saying the UK needs to increase by as much as 50% the number of Stem graduates it produces.
Competitiveness
Delivering this year's Mountbatten Lecture at the Royal Institution, Sir John argued that engineers should recognise the role of the arts in their work - among other benefits, this could attract more people into the profession.
The lecture, Full Steam Ahead for Growth, advocated adoption of a wider acronym - Steam, or science, technology, engineering, arts and maths.
Engineers should embrace the arts as being key to creativity and an important component of innovation, crucial to creating new products and boosting future competitiveness, he argued.
"Engineering and technology is an increasingly diverse and creative domain," said Sir John.
Some university engineering departments already collaborated with art schools to develop understanding, he told BBC News.
In particular he mentioned Cranfield University's Centre for Creative Competitive Design and Imperial College's work with the Royal College of Art.
Woman engineer at work  Engineering is keen to widen the pool of recruits to the profession
The two sets of people could work well together and more emphasis on the creative side of engineering could improve the success of products, he said.
"Aesthetics is part of it," he told BBC News, adding that Apple's iPod was not the first digital media player, nor the only one that worked - but it came to dominate the market "because it was nice to have".
Sir John said he was not suggesting universities started requiring A-level art from engineering applicants - the key subjects for admission would continue to be maths and the sciences. But an emphasis on creative skills would help "broaden the pool and attract more people in".
The IET's skills survey raised concerns not only about the number of recruits to engineering, but about the diversity of the workforce, with only 6% being women.
A report last week by the Wise campaign to promote women in science and engineering found too many young women felt engineering was "not for people like me".
Wise director Helen Wollaston commented: "People who are creative and imaginative are good at working out how to improve products, making them more useful and attractive to customers.
"Advertising for people with these characteristics would be a good way to attract more girls and women into science, technology and engineering."
National Union of Teachers general secretary Christine Blower said Sir John's comments illustrated the educational importance of arts subjects "to ensure students have a range of skills and knowledge to equip them for their future careers".

from bbc.com

Do We Have What It Takes to Explore Space?

Do We Have What It Takes to Explore Space?
Do We Have What It Takes to Explore Space?


The recent accidents at Virgin Galactic and Orbital Sciences have stimulated an important discussion not only for space exploration, but also for our national economic future: What level of risk are we willing to accept in order to advance technology and exploration?

We are all saddened by the recent death and injury of the Virgin Galactic test pilots. Comprehensive investigations of both accidents are required; but these episodes have fueled cases of wild speculation, misinformation, and at times borderline hysteria from various members of the media. Many of these stories question whether 'commercial' companies should be engaged in space exploration -- and some have questioned whether we should risk lives for space exploration at all.

Ironically, during the same time-frame as these two accidents, circus performer Nik Wallenda tightrope walked blindfolded between two Chicago skyscrapers, and actor Tom Cruise dangled outside an inflight airplane to promote his upcoming movie. These stunts did not receive nearly the scrutiny and condemnation from the pundits that the spacecraft accidents received. Granted, neither of these stunts resulted in a loss of life, but both were cases of individuals taking a substantial risk to their lives for nothing more than publicity and entertainment. By comparison, companies like Virgin Galactic, Orbital, and many others are trying to advance technology, exploration, and create new industries. As with early aviation, it is essential that the burgeoning commercial space industry be allowed to take reasonable risks. 

This isn't to say that these companies shouldn't be scrutinized. If the investigations find serious problems with the technology and procedures, the companies should certainly be held accountable, and they should make any changes reasonably necessary to improve the safety and reliability of their products. But if we allow a knee-jerk reaction and don't allow companies and individuals to take reasonable risks to achieve breakthroughs, we will almost certainly be condemning ourselves to economic decline.

Consistent funding and acceptance of reasonable risk are perhaps the two most essential elements that are required to advance a robust human space flight program. In the case of human spaceflight, mission planners should (and do) try to make missions as safe as possible, but they will NEVER be able to make them 100 percent safe, just as aircraft, automobiles, and other transportation systems have not been made 100 percent safe. Almost 33,000 people perished in motor vehicle accidents in 2013; an astonishing figure, but nobody suggests abandoning automobiles. People also die in military training accidents - and it is well-known that commercial aviation, while safer than most modes of transportation, is also not 100 percent safe.

Why do we perceive these risks differently when it comes to space exploration? When military or automobile accidents occur, the national psyche isn't riding along. Even for people who don't consider themselves fans of NASA, space exploration can be an emotional roller coaster, and monetary and personal risk are often used to deflect a potentially larger fear - emotional risk. When there is an accident with our space program (like the Space Shuttle Columbia or Challenger), it has a psychological impact like few other events. It impacts our national pride and our outlook on the future. Without emotional risk, however, we will never have the emotional highs (or technological and scientific benefits) of great success - like when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped on the Moon or when the Curiosity rover landed on the Martian surface - or recently when the European Space Agency landed Philea on the surface of a comet.

Individuals, companies, and governments must weigh whether the goals they hope to achieve justify the financial and human risks. Some goals may not be worth the risk and others may require that astronauts take on greater personal risks than have ever been taken before in space exploration. But we are on the verge of a potentially game changing era of exploration, technological advancement, and emerging industries. If we willing to take smart risks, we will see an extraordinary future.

from  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
Do We Have What It Takes to Explore Space?
Do We Have What It Takes to Explore Space?


The recent accidents at Virgin Galactic and Orbital Sciences have stimulated an important discussion not only for space exploration, but also for our national economic future: What level of risk are we willing to accept in order to advance technology and exploration?

We are all saddened by the recent death and injury of the Virgin Galactic test pilots. Comprehensive investigations of both accidents are required; but these episodes have fueled cases of wild speculation, misinformation, and at times borderline hysteria from various members of the media. Many of these stories question whether 'commercial' companies should be engaged in space exploration -- and some have questioned whether we should risk lives for space exploration at all.

Ironically, during the same time-frame as these two accidents, circus performer Nik Wallenda tightrope walked blindfolded between two Chicago skyscrapers, and actor Tom Cruise dangled outside an inflight airplane to promote his upcoming movie. These stunts did not receive nearly the scrutiny and condemnation from the pundits that the spacecraft accidents received. Granted, neither of these stunts resulted in a loss of life, but both were cases of individuals taking a substantial risk to their lives for nothing more than publicity and entertainment. By comparison, companies like Virgin Galactic, Orbital, and many others are trying to advance technology, exploration, and create new industries. As with early aviation, it is essential that the burgeoning commercial space industry be allowed to take reasonable risks. 

This isn't to say that these companies shouldn't be scrutinized. If the investigations find serious problems with the technology and procedures, the companies should certainly be held accountable, and they should make any changes reasonably necessary to improve the safety and reliability of their products. But if we allow a knee-jerk reaction and don't allow companies and individuals to take reasonable risks to achieve breakthroughs, we will almost certainly be condemning ourselves to economic decline.

Consistent funding and acceptance of reasonable risk are perhaps the two most essential elements that are required to advance a robust human space flight program. In the case of human spaceflight, mission planners should (and do) try to make missions as safe as possible, but they will NEVER be able to make them 100 percent safe, just as aircraft, automobiles, and other transportation systems have not been made 100 percent safe. Almost 33,000 people perished in motor vehicle accidents in 2013; an astonishing figure, but nobody suggests abandoning automobiles. People also die in military training accidents - and it is well-known that commercial aviation, while safer than most modes of transportation, is also not 100 percent safe.

Why do we perceive these risks differently when it comes to space exploration? When military or automobile accidents occur, the national psyche isn't riding along. Even for people who don't consider themselves fans of NASA, space exploration can be an emotional roller coaster, and monetary and personal risk are often used to deflect a potentially larger fear - emotional risk. When there is an accident with our space program (like the Space Shuttle Columbia or Challenger), it has a psychological impact like few other events. It impacts our national pride and our outlook on the future. Without emotional risk, however, we will never have the emotional highs (or technological and scientific benefits) of great success - like when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped on the Moon or when the Curiosity rover landed on the Martian surface - or recently when the European Space Agency landed Philea on the surface of a comet.

Individuals, companies, and governments must weigh whether the goals they hope to achieve justify the financial and human risks. Some goals may not be worth the risk and others may require that astronauts take on greater personal risks than have ever been taken before in space exploration. But we are on the verge of a potentially game changing era of exploration, technological advancement, and emerging industries. If we willing to take smart risks, we will see an extraordinary future.

from  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

Galaxies may be aligned across 1 billion light-years


The cores of several distant galaxies, spread out across roughly 1 billion light-years, appear to mysteriously align with one another. If confirmed, the new observations could be a hint of some unknown mechanism that shapes the largest structures in the universe.

Damien Hutsemékers, an astrophysicist at the University of Liège in Belgium, and colleagues used the Very Large Telescope in northern Chile to measure the orientations of 19 quasars, blazing disks of gas that swirl around supermassive black holes in the centers of some galaxies. Each of the quasars lives in one of four groups that are about 13 billion light-years away and centered on the constellation Leo. Within the groups, powerful jets of charged particles that spew from the quasars seem to point in nearly the same direction, the researchers report November 19 in Astronomy & Astrophysics.

The conclusions are on shaky ground, says Mike DiPompeo, an astrophysicist at the University of Wyoming. With only 19 quasars, the alignments could be just a coincidence. But even with a small sample, he finds the results intriguing and worthy of further investigation. It would be surprising, he says, if quasars knew how their neighbors were aligned.

from      https://www.sciencenews.org

The cores of several distant galaxies, spread out across roughly 1 billion light-years, appear to mysteriously align with one another. If confirmed, the new observations could be a hint of some unknown mechanism that shapes the largest structures in the universe.

Damien Hutsemékers, an astrophysicist at the University of Liège in Belgium, and colleagues used the Very Large Telescope in northern Chile to measure the orientations of 19 quasars, blazing disks of gas that swirl around supermassive black holes in the centers of some galaxies. Each of the quasars lives in one of four groups that are about 13 billion light-years away and centered on the constellation Leo. Within the groups, powerful jets of charged particles that spew from the quasars seem to point in nearly the same direction, the researchers report November 19 in Astronomy & Astrophysics.

The conclusions are on shaky ground, says Mike DiPompeo, an astrophysicist at the University of Wyoming. With only 19 quasars, the alignments could be just a coincidence. But even with a small sample, he finds the results intriguing and worthy of further investigation. It would be surprising, he says, if quasars knew how their neighbors were aligned.

from      https://www.sciencenews.org