Can Muons – Which Live For Just Microseconds – Save Experimental Particle Physics? (Synopsis) [Starts With A Bang]


“It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop.” -Confucius

The large hadron collider is the world’s most powerful particle accelerator, colliding two protons at energies of 6.5 TeV apiece. But you’ll never have the full 13 TeV of energy available for that collision, thanks to the fact that the proton itself is a composite particle, and that energy is distributed throughout its components. When you get a collision, only a fraction of that energy goes into the collision itself, while the rest remains in the other component particles.

A candidate Higgs event in the ATLAS detector. Note how even with the clear signatures and transverse tracks, there is a shower of other particles; this is due to the fact that protons are composite particles. Image credit: ATLAS Collaboration / CERN.

A candidate Higgs event in the ATLAS detector. Note how even with the clear signatures and transverse tracks, there is a shower of other particles; this is due to the fact that protons are composite particles. Image credit: ATLAS Collaboration / CERN.

The way around this is to use fundamental particles. The electron is no good, because it loses too much energy when you accelerate it in a magnetic field; it’s charge-to-mass ratio is too high. But the electron has a high-mass cousin, the muon, that’s 206 times as massive. Even though the muon only lives for microseconds, the right accelerator might be able to take advantage of special relativity (and time dilation), bringing a muon/antimuon collider to life, and realizing the best of both worlds.

A design plan for a full-scale muon-antimuon collider at Fermilab, the source of the world's second-most powerful particle accelerator. Image credit: Fermilab.

A design plan for a full-scale muon-antimuon collider at Fermilab, the source of the world’s second-most powerful particle accelerator. Image credit: Fermilab.

What are the prospects for a muon collider? They’re better than they’ve ever been, and just might save experimental particle physics!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2nSdcb4

“It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop.” -Confucius

The large hadron collider is the world’s most powerful particle accelerator, colliding two protons at energies of 6.5 TeV apiece. But you’ll never have the full 13 TeV of energy available for that collision, thanks to the fact that the proton itself is a composite particle, and that energy is distributed throughout its components. When you get a collision, only a fraction of that energy goes into the collision itself, while the rest remains in the other component particles.

A candidate Higgs event in the ATLAS detector. Note how even with the clear signatures and transverse tracks, there is a shower of other particles; this is due to the fact that protons are composite particles. Image credit: ATLAS Collaboration / CERN.

A candidate Higgs event in the ATLAS detector. Note how even with the clear signatures and transverse tracks, there is a shower of other particles; this is due to the fact that protons are composite particles. Image credit: ATLAS Collaboration / CERN.

The way around this is to use fundamental particles. The electron is no good, because it loses too much energy when you accelerate it in a magnetic field; it’s charge-to-mass ratio is too high. But the electron has a high-mass cousin, the muon, that’s 206 times as massive. Even though the muon only lives for microseconds, the right accelerator might be able to take advantage of special relativity (and time dilation), bringing a muon/antimuon collider to life, and realizing the best of both worlds.

A design plan for a full-scale muon-antimuon collider at Fermilab, the source of the world's second-most powerful particle accelerator. Image credit: Fermilab.

A design plan for a full-scale muon-antimuon collider at Fermilab, the source of the world’s second-most powerful particle accelerator. Image credit: Fermilab.

What are the prospects for a muon collider? They’re better than they’ve ever been, and just might save experimental particle physics!



from ScienceBlogs http://ift.tt/2nSdcb4

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire