aads

Venus through saguaro cactus


Photo credit: David Jamieson

Venus in the west after sunset, by David Jamieson



David Jamieson at Cave Creek, Arizona took this shot of the planet Venus – brightest planet visible from Earth – on Sunday (February 8, 2015) with a Olympus E-P3 with a 14-42 mm lens. Thank you, David!


The saguaro cactus in this photo are really special, by the way. They are the largest cactus in the United States. You see them in a lot of old Western movies, but you might not know that saguaros are found in a relatively small area, exclusively in the Sonoran Desert, in southern Arizona and western Sonora, Mexico. Click here for a saguaro cactus fact sheet.


Love EarthSky? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1DWCxSC

Photo credit: David Jamieson

Venus in the west after sunset, by David Jamieson



David Jamieson at Cave Creek, Arizona took this shot of the planet Venus – brightest planet visible from Earth – on Sunday (February 8, 2015) with a Olympus E-P3 with a 14-42 mm lens. Thank you, David!


The saguaro cactus in this photo are really special, by the way. They are the largest cactus in the United States. You see them in a lot of old Western movies, but you might not know that saguaros are found in a relatively small area, exclusively in the Sonoran Desert, in southern Arizona and western Sonora, Mexico. Click here for a saguaro cactus fact sheet.


Love EarthSky? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1DWCxSC

See the beautiful Double Cluster in Perseus



Finding the Double Cluster with the constellation Cassiopeia. Image credit: madmiked



Tonight, find the gorgeous Double Cluster in the constellation Perseus. It’s a wonderful sight to see on winter evenings, here in the Northern Hemisphere. To see it at this time of year, face north to northwest as darkness falls. The Double Cluster consists of two open stars clusters, known as “H” and “Chi” Persei (also called NGC 884 and 869).


How to find them? First, you need a dark sky. Second, you may need binoculars, as the Double Cluster is only faintly visible to the unaided eye – even on an inky black night. Look for the famous constellation Cassiopeia in the northwest, forming a backwards “3,” or perhaps an “E,” or the letter “M” or “W” turned on its side. Just above Cassiopeia, assuming your sky is dark enough, you’ll see a faint fuzzy patch. This is the Double Cluster, which blooms into a sparkling array of stars through binoculars or a small backyard telescope.


These two open star clusters reside an estimated 7,400 light years away. Each contains 300 to 400 stars. These stars are thought to be approximately three million years old … babies in star time! The stellar gas and the myriad stars that compose the flat disk of our Milky Way galaxy pass right through Cassiopeia and Perseus – and in front and behind the Double Cluster. If your sky is dark enough, you’ll see the hazy pathway of the winter Milky Way crossing this part of the sky.


The Double Cluster was charted by skywatchers as early as 150 B.C. Hipparchus saw it, and Ptolemy named it as one of seven “nebulosities” in the Almagest, an ancient astronomy text used for over a millennium. The Double Cluster in Perseus ranks as a favorite among stargazers, a bejeweled place in the heavens to zoom in on with binoculars.


Read more: Double Cluster in Perseus


Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!


If you're up before dawn, let the moon introduce you to the constellations Libra and Scorpius during the next few days.

Up before dawn this week? Let the waning moon introduce you to the constellations Libra and Scorpius. Look in the direction of sunrise. Notice that the moon will sweep past the planet Saturn on the mornings of February 12 and 13, 2015.



Bottom line: Face the northwestern horizon as darkness falls on winter evenings to find the Double Cluster in the constellation Perseus.


Donate: Your support means the world to us


EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order today from the EarthSky store






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1IJcQeR


Finding the Double Cluster with the constellation Cassiopeia. Image credit: madmiked



Tonight, find the gorgeous Double Cluster in the constellation Perseus. It’s a wonderful sight to see on winter evenings, here in the Northern Hemisphere. To see it at this time of year, face north to northwest as darkness falls. The Double Cluster consists of two open stars clusters, known as “H” and “Chi” Persei (also called NGC 884 and 869).


How to find them? First, you need a dark sky. Second, you may need binoculars, as the Double Cluster is only faintly visible to the unaided eye – even on an inky black night. Look for the famous constellation Cassiopeia in the northwest, forming a backwards “3,” or perhaps an “E,” or the letter “M” or “W” turned on its side. Just above Cassiopeia, assuming your sky is dark enough, you’ll see a faint fuzzy patch. This is the Double Cluster, which blooms into a sparkling array of stars through binoculars or a small backyard telescope.


These two open star clusters reside an estimated 7,400 light years away. Each contains 300 to 400 stars. These stars are thought to be approximately three million years old … babies in star time! The stellar gas and the myriad stars that compose the flat disk of our Milky Way galaxy pass right through Cassiopeia and Perseus – and in front and behind the Double Cluster. If your sky is dark enough, you’ll see the hazy pathway of the winter Milky Way crossing this part of the sky.


The Double Cluster was charted by skywatchers as early as 150 B.C. Hipparchus saw it, and Ptolemy named it as one of seven “nebulosities” in the Almagest, an ancient astronomy text used for over a millennium. The Double Cluster in Perseus ranks as a favorite among stargazers, a bejeweled place in the heavens to zoom in on with binoculars.


Read more: Double Cluster in Perseus


Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!


If you're up before dawn, let the moon introduce you to the constellations Libra and Scorpius during the next few days.

Up before dawn this week? Let the waning moon introduce you to the constellations Libra and Scorpius. Look in the direction of sunrise. Notice that the moon will sweep past the planet Saturn on the mornings of February 12 and 13, 2015.



Bottom line: Face the northwestern horizon as darkness falls on winter evenings to find the Double Cluster in the constellation Perseus.


Donate: Your support means the world to us


EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order today from the EarthSky store






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1IJcQeR

Boston Snow Climate Change Amplified [Greg Laden's Blog]

New England is now experiencing the fifth in a series of worse than average winter storms. So far, Winter has dumped over 60 inches of snow on Boston, and after the present storm, it will probably be possible to say that a total of 60 inches or more have fallen there in just over 2 weeks, according to Paul Douglas, meteorologist and founder of Media Logic Group. Douglas notes “I’ve never seen a SST anomaly of +11.5C, but that’s the case just east of Cape Cod. No wonder Boston is submerged…. Quite amazing, really.” As such, Boston has already broken it’s 30 day snowfall record going into the latest storm. According to Massachusetts Governor Baker, the region has had enough snow to fill Foxboro Stadium 90 times. That is, of course, a meaningless number for most people, but I can tell you (because I saw Paul McCartney there … I think a sports team also plays there), that iss a huge stadium and since it has no roof and one can pile the snow quite high, mighty impressive!


The huge amount of snow falling on the region is normal snow amplified in amount by extraordinary sea surface temperatures, supplying more moisture and creating a stronger contrast across cold fonts moving through the region, which together brings more snow. The US National Climate Assessment indicates that there has already been an increase in extreme precipitation in the region, up over 71% in the Northeast, and climate experts predict further change in that direction. And it is costly. According to Climate Nexus, it costs Boston about $300,000 for every inch of snow removal, and a large storm costs the state of Massachusetts about a quarter of a billion dollars.


Severe weather is becoming the new normal.


_________

Photo Credit: Aviad T via Compfight cc






from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/1y2tNph

New England is now experiencing the fifth in a series of worse than average winter storms. So far, Winter has dumped over 60 inches of snow on Boston, and after the present storm, it will probably be possible to say that a total of 60 inches or more have fallen there in just over 2 weeks, according to Paul Douglas, meteorologist and founder of Media Logic Group. Douglas notes “I’ve never seen a SST anomaly of +11.5C, but that’s the case just east of Cape Cod. No wonder Boston is submerged…. Quite amazing, really.” As such, Boston has already broken it’s 30 day snowfall record going into the latest storm. According to Massachusetts Governor Baker, the region has had enough snow to fill Foxboro Stadium 90 times. That is, of course, a meaningless number for most people, but I can tell you (because I saw Paul McCartney there … I think a sports team also plays there), that iss a huge stadium and since it has no roof and one can pile the snow quite high, mighty impressive!


The huge amount of snow falling on the region is normal snow amplified in amount by extraordinary sea surface temperatures, supplying more moisture and creating a stronger contrast across cold fonts moving through the region, which together brings more snow. The US National Climate Assessment indicates that there has already been an increase in extreme precipitation in the region, up over 71% in the Northeast, and climate experts predict further change in that direction. And it is costly. According to Climate Nexus, it costs Boston about $300,000 for every inch of snow removal, and a large storm costs the state of Massachusetts about a quarter of a billion dollars.


Severe weather is becoming the new normal.


_________

Photo Credit: Aviad T via Compfight cc






from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/1y2tNph

Mary’s Monday Metazoan: Jewelry I could get into [Pharyngula]

I’d wear it on my lapel, with the nice pocket watch on my vest and my jeweled monocle.



I know. I’m a slob. But I could change! I’ve been reading fantasy regency novels, and could get into the style. Carriger has even posted suggestions for improving the stylishness of us uncaring nerds.


Also, I’ve been wondering…there are a lot of steampunk novels out there, stories about alternative histories in which the industrial revolution leads to elaborate technologies involving mechanical gears and steam engines. Has anyone written any biopunk novels, where 19th century Europe is revolutionized by radical biological technologies? That would be fun.






from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/1zEp0Q3

I’d wear it on my lapel, with the nice pocket watch on my vest and my jeweled monocle.



I know. I’m a slob. But I could change! I’ve been reading fantasy regency novels, and could get into the style. Carriger has even posted suggestions for improving the stylishness of us uncaring nerds.


Also, I’ve been wondering…there are a lot of steampunk novels out there, stories about alternative histories in which the industrial revolution leads to elaborate technologies involving mechanical gears and steam engines. Has anyone written any biopunk novels, where 19th century Europe is revolutionized by radical biological technologies? That would be fun.






from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/1zEp0Q3

How far is Betelgeuse?


Recently I realized that the distance I used for the star Betelgeuse – ninth-brightest star in the night sky and second-brightest in the constellation Orion the Hunter – in a popular blog post here at EarthSky has become outdated. I thought that this would be good time to mention how star distances are determined, while correcting Betelgeuse’s distance estimate. Truth is, finding the distances to even the nearest stars is not easy.


Ancient Greek astronomers knew how to do it but could not, because they lacked the technology. Oddly enough, normal-sighted people use something like this same concept – the concept of parallax, used to find distances to the nearby stars – every day without ever thinking about it.


Your point of view makes a difference! Photo via CfA.

Your point of view makes a difference! Photo via CfA.



Here’s what we do, on a human scale. Hold your thumb out at arms’ length and look at it with just one eye. Note the apparent position of your thumb with respect to the background, say a fence in your backyard, a row of distant trees or buildings. Then quickly switch to the other eye. You should note that your thumb seems to jog slightly to one side or the other. That’s because you are looking at your thumb with your two different eyes separated by a couple of inches, seeing a slightly different view with each.


Normally our brains consolidate the two views, and that’s why we have stereoscopic vision. The brain calculates distances based on how much the view differs. It is similar to how a surveyor can measure the distance to some object using triangulation. Our brains do it automatically.


The ancients thought, correctly, that this concept could be used to determine the distances to stars. Instead of using the views from two human eyes, they chose to make separate observations from two different locations. Mathematically, if you can measure the apparent angular offset (also called the parallax angle) of some object when viewed from two different locations separated by a known distance, you can calculate the distance to the object easily. Ancient astronomers, however, could not make it work because no matter how far they extended the distance between the two observations, they could not see any angular displacement. In other words, the view from one place looked exactly the same as a view from another. They failed, but they concluded correctly that the angle must be very small, and the stars very, very far away!


Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!


 Betelgeuse imaged in ultraviolet light by the Hubble Space Telescope and subsequently enhanced by NASA. The bright white spot is likely one of this star's poles. Image via NASA/ESA.

Betelgeuse imaged in ultraviolet light by the Hubble Space Telescope and subsequently enhanced by NASA. The bright white spot is likely one of this star’s poles. Image via NASA/ESA.



Stellar parallax

When using the technique of stellar parallax to find star distances, it’s possible to use the orbit of Earth as a baseline. Illustration via Wikipedia.



All measurements of stellar parallax (and determination of the distances to stars) failed until German astronomer Friedrich Bessel succeeded in 1838. Instead of just his eye, he used a telescope. And instead of the distance between his eyes, his baseline was the diameter of the Earth’s orbit. He accomplished this huge baseline by measuring once, and then again 6 months later when the Earth was on the other side in its orbit, a distance of roughly 186 million miles (300 million km). Even then, he was barely able to make out a tiny angular displacement. But it was enough to determine a distance of 11 light-years to a nearby star called 61 Cygni.


From Bessel’s time until the 1980s, only a few thousand parallaxes had been determined. The process is hindered by a number of factors including the extremely small angles involved, imperfections in the instruments and perhaps most of all, the murkiness of Earth’s own atmosphere. Observations from the Earth, even from very clear and dark locations such as deserts and mountaintops are blurred by distortions from the atmosphere. It’s a bit like looking up from the bottom of a swimming pool.


In 1989, the European Space Agency (ESA) launched a satellite with a telescope above the Earth’s blurry blanket of air. It was called Hipparcos, named after the famed Greek astronomer Hipparchus, who applied trigonometry to the problem of stellar distances more than 2,000 years ago.


Over several years of observations, Hipparcos provided parallax and distance data for more than 100,000 relatively nearby stars.


This brings me back to the reason for this post. The original Hipparcos data gave a parallax of Betelgeuse of 7.63 milliarcseconds (mas), which is about one millionth the width of a full moon. This equates to a distance of about 430 light-years.


Subsequent studies found an error in the methods of reducing data for variable stars such as Betelgeuse. One effort to correct those errors gives 5.07 mas. Using this figure, Betelgeuse is about 643 plus or minus 46 light-years. This is likely the most accurate current estimate to date.


To give a sense of scale here, if our sun were the size of a BB (a pellet used in a BB gun), Betelgeuse would be roughly the size of a Toyota Camry, and located nearly 12,500 miles (20,000 km) away!


The range is still quite large, and, while it does not seem precise, we are probably safe in saying that Betelgeuse is somewhere between 430 and 690 light years away!


Betelgeuse is the second-brightest star in the well-known constellation Orion the Hunter, which is well placed for viewing in the evening sky from about December to March each year.

Betelgeuse is the second-brightest star in the well-known constellation Orion the Hunter, which is well placed for viewing in the evening sky from about December to March each year.



Bottom line: Finding the distances to even the nearest stars is not easy. Here’s how it’s done, and why the distance to the famous star Betelgeuse recently was modified from 430 light-years to Betelgeuse is about 643 plus or minus 46 light-years.






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1AQuHfA

Recently I realized that the distance I used for the star Betelgeuse – ninth-brightest star in the night sky and second-brightest in the constellation Orion the Hunter – in a popular blog post here at EarthSky has become outdated. I thought that this would be good time to mention how star distances are determined, while correcting Betelgeuse’s distance estimate. Truth is, finding the distances to even the nearest stars is not easy.


Ancient Greek astronomers knew how to do it but could not, because they lacked the technology. Oddly enough, normal-sighted people use something like this same concept – the concept of parallax, used to find distances to the nearby stars – every day without ever thinking about it.


Your point of view makes a difference! Photo via CfA.

Your point of view makes a difference! Photo via CfA.



Here’s what we do, on a human scale. Hold your thumb out at arms’ length and look at it with just one eye. Note the apparent position of your thumb with respect to the background, say a fence in your backyard, a row of distant trees or buildings. Then quickly switch to the other eye. You should note that your thumb seems to jog slightly to one side or the other. That’s because you are looking at your thumb with your two different eyes separated by a couple of inches, seeing a slightly different view with each.


Normally our brains consolidate the two views, and that’s why we have stereoscopic vision. The brain calculates distances based on how much the view differs. It is similar to how a surveyor can measure the distance to some object using triangulation. Our brains do it automatically.


The ancients thought, correctly, that this concept could be used to determine the distances to stars. Instead of using the views from two human eyes, they chose to make separate observations from two different locations. Mathematically, if you can measure the apparent angular offset (also called the parallax angle) of some object when viewed from two different locations separated by a known distance, you can calculate the distance to the object easily. Ancient astronomers, however, could not make it work because no matter how far they extended the distance between the two observations, they could not see any angular displacement. In other words, the view from one place looked exactly the same as a view from another. They failed, but they concluded correctly that the angle must be very small, and the stars very, very far away!


Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!


 Betelgeuse imaged in ultraviolet light by the Hubble Space Telescope and subsequently enhanced by NASA. The bright white spot is likely one of this star's poles. Image via NASA/ESA.

Betelgeuse imaged in ultraviolet light by the Hubble Space Telescope and subsequently enhanced by NASA. The bright white spot is likely one of this star’s poles. Image via NASA/ESA.



Stellar parallax

When using the technique of stellar parallax to find star distances, it’s possible to use the orbit of Earth as a baseline. Illustration via Wikipedia.



All measurements of stellar parallax (and determination of the distances to stars) failed until German astronomer Friedrich Bessel succeeded in 1838. Instead of just his eye, he used a telescope. And instead of the distance between his eyes, his baseline was the diameter of the Earth’s orbit. He accomplished this huge baseline by measuring once, and then again 6 months later when the Earth was on the other side in its orbit, a distance of roughly 186 million miles (300 million km). Even then, he was barely able to make out a tiny angular displacement. But it was enough to determine a distance of 11 light-years to a nearby star called 61 Cygni.


From Bessel’s time until the 1980s, only a few thousand parallaxes had been determined. The process is hindered by a number of factors including the extremely small angles involved, imperfections in the instruments and perhaps most of all, the murkiness of Earth’s own atmosphere. Observations from the Earth, even from very clear and dark locations such as deserts and mountaintops are blurred by distortions from the atmosphere. It’s a bit like looking up from the bottom of a swimming pool.


In 1989, the European Space Agency (ESA) launched a satellite with a telescope above the Earth’s blurry blanket of air. It was called Hipparcos, named after the famed Greek astronomer Hipparchus, who applied trigonometry to the problem of stellar distances more than 2,000 years ago.


Over several years of observations, Hipparcos provided parallax and distance data for more than 100,000 relatively nearby stars.


This brings me back to the reason for this post. The original Hipparcos data gave a parallax of Betelgeuse of 7.63 milliarcseconds (mas), which is about one millionth the width of a full moon. This equates to a distance of about 430 light-years.


Subsequent studies found an error in the methods of reducing data for variable stars such as Betelgeuse. One effort to correct those errors gives 5.07 mas. Using this figure, Betelgeuse is about 643 plus or minus 46 light-years. This is likely the most accurate current estimate to date.


To give a sense of scale here, if our sun were the size of a BB (a pellet used in a BB gun), Betelgeuse would be roughly the size of a Toyota Camry, and located nearly 12,500 miles (20,000 km) away!


The range is still quite large, and, while it does not seem precise, we are probably safe in saying that Betelgeuse is somewhere between 430 and 690 light years away!


Betelgeuse is the second-brightest star in the well-known constellation Orion the Hunter, which is well placed for viewing in the evening sky from about December to March each year.

Betelgeuse is the second-brightest star in the well-known constellation Orion the Hunter, which is well placed for viewing in the evening sky from about December to March each year.



Bottom line: Finding the distances to even the nearest stars is not easy. Here’s how it’s done, and why the distance to the famous star Betelgeuse recently was modified from 430 light-years to Betelgeuse is about 643 plus or minus 46 light-years.






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1AQuHfA

View from space: Antarctica’s tallest volcano


Image credit: Jesse Allen/NASA

Image credit: Jesse Allen/NASA



A chain of volcanoes along a 900-kilometer (560-mile) stretch of Antarctica’s Pacific coast, similar in size to the Cascade volcanic chain in North America, is home to Antarctica’s tallest volcano — Mount Sidley.


Screen Shot 2015-02-09 at 4.11.51 PM


Enjoying EarthSky? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!


The volcano – not to be confused with Vinson Massif, Antarctica’s tallest mountain – stands about 4,200 meters (13,800 feet) above sea level and 2,200 meters (7,200 feet) above ice level. The wall of the caldera – the cauldron-like feature formed by the collapse of land following an eruption – mostly shadowed in this image, is about 1,200 meters (3,900 feet) high. The caldera floor spans 5 kilometers (3 miles).


According to the USGS Geographic Names Information System, Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd discovered the volcano during a flight on November 18, 1934. He later named the mountain after Mabelle E. Sidley, the daughter of a contributor to the Byrd Antarctic Expedition.


Image credit: Jesse Allen/NASA

Image credit: Jesse Allen/NASA



Sidley is one of five volcanoes in the Executive Committee Range (above image), which stretches about 80 kilometers (50 miles) from north to south. The range was discovered during a flight by the United States Antarctic Service on December 15, 1940, and it is named for the Service’s Executive Committee. Mount Sidley is the only mountain in the range not named for a committee member.


Mount Sidley is the youngest volcano in the Executive Committee Range to rise above the ice sheet. Below the ice sheet, however, seismologists have detected new volcanic activity 30 miles from Sidley, according to a 2013 news report .


These images of Mount Sidley were acquired on November 20, 2014 by the Landsat 8 satellite.


Read more from NASA Earth Observatory






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/16Iamvr

Image credit: Jesse Allen/NASA

Image credit: Jesse Allen/NASA



A chain of volcanoes along a 900-kilometer (560-mile) stretch of Antarctica’s Pacific coast, similar in size to the Cascade volcanic chain in North America, is home to Antarctica’s tallest volcano — Mount Sidley.


Screen Shot 2015-02-09 at 4.11.51 PM


Enjoying EarthSky? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!


The volcano – not to be confused with Vinson Massif, Antarctica’s tallest mountain – stands about 4,200 meters (13,800 feet) above sea level and 2,200 meters (7,200 feet) above ice level. The wall of the caldera – the cauldron-like feature formed by the collapse of land following an eruption – mostly shadowed in this image, is about 1,200 meters (3,900 feet) high. The caldera floor spans 5 kilometers (3 miles).


According to the USGS Geographic Names Information System, Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd discovered the volcano during a flight on November 18, 1934. He later named the mountain after Mabelle E. Sidley, the daughter of a contributor to the Byrd Antarctic Expedition.


Image credit: Jesse Allen/NASA

Image credit: Jesse Allen/NASA



Sidley is one of five volcanoes in the Executive Committee Range (above image), which stretches about 80 kilometers (50 miles) from north to south. The range was discovered during a flight by the United States Antarctic Service on December 15, 1940, and it is named for the Service’s Executive Committee. Mount Sidley is the only mountain in the range not named for a committee member.


Mount Sidley is the youngest volcano in the Executive Committee Range to rise above the ice sheet. Below the ice sheet, however, seismologists have detected new volcanic activity 30 miles from Sidley, according to a 2013 news report .


These images of Mount Sidley were acquired on November 20, 2014 by the Landsat 8 satellite.


Read more from NASA Earth Observatory






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/16Iamvr

Undersea volcanic pulses might trigger climate swings

Magma from undersea eruptions congealed into forms known as pillow basalts on the Juan De Fuca Ridge, off the U.S. Pacific Northwest. A new study shows such eruptions wax and wane on regular schedules. Image credit: Deborah Kelley/University of Washington

Magma from undersea eruptions congealed into forms known as pillow basalts on the Juan De Fuca Ridge, off the U.S. Pacific Northwest. A new study shows such eruptions wax and wane on regular schedules. Image credit: Deborah Kelley/University of Washington



A new study, published February 6 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, suggests that undersea volcanic pulses — apparently tied to short- and long-term changes in earth’s orbit, and to sea levels – may help trigger natural climate swings.


Vast ranges of volcanoes hidden under the oceans are presumed by scientists to be the gentle giants of the planet, oozing lava at slow, steady rates along mid-ocean ridges. The new study shows that they flare up on strikingly regular cycles, ranging from two weeks to 100,000 years—and, that they erupt almost exclusively during the first six months of each year.


Scientists have already speculated that volcanic cycles on land emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide might influence climate. But up to now there was no evidence from submarine volcanoes. The new findings suggest that models of Earth’s natural climate dynamics, and by extension human-influenced climate change, may have to be adjusted.


Marine geophysicist Maya Tolstoy of Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory is the study’s author. She said:



People have ignored seafloor volcanoes on the idea that their influence is small. But that’s because they are assumed to be in a steady state, which they’re not. They respond to both very large forces, and to very small ones, and that tells us that we need to look at them much more closely.



Volcanically active mid-ocean ridges crisscross earth’s seafloors like stitching on a baseball, stretching some 37,000 miles. They are the growing edges of giant tectonic plates; as lavas push out, they form new areas of seafloor, which comprise some 80 percent of the planet’s crust.


Conventional wisdom holds that they erupt at a fairly constant rate, but Tolstoy finds that the ridges are actually now in a languid phase. Even at that, they produce maybe eight times more lava annually than land volcanoes. Due to the chemistry of their magmas, the carbon dioxide they are thought to emit is currently about the same as, or perhaps a little less than, from land volcanoes—about 88 million metric tons a year. But were the undersea chains to stir even a little bit more, their CO2 output would shoot up, says Tolstoy.


Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!


Alternating ridges and valleys formed by volcanism near the East Pacific Rise, a mid-ocean ridge in the Pacific Ocean. Such formations indicate ancient highs and lows of volcanic activity. Image credit: Haymon et al., NOAA-OE, WHOI

Alternating ridges and valleys formed by volcanism near the East Pacific Rise, a mid-ocean ridge in the Pacific Ocean. Such formations indicate ancient highs and lows of volcanic activity. Image credit: Haymon et al., NOAA-OE, WHOI



Some scientists think volcanoes may act in concert with Milankovitch cycles -repeating changes in the shape of earth’s solar orbit, and the tilt and direction of its axis—to produce suddenly seesawing hot and cold periods. The major one is a 100,000-year cycle in which the planet’s orbit around the sun changes from more or less an annual circle into an ellipse that annually brings it closer or farther from the sun. Recent ice ages seem to build up through most of the cycle; but then things suddenly warm back up near the orbit’s peak eccentricity. The causes are not clear.


Enter volcanoes. Researchers have suggested that as icecaps build on land, pressure on underlying volcanoes also builds, and eruptions are suppressed. But when warming somehow starts and the ice begins melting, pressure lets up, and eruptions surge. They belch CO2 that produces more warming, which melts more ice, which creates a self-feeding effect that tips the planet suddenly into a warm period. A 2009 paper from Harvard University says that land volcanoes worldwide indeed surged six to eight times over background levels during the most recent deglaciation, 12,000 to 7,000 years ago. The corollary would be that undersea volcanoes do the opposite: as earth cools, sea levels may drop 100 meters, because so much water gets locked into ice. This relieves pressure on submarine volcanoes, and they erupt more. At some point, could the increased CO2 from undersea eruptions start the warming that melts the ice covering volcanoes on land?


That has been a mystery, partly because undersea eruptions are almost impossible to observe. However, Tolstoy and other researchers recently have been able to closely monitor 10 submarine eruption sites using sensitive new seismic instruments. They have also produced new high-resolution maps showing outlines of past lava flows. Tolstoy analyzed some 25 years of seismic data from ridges in the Pacific, Atlantic and Arctic oceans, plus maps showing past activity in the south Pacific.


The long-term eruption data, spread over more than 700,000 years, showed that during the coldest times, when sea levels are low, undersea volcanism surges, producing visible bands of hills. When things warm up and sea levels rise to levels similar to the present, lava erupts more slowly, creating bands of lower topography. Tolstoy attributes this not only to the varying sea level, but to closely related changes in earth’s orbit. When the orbit is more elliptical, Earth gets squeezed and unsqueezed by the sun’s gravitational pull at a rapidly varying rate as it spins daily—a process that she thinks tends to massage undersea magma upward, and help open the tectonic cracks that let it out. When the orbit is fairly (though not completely) circular, as it is now, the squeezing/unsqueezing effect is minimized, and there are fewer eruptions.


The idea that remote gravitational forces influence volcanism is mirrored by the short-term data, says Tolstoy. She says the seismic data suggest that today, undersea volcanoes pulse to life mainly during periods that come every two weeks. That is the schedule upon which combined gravity from the moon and sun cause ocean tides to reach their lowest points, thus subtly relieving pressure on volcanoes below. Seismic signals interpreted as eruptions followed fortnightly low tides at eight out of nine study sites. Furthermore, Tolstoy found that all known modern eruptions occur from January through June. January is the month when Earth is closest to the sun, July when it is farthest—a period similar to the squeezing/unsqueezing effect Tolstoy sees in longer-term cycles. She said:



If you look at the present-day eruptions, volcanoes respond even to much smaller forces than the ones that might drive climate.



Edward Baker, a senior ocean scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said, “The most interesting takeaway from this paper is that it provides further evidence that the solid Earth, and the air and water all operate as a single system.”


The research for this paper was funded in large part by the U.S. National Science Foundation.


Bottom line: A study published February 6, 2015 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, suggests that undersea volcanic pulses — apparently tied to short- and long-term changes in earth’s orbit, and to sea levels – may help trigger natural climate swings. Submarine volcanoes flare up on strikingly regular cycles, from two weeks to 100,000 years and produce about the same amount of CO2 as land volcanoes, says the study.


Read more from the Earth Institute






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1zq8jmA
Magma from undersea eruptions congealed into forms known as pillow basalts on the Juan De Fuca Ridge, off the U.S. Pacific Northwest. A new study shows such eruptions wax and wane on regular schedules. Image credit: Deborah Kelley/University of Washington

Magma from undersea eruptions congealed into forms known as pillow basalts on the Juan De Fuca Ridge, off the U.S. Pacific Northwest. A new study shows such eruptions wax and wane on regular schedules. Image credit: Deborah Kelley/University of Washington



A new study, published February 6 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, suggests that undersea volcanic pulses — apparently tied to short- and long-term changes in earth’s orbit, and to sea levels – may help trigger natural climate swings.


Vast ranges of volcanoes hidden under the oceans are presumed by scientists to be the gentle giants of the planet, oozing lava at slow, steady rates along mid-ocean ridges. The new study shows that they flare up on strikingly regular cycles, ranging from two weeks to 100,000 years—and, that they erupt almost exclusively during the first six months of each year.


Scientists have already speculated that volcanic cycles on land emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide might influence climate. But up to now there was no evidence from submarine volcanoes. The new findings suggest that models of Earth’s natural climate dynamics, and by extension human-influenced climate change, may have to be adjusted.


Marine geophysicist Maya Tolstoy of Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory is the study’s author. She said:



People have ignored seafloor volcanoes on the idea that their influence is small. But that’s because they are assumed to be in a steady state, which they’re not. They respond to both very large forces, and to very small ones, and that tells us that we need to look at them much more closely.



Volcanically active mid-ocean ridges crisscross earth’s seafloors like stitching on a baseball, stretching some 37,000 miles. They are the growing edges of giant tectonic plates; as lavas push out, they form new areas of seafloor, which comprise some 80 percent of the planet’s crust.


Conventional wisdom holds that they erupt at a fairly constant rate, but Tolstoy finds that the ridges are actually now in a languid phase. Even at that, they produce maybe eight times more lava annually than land volcanoes. Due to the chemistry of their magmas, the carbon dioxide they are thought to emit is currently about the same as, or perhaps a little less than, from land volcanoes—about 88 million metric tons a year. But were the undersea chains to stir even a little bit more, their CO2 output would shoot up, says Tolstoy.


Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!


Alternating ridges and valleys formed by volcanism near the East Pacific Rise, a mid-ocean ridge in the Pacific Ocean. Such formations indicate ancient highs and lows of volcanic activity. Image credit: Haymon et al., NOAA-OE, WHOI

Alternating ridges and valleys formed by volcanism near the East Pacific Rise, a mid-ocean ridge in the Pacific Ocean. Such formations indicate ancient highs and lows of volcanic activity. Image credit: Haymon et al., NOAA-OE, WHOI



Some scientists think volcanoes may act in concert with Milankovitch cycles -repeating changes in the shape of earth’s solar orbit, and the tilt and direction of its axis—to produce suddenly seesawing hot and cold periods. The major one is a 100,000-year cycle in which the planet’s orbit around the sun changes from more or less an annual circle into an ellipse that annually brings it closer or farther from the sun. Recent ice ages seem to build up through most of the cycle; but then things suddenly warm back up near the orbit’s peak eccentricity. The causes are not clear.


Enter volcanoes. Researchers have suggested that as icecaps build on land, pressure on underlying volcanoes also builds, and eruptions are suppressed. But when warming somehow starts and the ice begins melting, pressure lets up, and eruptions surge. They belch CO2 that produces more warming, which melts more ice, which creates a self-feeding effect that tips the planet suddenly into a warm period. A 2009 paper from Harvard University says that land volcanoes worldwide indeed surged six to eight times over background levels during the most recent deglaciation, 12,000 to 7,000 years ago. The corollary would be that undersea volcanoes do the opposite: as earth cools, sea levels may drop 100 meters, because so much water gets locked into ice. This relieves pressure on submarine volcanoes, and they erupt more. At some point, could the increased CO2 from undersea eruptions start the warming that melts the ice covering volcanoes on land?


That has been a mystery, partly because undersea eruptions are almost impossible to observe. However, Tolstoy and other researchers recently have been able to closely monitor 10 submarine eruption sites using sensitive new seismic instruments. They have also produced new high-resolution maps showing outlines of past lava flows. Tolstoy analyzed some 25 years of seismic data from ridges in the Pacific, Atlantic and Arctic oceans, plus maps showing past activity in the south Pacific.


The long-term eruption data, spread over more than 700,000 years, showed that during the coldest times, when sea levels are low, undersea volcanism surges, producing visible bands of hills. When things warm up and sea levels rise to levels similar to the present, lava erupts more slowly, creating bands of lower topography. Tolstoy attributes this not only to the varying sea level, but to closely related changes in earth’s orbit. When the orbit is more elliptical, Earth gets squeezed and unsqueezed by the sun’s gravitational pull at a rapidly varying rate as it spins daily—a process that she thinks tends to massage undersea magma upward, and help open the tectonic cracks that let it out. When the orbit is fairly (though not completely) circular, as it is now, the squeezing/unsqueezing effect is minimized, and there are fewer eruptions.


The idea that remote gravitational forces influence volcanism is mirrored by the short-term data, says Tolstoy. She says the seismic data suggest that today, undersea volcanoes pulse to life mainly during periods that come every two weeks. That is the schedule upon which combined gravity from the moon and sun cause ocean tides to reach their lowest points, thus subtly relieving pressure on volcanoes below. Seismic signals interpreted as eruptions followed fortnightly low tides at eight out of nine study sites. Furthermore, Tolstoy found that all known modern eruptions occur from January through June. January is the month when Earth is closest to the sun, July when it is farthest—a period similar to the squeezing/unsqueezing effect Tolstoy sees in longer-term cycles. She said:



If you look at the present-day eruptions, volcanoes respond even to much smaller forces than the ones that might drive climate.



Edward Baker, a senior ocean scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said, “The most interesting takeaway from this paper is that it provides further evidence that the solid Earth, and the air and water all operate as a single system.”


The research for this paper was funded in large part by the U.S. National Science Foundation.


Bottom line: A study published February 6, 2015 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, suggests that undersea volcanic pulses — apparently tied to short- and long-term changes in earth’s orbit, and to sea levels – may help trigger natural climate swings. Submarine volcanoes flare up on strikingly regular cycles, from two weeks to 100,000 years and produce about the same amount of CO2 as land volcanoes, says the study.


Read more from the Earth Institute






from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1zq8jmA

adds 2