aads

Fly through the Orion Nebula

Astronomers and visualization specialists from NASA’s Universe of Learning program combined the visible and infrared capabilities of the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes to create this two-minute, three-dimensional, fly-through movie of the magnificent Orion Nebula.

The Orion Nebula, a nearby stellar nursery, is an enormous cloud of gas and dust, one of many in our Milky Way galaxy. It lies roughly 1,300 light-years from Earth. At some 30 to 40 light-years in diameter, this great big nebulous cocoon is giving birth to perhaps a thousand stars.

More about the Orion Nebula, including how to find it in your sky, here.

To create the movie, the team from the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, and the Caltech/IPAC in Pasadena, California used actual scientific data along with Hollywood techniques to produce the most detailed multi-wavelength visualization yet of the Orion Nebula.

Bottom line: New 3D Orion Nebula fly-through visualization from NASA.

Read more from NASA



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2klTiFh

Astronomers and visualization specialists from NASA’s Universe of Learning program combined the visible and infrared capabilities of the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes to create this two-minute, three-dimensional, fly-through movie of the magnificent Orion Nebula.

The Orion Nebula, a nearby stellar nursery, is an enormous cloud of gas and dust, one of many in our Milky Way galaxy. It lies roughly 1,300 light-years from Earth. At some 30 to 40 light-years in diameter, this great big nebulous cocoon is giving birth to perhaps a thousand stars.

More about the Orion Nebula, including how to find it in your sky, here.

To create the movie, the team from the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, and the Caltech/IPAC in Pasadena, California used actual scientific data along with Hollywood techniques to produce the most detailed multi-wavelength visualization yet of the Orion Nebula.

Bottom line: New 3D Orion Nebula fly-through visualization from NASA.

Read more from NASA



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2klTiFh

What’s this strange cloud?

Photo taken Monday, May 21 – 5:20 a.m. – by Michael Scully in North Carolina. Thanks, Michael!

Michael Scully in Hurdle Mills, North Carolina wasn’t sure what he was seeing in the early morning twilight on May 21, 2018. He wrote:

This was eerie. The “cloud” pattern was the only thing lit up in that part of the sky. If you get a chance and could tell me what this is, I’d be thrilled.

Cool photo, Michael, especially to catch by chance!

It was exhaust from Monday morning’s launch of an Antares rocket, which was boosting an uncrewed Cygnus cargo ship to space. The cargo ship did reach orbit none minutes after launch at 4:44 a.m. EDT (08:44 UTC) from Pad-0A of NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. The Cygnus is carrying supplies to the International Space Station. It’s due to arrive at the space station today (Thursday, May 24).

Michael’s photo was not the only one we received of Monday’s launch from Wallops:

View larger. | Robert Williams on Wallops Island, Virginia, was prepared. He caught the rocket launch itself on May 21, 2018, at 4:45 a.m. He wrote: “This is comprised of 3 30-second images stacked together, with a little brightness adjustment in Adobe Lightroom. Each image was taken at f/20, ISO 200. Canon 6D, Rokinon 14mm lens.” Thanks, Robert!

Did you see it? Tell us in the comments below. Map of viewing area on the U.S. East Coast for the May 21, 2018, Antares rocket launch. Image via Orbital ATK.

Bottom line: Images of Monday’s launch of an uncrewed Cygnus cargo ship, due to reach the International Space Station on Thursday, May 24.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2IGqVQG

Photo taken Monday, May 21 – 5:20 a.m. – by Michael Scully in North Carolina. Thanks, Michael!

Michael Scully in Hurdle Mills, North Carolina wasn’t sure what he was seeing in the early morning twilight on May 21, 2018. He wrote:

This was eerie. The “cloud” pattern was the only thing lit up in that part of the sky. If you get a chance and could tell me what this is, I’d be thrilled.

Cool photo, Michael, especially to catch by chance!

It was exhaust from Monday morning’s launch of an Antares rocket, which was boosting an uncrewed Cygnus cargo ship to space. The cargo ship did reach orbit none minutes after launch at 4:44 a.m. EDT (08:44 UTC) from Pad-0A of NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. The Cygnus is carrying supplies to the International Space Station. It’s due to arrive at the space station today (Thursday, May 24).

Michael’s photo was not the only one we received of Monday’s launch from Wallops:

View larger. | Robert Williams on Wallops Island, Virginia, was prepared. He caught the rocket launch itself on May 21, 2018, at 4:45 a.m. He wrote: “This is comprised of 3 30-second images stacked together, with a little brightness adjustment in Adobe Lightroom. Each image was taken at f/20, ISO 200. Canon 6D, Rokinon 14mm lens.” Thanks, Robert!

Did you see it? Tell us in the comments below. Map of viewing area on the U.S. East Coast for the May 21, 2018, Antares rocket launch. Image via Orbital ATK.

Bottom line: Images of Monday’s launch of an uncrewed Cygnus cargo ship, due to reach the International Space Station on Thursday, May 24.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2IGqVQG

Astronomers magnify detail in Black Widow pulsar

Here’s a composite X-ray (red/white) and optical (green/blue) image of the Black Widow pulsar, aka PSR B1957+20. The image shows an elongated cloud, or cocoon, of high-energy particles flowing behind the rapidly rotating pulsar (the white point-like source). Astronomers have announced a highly detailed observation of this distant pulsar, which they accomplished using the gas in this cloud, or coccon, as a magnifier. This image, from 2001, is via Chandra.

Astronomers in Toronto said today (May 23, 2018) that they’ve performed:

… one of the highest resolution observations in astronomical history by observing two intense regions of radiation, 20 kilometers [12 miles] apart, around a star 6,500 light-years away.

The observation is equivalent to using a telescope on Earth to see a flea on the surface of Pluto.

The work is being published May 24 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature,

Their target object was pulsar PSR B1957+20 – aka the Black Widow pulsar – discovered in 1988. It’s millisecond pulsar, spinning over 600 times per second. As the pulsar spins, it emits beams of radiation from the two hotspots on its surface. The intense regions of radiation observed in this new work are associated with the beams.

The pulsar also has a cool, lightweight brown dwarf companion. The two stars orbit each other about every 9 hours and happen to be aligned with respect to Earth so that – within each orbit – an eclipse occurs, lasting 20 minutes. The brown dwarf is known to have a “wake” or comet-like tail of gas. That’s because it’s moving through space at approximately a million kilometers per hour, in contrast to our own sun’s forward velocity through the Milky Way galaxy of about 72,000 kilometers (45,000 miles) per hour.

Robert Main at the University of Toronto is lead author of the new study. He said this gas around the brown dwarf is what made his observation possible:

The gas is acting like a magnifying glass right in front of the pulsar. We are essentially looking at the pulsar through a naturally occurring magnifier which periodically allows us to see the two regions separately.

The pulsar PSR B1957+20 is seen in the background through the cloud of gas enveloping its brown dwarf star companion. Image: Dr. Mark A. Garlick; Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto

In this unusual star system, the brown dwarf and the pulsar are very close together. The brown dwarf star – which is about a third the diameter of our sun – is roughly 2 million kilometers (1.2 million miles) from the pulsar — in contrast to Earth’s distance from the sun of 150 million kilometers (93 million miles). The dwarf companion star is tidally locked to the pulsar so that one side always faces its pulsating companion, the way the moon is tidally locked to the Earth.

Because it is so close to the pulsar, the brown dwarf star is blasted by the strong radiation coming from its smaller companion. The intense radiation from the pulsar heats one side of the relatively cool dwarf star to the temperature of our sun’s surface, about 10,000 degrees Fahrenheit or some 6,000 degrees Celsius.

The blast from the pulsar may ultimately destroy the brown dwarf companion, these astronomers said. Pulsars in these types of binary systems are called black widows because – just as a black widow spider eats its mate – the pulsar, given the right conditions, could gradually erode gas from the dwarf star until the latter is consumed.

Artist’s concept of the B1957+20 system, moving through space, surrounded by a cloud of gas. The companion star is too close to the pulsar to be visible at this scale. Read more about this image via Wikimedia Commons.

Bottom line: Astronomers observed two intense regions of radiation – 12 miles (20 km) apart – on the rapidly spinning pulsar PSR B1957+20 – aka the Black Widow pulsar. They say it’s “one of the highest resolution observations in astronomical history.”

Source: “Extreme Plasma Lensing of the Black Widow Pulsar,” Robert Main et al., 2018 May 24, Nature



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2sb7u7E

Here’s a composite X-ray (red/white) and optical (green/blue) image of the Black Widow pulsar, aka PSR B1957+20. The image shows an elongated cloud, or cocoon, of high-energy particles flowing behind the rapidly rotating pulsar (the white point-like source). Astronomers have announced a highly detailed observation of this distant pulsar, which they accomplished using the gas in this cloud, or coccon, as a magnifier. This image, from 2001, is via Chandra.

Astronomers in Toronto said today (May 23, 2018) that they’ve performed:

… one of the highest resolution observations in astronomical history by observing two intense regions of radiation, 20 kilometers [12 miles] apart, around a star 6,500 light-years away.

The observation is equivalent to using a telescope on Earth to see a flea on the surface of Pluto.

The work is being published May 24 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature,

Their target object was pulsar PSR B1957+20 – aka the Black Widow pulsar – discovered in 1988. It’s millisecond pulsar, spinning over 600 times per second. As the pulsar spins, it emits beams of radiation from the two hotspots on its surface. The intense regions of radiation observed in this new work are associated with the beams.

The pulsar also has a cool, lightweight brown dwarf companion. The two stars orbit each other about every 9 hours and happen to be aligned with respect to Earth so that – within each orbit – an eclipse occurs, lasting 20 minutes. The brown dwarf is known to have a “wake” or comet-like tail of gas. That’s because it’s moving through space at approximately a million kilometers per hour, in contrast to our own sun’s forward velocity through the Milky Way galaxy of about 72,000 kilometers (45,000 miles) per hour.

Robert Main at the University of Toronto is lead author of the new study. He said this gas around the brown dwarf is what made his observation possible:

The gas is acting like a magnifying glass right in front of the pulsar. We are essentially looking at the pulsar through a naturally occurring magnifier which periodically allows us to see the two regions separately.

The pulsar PSR B1957+20 is seen in the background through the cloud of gas enveloping its brown dwarf star companion. Image: Dr. Mark A. Garlick; Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto

In this unusual star system, the brown dwarf and the pulsar are very close together. The brown dwarf star – which is about a third the diameter of our sun – is roughly 2 million kilometers (1.2 million miles) from the pulsar — in contrast to Earth’s distance from the sun of 150 million kilometers (93 million miles). The dwarf companion star is tidally locked to the pulsar so that one side always faces its pulsating companion, the way the moon is tidally locked to the Earth.

Because it is so close to the pulsar, the brown dwarf star is blasted by the strong radiation coming from its smaller companion. The intense radiation from the pulsar heats one side of the relatively cool dwarf star to the temperature of our sun’s surface, about 10,000 degrees Fahrenheit or some 6,000 degrees Celsius.

The blast from the pulsar may ultimately destroy the brown dwarf companion, these astronomers said. Pulsars in these types of binary systems are called black widows because – just as a black widow spider eats its mate – the pulsar, given the right conditions, could gradually erode gas from the dwarf star until the latter is consumed.

Artist’s concept of the B1957+20 system, moving through space, surrounded by a cloud of gas. The companion star is too close to the pulsar to be visible at this scale. Read more about this image via Wikimedia Commons.

Bottom line: Astronomers observed two intense regions of radiation – 12 miles (20 km) apart – on the rapidly spinning pulsar PSR B1957+20 – aka the Black Widow pulsar. They say it’s “one of the highest resolution observations in astronomical history.”

Source: “Extreme Plasma Lensing of the Black Widow Pulsar,” Robert Main et al., 2018 May 24, Nature



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2sb7u7E

Deneb is distant and very luminous

Image via Fred Espanak

Image via Fred Espenak

The star Deneb in the constellation Cygnus is one of the most distant stars you’ll ever see with your eye alone. That’s because it’s one of our Milky Way galaxy’s most luminous stars. Strange to say, even in this era of the Gaia satellite – which in April 2018 announced its second data release and the measurement of distances for some 1.7 billion stars in our Milky Way galaxy – the exact distance to Deneb is uncertain. More about why below.

For now, just know that, when you gaze at this bright star Deneb, you’re gazing across thousands of light-years of space. That’s in contrast to most visible stars in our sky, located tens to hundreds of light-years away.

Why don’t astronomers know the distance to Deneb exactly? Why are there varying estimates for this very luminous star’s distance?

Astronomers can directly measure the distance to nearby stars using the parallax method. But Deneb is too far away for accurate parallax measurements from Earth’s surface.

The most important modern distant measurement for Deneb came in the 1990s, with ESA’s Earth-orbiting Hipparcos satellite, the predecessor to Gaia. Both Hipparcos and Gaia gather astrometric data on the stars; that is, they measure stars’ positions, motions and brightnesses in order to calculate a distance.

Early analyses of Hipparcos data indicated a distance of somewhere around 2,600 light-years for Deneb. Then, in 2009, a newer study – which had used more powerful analysis techniques on Hipparcos data – gave a distance for Deneb that’s about half the widely accepted value, closer to 1,500 light-years. Today, that value – around 1,500 light-years – is the most widely accepted value for Deneb’s distance.

Why hasn’t Gaia measured Deneb’s distance more precisely. Astronomer Anthony G.A. Brown of Leiden Observatory in The Netherlands – a member of the Gaia team – told us in May 2018:

Deneb is too bright to appear in Gaia’s second data release so we have no updated distance available. This holds for all stars brighter than about 2nd magnitude.

He said the Hipparcos catalog is still the best source for Deneb’s distance.

So approximately 1,500 light-years it is, for now. And that’s impressive. In order for us to see a star at this distance, it must also be tremendously bright and energetic. Deneb is thought to be one of the most powerful stars we can see with the eye.

Deneb (bottom half of frame) is some 200 times bigger than our sun. Image via AstroBob

Want to see Deneb? You can gaze at this faraway star in the evenings starting around this time of year – around May, or late spring in the Northern Hemisphere. From this hemisphere, at this time of year, Deneb rises over the northeastern horizon by mid-evening. Like all stars, Deneb rises earlier as the weeks and months pass. Its midnight culmination date – the date on which Deneb rises at sunset and appears at its highest point in the sky at midnight – is about August 1 (or August 15 for those using Daylight Time).

Deneb is part of several famous star patterns, which overlap each other. It’s the brightest of the stars composing the constellation Cygnus the Swan, where it marks the Swan’s Tail. When you hear deneb in a star name, it always means tail.

Deneb marks the Tail of Cynus the Swan … and the head of a crosslike pattern known as the Northern Cross.

Simultaneously, Deneb marks the head of an asterism (a readily recognizable grouping of stars that is not an official constellation), known as the Northern Cross.

Plus it is one of the three stars known as the Summer Triangle. The other two stars are Vega and Altair. Deneb is the northernmost and dimmest of the three Triangle stars, but its association with the other bright stars makes it easy to identify.

The Summer Triangle by Susan Jensen in Odessa, Washington.

Deneb is circumpolar as seen from locations of about 45 degrees north latitude, roughly the northern tier of U.S. states. In other words, from the northern U.S. and similar latitudes, Deneb never sets but instead circles round and round the pole star. It cannot ever be seen south of about 45 degrees south latitude. That includes Antarctica, far southern Argentina and Chile, and perhaps the far southern tip of New Zealand’s South Island. Aside from that, just about anyone should have a chance to see Deneb at one time or another.

The constellation Cygnus the Swan. The bright star Deneb represents the Tail of Cygnus. Image via Constellation of Words

The name Deneb derives from the Arabic Al Dhanab al Dajajah meaning Tail of the Hen. It obviously dates from an earlier incarnation of Cygnus not as a swan but as a chicken. Like many bright stars, Deneb has been called by a number of other names, but the oddest, according the Richard Hinckley Allen, who cites the Arabic name above, was Uropygium, meaning the posterior part of a bird’s body from which feathers grow, and oddly sometimes called the “Pope’s nose.”

In Chinese mythology Deneb is associated with the story of the Celestial Princess or the Weaver Girl. In this story a Girl (the star Vega) is separated from her beloved (a cowherd represented by the star Altair) by the Milky Way. Once a year, the girl and the cowherd are allowed to meet briefly when a large flock of magpies form a bridge across the starry river. Deneb represents the bridge.

Deneb’s position is RA: 20h 41m 26s, dec: +45° 16′ 49″.

Bottom line: Information on the star Deneb, plus how to see it in your sky.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/1nqI1AS
Image via Fred Espanak

Image via Fred Espenak

The star Deneb in the constellation Cygnus is one of the most distant stars you’ll ever see with your eye alone. That’s because it’s one of our Milky Way galaxy’s most luminous stars. Strange to say, even in this era of the Gaia satellite – which in April 2018 announced its second data release and the measurement of distances for some 1.7 billion stars in our Milky Way galaxy – the exact distance to Deneb is uncertain. More about why below.

For now, just know that, when you gaze at this bright star Deneb, you’re gazing across thousands of light-years of space. That’s in contrast to most visible stars in our sky, located tens to hundreds of light-years away.

Why don’t astronomers know the distance to Deneb exactly? Why are there varying estimates for this very luminous star’s distance?

Astronomers can directly measure the distance to nearby stars using the parallax method. But Deneb is too far away for accurate parallax measurements from Earth’s surface.

The most important modern distant measurement for Deneb came in the 1990s, with ESA’s Earth-orbiting Hipparcos satellite, the predecessor to Gaia. Both Hipparcos and Gaia gather astrometric data on the stars; that is, they measure stars’ positions, motions and brightnesses in order to calculate a distance.

Early analyses of Hipparcos data indicated a distance of somewhere around 2,600 light-years for Deneb. Then, in 2009, a newer study – which had used more powerful analysis techniques on Hipparcos data – gave a distance for Deneb that’s about half the widely accepted value, closer to 1,500 light-years. Today, that value – around 1,500 light-years – is the most widely accepted value for Deneb’s distance.

Why hasn’t Gaia measured Deneb’s distance more precisely. Astronomer Anthony G.A. Brown of Leiden Observatory in The Netherlands – a member of the Gaia team – told us in May 2018:

Deneb is too bright to appear in Gaia’s second data release so we have no updated distance available. This holds for all stars brighter than about 2nd magnitude.

He said the Hipparcos catalog is still the best source for Deneb’s distance.

So approximately 1,500 light-years it is, for now. And that’s impressive. In order for us to see a star at this distance, it must also be tremendously bright and energetic. Deneb is thought to be one of the most powerful stars we can see with the eye.

Deneb (bottom half of frame) is some 200 times bigger than our sun. Image via AstroBob

Want to see Deneb? You can gaze at this faraway star in the evenings starting around this time of year – around May, or late spring in the Northern Hemisphere. From this hemisphere, at this time of year, Deneb rises over the northeastern horizon by mid-evening. Like all stars, Deneb rises earlier as the weeks and months pass. Its midnight culmination date – the date on which Deneb rises at sunset and appears at its highest point in the sky at midnight – is about August 1 (or August 15 for those using Daylight Time).

Deneb is part of several famous star patterns, which overlap each other. It’s the brightest of the stars composing the constellation Cygnus the Swan, where it marks the Swan’s Tail. When you hear deneb in a star name, it always means tail.

Deneb marks the Tail of Cynus the Swan … and the head of a crosslike pattern known as the Northern Cross.

Simultaneously, Deneb marks the head of an asterism (a readily recognizable grouping of stars that is not an official constellation), known as the Northern Cross.

Plus it is one of the three stars known as the Summer Triangle. The other two stars are Vega and Altair. Deneb is the northernmost and dimmest of the three Triangle stars, but its association with the other bright stars makes it easy to identify.

The Summer Triangle by Susan Jensen in Odessa, Washington.

Deneb is circumpolar as seen from locations of about 45 degrees north latitude, roughly the northern tier of U.S. states. In other words, from the northern U.S. and similar latitudes, Deneb never sets but instead circles round and round the pole star. It cannot ever be seen south of about 45 degrees south latitude. That includes Antarctica, far southern Argentina and Chile, and perhaps the far southern tip of New Zealand’s South Island. Aside from that, just about anyone should have a chance to see Deneb at one time or another.

The constellation Cygnus the Swan. The bright star Deneb represents the Tail of Cygnus. Image via Constellation of Words

The name Deneb derives from the Arabic Al Dhanab al Dajajah meaning Tail of the Hen. It obviously dates from an earlier incarnation of Cygnus not as a swan but as a chicken. Like many bright stars, Deneb has been called by a number of other names, but the oddest, according the Richard Hinckley Allen, who cites the Arabic name above, was Uropygium, meaning the posterior part of a bird’s body from which feathers grow, and oddly sometimes called the “Pope’s nose.”

In Chinese mythology Deneb is associated with the story of the Celestial Princess or the Weaver Girl. In this story a Girl (the star Vega) is separated from her beloved (a cowherd represented by the star Altair) by the Milky Way. Once a year, the girl and the cowherd are allowed to meet briefly when a large flock of magpies form a bridge across the starry river. Deneb represents the bridge.

Deneb’s position is RA: 20h 41m 26s, dec: +45° 16′ 49″.

Bottom line: Information on the star Deneb, plus how to see it in your sky.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/1nqI1AS

Sunrise from Sea Bright, New Jersey

Steve Scanlon Photography wrote: “May 21 sunrise reflecting off the Freedom Tower as seen form Anchorage Beach, Sea Bright, New Jersey. 5:41 a.m.”



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2IDZEu2

Steve Scanlon Photography wrote: “May 21 sunrise reflecting off the Freedom Tower as seen form Anchorage Beach, Sea Bright, New Jersey. 5:41 a.m.”



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2IDZEu2

How to see a green flash

The green flash image at the top of this post was taken by Jim Grant, our friend on Facebook. He captured it off the coast of Ocean Beach, California. He called it a mock mirage green flash.

You can see green flashes with the eye, when sky conditions are just right, if you are looking toward a very clear and very distant horizon. That’s why those who see green flashes most often see them over a sea horizon. You also must be looking just at sunset, at the last moment before the sun disappears below the horizon. And you have to be careful not to look too soon. Wait until just the thinnest rim of the sun appears above the horizon. If you look too soon, the light of the sunset will dazzle (or damage) your eyes, and you’ll miss your green flash chance that day.

A planisphere is virtually indispensable for beginning stargazers. Order your EarthSky planisphere today.

View larger. | EarthSky Facebook friend Jim Grant caught this green flash on April 27, 2012 off the coast of San Diego.

There are many different types of green flash. Some describe a streak or ray of the color green … like a green flame shooting up from the sunrise or sunset horizon. The most common green flash, which many people describe, is a flash of the color green seen when the sun is nearly entirely below the horizon.

Green flash image by Mike Baird. Used with permission.

You need a distant horizon to see any of these phenomena, and you need a distinct edge to the horizon. So these green flashes, streaks, and rays are often seen over the ocean – but you can see them over land, too, if your horizon is far enough away. Pollution or haze on the horizon will hide this instantaneous flash of the color green.

If you’re interested in green flashes, Andrew Young’s green flash page is great. He also has a page of links to pictures of green flashes taken by people from around the globe.

Here’s another good article about the green flash by Peter Michaud.

And here’s a rather subtle green flash video here. I had to watch it several times to convince myself I saw any green.

Bottom line: The green flash is legendary, and some people have told us they thought it was a myth, like a unicorn or a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. But green flashes are very real. You need a distant and very clear horizon to see them at the last moment before the sun disappears below the horizon at sunset.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Help support EarthSky! Visit the EarthSky store for to see the great selection of educational tools and team gear we have to offer.

Can you see a green flash? More tips, plus more pictures



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/1Jg01Vr

The green flash image at the top of this post was taken by Jim Grant, our friend on Facebook. He captured it off the coast of Ocean Beach, California. He called it a mock mirage green flash.

You can see green flashes with the eye, when sky conditions are just right, if you are looking toward a very clear and very distant horizon. That’s why those who see green flashes most often see them over a sea horizon. You also must be looking just at sunset, at the last moment before the sun disappears below the horizon. And you have to be careful not to look too soon. Wait until just the thinnest rim of the sun appears above the horizon. If you look too soon, the light of the sunset will dazzle (or damage) your eyes, and you’ll miss your green flash chance that day.

A planisphere is virtually indispensable for beginning stargazers. Order your EarthSky planisphere today.

View larger. | EarthSky Facebook friend Jim Grant caught this green flash on April 27, 2012 off the coast of San Diego.

There are many different types of green flash. Some describe a streak or ray of the color green … like a green flame shooting up from the sunrise or sunset horizon. The most common green flash, which many people describe, is a flash of the color green seen when the sun is nearly entirely below the horizon.

Green flash image by Mike Baird. Used with permission.

You need a distant horizon to see any of these phenomena, and you need a distinct edge to the horizon. So these green flashes, streaks, and rays are often seen over the ocean – but you can see them over land, too, if your horizon is far enough away. Pollution or haze on the horizon will hide this instantaneous flash of the color green.

If you’re interested in green flashes, Andrew Young’s green flash page is great. He also has a page of links to pictures of green flashes taken by people from around the globe.

Here’s another good article about the green flash by Peter Michaud.

And here’s a rather subtle green flash video here. I had to watch it several times to convince myself I saw any green.

Bottom line: The green flash is legendary, and some people have told us they thought it was a myth, like a unicorn or a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. But green flashes are very real. You need a distant and very clear horizon to see them at the last moment before the sun disappears below the horizon at sunset.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Help support EarthSky! Visit the EarthSky store for to see the great selection of educational tools and team gear we have to offer.

Can you see a green flash? More tips, plus more pictures



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/1Jg01Vr

Climate change is already making droughts worse

This is a re-post from Carbon Brief by Benjamin Cook

Dr Benjamin Cook is a climate scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.

Few areas of the world are completely immune to droughts and their often-devastating impacts on water resources, ecosystems and people.

Regions as diverse as California, the Eastern MediterraneanEast AfricaSouth Africa and Australia have all experienced severe – and, in some cases, unprecedented – droughts in recent years.

As with other climate and weather extremes, such as storms and floods, these events have spurred strong interest in questions surrounding the impact of climate change. For example, is climate change making droughts more frequent or severe? And can we expect climate change to contribute to increased drought risk and severity in the future?

The most recent research shows climate change is already making many parts of the world drier and droughts are likely to pack more punch as the climate warms further.

Defining drought

Droughts are among the most expensive weather-related disasters in the world (pdf), affecting ecosystemsagriculture and human society.

The scale of the impacts underlines how important it is to understand droughts and how their likelihood and severity can be made worse by climate change.

But this is easier said than done. For a start, drought is fundamentally a cross-disciplinary phenomenon – it extends across the fields of meteorology, climatology, hydrology, ecology, agronomy, and even sociology, economics, and anthropology.

This means how you define a drought may depend on your field of interest.

A meteorologist might characterise a drought as a straightforward lack of rainfall (known as “meteorological drought”). A farmer, however, would be most concerned when the lack of rain affects soil moisture and crop growth (“agricultural drought”). While a hydrologist would be most interested in when this has a noticeable impact on river flows, aquifers and surface reservoirs (“hydrological drought”).

Schematic illustrating the classical definitions of drought and the associated processes

Schematic illustrating the classical definitions of drought and the associated processes. Precipitation deficits are the ultimate driver of most drought events, with these deficits propagating over time through the hydrological cycle. Other climate variables, particularly temperature, can also affect both agricultural and hydrological drought. Credit: Cook et al. (2018)

The above definitions show that drought is rarely about precipitation – rain, hail, sleet and/or snow – alone. Warmer temperatures, for example, can increase evaporation of moisture from the surface, increase the fraction of precipitation falling as rain rather than snow, and advance the timing of the snow melt season in spring. Vegetation, soil type and topography can all affect droughts through the way they intercept and hold (or do not hold) rainwater.

Humans also play a key role through how we use water (irrigating farmland and withdrawing water from long-held groundwater sources, for example) and change the land surface through deforestation, expanding croplands and urban development.

Because there are many ways to define a drought, there are also numerous ways to quantify one. These “indices” take into account different variables that can be measured directly or indirectly, such as precipitation, temperature, evaporation, soil moisture, river flows and reservoir levels.

One of the most common, for example, is the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). This uses monthly estimates of evapotranspiration (calculated largely as a function of temperature) and rainfall data, as well as information on the water-holding capacity of the soil.

It is also possible to use more than one drought indicator. For example, the US Drought Monitor classifies drought severity according to a combination of five different indices (including PDSI), along with drought impacts and local reports from expert observers. As the map below shows, this gives a score of drought intensity and impacts from “D0 – Abnormally dry” (yellow shading) up to “D4 – Exceptional Drought” (maroon).

Drought severity across the US as of 10 May. Intensity of drought indicated by colour of shading, from none (white) through to exceptional drought (maroon). Credit: US Drought Monitor

Detection and attribution

The multitude of contributing factors to a drought means that identifying the sometimes-subtle signal of climate change is tricky.

In part because of this, the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2013 concluded that there was low confidence (pdf) that any significant trends in drought could be detected or attributed to climate change.

Since then, however, the science of detection and attribution – concerned with identifying changes in the climate system and their causes – has advanced considerably.

Findings from more recent studies using state-of-the-art models and techniques have significantly advanced our understanding of drought and climate change. These studies, using climate models, the observational record and palaeoclimate information, have clearly demonstrated that climate change has played a role in recent droughts.

In the Mediterranean, for example, declines in rainfall driven by climate change have increased drought risk across the region, amplifying recent events including the drought that preceded the Syrian civil war.

Along the Pacific coast of the US, warmer temperatures from climate change have pushed snow and soil moisture to record breaking deficits in California and the Pacific Northwest. In the Upper Colorado river basin, warmer temperatures have even caused significant river flow deficits, despite near normal levels of precipitation.

A climate change signal has not been detected with confidence for every drought, especially in regions where natural climate variability is more complex or less well understood – in Australia and East Africa, for example. But for many places, the fingerprints of climate change are undeniably clear.

Projecting precipitation

With climate change already having an impact on droughts, we can reasonably expect this impact to increase as the climate warms further. And model projections bear this out.

The maps below give some examples according to simulations under a high warming scenario (“RCP8.5”) using 17 climate models. They show the projected percentage change in annual rainfall (top left), summer rainfall runoff (top right), summer soil moisture in the top 10cm (bottom left) and summer total column soil moisture (various depths for different models; bottom right) between 1976-2005 and 2070-99. “Runoff” is the amount of rainfall that flows over land into streams and rivers rather than soaking into the ground.

The colour of the shading indicates whether an area is likely to get wetter (blue) or drier (brown).

Map of End-of-century percentage changes in hydroclimate variables from 17 models in the CMIP5 archive (2070-2099 minus 1976-2005) under RCP8.5

End-of-century percentage changes in hydroclimate variables from 17 models in the CMIP5 archive (2070-2099 minus 1976-2005) under RCP8.5. Moving clockwise from the upper left: water-year (WY; October–September in the northern hemisphere and July–June in the Southern Hemisphere) precipitation (P), summer (June-July-August in the northern hemisphere; December-January-February in the southern hemisphere) total runoff, summer near surface soil moisture (0.1m), and summer full-column soil moisture. In all panels, drying tendencies are indicated in brown, wetting tendencies in blue. Hatching shows areas will little agreement between model results. Amended from Cook et al. (2018)

Although projections generally agree a little less across models for rainfall changesthan for temperature, they do show – unequivocally – an increased drying and drought risk for many regions of the world.

Most likely to be adversely affected are Mediterranean regions of Europe and Africa, Central America, southwest US and the subtropics of the southern hemisphere.

This drying occurs because of climate change-forced regional declines in rainfall, but also from the direct effect of warmer temperatures, which increases evaporative losses from the surface, causes earlier snowmelt and shifts precipitation from snow to rain.

Theewaterskloof Dam, the biggest reservoir for Cape Town, in February 2018

Theewaterskloof Dam, the biggest reservoir for Cape Town, in February 2018. Credit: Robert McSweeney

Consequently, significant drying in the future is expected to affect large regions in the subtropics and mid-latitudes, even in areas where rainfall changes are negligible.

When rainfall does occur, it is more likely to be in shorter, more intense bursts. This might mean summers are increasingly likely to see periods of dry weather punctuated with heavy storms. As a result, summer runoff may actually increase for many areas because of more intense rains. While this might be beneficial for topping up rivers, lakes and reservoirs, it does not necessarily help relieve soil moisture deficits and groundwater shortages.

Challenges and opportunities

While a drier future – and, in some cases, present – poses significant challenges for the management of water resources, there are also substantial opportunities to alleviate the worst impacts.

These include policies for improving water conservation and stakeholder cooperation, exploiting surpluses during wet years (which still occur, even in the driest projections), and the clear benefits of cutting greenhouse gases for limiting the extent of climate change and reducing drought risk in many regions.

While studies of the physical climate system cannot provide recommendations for one path or the other, they do highlight the challenges that will be necessary to address in a world that will be warmer – and, in many places, drier – than anything humanity has experienced in the last 200 years.

Cook, B. I., et al. (2018) Climate Change and Drought: From Past to Future, Current Climate Change Reports, doi:10.1007/s40641-018-0093-2

 



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2GI7Zei

This is a re-post from Carbon Brief by Benjamin Cook

Dr Benjamin Cook is a climate scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.

Few areas of the world are completely immune to droughts and their often-devastating impacts on water resources, ecosystems and people.

Regions as diverse as California, the Eastern MediterraneanEast AfricaSouth Africa and Australia have all experienced severe – and, in some cases, unprecedented – droughts in recent years.

As with other climate and weather extremes, such as storms and floods, these events have spurred strong interest in questions surrounding the impact of climate change. For example, is climate change making droughts more frequent or severe? And can we expect climate change to contribute to increased drought risk and severity in the future?

The most recent research shows climate change is already making many parts of the world drier and droughts are likely to pack more punch as the climate warms further.

Defining drought

Droughts are among the most expensive weather-related disasters in the world (pdf), affecting ecosystemsagriculture and human society.

The scale of the impacts underlines how important it is to understand droughts and how their likelihood and severity can be made worse by climate change.

But this is easier said than done. For a start, drought is fundamentally a cross-disciplinary phenomenon – it extends across the fields of meteorology, climatology, hydrology, ecology, agronomy, and even sociology, economics, and anthropology.

This means how you define a drought may depend on your field of interest.

A meteorologist might characterise a drought as a straightforward lack of rainfall (known as “meteorological drought”). A farmer, however, would be most concerned when the lack of rain affects soil moisture and crop growth (“agricultural drought”). While a hydrologist would be most interested in when this has a noticeable impact on river flows, aquifers and surface reservoirs (“hydrological drought”).

Schematic illustrating the classical definitions of drought and the associated processes

Schematic illustrating the classical definitions of drought and the associated processes. Precipitation deficits are the ultimate driver of most drought events, with these deficits propagating over time through the hydrological cycle. Other climate variables, particularly temperature, can also affect both agricultural and hydrological drought. Credit: Cook et al. (2018)

The above definitions show that drought is rarely about precipitation – rain, hail, sleet and/or snow – alone. Warmer temperatures, for example, can increase evaporation of moisture from the surface, increase the fraction of precipitation falling as rain rather than snow, and advance the timing of the snow melt season in spring. Vegetation, soil type and topography can all affect droughts through the way they intercept and hold (or do not hold) rainwater.

Humans also play a key role through how we use water (irrigating farmland and withdrawing water from long-held groundwater sources, for example) and change the land surface through deforestation, expanding croplands and urban development.

Because there are many ways to define a drought, there are also numerous ways to quantify one. These “indices” take into account different variables that can be measured directly or indirectly, such as precipitation, temperature, evaporation, soil moisture, river flows and reservoir levels.

One of the most common, for example, is the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). This uses monthly estimates of evapotranspiration (calculated largely as a function of temperature) and rainfall data, as well as information on the water-holding capacity of the soil.

It is also possible to use more than one drought indicator. For example, the US Drought Monitor classifies drought severity according to a combination of five different indices (including PDSI), along with drought impacts and local reports from expert observers. As the map below shows, this gives a score of drought intensity and impacts from “D0 – Abnormally dry” (yellow shading) up to “D4 – Exceptional Drought” (maroon).

Drought severity across the US as of 10 May. Intensity of drought indicated by colour of shading, from none (white) through to exceptional drought (maroon). Credit: US Drought Monitor

Detection and attribution

The multitude of contributing factors to a drought means that identifying the sometimes-subtle signal of climate change is tricky.

In part because of this, the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2013 concluded that there was low confidence (pdf) that any significant trends in drought could be detected or attributed to climate change.

Since then, however, the science of detection and attribution – concerned with identifying changes in the climate system and their causes – has advanced considerably.

Findings from more recent studies using state-of-the-art models and techniques have significantly advanced our understanding of drought and climate change. These studies, using climate models, the observational record and palaeoclimate information, have clearly demonstrated that climate change has played a role in recent droughts.

In the Mediterranean, for example, declines in rainfall driven by climate change have increased drought risk across the region, amplifying recent events including the drought that preceded the Syrian civil war.

Along the Pacific coast of the US, warmer temperatures from climate change have pushed snow and soil moisture to record breaking deficits in California and the Pacific Northwest. In the Upper Colorado river basin, warmer temperatures have even caused significant river flow deficits, despite near normal levels of precipitation.

A climate change signal has not been detected with confidence for every drought, especially in regions where natural climate variability is more complex or less well understood – in Australia and East Africa, for example. But for many places, the fingerprints of climate change are undeniably clear.

Projecting precipitation

With climate change already having an impact on droughts, we can reasonably expect this impact to increase as the climate warms further. And model projections bear this out.

The maps below give some examples according to simulations under a high warming scenario (“RCP8.5”) using 17 climate models. They show the projected percentage change in annual rainfall (top left), summer rainfall runoff (top right), summer soil moisture in the top 10cm (bottom left) and summer total column soil moisture (various depths for different models; bottom right) between 1976-2005 and 2070-99. “Runoff” is the amount of rainfall that flows over land into streams and rivers rather than soaking into the ground.

The colour of the shading indicates whether an area is likely to get wetter (blue) or drier (brown).

Map of End-of-century percentage changes in hydroclimate variables from 17 models in the CMIP5 archive (2070-2099 minus 1976-2005) under RCP8.5

End-of-century percentage changes in hydroclimate variables from 17 models in the CMIP5 archive (2070-2099 minus 1976-2005) under RCP8.5. Moving clockwise from the upper left: water-year (WY; October–September in the northern hemisphere and July–June in the Southern Hemisphere) precipitation (P), summer (June-July-August in the northern hemisphere; December-January-February in the southern hemisphere) total runoff, summer near surface soil moisture (0.1m), and summer full-column soil moisture. In all panels, drying tendencies are indicated in brown, wetting tendencies in blue. Hatching shows areas will little agreement between model results. Amended from Cook et al. (2018)

Although projections generally agree a little less across models for rainfall changesthan for temperature, they do show – unequivocally – an increased drying and drought risk for many regions of the world.

Most likely to be adversely affected are Mediterranean regions of Europe and Africa, Central America, southwest US and the subtropics of the southern hemisphere.

This drying occurs because of climate change-forced regional declines in rainfall, but also from the direct effect of warmer temperatures, which increases evaporative losses from the surface, causes earlier snowmelt and shifts precipitation from snow to rain.

Theewaterskloof Dam, the biggest reservoir for Cape Town, in February 2018

Theewaterskloof Dam, the biggest reservoir for Cape Town, in February 2018. Credit: Robert McSweeney

Consequently, significant drying in the future is expected to affect large regions in the subtropics and mid-latitudes, even in areas where rainfall changes are negligible.

When rainfall does occur, it is more likely to be in shorter, more intense bursts. This might mean summers are increasingly likely to see periods of dry weather punctuated with heavy storms. As a result, summer runoff may actually increase for many areas because of more intense rains. While this might be beneficial for topping up rivers, lakes and reservoirs, it does not necessarily help relieve soil moisture deficits and groundwater shortages.

Challenges and opportunities

While a drier future – and, in some cases, present – poses significant challenges for the management of water resources, there are also substantial opportunities to alleviate the worst impacts.

These include policies for improving water conservation and stakeholder cooperation, exploiting surpluses during wet years (which still occur, even in the driest projections), and the clear benefits of cutting greenhouse gases for limiting the extent of climate change and reducing drought risk in many regions.

While studies of the physical climate system cannot provide recommendations for one path or the other, they do highlight the challenges that will be necessary to address in a world that will be warmer – and, in many places, drier – than anything humanity has experienced in the last 200 years.

Cook, B. I., et al. (2018) Climate Change and Drought: From Past to Future, Current Climate Change Reports, doi:10.1007/s40641-018-0093-2

 



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2GI7Zei

adds 2