aads

To restore soils, feed the microbes

Image via Shutterstock.

by Matthew Wallenstein, Colorado State University

Our soils are in trouble. Over the past century, we’ve abused them with plowing, tilling and too much fertilizer.

What many think of as “just dirt” is actually an incredibly complex mixture of rock-derived minerals, plant-derived organic matter, dissolved nutrients, gases and a rich food web of interacting organisms.

By plowing and overtilling, we have increased erosion on agricultural fields by 10 to 100 times natural rates. Over just the last several decades, we may have lost about half of the topsoil that natural processes produced over thousands of years in the U.S. corn belt.

Topsoil is rich in soil organic matter – dark spongy material formed from decomposed plant and animal tissue. Soil organic matter is critically important: It helps soils hold onto water and nutrients and supports soil microbes that recycle nutrients. Loss of soil organic matter has made many farms increasingly reliant on fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides.

Much recent research has focused on adding organic material back to soils to restore them. This is an important strategy, but I believe we also should aim to enhance the microbes that are responsible for soil formation. I was part of a research team that demonstrated in a 2015 study that adding efficient microbes to soils can enhance the percentage of plant carbon that is transformed into soil. New research suggests that by fostering an efficient and active soil microbiome, we can accelerate soil regeneration far beyond typical rates seen in nature.

Microbes perform critical functions in soil food webs, such as decomposing organic materials, cycling nutrients and improving soil structure. Image via USDA NRCS.

It takes a village to make healthy soil

Natural soils are thriving with life. They contain an incredible diversity of microscopic bacteria, fungi, viruses and other organisms. A single handful of soil can contain tens of thousands of different species.

These microbes interact closely with each other, forming complex networks. They communicate with chemical signals. They work together to break down complex organic materials, including dead plants and animals. They often work in teams to complete biochemical processes, such as transforming nitrogen from an inert gas to plant-usable forms, and recycling it from dead plant materials back into dissolved forms.

In healthy soils, organic matter is protected from decomposition inside clumps of soil called aggregates. But tilling crushes aggregates, unlocking their carbon and allowing microbes and soil fauna to attack it.

Components of soil organic matter. Image via USDA NRCS.

This creates a temporary feast for soil microbes, but eventually they deplete their food supply and die off. Without a healthy microbial community, nutrients are no longer recycled, opportunistic pests can invade and farmers rely increasingly on chemicals to replace biological soil functions.

Reviving agricultural soils

Soil degradation is a critical problem because it threatens our ability to produce enough healthy food for a growing human population and contributes to climate change. In response, large companies, nonprofits, scientists and government agencies are working together to restore soil health.

For example, General Mills is working with the Nature Conservancy and the Soil Health Institute to encourage farming practices that begin to rebuild soils.

The first step to improving soil health is to stop the bleeding. Instead of leaving fields barren in between crops, which leads to erosion, farmers are increasingly planting cover crops such as rye grass, oats and alfalfa. They also are replacing intensive tilling with no-till practices to prevent the breakdown of soil structure.

Soil organic matter contains over 50 percent carbon. Globally, soils contain more carbon than plants and the atmosphere combined. Losing carbon-rich organic matter from soils releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, which can accelerate climate warming. But by regenerating our soils, we can sequester more carbon underground and slow climate warming.

In addition to protecting soil, cover crops take carbon out of the atmosphere as they grow and funnel it into the soil. Unlike cash crops that are harvested and removed from the soil, cover crops are left to decompose and contribute to soil formation.

Increasing the supply of plant carbon in this way is an important first step in rebuilding soil carbon. But new research suggests that it may be insufficient.

A new paradigm of soil formation

We used to think that soil organic matter was formed from leftover bits of plants that were difficult to degrade. Over time, we thought that these plant particles became chemically transformed into what was called humus – dark, long-lasting material left over when dead plants and animals decay. This view suggested that the key to building soils was getting a lot of dead plant material into the ground.

Recently, however, technological advances have transformed our understanding of soil formation. There is now strong evidence that that the most persistent forms of soil carbon are formed primarily from dead microbial bodies rather than from leftover plant parts. The vast majority of old soil carbon appears to have undergone microbial decomposition. While plants are the original source of carbon for soils, microbes control its fate by using it as food, thus ensuring that at least some of it will remain in the soil.

North Dakota farmer Gabe Brown describes ways to improve soil health, including relying on microbial action.

Feeding the soil by feeding microbes

Microbes can take a simple compound like sugar and transform it into the thousands of complex molecules found in soils. When microbes break plant matter down, they use some of the material they consume for building new biomass – that is, to fuel their own growth – and exhale the rest as carbon dioxide. The efficiency with which they create new biomass varies widely. Some microbes are like weeds: They grow quickly in food-rich environments, but are sloppy eaters and waste much of what they consume. Others are slow-growing but hardy, waste little and are able to survive times of starvation or stress.

To maximize the proportion of plant carbon that is transformed into soil organic matter, we should aim to support and enhance soil microbiomes that quickly and efficiently transform dead plant materials into soil organic matter. Healthy soils should also contain microbiomes that help prevent disease, cycle nutrients and help reduce plant stress.

The ConversationMy research group is now bioprospecting for groups of microbes that are especially efficient at forming new soil and recycling nutrients. We are also researching which crop traits support microbiomes that help enhance soil health. Making soils more healthy will make it possible to grow more food with fewer inputs, which will make farming more profitable and protect our air and water.

Matthew Wallenstein, Associate Professor and Director, Innovation Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Colorado State University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2w9yOV1

Image via Shutterstock.

by Matthew Wallenstein, Colorado State University

Our soils are in trouble. Over the past century, we’ve abused them with plowing, tilling and too much fertilizer.

What many think of as “just dirt” is actually an incredibly complex mixture of rock-derived minerals, plant-derived organic matter, dissolved nutrients, gases and a rich food web of interacting organisms.

By plowing and overtilling, we have increased erosion on agricultural fields by 10 to 100 times natural rates. Over just the last several decades, we may have lost about half of the topsoil that natural processes produced over thousands of years in the U.S. corn belt.

Topsoil is rich in soil organic matter – dark spongy material formed from decomposed plant and animal tissue. Soil organic matter is critically important: It helps soils hold onto water and nutrients and supports soil microbes that recycle nutrients. Loss of soil organic matter has made many farms increasingly reliant on fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides.

Much recent research has focused on adding organic material back to soils to restore them. This is an important strategy, but I believe we also should aim to enhance the microbes that are responsible for soil formation. I was part of a research team that demonstrated in a 2015 study that adding efficient microbes to soils can enhance the percentage of plant carbon that is transformed into soil. New research suggests that by fostering an efficient and active soil microbiome, we can accelerate soil regeneration far beyond typical rates seen in nature.

Microbes perform critical functions in soil food webs, such as decomposing organic materials, cycling nutrients and improving soil structure. Image via USDA NRCS.

It takes a village to make healthy soil

Natural soils are thriving with life. They contain an incredible diversity of microscopic bacteria, fungi, viruses and other organisms. A single handful of soil can contain tens of thousands of different species.

These microbes interact closely with each other, forming complex networks. They communicate with chemical signals. They work together to break down complex organic materials, including dead plants and animals. They often work in teams to complete biochemical processes, such as transforming nitrogen from an inert gas to plant-usable forms, and recycling it from dead plant materials back into dissolved forms.

In healthy soils, organic matter is protected from decomposition inside clumps of soil called aggregates. But tilling crushes aggregates, unlocking their carbon and allowing microbes and soil fauna to attack it.

Components of soil organic matter. Image via USDA NRCS.

This creates a temporary feast for soil microbes, but eventually they deplete their food supply and die off. Without a healthy microbial community, nutrients are no longer recycled, opportunistic pests can invade and farmers rely increasingly on chemicals to replace biological soil functions.

Reviving agricultural soils

Soil degradation is a critical problem because it threatens our ability to produce enough healthy food for a growing human population and contributes to climate change. In response, large companies, nonprofits, scientists and government agencies are working together to restore soil health.

For example, General Mills is working with the Nature Conservancy and the Soil Health Institute to encourage farming practices that begin to rebuild soils.

The first step to improving soil health is to stop the bleeding. Instead of leaving fields barren in between crops, which leads to erosion, farmers are increasingly planting cover crops such as rye grass, oats and alfalfa. They also are replacing intensive tilling with no-till practices to prevent the breakdown of soil structure.

Soil organic matter contains over 50 percent carbon. Globally, soils contain more carbon than plants and the atmosphere combined. Losing carbon-rich organic matter from soils releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, which can accelerate climate warming. But by regenerating our soils, we can sequester more carbon underground and slow climate warming.

In addition to protecting soil, cover crops take carbon out of the atmosphere as they grow and funnel it into the soil. Unlike cash crops that are harvested and removed from the soil, cover crops are left to decompose and contribute to soil formation.

Increasing the supply of plant carbon in this way is an important first step in rebuilding soil carbon. But new research suggests that it may be insufficient.

A new paradigm of soil formation

We used to think that soil organic matter was formed from leftover bits of plants that were difficult to degrade. Over time, we thought that these plant particles became chemically transformed into what was called humus – dark, long-lasting material left over when dead plants and animals decay. This view suggested that the key to building soils was getting a lot of dead plant material into the ground.

Recently, however, technological advances have transformed our understanding of soil formation. There is now strong evidence that that the most persistent forms of soil carbon are formed primarily from dead microbial bodies rather than from leftover plant parts. The vast majority of old soil carbon appears to have undergone microbial decomposition. While plants are the original source of carbon for soils, microbes control its fate by using it as food, thus ensuring that at least some of it will remain in the soil.

North Dakota farmer Gabe Brown describes ways to improve soil health, including relying on microbial action.

Feeding the soil by feeding microbes

Microbes can take a simple compound like sugar and transform it into the thousands of complex molecules found in soils. When microbes break plant matter down, they use some of the material they consume for building new biomass – that is, to fuel their own growth – and exhale the rest as carbon dioxide. The efficiency with which they create new biomass varies widely. Some microbes are like weeds: They grow quickly in food-rich environments, but are sloppy eaters and waste much of what they consume. Others are slow-growing but hardy, waste little and are able to survive times of starvation or stress.

To maximize the proportion of plant carbon that is transformed into soil organic matter, we should aim to support and enhance soil microbiomes that quickly and efficiently transform dead plant materials into soil organic matter. Healthy soils should also contain microbiomes that help prevent disease, cycle nutrients and help reduce plant stress.

The ConversationMy research group is now bioprospecting for groups of microbes that are especially efficient at forming new soil and recycling nutrients. We are also researching which crop traits support microbiomes that help enhance soil health. Making soils more healthy will make it possible to grow more food with fewer inputs, which will make farming more profitable and protect our air and water.

Matthew Wallenstein, Associate Professor and Director, Innovation Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Colorado State University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2w9yOV1

Morning tranquility

Yuri Beletsky took this photo before sunrise on July 22, 2017. He wrote:

Morning tranquility .. Here is the scene I witnessed from the Australian east coast, where Venus and the Orion constellation were shining in all their glory. Even airglow with its characteristic (for us in the South) red color added a nice touch to the image (visible on the right). Beautiful Pleiades and Hyades star clusters can be also seen in the center/left. I really did enjoy the moment! I hope you’ll like it too :)

We do like it! Thanks Yuri.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2w9vSHK

Yuri Beletsky took this photo before sunrise on July 22, 2017. He wrote:

Morning tranquility .. Here is the scene I witnessed from the Australian east coast, where Venus and the Orion constellation were shining in all their glory. Even airglow with its characteristic (for us in the South) red color added a nice touch to the image (visible on the right). Beautiful Pleiades and Hyades star clusters can be also seen in the center/left. I really did enjoy the moment! I hope you’ll like it too :)

We do like it! Thanks Yuri.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2w9vSHK

Watch for Cassiopeia the Queen

Tonight – August 3, 2017 – look for one of the most recognizable constellations, Cassiopeia the Queen, which can be found in the north-northeastern sky after the sun goes down. This constellation has the distinct shape of a W, or M, depending on your perspective. The constellation is fairly bright and can often be seen on a moonlit night, such as the one we’ll have tonight with a waxing gibbous moon in the sky.

Cassiopeia is associated with a queen of Ethiopia. She is sometimes called the Lady of the Chair. Queen Cassiopeia was said to have offended the sea nymphs, or Nereids, by boasting that her own beauty was greater than theirs. It’s said that the nymphs appealed to Zeus, king of the gods, who caused Cassiopeia to be placed upon a throne in the heavens – but in such a location that, for part of each night, she appears upside-down!

View larger. | The constellation Cassiopeia the Queen appearing as a W.

At this time of year, Cassiopeia the Queen is found fairly low in the north-northeast at nightfall but high over the North Star before dawn. Cassiopeia circles counter-clockwise around Polaris, the North Star, throughout the night.

By the way, if you’re out before dawn, also look for the constellation Orion the Hunter to be in a recumbent position over the eastern horizon.

Bottom line: Find the constellation Cassiopeia the Queen in the northeastern sky after sundown. Depending on your perspective look for the telltale shape W or M.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order yours today.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1KOk7ba

Tonight – August 3, 2017 – look for one of the most recognizable constellations, Cassiopeia the Queen, which can be found in the north-northeastern sky after the sun goes down. This constellation has the distinct shape of a W, or M, depending on your perspective. The constellation is fairly bright and can often be seen on a moonlit night, such as the one we’ll have tonight with a waxing gibbous moon in the sky.

Cassiopeia is associated with a queen of Ethiopia. She is sometimes called the Lady of the Chair. Queen Cassiopeia was said to have offended the sea nymphs, or Nereids, by boasting that her own beauty was greater than theirs. It’s said that the nymphs appealed to Zeus, king of the gods, who caused Cassiopeia to be placed upon a throne in the heavens – but in such a location that, for part of each night, she appears upside-down!

View larger. | The constellation Cassiopeia the Queen appearing as a W.

At this time of year, Cassiopeia the Queen is found fairly low in the north-northeast at nightfall but high over the North Star before dawn. Cassiopeia circles counter-clockwise around Polaris, the North Star, throughout the night.

By the way, if you’re out before dawn, also look for the constellation Orion the Hunter to be in a recumbent position over the eastern horizon.

Bottom line: Find the constellation Cassiopeia the Queen in the northeastern sky after sundown. Depending on your perspective look for the telltale shape W or M.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order yours today.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1KOk7ba

Report: U.S. funding for global health research saves lives and creates American jobs [The Pump Handle]

U.S. investments in global health research have saved millions of lives and prevented immeasurable suffering. And by working to detect, treat and eventually eliminate infectious diseases worldwide, we’re protecting our own country too. That cliché about diseases knowing no borders is unfortunately very true. All that alone should be enough to remain committed to the cause.

But a couple weeks ago, a new report from the Global Health Technologies Coalition (GHTC) offered another persuasive reason: U.S. funding for global health research and development (R&D) is good for the American economy. The report, “Return on Innovation,” found that in 2015, 89 cents of every U.S. public dollar directed to global health R&D was invested right here at home. Between 2007 and 2015, that investment injected $12 billion into the U.S. economy, creating an estimated 200,000 new jobs and generating an additional $33 billion in economic output. Every $1 that the National Institutes of Health spends on basic research is estimated to generate more than $8 of industry investments over the next eight years.

“We want policymakers to know that (global health funding) affects their constituents,” Jamie Bay Nishi, director of GHTC, told me. “Part of the interesting story here is the catalytic power of U.S. government investment in terms of incentivizing private investment.”

Nishi said work on the new report began last fall — before the presidential election — and wasn’t initially intended as a response to global health cuts now being proposed by the Trump administration. With U.S. funding for global health R&D either stagnant or declining since 2009 (with the exception of emergency funds for Ebola and Zika), Nishi said the report was written to help “change that trend line regardless of administration.” According to the report, the U.S. invested $1.7 billion in global health R&D in 2015, which represented less than one-tenth of 1 percent of U.S. gross domestic product. The 2015 budget for global health R&D was already a quarter-billion dollars less than 2012 funding levels.

President Trump’s fiscal year 2018 proposal doesn’t look much better. Among its many recommended cuts to global health: A 50 percent cut to USAID global health programs, including a zeroing out of its HIV programs; a $25 million cut to neglected tropical diseases; a $65 million cut to maternal and child health; a $1.1 billion cut to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which leads critical infectious disease research; and a $70 million cut to the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. There’s more than that, but fortunately no one — including Nishi — thinks Trump’s budget will make it out of Congress in one piece. Like many other advocates working in Washington, D.C., she called it “dead on arrival.”

The budget proposal from House looks better for global health — it increases the NIH budget and saves its global health center, though it still recommends sizeable cuts to USAID and CDC. The House proposal may be an improvement over Trump’s, but Nishi said “there’s still too many variables out there for us to feel that global health funding for R&D is safe.”

Enter the new GHTC report, which provides a trove of information on the benefits and returns we yield with investments in global health R&D. Its authors write:

Not only does U.S. government investment play an essential and catalytic role in developing new drugs, vaccines, diagnostics, and other urgently-needed tools for neglected diseases and health conditions, but it also delivers tangible economic and security returns for Americans. This is a win-win from a humanitarian and strategic perspective – these investments save and improve lives in vulnerable populations around the world, while at the same time advancing American leadership in science and innovation, creating jobs and economic growth at home, supporting public-private partnerships, and protecting American and health security.

First, the lives saved. According to the GHTC report, all 42 new drugs, diagnostics, vaccines and reproductive health technologies created since 2000 with U.S. investment have made a positive difference. For instance, a 50-cent meningitis A vaccine, developed with U.S. global health R&D funding support, prevented 673,000 cases of disease, 378,000 deaths and 63,000 cases of lifelong disability. By the end of this decade, this one vaccine will have saved $9 billion in health care spending. Other examples include a new pediatric malaria treatment estimated to have saved 750,000 children, and a late-stage HIV vaccine candidate now being tested that could cut the number of new HIV infections in half in just 10 years.

Global health R&D is good for America’s health and economy too. Since 2007, global health R&D investment has created about 200,000 U.S. jobs and generated more than $30 billion in economic output as it cycles its way through the American economy. For example, the U.S. invested $192 million in global health R&D monies into U.S.-based pharmaceutical companies in 2015. That investment, according to the report, encouraged those companies to invest another $294 million, with the majority of that money spent domestically. In other words, “US government investment in global health R&D has a stimulative effect” that not only encourages additional private investment in the U.S. economy, but investment in disease research that benefits the world’s poorest people.

Plus, upfront investments now could help avert much higher spending in the future. For example, the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance — a problem often described as a looming public health crisis — is expected to cause 10 million deaths by 2050 and cost the global economy upwards of $100 trillion. However, according to the GHTC report, investing $2 billion annually in anti-microbial R&D could lead to the kinds of tools needed to combat the problem. Global R&D investments also prepare us for the next novel disease outbreak. The report notes:

The US government spent nearly $600 million to improve domestic preparedness for Ebola within the United States during the recent outbreak, and an additional $2.4 billion on efforts to combat and contain the Ebola outbreak at its source. If a point-of-care diagnostic and vaccine against Ebola had been available at the start, the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak would never have grown into the global health emergency it became. Not only would thousands of deaths have been prevented, but the US government would also have saved billions of dollars.

Nishi said the coalition hopes to follow its new report with one that breaks down the impact of global health R&D at the state level — “we really want to connect those dots for policymakers so they understand why they should care about this,” she said.

“First and foremost, it’s about saving millions of lives,” Nishi said. “The U.S. has an incredible history of being a leader in technology and innovation and that should hold true when it comes to (global health R&D) as well.”

She added: “Sometimes it does seem like these are distant problems and it’s hard to see the connections. …But it can’t be U.S. health versus global health — U.S. health is global health.”

For a copy of the “Return on Innovation” report, visit GHTC.

Kim Krisberg is a freelance public health writer living in Austin, Texas, and has been writing about public health for 15 years. Follow me on Twitter — @kkrisberg.



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2uWPxwd

U.S. investments in global health research have saved millions of lives and prevented immeasurable suffering. And by working to detect, treat and eventually eliminate infectious diseases worldwide, we’re protecting our own country too. That cliché about diseases knowing no borders is unfortunately very true. All that alone should be enough to remain committed to the cause.

But a couple weeks ago, a new report from the Global Health Technologies Coalition (GHTC) offered another persuasive reason: U.S. funding for global health research and development (R&D) is good for the American economy. The report, “Return on Innovation,” found that in 2015, 89 cents of every U.S. public dollar directed to global health R&D was invested right here at home. Between 2007 and 2015, that investment injected $12 billion into the U.S. economy, creating an estimated 200,000 new jobs and generating an additional $33 billion in economic output. Every $1 that the National Institutes of Health spends on basic research is estimated to generate more than $8 of industry investments over the next eight years.

“We want policymakers to know that (global health funding) affects their constituents,” Jamie Bay Nishi, director of GHTC, told me. “Part of the interesting story here is the catalytic power of U.S. government investment in terms of incentivizing private investment.”

Nishi said work on the new report began last fall — before the presidential election — and wasn’t initially intended as a response to global health cuts now being proposed by the Trump administration. With U.S. funding for global health R&D either stagnant or declining since 2009 (with the exception of emergency funds for Ebola and Zika), Nishi said the report was written to help “change that trend line regardless of administration.” According to the report, the U.S. invested $1.7 billion in global health R&D in 2015, which represented less than one-tenth of 1 percent of U.S. gross domestic product. The 2015 budget for global health R&D was already a quarter-billion dollars less than 2012 funding levels.

President Trump’s fiscal year 2018 proposal doesn’t look much better. Among its many recommended cuts to global health: A 50 percent cut to USAID global health programs, including a zeroing out of its HIV programs; a $25 million cut to neglected tropical diseases; a $65 million cut to maternal and child health; a $1.1 billion cut to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which leads critical infectious disease research; and a $70 million cut to the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. There’s more than that, but fortunately no one — including Nishi — thinks Trump’s budget will make it out of Congress in one piece. Like many other advocates working in Washington, D.C., she called it “dead on arrival.”

The budget proposal from House looks better for global health — it increases the NIH budget and saves its global health center, though it still recommends sizeable cuts to USAID and CDC. The House proposal may be an improvement over Trump’s, but Nishi said “there’s still too many variables out there for us to feel that global health funding for R&D is safe.”

Enter the new GHTC report, which provides a trove of information on the benefits and returns we yield with investments in global health R&D. Its authors write:

Not only does U.S. government investment play an essential and catalytic role in developing new drugs, vaccines, diagnostics, and other urgently-needed tools for neglected diseases and health conditions, but it also delivers tangible economic and security returns for Americans. This is a win-win from a humanitarian and strategic perspective – these investments save and improve lives in vulnerable populations around the world, while at the same time advancing American leadership in science and innovation, creating jobs and economic growth at home, supporting public-private partnerships, and protecting American and health security.

First, the lives saved. According to the GHTC report, all 42 new drugs, diagnostics, vaccines and reproductive health technologies created since 2000 with U.S. investment have made a positive difference. For instance, a 50-cent meningitis A vaccine, developed with U.S. global health R&D funding support, prevented 673,000 cases of disease, 378,000 deaths and 63,000 cases of lifelong disability. By the end of this decade, this one vaccine will have saved $9 billion in health care spending. Other examples include a new pediatric malaria treatment estimated to have saved 750,000 children, and a late-stage HIV vaccine candidate now being tested that could cut the number of new HIV infections in half in just 10 years.

Global health R&D is good for America’s health and economy too. Since 2007, global health R&D investment has created about 200,000 U.S. jobs and generated more than $30 billion in economic output as it cycles its way through the American economy. For example, the U.S. invested $192 million in global health R&D monies into U.S.-based pharmaceutical companies in 2015. That investment, according to the report, encouraged those companies to invest another $294 million, with the majority of that money spent domestically. In other words, “US government investment in global health R&D has a stimulative effect” that not only encourages additional private investment in the U.S. economy, but investment in disease research that benefits the world’s poorest people.

Plus, upfront investments now could help avert much higher spending in the future. For example, the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance — a problem often described as a looming public health crisis — is expected to cause 10 million deaths by 2050 and cost the global economy upwards of $100 trillion. However, according to the GHTC report, investing $2 billion annually in anti-microbial R&D could lead to the kinds of tools needed to combat the problem. Global R&D investments also prepare us for the next novel disease outbreak. The report notes:

The US government spent nearly $600 million to improve domestic preparedness for Ebola within the United States during the recent outbreak, and an additional $2.4 billion on efforts to combat and contain the Ebola outbreak at its source. If a point-of-care diagnostic and vaccine against Ebola had been available at the start, the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak would never have grown into the global health emergency it became. Not only would thousands of deaths have been prevented, but the US government would also have saved billions of dollars.

Nishi said the coalition hopes to follow its new report with one that breaks down the impact of global health R&D at the state level — “we really want to connect those dots for policymakers so they understand why they should care about this,” she said.

“First and foremost, it’s about saving millions of lives,” Nishi said. “The U.S. has an incredible history of being a leader in technology and innovation and that should hold true when it comes to (global health R&D) as well.”

She added: “Sometimes it does seem like these are distant problems and it’s hard to see the connections. …But it can’t be U.S. health versus global health — U.S. health is global health.”

For a copy of the “Return on Innovation” report, visit GHTC.

Kim Krisberg is a freelance public health writer living in Austin, Texas, and has been writing about public health for 15 years. Follow me on Twitter — @kkrisberg.



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2uWPxwd

How to catch the Perseids and beat the almost-full Moon (Synopsis) [Starts With A Bang]

“My dad took me out to see a meteor shower when I was a little kid, and it was scary for me because he woke me up in the middle of the night. My heart was beating; I didn’t know what he wanted to do. He wouldn’t tell me, and he put me in the car and we went off, and I saw all these people lying on blankets, looking up at the sky.” -Steven Spielberg

The full or almost-full Moon might be one of the most familiar sights in the night sky to those of us here on Earth, but it’s also the largest natural source of light pollution we have to contend with. The peak of this year’s Perseid meteor shower meant, if all things were equal, the best time to see the highest rate of meteors would be the pre-sunrise sky of August 12.

A view of many meteors striking Earth over a long period of time, shown all at once, from the ground (left) and space (right). A visible Moon will reduce the number of meteors seen by half, and will reduce the apparent brightness of the meteors significantly. Image credit: Astronomical and geophysical observatory, Comenius University (L); NASA (from space), via Wikimedia Commons user Svdmolen (R).

But with a large gibbous Moon dominating the skies during that time, it’s actually one of the worst ways you can try and view the Perseids this year. Instead, go out when the skies are darkest: before the Moon rises just after the peak. Because of how wide the cometary debris stream that gives rise to the Perseids is, viewing the sky in the evening before the Moon rises on the 12th or even the 13th is a far safer bet.

The debris stream of a comet (in this illustration, Comet Encke) is very wide: much wider than Earth. When we’re closer to the stream’s center, the rate of meteors can be increased. Image credit: NASA / GSFC.

Come get your fix of the great night sky views of August, just a week before the solar eclipse comes to your daytime skies!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2vsELz1

“My dad took me out to see a meteor shower when I was a little kid, and it was scary for me because he woke me up in the middle of the night. My heart was beating; I didn’t know what he wanted to do. He wouldn’t tell me, and he put me in the car and we went off, and I saw all these people lying on blankets, looking up at the sky.” -Steven Spielberg

The full or almost-full Moon might be one of the most familiar sights in the night sky to those of us here on Earth, but it’s also the largest natural source of light pollution we have to contend with. The peak of this year’s Perseid meteor shower meant, if all things were equal, the best time to see the highest rate of meteors would be the pre-sunrise sky of August 12.

A view of many meteors striking Earth over a long period of time, shown all at once, from the ground (left) and space (right). A visible Moon will reduce the number of meteors seen by half, and will reduce the apparent brightness of the meteors significantly. Image credit: Astronomical and geophysical observatory, Comenius University (L); NASA (from space), via Wikimedia Commons user Svdmolen (R).

But with a large gibbous Moon dominating the skies during that time, it’s actually one of the worst ways you can try and view the Perseids this year. Instead, go out when the skies are darkest: before the Moon rises just after the peak. Because of how wide the cometary debris stream that gives rise to the Perseids is, viewing the sky in the evening before the Moon rises on the 12th or even the 13th is a far safer bet.

The debris stream of a comet (in this illustration, Comet Encke) is very wide: much wider than Earth. When we’re closer to the stream’s center, the rate of meteors can be increased. Image credit: NASA / GSFC.

Come get your fix of the great night sky views of August, just a week before the solar eclipse comes to your daytime skies!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2vsELz1

Protected Communications Go Polar

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (SSC) Pacific recently reached a milestone in a project that will allow submarines in the Arctic region to communicate with other polar users and those ashore.

from http://ift.tt/2vovjfa
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (SSC) Pacific recently reached a milestone in a project that will allow submarines in the Arctic region to communicate with other polar users and those ashore.

from http://ift.tt/2vovjfa

Sagittarius? Here’s your constellation

Image via Galactic.name

Image via Galactic.name

If you’re outside on an August or September evening, you can glimpse the zodiacal constellation Sagittarius the Archer. From our northerly latitudes, it never climbs high in the sky. Yet Sagittarius marks the direction in our sky to one of the most wondrous places we can imagine: the center of our own Milky Way galaxy. And the constellation is fairly easy to spot, because its brightest stars form a distinctive shape of a Teapot. Follow the links below to learn how to see Sagittarius, and about the lore and science of this constellation.

How to see the constellation Sagittarius

What’s the difference between the constellation Sagittarius and the sign?

Deep-sky wonders in Sagittarius

Sagittarius in mythology

The Teapot asterism in the constellation Sagittarius. This image is from EarthSky Facebook friend Eileen Claffey. She captured it in mid-September 2012. At that time of year, Sagittarius is headed toward the sunset glare.

The Teapot asterism in the constellation Sagittarius. This image is from Eileen Claffey. She captured it in mid-September 2012. At that time of year, Sagittarius is headed toward the sunset glare.

How to see the constellation Sagittarius. If you want to see Sagittarius, you’ll want first to find a dark location.

In August or September, if you go someplace really dark, and simply look up in the evening, you’ll see the starlit band of the Milky Way. It’ll appear as a hazy band stretching all the way across the sky. The haze is really countless stars. From the Northern Hemisphere, the starlit trail of the Milky Way seems to bulge just before it reaches the southern horizon. You can see this bulge in the night sky, and it marks the approximate location of the Milky Way’s center, which is located within the boundaries of the constellation Sagittarius.

Here’s another way to find Sagittarius. If you’re familiar with the Summer Triangle asterism, draw an imaginary line from the star Deneb and through the star Altair to locate Sagittarius near the horizon. At mid-northern latitudes, the Summer Triangle hangs high in the south to overhead on late summer and autumn evenings.

Constellation Sagittarius by Lewistown StormWatcher.

See the Teapot of Sagittarius in this photo? It comes from EarthSky Facebook friend Lewistown StormWatcher. The center of the galaxy is located in this direction.

What’s the difference between the constellation Sagittarius and the sign? In our modern times, the sun passes in front of the constellation Sagittarius from about December 18 to January 20. These dates are off by about a month from what you read on the horoscope page. The sun moves through the sign Sagittarius from about November 21 to December 21.

Yes, there is a difference between an astronomical constellation and an astrological sign! Keep in mind that we’re talking about the constellation Sagittarius in this article. The horoscope is referring to the sign Sagittarius.

By definition, the sun enters the sign Sagittarius whenever the sun is precisely 30o west of the December solstice point. Then, on the December solstice, the sun enters the sign Capricorn.

While the signs remain fixed relative to the solstices and equinoxes, the solstices and equinox points move 30o westward in front of the constellations – or backdrop stars – in about 2,160 years.

The constellation boundaries were formally defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in 1930. Based on the present IAU boundaries, the December solstice point moved into the constellation Sagittarius in the year -130 (131 B.C.) and will move into the constellation Ophiuchus in 2269 (A.D. 2269).

The constellation Sagittarius, with the Teapot asterism outlined in green. Click here for a larger chart.

Deep-sky wonders in Sagittarius. Sagittarius points to the heart of the Milky Way galaxy. We can’t see all the way to the galactic center because the plethora of stars, star clusters and nebulae between us and the Milky Way center veil it from view.

But trying viewing these deep-sky treasures in Sagittarius with binoculars or the telescope: Sagittarius Star Cloud (Messier 24), globular cluster Messier 22, Lagoon Nebula (Messier 8), Trifid Nebula (Messier 20) and Omega Nebula (Messier 17). Sharp-eyed people can even see these deep-sky objects with the unaided eye. (The above sky chart locates these sites for you.)

Modern stargazers have difficulty making out the Centaur that this constellation is supposed to depict. Most people have an easier time seeing the Teapot asterism in the western half of Sagittarius. Once you learn the Teapot, it’ll greatly assist you on your star-hopping adventures to deep-sky marvels.

A centaur. Image via Wikimedia Commons

A centaur. Image via Wikimedia Commons

Sagittarius in mythology, and more. The constellations Sagittarius and Centaurus are both supposed to represent a centaur – a creature with the upper torso of a man and the hindquarters of a horse. Historically, centaurs might have really been cowboys, using horses to round up cattle in ancient Greece.

According to Greek myth, the centaurs were the offspring of Ixion and the cloud nymph Nephele. Apparently, Sagittarius’ drawn-out bow and arrow originated from the Mesopotamian archer god, and this constellation might not have always represented the centaur Chiron.

It’s said that the Greeks associated Sagittarius with Crotus the satyr – another type of part man, part horse and part goat monstrosity. Quite possibly, the Romans first identified the constellation Sagittarius with Chiron, the wise and kindly centaur.

Here’s soemthing that distinguishes Sagittarius the Archer from the other 13 constellations of the zodiac. The sun shines in front of this constellation on the December 21 solstice.

Also, the ecliptic – the sun’s yearly pathway in front of the backdrop stars – intersects the galactic equator in Sagittarius. Although the sun crosses the galactic equator twice a year every year, much ado was made about the alignment of the December solstice sun with the galactic equator in 2012. Actually, if we are to accept the galactic coordinates as defined by the International Astronomical Union in 1959, the solstice points were in alignment with the galactic equator in 1998. By 2012, the time had long passed.

If you spot Sagittarius, don't forget to look nearby for neighboring Scorpius. Photo by EarthSky Facebook friend Matthew Chin in Hong Kong.

If you spot Sagittarius, don’t forget to look nearby for neighboring Scorpius. Photo by EarthSky Facebook friend Matthew Chin in Hong Kong.

Enjoying EarthSky? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Bottom line: Look for the constellation Sagittarius on an August or September evening. The brightest stars in Sagittarius form a distinctive shape: that of a Teapot.

Taurus? Here’s your constellation
Gemini? Here’s your constellation
Cancer? Here’s your constellation
Leo? Here’s your constellation
Virgo? Here’s your constellation
Libra? Here’s your constellation
Scorpius? Here’s your contellation
Sagittarius? Here’s your constellation
Capricornus? Here’s your constellation
Aquarius? Here’s your constellation
Pisces? Here’s your constellation
Aries? Here’s your constellation
Birthday late November to early December? Here’s your constellation



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2tZeELJ
Image via Galactic.name

Image via Galactic.name

If you’re outside on an August or September evening, you can glimpse the zodiacal constellation Sagittarius the Archer. From our northerly latitudes, it never climbs high in the sky. Yet Sagittarius marks the direction in our sky to one of the most wondrous places we can imagine: the center of our own Milky Way galaxy. And the constellation is fairly easy to spot, because its brightest stars form a distinctive shape of a Teapot. Follow the links below to learn how to see Sagittarius, and about the lore and science of this constellation.

How to see the constellation Sagittarius

What’s the difference between the constellation Sagittarius and the sign?

Deep-sky wonders in Sagittarius

Sagittarius in mythology

The Teapot asterism in the constellation Sagittarius. This image is from EarthSky Facebook friend Eileen Claffey. She captured it in mid-September 2012. At that time of year, Sagittarius is headed toward the sunset glare.

The Teapot asterism in the constellation Sagittarius. This image is from Eileen Claffey. She captured it in mid-September 2012. At that time of year, Sagittarius is headed toward the sunset glare.

How to see the constellation Sagittarius. If you want to see Sagittarius, you’ll want first to find a dark location.

In August or September, if you go someplace really dark, and simply look up in the evening, you’ll see the starlit band of the Milky Way. It’ll appear as a hazy band stretching all the way across the sky. The haze is really countless stars. From the Northern Hemisphere, the starlit trail of the Milky Way seems to bulge just before it reaches the southern horizon. You can see this bulge in the night sky, and it marks the approximate location of the Milky Way’s center, which is located within the boundaries of the constellation Sagittarius.

Here’s another way to find Sagittarius. If you’re familiar with the Summer Triangle asterism, draw an imaginary line from the star Deneb and through the star Altair to locate Sagittarius near the horizon. At mid-northern latitudes, the Summer Triangle hangs high in the south to overhead on late summer and autumn evenings.

Constellation Sagittarius by Lewistown StormWatcher.

See the Teapot of Sagittarius in this photo? It comes from EarthSky Facebook friend Lewistown StormWatcher. The center of the galaxy is located in this direction.

What’s the difference between the constellation Sagittarius and the sign? In our modern times, the sun passes in front of the constellation Sagittarius from about December 18 to January 20. These dates are off by about a month from what you read on the horoscope page. The sun moves through the sign Sagittarius from about November 21 to December 21.

Yes, there is a difference between an astronomical constellation and an astrological sign! Keep in mind that we’re talking about the constellation Sagittarius in this article. The horoscope is referring to the sign Sagittarius.

By definition, the sun enters the sign Sagittarius whenever the sun is precisely 30o west of the December solstice point. Then, on the December solstice, the sun enters the sign Capricorn.

While the signs remain fixed relative to the solstices and equinoxes, the solstices and equinox points move 30o westward in front of the constellations – or backdrop stars – in about 2,160 years.

The constellation boundaries were formally defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in 1930. Based on the present IAU boundaries, the December solstice point moved into the constellation Sagittarius in the year -130 (131 B.C.) and will move into the constellation Ophiuchus in 2269 (A.D. 2269).

The constellation Sagittarius, with the Teapot asterism outlined in green. Click here for a larger chart.

Deep-sky wonders in Sagittarius. Sagittarius points to the heart of the Milky Way galaxy. We can’t see all the way to the galactic center because the plethora of stars, star clusters and nebulae between us and the Milky Way center veil it from view.

But trying viewing these deep-sky treasures in Sagittarius with binoculars or the telescope: Sagittarius Star Cloud (Messier 24), globular cluster Messier 22, Lagoon Nebula (Messier 8), Trifid Nebula (Messier 20) and Omega Nebula (Messier 17). Sharp-eyed people can even see these deep-sky objects with the unaided eye. (The above sky chart locates these sites for you.)

Modern stargazers have difficulty making out the Centaur that this constellation is supposed to depict. Most people have an easier time seeing the Teapot asterism in the western half of Sagittarius. Once you learn the Teapot, it’ll greatly assist you on your star-hopping adventures to deep-sky marvels.

A centaur. Image via Wikimedia Commons

A centaur. Image via Wikimedia Commons

Sagittarius in mythology, and more. The constellations Sagittarius and Centaurus are both supposed to represent a centaur – a creature with the upper torso of a man and the hindquarters of a horse. Historically, centaurs might have really been cowboys, using horses to round up cattle in ancient Greece.

According to Greek myth, the centaurs were the offspring of Ixion and the cloud nymph Nephele. Apparently, Sagittarius’ drawn-out bow and arrow originated from the Mesopotamian archer god, and this constellation might not have always represented the centaur Chiron.

It’s said that the Greeks associated Sagittarius with Crotus the satyr – another type of part man, part horse and part goat monstrosity. Quite possibly, the Romans first identified the constellation Sagittarius with Chiron, the wise and kindly centaur.

Here’s soemthing that distinguishes Sagittarius the Archer from the other 13 constellations of the zodiac. The sun shines in front of this constellation on the December 21 solstice.

Also, the ecliptic – the sun’s yearly pathway in front of the backdrop stars – intersects the galactic equator in Sagittarius. Although the sun crosses the galactic equator twice a year every year, much ado was made about the alignment of the December solstice sun with the galactic equator in 2012. Actually, if we are to accept the galactic coordinates as defined by the International Astronomical Union in 1959, the solstice points were in alignment with the galactic equator in 1998. By 2012, the time had long passed.

If you spot Sagittarius, don't forget to look nearby for neighboring Scorpius. Photo by EarthSky Facebook friend Matthew Chin in Hong Kong.

If you spot Sagittarius, don’t forget to look nearby for neighboring Scorpius. Photo by EarthSky Facebook friend Matthew Chin in Hong Kong.

Enjoying EarthSky? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Bottom line: Look for the constellation Sagittarius on an August or September evening. The brightest stars in Sagittarius form a distinctive shape: that of a Teapot.

Taurus? Here’s your constellation
Gemini? Here’s your constellation
Cancer? Here’s your constellation
Leo? Here’s your constellation
Virgo? Here’s your constellation
Libra? Here’s your constellation
Scorpius? Here’s your contellation
Sagittarius? Here’s your constellation
Capricornus? Here’s your constellation
Aquarius? Here’s your constellation
Pisces? Here’s your constellation
Aries? Here’s your constellation
Birthday late November to early December? Here’s your constellation



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2tZeELJ

adds 2