Chemists teach old drug new tricks to target deadly staph bacteria

Emory chemist Bill Wuest, far right, with some of his graduate students, from left: Erika Csatary, Madeleine Dekarske and Ingrid Wilt. Photo by Ann Watson.

"Saying superbugs, one antibiotic at a time,” is the motto of Bill Wuest’s chemistry lab at Emory University. Wuest (it rhymes with “beast”) leads a team of students fighting drug-resistant bacteria — some of the scariest, most dangerous bugs on the planet.

Most recently, they created new molecules for a study published in PNAS. Their work helped verify how bithionol — a drug used to treat parasitic infections — can weaken the cell membranes of “persister” cells of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a deadly staph bacterium. They also synthesized new compounds, to learn more about how bithionol works and enhance its potential for clinical use.

“Just before I entered graduate school, my mother was diagnosed with a severe staph infection,” says Ingrid Wilt, a PhD candidate, explaining what drives her passion to tackle MRSA.

“She was in a hospital in the ICU for about two weeks,” Wilt adds. “Luckily, a last-resort antibiotic worked for her and she’s okay now.”

Click here to read the full story.

Related:
Chemistry students sing their studies, hoping for a good reaction
Brazilian peppertree packs power to knock out antibiotic-resistant bacteria

from eScienceCommons https://ift.tt/2OFhtAe
Emory chemist Bill Wuest, far right, with some of his graduate students, from left: Erika Csatary, Madeleine Dekarske and Ingrid Wilt. Photo by Ann Watson.

"Saying superbugs, one antibiotic at a time,” is the motto of Bill Wuest’s chemistry lab at Emory University. Wuest (it rhymes with “beast”) leads a team of students fighting drug-resistant bacteria — some of the scariest, most dangerous bugs on the planet.

Most recently, they created new molecules for a study published in PNAS. Their work helped verify how bithionol — a drug used to treat parasitic infections — can weaken the cell membranes of “persister” cells of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a deadly staph bacterium. They also synthesized new compounds, to learn more about how bithionol works and enhance its potential for clinical use.

“Just before I entered graduate school, my mother was diagnosed with a severe staph infection,” says Ingrid Wilt, a PhD candidate, explaining what drives her passion to tackle MRSA.

“She was in a hospital in the ICU for about two weeks,” Wilt adds. “Luckily, a last-resort antibiotic worked for her and she’s okay now.”

Click here to read the full story.

Related:
Chemistry students sing their studies, hoping for a good reaction
Brazilian peppertree packs power to knock out antibiotic-resistant bacteria

from eScienceCommons https://ift.tt/2OFhtAe

Black Moon supermoon on July 31

Image at top via EarthView.

Depending on where you live worldwide, the new moon falls on July 31 or August 1, 2019. Same new moon … different time zones. Thus this new moon is either the second of two July 2019 new moons. Or it’s the first of two August 2019 new moons. Either way, the second of two new moons in one calendar month is sometimes called a Black Moon. Here, in the United States, the Black Moon – July’s second new moon – falls on July 31. In the world’s Eastern Hemisphere, a Black Moon falls in late August.

You can’t see a new moon. It travels across the sky with the sun during the day. But the gravitational influence of the new moon and sun combine to physically affect our water planet, which people along the ocean coastlines may notice in the coming days.

Moreover, this new moon is a supermoon, that is, a new moon happening in close conjunction with lunar perigee – the moon’s closest point to Earth in its monthly orbit. Don’t listen to curmudgeon-y old astronomers telling you supermoons are “hype.” Supermoons aren’t hype; the name has arisen from folklore, like Blue Moon or Black Moon or the beloved Harvest Moon.

And, although you can’t see a new supermoon (because it’s in the sun’s glare), a new supermoon’s impact is real and profound. The tidal force of the extra-close new moon and the sun team up to usher in extra-large spring tides, where the variation in high and low tide is especially great. High spring tides typically follow the new or full moon by a day or so; as always, the variation in your local tide will depend on a number of factors, including the weather and the shape of your coast.

In any case, spring tides – especially the large spring tides caused by supermoons – are in stark contrast to even-keeled neap tides, when there’s a minimal variation between high and low tide, around the time of the first and last quarter moon.

So supermoons – particularly close new or full moons – increase the range between high and low spring tides all the more. Spring tides are not named for the season, by the way, but in the sense of jump, burst forth, or rise.

Diagram: the sun, Earth and moon in a line, and tide represented by an oval around Earth.

Supermoons affect earthly tides. A day or so after every new moon and full moon – when the sun, Earth, and moon are located more or less on a line in space – the whole Earth has its highest and lowest tides. These are called “spring tides.” A supermoon – close moon at the new or full phase – will accentuate the range between high and low tides even more. Image via physicalgeography.net. Read more: Tides, and the pull of the moon and sun.

The exact time of this new moon is August 1 at 03:12 Universal Time. Although the new moon comes at the same instant worldwide, our clocks read differently by time zone. At North American and U.S. time zones, the new moon instant falls on August 1, at 12:12 a.m. ADT – yet on July 31 at 11:12 p.m. EDT, 10:12 p.m. CDT, 9:12 p.m. MDT, 8:12 p.m. PDT, 7:12 p.m. AKDT, and 5:12 p.m. HST.

At new moon, the moon swings (more or less) between the Earth and sun, to transition from the morning to evening sky. Around new moon, the moon is lost in the sun’s glare for a day or two. Expect to see the moon next in the western evening sky after sunset. You might see it as soon as August 2, for example.

A smaller full moon superimposed on a larger crescent moon.

How much bigger is a supermoon? Above, Peter Lowenstein superimposed a mini-moon (full moon at apogee, its farthest from Earth for that month) on a young crescent moon (covered over in earthshine) near perigee, its closest to Earth for that month. The size difference is proportionally similar to that of a U.S. quarter versus a U.S. nickel.

The astrologer Richard Nolle is credited for coining the word supermoon. That’s probably one reason some astronomers object to it, although others embrace it as a simpler and catchier name than perigean new or full moon, which is what we called these moons before the term supermoon came along. Nolle defined a supermoon as:

… a new moon or full moon at or near (within 90 percent) of its closest approach to earth in a given orbit.

The moon in its orbit comes closest to Earth at perigee and swings farthest from Earth at apogee. At apogee, the moon is at 0 percent of its closest distance to Earth; and at perigee, it’s at 100 percent of its closest distance to Earth. A new or full moon aligning with perigee is about 30,000 miles (50,000 km) closer to Earth than a new or full moon aligning with apogee.

Based on Nolle’s definition of a supermoon, the relative nearness of the next three new moons gives us a “season” of new supermoons:

New moon distance (2019 Aug 01): 224,074 miles or 360,612 km
New moon distance (2019 Aug 30): 221,971 miles or 357,227 km
New moon distance (2019 Sep 28): 222,596 miles or 358,233 km

Source: The Moon Tonight

By the way, this year’s farthest new moon happened on February 4, 2019, when it was a whopping 252,566 miles (406,466 km) away. This new moon micro-moon took place one fortnight (approximately two weeks) after the full moon supermoon of January 21 and one fortnight before the full moon supermoon of February 19, 2019.

And guess what? The year’s farthest and smallest full moon (micro-moon) will occur on September 14, 2019, exactly one fortnight after the new moon supermoon of August 30 and one fortnight before the new moon supermoon of September 28, 2019.

In fact, the July 31-August 1, 2019, new moon will present the first in a series of three straight new moon supermoons, to fall (by Universal Time) on August 1, August 30, and September 28.

Two full moons side by side, one labeled perigee and distinctly larger, the other labeled apogee.

Here’s another far moon/near moon comparison between the December 3, 2017 close full moon and 2017’s farthest full moon in June by Muzamir Mazlan at Telok Kemang Observatory, Port Dickson, Malaysia.

Bottom line: Depending on where you live worldwide, this new moon happens on July 31 or August 1. It is either the second of two July 2019 new moons, or the first of two August 2019 new moons, depending on your time zone. By popular decree, the second of two new moons in one calendar month is called a Black Moon. This July 31/August 1 new moon is also a supermoon.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2yotMWL

Image at top via EarthView.

Depending on where you live worldwide, the new moon falls on July 31 or August 1, 2019. Same new moon … different time zones. Thus this new moon is either the second of two July 2019 new moons. Or it’s the first of two August 2019 new moons. Either way, the second of two new moons in one calendar month is sometimes called a Black Moon. Here, in the United States, the Black Moon – July’s second new moon – falls on July 31. In the world’s Eastern Hemisphere, a Black Moon falls in late August.

You can’t see a new moon. It travels across the sky with the sun during the day. But the gravitational influence of the new moon and sun combine to physically affect our water planet, which people along the ocean coastlines may notice in the coming days.

Moreover, this new moon is a supermoon, that is, a new moon happening in close conjunction with lunar perigee – the moon’s closest point to Earth in its monthly orbit. Don’t listen to curmudgeon-y old astronomers telling you supermoons are “hype.” Supermoons aren’t hype; the name has arisen from folklore, like Blue Moon or Black Moon or the beloved Harvest Moon.

And, although you can’t see a new supermoon (because it’s in the sun’s glare), a new supermoon’s impact is real and profound. The tidal force of the extra-close new moon and the sun team up to usher in extra-large spring tides, where the variation in high and low tide is especially great. High spring tides typically follow the new or full moon by a day or so; as always, the variation in your local tide will depend on a number of factors, including the weather and the shape of your coast.

In any case, spring tides – especially the large spring tides caused by supermoons – are in stark contrast to even-keeled neap tides, when there’s a minimal variation between high and low tide, around the time of the first and last quarter moon.

So supermoons – particularly close new or full moons – increase the range between high and low spring tides all the more. Spring tides are not named for the season, by the way, but in the sense of jump, burst forth, or rise.

Diagram: the sun, Earth and moon in a line, and tide represented by an oval around Earth.

Supermoons affect earthly tides. A day or so after every new moon and full moon – when the sun, Earth, and moon are located more or less on a line in space – the whole Earth has its highest and lowest tides. These are called “spring tides.” A supermoon – close moon at the new or full phase – will accentuate the range between high and low tides even more. Image via physicalgeography.net. Read more: Tides, and the pull of the moon and sun.

The exact time of this new moon is August 1 at 03:12 Universal Time. Although the new moon comes at the same instant worldwide, our clocks read differently by time zone. At North American and U.S. time zones, the new moon instant falls on August 1, at 12:12 a.m. ADT – yet on July 31 at 11:12 p.m. EDT, 10:12 p.m. CDT, 9:12 p.m. MDT, 8:12 p.m. PDT, 7:12 p.m. AKDT, and 5:12 p.m. HST.

At new moon, the moon swings (more or less) between the Earth and sun, to transition from the morning to evening sky. Around new moon, the moon is lost in the sun’s glare for a day or two. Expect to see the moon next in the western evening sky after sunset. You might see it as soon as August 2, for example.

A smaller full moon superimposed on a larger crescent moon.

How much bigger is a supermoon? Above, Peter Lowenstein superimposed a mini-moon (full moon at apogee, its farthest from Earth for that month) on a young crescent moon (covered over in earthshine) near perigee, its closest to Earth for that month. The size difference is proportionally similar to that of a U.S. quarter versus a U.S. nickel.

The astrologer Richard Nolle is credited for coining the word supermoon. That’s probably one reason some astronomers object to it, although others embrace it as a simpler and catchier name than perigean new or full moon, which is what we called these moons before the term supermoon came along. Nolle defined a supermoon as:

… a new moon or full moon at or near (within 90 percent) of its closest approach to earth in a given orbit.

The moon in its orbit comes closest to Earth at perigee and swings farthest from Earth at apogee. At apogee, the moon is at 0 percent of its closest distance to Earth; and at perigee, it’s at 100 percent of its closest distance to Earth. A new or full moon aligning with perigee is about 30,000 miles (50,000 km) closer to Earth than a new or full moon aligning with apogee.

Based on Nolle’s definition of a supermoon, the relative nearness of the next three new moons gives us a “season” of new supermoons:

New moon distance (2019 Aug 01): 224,074 miles or 360,612 km
New moon distance (2019 Aug 30): 221,971 miles or 357,227 km
New moon distance (2019 Sep 28): 222,596 miles or 358,233 km

Source: The Moon Tonight

By the way, this year’s farthest new moon happened on February 4, 2019, when it was a whopping 252,566 miles (406,466 km) away. This new moon micro-moon took place one fortnight (approximately two weeks) after the full moon supermoon of January 21 and one fortnight before the full moon supermoon of February 19, 2019.

And guess what? The year’s farthest and smallest full moon (micro-moon) will occur on September 14, 2019, exactly one fortnight after the new moon supermoon of August 30 and one fortnight before the new moon supermoon of September 28, 2019.

In fact, the July 31-August 1, 2019, new moon will present the first in a series of three straight new moon supermoons, to fall (by Universal Time) on August 1, August 30, and September 28.

Two full moons side by side, one labeled perigee and distinctly larger, the other labeled apogee.

Here’s another far moon/near moon comparison between the December 3, 2017 close full moon and 2017’s farthest full moon in June by Muzamir Mazlan at Telok Kemang Observatory, Port Dickson, Malaysia.

Bottom line: Depending on where you live worldwide, this new moon happens on July 31 or August 1. It is either the second of two July 2019 new moons, or the first of two August 2019 new moons, depending on your time zone. By popular decree, the second of two new moons in one calendar month is called a Black Moon. This July 31/August 1 new moon is also a supermoon.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2yotMWL

Opinion: ‘Building an NHS workforce for the future must be Boris Johnson’s top health priority’

Michelle Mitchell chief executive Cancer Research UK

The dust has just about settled on the latest busy week in politics. The Conservative party has a new leader and so the UK has a new Prime Minister.

Outside 10 Downing Street, Boris Johnson used his first speech to commit to supporting the NHS and building on the strength of our science in the UK.

These are vital ambitions. And now more than ever, they must become reality.

Why should the Government prioritise cancer?

Brexit will be the biggest thing on the Government’s plate. But cancer can’t be forgotten.

Cancer affects all of us. In the UK, 1 in 2 people born after 1960 will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime. And the public consistently see health as one of the most important issues facing the country.

Preventing more cancers and making sure people are diagnosed early and treated quickly matters deeply to those affected. That’s why it should be a priority for anyone leading the country, from MPs up to the Prime Minister.

So, what should the new Government do?

Early diagnosis is crucial. The commitment from Government and the NHS last year that it will diagnose 3 in 4 cancers early by 2028 was hugely positive. This will save thousands of lives. But getting there will mean hospitals have to carry out more tests, leaving an already short-staffed NHS under growing pressure.

To prevent this, the new Government must now invest in the NHS workforce. This is essential in the short-term, but it also goes much further.

Without investment in training and education to grow vital staff numbers, the ambitions of the NHS long term plan are at risk of being lost. And it will become even more challenging to help the growing number of people who will be diagnosed with cancer in the future.

But relieving the strain on our much-loved NHS doesn’t just rely on staff numbers.

Preventing more cancers should also be an essential goal for the new Government. This means delivering on the recent promises to make England smokefree by 2030 and acting on evidence that will help people make healthier choices, including through restrictions on junk food advertising. If the Prime Minister prioritises cancer prevention, he can protect future generations, while saving the NHS time and money.

Progress on all these fronts relies on one thing: great science. It’s what builds the evidence for us, and Government, to save lives. Thanks to research, cancer survival in the UK has doubled since the 1970s, so today half of all people diagnosed with cancer survive.

That’s why I fully support the Prime Minister’s commitment to UK science. And as Brexit discussions continue, science must be front and centre in our future relationship with the EU.

I hear time and again from our scientists that international collaboration is at the heart of developing life-saving treatments. If it’s harder to work together, progress is likely to be slower.

How will Cancer Research UK help?

Whatever the Prime Minister’s priorities, we’ll be working hard – with your help – to make sure that early diagnosis, prevention and world-class research are high on the Government’s agenda.

We will also continue our work with MPs from all political parties, because it’s not just the Government of the day that influences the agenda for change. Our priorities are long-term, not just for the course of one Government.

And as we do this our message will be clear: together we will beat cancer.

Michelle Mitchell is chief executive of Cancer Research UK



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog https://ift.tt/2KeKvRZ
Michelle Mitchell chief executive Cancer Research UK

The dust has just about settled on the latest busy week in politics. The Conservative party has a new leader and so the UK has a new Prime Minister.

Outside 10 Downing Street, Boris Johnson used his first speech to commit to supporting the NHS and building on the strength of our science in the UK.

These are vital ambitions. And now more than ever, they must become reality.

Why should the Government prioritise cancer?

Brexit will be the biggest thing on the Government’s plate. But cancer can’t be forgotten.

Cancer affects all of us. In the UK, 1 in 2 people born after 1960 will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime. And the public consistently see health as one of the most important issues facing the country.

Preventing more cancers and making sure people are diagnosed early and treated quickly matters deeply to those affected. That’s why it should be a priority for anyone leading the country, from MPs up to the Prime Minister.

So, what should the new Government do?

Early diagnosis is crucial. The commitment from Government and the NHS last year that it will diagnose 3 in 4 cancers early by 2028 was hugely positive. This will save thousands of lives. But getting there will mean hospitals have to carry out more tests, leaving an already short-staffed NHS under growing pressure.

To prevent this, the new Government must now invest in the NHS workforce. This is essential in the short-term, but it also goes much further.

Without investment in training and education to grow vital staff numbers, the ambitions of the NHS long term plan are at risk of being lost. And it will become even more challenging to help the growing number of people who will be diagnosed with cancer in the future.

But relieving the strain on our much-loved NHS doesn’t just rely on staff numbers.

Preventing more cancers should also be an essential goal for the new Government. This means delivering on the recent promises to make England smokefree by 2030 and acting on evidence that will help people make healthier choices, including through restrictions on junk food advertising. If the Prime Minister prioritises cancer prevention, he can protect future generations, while saving the NHS time and money.

Progress on all these fronts relies on one thing: great science. It’s what builds the evidence for us, and Government, to save lives. Thanks to research, cancer survival in the UK has doubled since the 1970s, so today half of all people diagnosed with cancer survive.

That’s why I fully support the Prime Minister’s commitment to UK science. And as Brexit discussions continue, science must be front and centre in our future relationship with the EU.

I hear time and again from our scientists that international collaboration is at the heart of developing life-saving treatments. If it’s harder to work together, progress is likely to be slower.

How will Cancer Research UK help?

Whatever the Prime Minister’s priorities, we’ll be working hard – with your help – to make sure that early diagnosis, prevention and world-class research are high on the Government’s agenda.

We will also continue our work with MPs from all political parties, because it’s not just the Government of the day that influences the agenda for change. Our priorities are long-term, not just for the course of one Government.

And as we do this our message will be clear: together we will beat cancer.

Michelle Mitchell is chief executive of Cancer Research UK



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog https://ift.tt/2KeKvRZ

Dark Rift in the Milky Way

Starry Milky Way band, divided by irregular dark dust streak along its length.

View at EarthSky Community Photos. | The Great Rift or Dark Rift is a dark area in the starlit band of the Milky Way. It’s really clouds of dust, where new stars are forming. Photo captured July 19, 2019, by Chuck Reinhart in Vincennes, Indiana. Thank you, Chuck!

Have you ever looked up from a dark place on a starry July or August evening and noticed the dark areas in the Milky Way? For centuries, skywatchers pondered this Great Rift or Dark Rift, as it’s called, but today’s astronomers know it consists of dark, obscuring dust in the disk of our Milky Way galaxy.

How can you see it? It’s best to wait until the moon is gone from your night sky, as it will be around late July and early August 2019. Under a dark sky, far from city lights, the Milky Way is easy to see at this time of year. It’s a shining band stretching across the sky. If you want to see the Dark Rift, that’s easy, too, as long as you realize you aren’t looking for a bright object. You’re looking instead for dark lanes of dust running the length of the starlit Milky Way band.

Chart with large Triangle to upper left, little Teapot to lower right, divided Milky Way.

The Great Rift - also known as the Dark Rift - and the Milky Way pass through the Summer Triangle and above the Teapot asterism in Sagittarius

You can see the Milky Way most easily in the evening from around June or July through about October. From a Northern Hemisphere location, you’ll see the thickest part of the Milky Way above the southern horizon. From the Southern Hemisphere, the thickest part of the Milky Way appears more overhead. Notice that the Milky Way band looks milky white. The skies aren’t really black like ink between stars in the Milky Way. You’ll know when you see the Dark Rift, because it is as if someone took a marker and colored parts of the Milky Way darker.

The Dark Rift begins just above the constellation Sagittarius the Archer. Follow the Milky Way up until you see a black area in the Milky Way just before you get to the constellation Cygnus, which has the shape of a cross. Deneb is the brightest star in Cygnus; it’s part of the famous Summer Triangle asterism. You can see the Dark Rift inside the Summer Triangle.

Be sure to keep your binoculars handy for any Milky Way viewing session. There are many interesting star-forming regions, star clusters and millions of stars that will capture your attention.

Brilliant colorful long exposure Milky Way above lake with Rift prominent.

Photo via Manish Mamtani.

The Dark Rift is dark due to dust. Stars are formed from great clouds of gas and dust in our Milky Way galaxy and other galaxies. When we look up at the starry band of the Milky Way and see the Dark Rift, we are looking into our galaxy’s star-forming regions. Imagine the vast number of new stars that will emerge, in time, from these clouds of dust!

Oval with irregular stripe, dark in middle, with blue arc lines above and below.

Shown is the interaction between interstellar dust in the Milky Way and the structure of our galaxy’s magnetic field, as detected by ESA’s Planck satellite over the entire sky. Image via ESA on Pinterest.

Ancient cultures focused on the dark areas, not the light areas. You know those paintings where if you look at the light areas you see one thing, but in the dark areas you see something else?

The Dark Rift is a bit like that. A few ancient cultures in Central and South America saw the dark areas of the Milky Way as constellations. These dark constellations had a variety of myths associated with them. For example, one important dark constellation was Yacana the Llama. It rises above Cuzco, the ancient city of the Incas, every year in November.

By the way, the other famous area of the sky that is obscured by molecular dust is visible from the Southern Hemisphere. It’s the famous Coalsack Nebula near the Southern Cross, also known as the constellation Crux. The Coalsack is another region of star-forming activity in our night sky – much like the Dark Rift.

Milky Way dark areas labeled Shepherd, Fox, Baby Llama, Llama, Partridge, Toad, Serpent.

This painting shows some of the animal shapes that the Incas saw in the Dark Rift of the Milky Way. Image via Coricancha Sun Temple in Cusco/Futurism.

Bottom line: On a late July or August evening, looking edgewise into our galaxy’s disk, you’ll notice a long, dark lane dividing the bright starry band of the Milky Way. This so-called Dark Rift or Great Rift is a place where new stars are forming.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2u4hK18
Starry Milky Way band, divided by irregular dark dust streak along its length.

View at EarthSky Community Photos. | The Great Rift or Dark Rift is a dark area in the starlit band of the Milky Way. It’s really clouds of dust, where new stars are forming. Photo captured July 19, 2019, by Chuck Reinhart in Vincennes, Indiana. Thank you, Chuck!

Have you ever looked up from a dark place on a starry July or August evening and noticed the dark areas in the Milky Way? For centuries, skywatchers pondered this Great Rift or Dark Rift, as it’s called, but today’s astronomers know it consists of dark, obscuring dust in the disk of our Milky Way galaxy.

How can you see it? It’s best to wait until the moon is gone from your night sky, as it will be around late July and early August 2019. Under a dark sky, far from city lights, the Milky Way is easy to see at this time of year. It’s a shining band stretching across the sky. If you want to see the Dark Rift, that’s easy, too, as long as you realize you aren’t looking for a bright object. You’re looking instead for dark lanes of dust running the length of the starlit Milky Way band.

Chart with large Triangle to upper left, little Teapot to lower right, divided Milky Way.

The Great Rift - also known as the Dark Rift - and the Milky Way pass through the Summer Triangle and above the Teapot asterism in Sagittarius

You can see the Milky Way most easily in the evening from around June or July through about October. From a Northern Hemisphere location, you’ll see the thickest part of the Milky Way above the southern horizon. From the Southern Hemisphere, the thickest part of the Milky Way appears more overhead. Notice that the Milky Way band looks milky white. The skies aren’t really black like ink between stars in the Milky Way. You’ll know when you see the Dark Rift, because it is as if someone took a marker and colored parts of the Milky Way darker.

The Dark Rift begins just above the constellation Sagittarius the Archer. Follow the Milky Way up until you see a black area in the Milky Way just before you get to the constellation Cygnus, which has the shape of a cross. Deneb is the brightest star in Cygnus; it’s part of the famous Summer Triangle asterism. You can see the Dark Rift inside the Summer Triangle.

Be sure to keep your binoculars handy for any Milky Way viewing session. There are many interesting star-forming regions, star clusters and millions of stars that will capture your attention.

Brilliant colorful long exposure Milky Way above lake with Rift prominent.

Photo via Manish Mamtani.

The Dark Rift is dark due to dust. Stars are formed from great clouds of gas and dust in our Milky Way galaxy and other galaxies. When we look up at the starry band of the Milky Way and see the Dark Rift, we are looking into our galaxy’s star-forming regions. Imagine the vast number of new stars that will emerge, in time, from these clouds of dust!

Oval with irregular stripe, dark in middle, with blue arc lines above and below.

Shown is the interaction between interstellar dust in the Milky Way and the structure of our galaxy’s magnetic field, as detected by ESA’s Planck satellite over the entire sky. Image via ESA on Pinterest.

Ancient cultures focused on the dark areas, not the light areas. You know those paintings where if you look at the light areas you see one thing, but in the dark areas you see something else?

The Dark Rift is a bit like that. A few ancient cultures in Central and South America saw the dark areas of the Milky Way as constellations. These dark constellations had a variety of myths associated with them. For example, one important dark constellation was Yacana the Llama. It rises above Cuzco, the ancient city of the Incas, every year in November.

By the way, the other famous area of the sky that is obscured by molecular dust is visible from the Southern Hemisphere. It’s the famous Coalsack Nebula near the Southern Cross, also known as the constellation Crux. The Coalsack is another region of star-forming activity in our night sky – much like the Dark Rift.

Milky Way dark areas labeled Shepherd, Fox, Baby Llama, Llama, Partridge, Toad, Serpent.

This painting shows some of the animal shapes that the Incas saw in the Dark Rift of the Milky Way. Image via Coricancha Sun Temple in Cusco/Futurism.

Bottom line: On a late July or August evening, looking edgewise into our galaxy’s disk, you’ll notice a long, dark lane dividing the bright starry band of the Milky Way. This so-called Dark Rift or Great Rift is a place where new stars are forming.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2u4hK18

How to find Delta Aquariid radiant point

Star chart of the constellation Aquarius with six stars labeled, including Skat.

The star Skat – near the radiant for the Delta Aquariids – is the 3rd-brightest in the faint constellation Aquarius.

The Delta Aquariid meteor shower has a broad maximum and produces meteors throughout late July and early August. It overlaps with the more famous Perseid meteor shower, which peaks this year on the mornings of August 12 and 13. The Delta Aquariid shower takes its name from the star Skat – also known by its Greek name Delta Aquarii. If you trace the paths of the meteors backward, you’ll find that all Delta Aquariids appear to originate from a point near this star. This point – near Skat – is called the radiant point of the Delta Aquariid meteor shower.

Skat isn’t a bright star. It ranks as only the third-brightest in the dim constellation Aquarius the Water Bearer. Still, you can glimpse this constellation and this star, if you go someplace nice and dark. If you’re in the Northern Hemisphere, you’ll also need a good view to the south. From mid-latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, the star and constellation are northward and higher in the sky.

Skat or Delta Aquarii appears modestly bright in a dark country sky. It’s near on the sky’s dome to a very bright star, Fomalhaut in the constellation Piscis Austrinus the Southern Fish.

If you can see the Great Square of Pegasus and Fomalhaut, they can help you find Skat. See the chart below.

Outlined square of stars with arrow pointing down and radial arrows from point near star Skat.

Find the star Skat by first finding the Great Square of Pegasus. Skat is found roughly on a line drawn southward through stars on Square’s west side. It’s between the Great Square and the bright star Fomalhaut.

Of course, in actuality, the Delta Aquariid meteors have nothing whatever to do with the star Skat. The meteors burn up some 60 miles (100 km) above Earth’s surface. Skat lies about 160 light-years away.

A meteor shower results when the Earth passes through the orbital path of a comet, and the debris from this passing comet vaporizes in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. The meteors enter Earth’s atmosphere on parallel paths.

Seeing them come from a radiant point in the sky is much the same illusion as standing on railroad tracks and seeing the tracks converge in the distance.

View of train tracks as if wide apart close to you and close together in the distance.

When you stand on a railroad track, you can see the illusion of tracks converging in the distance. Likewise, the paths of meteors in a single meteor shower appear to converge at a point – the radiant point – on the sky’s dome. Image via Shutterstock.

In late July and early August, when the Delta Aquariid meteors are flying, Skat and its constellation Aquarius rise above the horizon in the hours between midnight and dawn. They’re best seen in the evening sky in the months of October, November and December.

No matter when you look, you’ll always find Skat to the south (or below) the Great Square of Pegasus and to the north (or above) the bright star Fomalhaut.

Star chart of constellation Aquarius with red circle around star Skat.

View larger. | Want to see the star Skat? This chart can help, and you also need a dark sky. Chart via Wikimedia Commons.

Bottom line: How to find the star Skat, or Delta Aquarii, third-brightest star in the constellation Aquarius the Water Bearer, radiant point for the Delta Aquariid meteor shower. Plus an explanation of why meteors in annual showers have radiant points.

Great Square of Pegasus: Easy to see

Read about all the major meteor showers: EarthSky’s meteor shower guide



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/318acKX
Star chart of the constellation Aquarius with six stars labeled, including Skat.

The star Skat – near the radiant for the Delta Aquariids – is the 3rd-brightest in the faint constellation Aquarius.

The Delta Aquariid meteor shower has a broad maximum and produces meteors throughout late July and early August. It overlaps with the more famous Perseid meteor shower, which peaks this year on the mornings of August 12 and 13. The Delta Aquariid shower takes its name from the star Skat – also known by its Greek name Delta Aquarii. If you trace the paths of the meteors backward, you’ll find that all Delta Aquariids appear to originate from a point near this star. This point – near Skat – is called the radiant point of the Delta Aquariid meteor shower.

Skat isn’t a bright star. It ranks as only the third-brightest in the dim constellation Aquarius the Water Bearer. Still, you can glimpse this constellation and this star, if you go someplace nice and dark. If you’re in the Northern Hemisphere, you’ll also need a good view to the south. From mid-latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, the star and constellation are northward and higher in the sky.

Skat or Delta Aquarii appears modestly bright in a dark country sky. It’s near on the sky’s dome to a very bright star, Fomalhaut in the constellation Piscis Austrinus the Southern Fish.

If you can see the Great Square of Pegasus and Fomalhaut, they can help you find Skat. See the chart below.

Outlined square of stars with arrow pointing down and radial arrows from point near star Skat.

Find the star Skat by first finding the Great Square of Pegasus. Skat is found roughly on a line drawn southward through stars on Square’s west side. It’s between the Great Square and the bright star Fomalhaut.

Of course, in actuality, the Delta Aquariid meteors have nothing whatever to do with the star Skat. The meteors burn up some 60 miles (100 km) above Earth’s surface. Skat lies about 160 light-years away.

A meteor shower results when the Earth passes through the orbital path of a comet, and the debris from this passing comet vaporizes in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. The meteors enter Earth’s atmosphere on parallel paths.

Seeing them come from a radiant point in the sky is much the same illusion as standing on railroad tracks and seeing the tracks converge in the distance.

View of train tracks as if wide apart close to you and close together in the distance.

When you stand on a railroad track, you can see the illusion of tracks converging in the distance. Likewise, the paths of meteors in a single meteor shower appear to converge at a point – the radiant point – on the sky’s dome. Image via Shutterstock.

In late July and early August, when the Delta Aquariid meteors are flying, Skat and its constellation Aquarius rise above the horizon in the hours between midnight and dawn. They’re best seen in the evening sky in the months of October, November and December.

No matter when you look, you’ll always find Skat to the south (or below) the Great Square of Pegasus and to the north (or above) the bright star Fomalhaut.

Star chart of constellation Aquarius with red circle around star Skat.

View larger. | Want to see the star Skat? This chart can help, and you also need a dark sky. Chart via Wikimedia Commons.

Bottom line: How to find the star Skat, or Delta Aquarii, third-brightest star in the constellation Aquarius the Water Bearer, radiant point for the Delta Aquariid meteor shower. Plus an explanation of why meteors in annual showers have radiant points.

Great Square of Pegasus: Easy to see

Read about all the major meteor showers: EarthSky’s meteor shower guide



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/318acKX

New moon is July 31 – August 1

Extremely thin, threadlike crescent against blue background.

Youngest possible lunar crescent, with the moon’s age being exactly zero when this photo was taken — at the instant of new moon – 07:14 UTC on July 8, 2013. Image by Thierry Legault.

The next new moon falls on August 1, 2019, at 03:12 UTC; that is, July 31 at 23:12 p.m. EDT. Translate UTC to your time. For some parts of the world, then, this will be the second new moon of July, and thus some will called it a Black Moon. It’s also a supermoon. Following this new moon, you’ll likely see the young crescent moon again – in the west after sunset – in early August.

New moons can’t be seen, or at least they can’t without special equipment and a lot of moon-watching experience. The photo at the top of this post shows the moon at the instant it became new in July 2013. When the moon is new, it’s most nearly between the Earth and sun for any particular month. There’s a new moon about once a month, because the moon takes about a month to orbit Earth. The moon is nearly between the Earth and sun. In most months, there’s no eclipse because, most of the time, the new moon passes not in front of the sun, but simply near it in our sky.

Either way – in front of the sun or just near it – on the day of new moon, the moon travels across the sky with the sun during the day, hidden in the sun’s glare.

A day or two after each month’s new moon, a slim crescent moon always becomes visible in the west after sunset. In the language of astronomy, this slim crescent is called a young moon by astronomers. When you can you expect to see the moon in the evening again? Probably around August 4, 5 or 6, when it’ll appear in the sunset direction for a brief time after sunset.

New moons, and young moons, are fascinating to many. The Farmer’s Almanac, for example, still offers information on gardening by the moon. And many cultures have holidays based on moon phases.

Chart showing crescent moons and Spica on August 4 to 6, 2019.

Watch the young moon – a slim crescent moon visible in the west after sunset – swing past the star S;pica on August 4, 5, and 6, 2019. Read more.

Bottom line: New moon is August 1, 2019, at 03:12 UTC; that is, July 31 at 23:12 p.m. EDT. Translate UTC to your time.

Read more: Spot the young moon in early August, 2019

Read more: 4 keys to understanding moon phases

Read more: EarthSky’s guide to the bright planets

Help EarthSky keep going! Please donate.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2QpMvsB
Extremely thin, threadlike crescent against blue background.

Youngest possible lunar crescent, with the moon’s age being exactly zero when this photo was taken — at the instant of new moon – 07:14 UTC on July 8, 2013. Image by Thierry Legault.

The next new moon falls on August 1, 2019, at 03:12 UTC; that is, July 31 at 23:12 p.m. EDT. Translate UTC to your time. For some parts of the world, then, this will be the second new moon of July, and thus some will called it a Black Moon. It’s also a supermoon. Following this new moon, you’ll likely see the young crescent moon again – in the west after sunset – in early August.

New moons can’t be seen, or at least they can’t without special equipment and a lot of moon-watching experience. The photo at the top of this post shows the moon at the instant it became new in July 2013. When the moon is new, it’s most nearly between the Earth and sun for any particular month. There’s a new moon about once a month, because the moon takes about a month to orbit Earth. The moon is nearly between the Earth and sun. In most months, there’s no eclipse because, most of the time, the new moon passes not in front of the sun, but simply near it in our sky.

Either way – in front of the sun or just near it – on the day of new moon, the moon travels across the sky with the sun during the day, hidden in the sun’s glare.

A day or two after each month’s new moon, a slim crescent moon always becomes visible in the west after sunset. In the language of astronomy, this slim crescent is called a young moon by astronomers. When you can you expect to see the moon in the evening again? Probably around August 4, 5 or 6, when it’ll appear in the sunset direction for a brief time after sunset.

New moons, and young moons, are fascinating to many. The Farmer’s Almanac, for example, still offers information on gardening by the moon. And many cultures have holidays based on moon phases.

Chart showing crescent moons and Spica on August 4 to 6, 2019.

Watch the young moon – a slim crescent moon visible in the west after sunset – swing past the star S;pica on August 4, 5, and 6, 2019. Read more.

Bottom line: New moon is August 1, 2019, at 03:12 UTC; that is, July 31 at 23:12 p.m. EDT. Translate UTC to your time.

Read more: Spot the young moon in early August, 2019

Read more: 4 keys to understanding moon phases

Read more: EarthSky’s guide to the bright planets

Help EarthSky keep going! Please donate.



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2QpMvsB

Ten million stars

The fuzzy blueish blob in this image is Omega Centauri, a globular cluster of 10 million stars about 15,800 light-years from Earth.

Globular clusters orbit the Milky Way outside the galactic disk. They harbor tens of thousands to millions of stars. Tightly bound by gravity, globular clusters remain intact after 12 billion years. Omega Centauri has a diameter of 230 light-years. Having a mass of 5 million suns, Omega Centauri is 10 times more massive than a typical globular cluster.

According to the European Space Agency (ESA), Omega Centauri is a picture-perfect example of a globular cluster: tightly bound by gravity, it has a very high density of stars at its center and a nearly perfect spherical shape. In addition:

As other globular clusters, Omega Centauri is made up of very old stars and it is almost devoid of gas and dust, indicating star formation in the cluster has long ceased. Its stars have a low proportion of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium, signaling they were formed earlier in the history of the universe than stars like our sun. Unlike in many other globular clusters, however, the stars in Omega Centauri don’t all have the same age and chemical abundances, making astronomers puzzle over the formation and evolution of this cluster. Some scientists have even suggested that Omega Centauri may not be a true cluster at all, but rather the leftovers of a dwarf galaxy that collided with the Milky Way.

Omega Centauri is also special in many other ways, not least because of the sheer number of stars it contains. It is the largest globular cluster in our galaxy, at about 150 light years in diameter, and is also the brightest and most massive of its type, its stars having a combined mass of about four million solar masses.

The image above was captured by Wouter van Reeven, a software engineer at ESA’s European Space Astronomy Centre in Spain, during his recent visit to Chile to observe the July 2019 total solar eclipse. From Chile’s La Silla Observatory, Omega Centauri was high in the sky, presenting the ideal opportunity to photograph it. To create the composition, Wouter combined eight images taken with an exposure time of 10 seconds, seven images of 30 seconds each and another seven images of 60 seconds each. He used a SkyWatcher Esprit 80 ED telescope and a Canon EOS 200D camera.

Bottom line: Image of globular cluster Omega Centauri.

Via ESA



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2Yy7aOt

The fuzzy blueish blob in this image is Omega Centauri, a globular cluster of 10 million stars about 15,800 light-years from Earth.

Globular clusters orbit the Milky Way outside the galactic disk. They harbor tens of thousands to millions of stars. Tightly bound by gravity, globular clusters remain intact after 12 billion years. Omega Centauri has a diameter of 230 light-years. Having a mass of 5 million suns, Omega Centauri is 10 times more massive than a typical globular cluster.

According to the European Space Agency (ESA), Omega Centauri is a picture-perfect example of a globular cluster: tightly bound by gravity, it has a very high density of stars at its center and a nearly perfect spherical shape. In addition:

As other globular clusters, Omega Centauri is made up of very old stars and it is almost devoid of gas and dust, indicating star formation in the cluster has long ceased. Its stars have a low proportion of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium, signaling they were formed earlier in the history of the universe than stars like our sun. Unlike in many other globular clusters, however, the stars in Omega Centauri don’t all have the same age and chemical abundances, making astronomers puzzle over the formation and evolution of this cluster. Some scientists have even suggested that Omega Centauri may not be a true cluster at all, but rather the leftovers of a dwarf galaxy that collided with the Milky Way.

Omega Centauri is also special in many other ways, not least because of the sheer number of stars it contains. It is the largest globular cluster in our galaxy, at about 150 light years in diameter, and is also the brightest and most massive of its type, its stars having a combined mass of about four million solar masses.

The image above was captured by Wouter van Reeven, a software engineer at ESA’s European Space Astronomy Centre in Spain, during his recent visit to Chile to observe the July 2019 total solar eclipse. From Chile’s La Silla Observatory, Omega Centauri was high in the sky, presenting the ideal opportunity to photograph it. To create the composition, Wouter combined eight images taken with an exposure time of 10 seconds, seven images of 30 seconds each and another seven images of 60 seconds each. He used a SkyWatcher Esprit 80 ED telescope and a Canon EOS 200D camera.

Bottom line: Image of globular cluster Omega Centauri.

Via ESA



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2Yy7aOt

Skeptical Science New Research for Week #30, 2019

56 articles this week. 

Dual Use Technology

There's a move in the United States to muzzle and curtail research into climate change, particularly climate change caused by humans. The interests driving this regression are primarily concerned with maintaining the present vectors of money but manage to attract a large and supportive rabble of ideologically fixated folks who have a hard time with what they view as coercive pressure to behave responsibly, avoid creating messes that other people have to clean up etc.

The trouble is that voluntary or simulated ignorance bears opportunity costs. It's impossible to anticipate the the full benefit of scientific research; asking one question may answer others even as other avenues of inquiry open in the process of exploring the first query. Research truncated for commercial or ideological reasons denies us an unimaginable range of benefits. 

As a case in point, just as  methods such as "2+2=4" might be employed to calculate dimensions of wood for a project even as the same tools can add up money, so does climate research produce insight quite other than assessing how much doom our fossil fuel habits are depositing in our worry accounts. This week's collection includes a new evaluation (let's not say "projection") of how a plausibly scaled nuclear exchange between the United States and the Russian Federation would affect the world's climate, employing the latest climate modeling techniques— resources unavailable when the term "nuclear winter" first entered our vernacular. The results are quite chilling. Now— thanks to research primarily intended to model another problem— we can better understand a different avoidable scenario, hopefully helping us to make wiser choices.

The issue with wearing blinkers is that when you're blind, you can't predict what might stub your toe or how much it may hurt. This is such a simple and obvious concept that it's astounding we need to be reminded but for what it's worth: Don't choose to be blind.

No substitute for boots on the ground (or dipping instruments in water) 

Long time reader Philippe C. pointed us to an article in the most recent AAAS Science conveying startling findings about melt rates of tidewater glaciers via direct observations, measurements that should help models perform better as discrepancies between observation and prediction are resolved. The format and acuity of the data gathered in this project seems well suited as fodder for mathematical derivations. 

Suggestions welcome

This week's harvest of research includes other items (the first three in "Physical sciences") that came to us by suggestion (thank you, GEUS and BaerbelW). By "new research" we don't imply that what's published in this weekly synopsis must still be reeking of wet ink. And we certainly are not omniscient! Omissions are inevitable not least because we must employ the help of machines for providing much of our input. If you think we've missed something important, please let us know in comments below or via emailing contact(at)skepticalscience.com.

Physical sciences: 

Update of annual calving front lines for 47 marine terminating outlet glaciers in Greenland (1999–2018)

Sea-level rise in Denmark: Bridging local reconstructions and global projections

Modeling the Influence of the Weddell Polynya on the Filchner–Ronne Ice Shelf Cavity

Direct observations of submarine melt and subsurface geometry at a tidewater glacier

Permafrost-carbon mobilization in Beringia caused by deglacial meltwater runoff, sea-level rise and warming

Energetically Consistent Scale Adaptive Stochastic and Deterministic Energy Backscatter Schemes for an Atmospheric Model

The glass half-empty: climate change drives lower freshwater input in the coastal system of the Chilean Northern Patagonia

1.5°, 2°, and 3° global warming: visualizing European regions affected by multiple changes

Interannual lake fluctuations in the Argentine Puna: relationships with its associated peatlands and climate change

Reassessment of the common concept to derive the surface cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic: Consideration of surface albedo – cloud interactions

Holocene sea-level variability from Chesapeake Bay Tidal Marshes, USA

Are the Observed Changes in Heat Extremes Associated with a Half‐degree Warming Increment Analogues for Future Projections?

Hemispheric asymmetry of tropical expansion under CO2 forcing

Stability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: A Review and Synthesis

Nuclear Winter Responses to Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 4 and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE

The Spectral Dimension of Arctic Outgoing Longwave Radiation and Greenhouse Efficiency Trends from 2003‐2016

Investigating the Fast Response of Precipitation Intensity and Boundary Layer Temperature to Atmospheric Heating Using a Cloud‐Resolving Model

Changing salinity gradients in the Baltic Sea as a consequence of altered freshwater budgets

Global and Regional Projected Changes in 100-Year Sub-Daily, Daily and Multi-Day Precipitation Extremes Estimated from Three Large Ensembles of Climate Simulation

Sixty Years of Widespread Warming in the Southern Mid- and High-Latitudes (1957-2016)

Mechanisms for global warming impacts on Madden-Julian Oscillation precipitation amplitude

Decomposition of Future Moisture Flux Changes over the Tibetan Plateau Projected by Global and Regional Climate Models

Response of the Indian Ocean to the Tibetan Plateau thermal forcing in late spring

Getz Ice Shelf melt enhanced by freshwater discharge from beneath the West Antarctic Ice Sheet

On the possibility of a long subglacial river under the north Greenland ice sheet

Impacts of climate change on characteristics of daily‐scale rainfall events based on nine selected GCMs under four CMIP5 RCP scenarios in Qu River basin, East China

A simple equation to study changes in rainfall statistics 

Biology and anthropogenic climate change:

What do we know about soil carbon destabilization?

Future ocean climate homogenizes communities across habitats through diversity loss and rise of generalist species

Regulation of carbon dioxide and methane in small agricultural reservoirs: Optimizing potential for greenhouse gas uptake

Reviews and syntheses: Greenhouse gas exchange data from drained organic forest soils – a review of current approaches and recommendations for future research

Metabolic tradeoffs and heterogeneity in microbial responses to temperature determine the fate of litter carbon in a warmer world

Ecosystem carbon storage affected by intertidal locations and climatic factors in three estuarine mangrove forests of South China

Snowmelt and early to mid‐growing season water availability augment tree growth during rapid warming in southern Asian boreal forests

The brighter side of climate change: How local oceanography amplified a lobster boom in the Gulf of Maine

Increasing microbial carbon use efficiency with warming predicts soil heterotrophic respiration globally

Negative feedback processes following drainage slow down permafrost degradation

Differing climate and landscape effects on regional dryland vegetation responses during wet periods allude to future patterns 

Humans cope with and mitigate their global warming:

Learning from the Climate Change Debate to Avoid Polarisation on Negative Emissions

Customising global climate science for national adaptation: A case study of climate projections in UNFCCC’s National Communications

Emissions and emergence: a new index comparing relative contributions to climate change with relative climatic consequences

Adopting LEDs changes attitudes towards climate change: experimental evidence from China

Social benefit cost analysis of ecosystem-based climate change adaptations: a community-level case study in Tanna Island, Vanuatu

Piercing the corporate veil: Towards a better assessment of the position of transnational oil and gas companies in the global carbon budget

Supporting climate change adaptation using historical climate analysis

Exploring local perspectives on the performance of a community-based adaptation project on Aniwa, Vanuatu

Experiential Learning Processes Informing Climate Change Decision Support

Isolating the climate change impacts on air-pollution-related-pathologies over central and southern Europe – a modelling approach on cases and costs

Future changes and uncertainty in decision-relevant measures of East African climate

Barriers and drivers to adaptation to climate change—a field study of ten French local authorities

Bioclimatic conditions of the Portuguese wine denominations of origin under changing climates

A mobilities perspective on migration in the context of environmental change

Planning for an uncertain future: the challenges of a locally based collaborative approach to coastal development decisions

Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA: insights and lessons from two continental-scale projects

Costs to achieve target net emissions reductions in the US electric sector using direct air capture

Normalisation of Paris agreement NDCs to enhance transparency and ambition

Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science

 

The previous edition of Skeptical Science research news may be found here. 



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2K4K3qB

56 articles this week. 

Dual Use Technology

There's a move in the United States to muzzle and curtail research into climate change, particularly climate change caused by humans. The interests driving this regression are primarily concerned with maintaining the present vectors of money but manage to attract a large and supportive rabble of ideologically fixated folks who have a hard time with what they view as coercive pressure to behave responsibly, avoid creating messes that other people have to clean up etc.

The trouble is that voluntary or simulated ignorance bears opportunity costs. It's impossible to anticipate the the full benefit of scientific research; asking one question may answer others even as other avenues of inquiry open in the process of exploring the first query. Research truncated for commercial or ideological reasons denies us an unimaginable range of benefits. 

As a case in point, just as  methods such as "2+2=4" might be employed to calculate dimensions of wood for a project even as the same tools can add up money, so does climate research produce insight quite other than assessing how much doom our fossil fuel habits are depositing in our worry accounts. This week's collection includes a new evaluation (let's not say "projection") of how a plausibly scaled nuclear exchange between the United States and the Russian Federation would affect the world's climate, employing the latest climate modeling techniques— resources unavailable when the term "nuclear winter" first entered our vernacular. The results are quite chilling. Now— thanks to research primarily intended to model another problem— we can better understand a different avoidable scenario, hopefully helping us to make wiser choices.

The issue with wearing blinkers is that when you're blind, you can't predict what might stub your toe or how much it may hurt. This is such a simple and obvious concept that it's astounding we need to be reminded but for what it's worth: Don't choose to be blind.

No substitute for boots on the ground (or dipping instruments in water) 

Long time reader Philippe C. pointed us to an article in the most recent AAAS Science conveying startling findings about melt rates of tidewater glaciers via direct observations, measurements that should help models perform better as discrepancies between observation and prediction are resolved. The format and acuity of the data gathered in this project seems well suited as fodder for mathematical derivations. 

Suggestions welcome

This week's harvest of research includes other items (the first three in "Physical sciences") that came to us by suggestion (thank you, GEUS and BaerbelW). By "new research" we don't imply that what's published in this weekly synopsis must still be reeking of wet ink. And we certainly are not omniscient! Omissions are inevitable not least because we must employ the help of machines for providing much of our input. If you think we've missed something important, please let us know in comments below or via emailing contact(at)skepticalscience.com.

Physical sciences: 

Update of annual calving front lines for 47 marine terminating outlet glaciers in Greenland (1999–2018)

Sea-level rise in Denmark: Bridging local reconstructions and global projections

Modeling the Influence of the Weddell Polynya on the Filchner–Ronne Ice Shelf Cavity

Direct observations of submarine melt and subsurface geometry at a tidewater glacier

Permafrost-carbon mobilization in Beringia caused by deglacial meltwater runoff, sea-level rise and warming

Energetically Consistent Scale Adaptive Stochastic and Deterministic Energy Backscatter Schemes for an Atmospheric Model

The glass half-empty: climate change drives lower freshwater input in the coastal system of the Chilean Northern Patagonia

1.5°, 2°, and 3° global warming: visualizing European regions affected by multiple changes

Interannual lake fluctuations in the Argentine Puna: relationships with its associated peatlands and climate change

Reassessment of the common concept to derive the surface cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic: Consideration of surface albedo – cloud interactions

Holocene sea-level variability from Chesapeake Bay Tidal Marshes, USA

Are the Observed Changes in Heat Extremes Associated with a Half‐degree Warming Increment Analogues for Future Projections?

Hemispheric asymmetry of tropical expansion under CO2 forcing

Stability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: A Review and Synthesis

Nuclear Winter Responses to Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 4 and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE

The Spectral Dimension of Arctic Outgoing Longwave Radiation and Greenhouse Efficiency Trends from 2003‐2016

Investigating the Fast Response of Precipitation Intensity and Boundary Layer Temperature to Atmospheric Heating Using a Cloud‐Resolving Model

Changing salinity gradients in the Baltic Sea as a consequence of altered freshwater budgets

Global and Regional Projected Changes in 100-Year Sub-Daily, Daily and Multi-Day Precipitation Extremes Estimated from Three Large Ensembles of Climate Simulation

Sixty Years of Widespread Warming in the Southern Mid- and High-Latitudes (1957-2016)

Mechanisms for global warming impacts on Madden-Julian Oscillation precipitation amplitude

Decomposition of Future Moisture Flux Changes over the Tibetan Plateau Projected by Global and Regional Climate Models

Response of the Indian Ocean to the Tibetan Plateau thermal forcing in late spring

Getz Ice Shelf melt enhanced by freshwater discharge from beneath the West Antarctic Ice Sheet

On the possibility of a long subglacial river under the north Greenland ice sheet

Impacts of climate change on characteristics of daily‐scale rainfall events based on nine selected GCMs under four CMIP5 RCP scenarios in Qu River basin, East China

A simple equation to study changes in rainfall statistics 

Biology and anthropogenic climate change:

What do we know about soil carbon destabilization?

Future ocean climate homogenizes communities across habitats through diversity loss and rise of generalist species

Regulation of carbon dioxide and methane in small agricultural reservoirs: Optimizing potential for greenhouse gas uptake

Reviews and syntheses: Greenhouse gas exchange data from drained organic forest soils – a review of current approaches and recommendations for future research

Metabolic tradeoffs and heterogeneity in microbial responses to temperature determine the fate of litter carbon in a warmer world

Ecosystem carbon storage affected by intertidal locations and climatic factors in three estuarine mangrove forests of South China

Snowmelt and early to mid‐growing season water availability augment tree growth during rapid warming in southern Asian boreal forests

The brighter side of climate change: How local oceanography amplified a lobster boom in the Gulf of Maine

Increasing microbial carbon use efficiency with warming predicts soil heterotrophic respiration globally

Negative feedback processes following drainage slow down permafrost degradation

Differing climate and landscape effects on regional dryland vegetation responses during wet periods allude to future patterns 

Humans cope with and mitigate their global warming:

Learning from the Climate Change Debate to Avoid Polarisation on Negative Emissions

Customising global climate science for national adaptation: A case study of climate projections in UNFCCC’s National Communications

Emissions and emergence: a new index comparing relative contributions to climate change with relative climatic consequences

Adopting LEDs changes attitudes towards climate change: experimental evidence from China

Social benefit cost analysis of ecosystem-based climate change adaptations: a community-level case study in Tanna Island, Vanuatu

Piercing the corporate veil: Towards a better assessment of the position of transnational oil and gas companies in the global carbon budget

Supporting climate change adaptation using historical climate analysis

Exploring local perspectives on the performance of a community-based adaptation project on Aniwa, Vanuatu

Experiential Learning Processes Informing Climate Change Decision Support

Isolating the climate change impacts on air-pollution-related-pathologies over central and southern Europe – a modelling approach on cases and costs

Future changes and uncertainty in decision-relevant measures of East African climate

Barriers and drivers to adaptation to climate change—a field study of ten French local authorities

Bioclimatic conditions of the Portuguese wine denominations of origin under changing climates

A mobilities perspective on migration in the context of environmental change

Planning for an uncertain future: the challenges of a locally based collaborative approach to coastal development decisions

Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA: insights and lessons from two continental-scale projects

Costs to achieve target net emissions reductions in the US electric sector using direct air capture

Normalisation of Paris agreement NDCs to enhance transparency and ambition

Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science

 

The previous edition of Skeptical Science research news may be found here. 



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2K4K3qB

'No doubt left' about scientific consensus on global warming, say experts

This is a re-post from The Guardian by Jonathan Watts

The scientific consensus that humans are causing global warming is likely to have passed 99%, according to the lead author of the most authoritative study on the subject, and could rise further after separate research that clears up some of the remaining doubts.

Three studies published in Nature and Nature Geoscience use extensive historical data to show there has never been a period in the last 2,000 years when temperature changes have been as fast and extensive as in recent decades.

It had previously been thought that similarly dramatic peaks and troughs might have occurred in the past, including in periods dubbed the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Climate Anomaly. But the three studies use reconstructions based on 700 proxy records of temperature change, such as trees, ice and sediment, from all continents that indicate none of these shifts took place in more than half the globe at any one time.

The Little Ice Age, for example, reached its extreme point in the 15th century in the Pacific Ocean, the 17th century in Europe and the 19th century elsewhere, says one of the studies. This localisation is markedly different from the trend since the late 20th century when records are being broken year after year over almost the entire globe, including this summer’s European heatwave.

Major temperature shifts in the distant past are also likely to have been primarily caused by volcanic eruptions, according to another of the studies, which helps to explain the strong global fluctuations in the first half of the 18th century as the world started to move from a volcanically cooled era to a climate warmed by human emissions. This has become particularly pronounced since the late 20th century, when temperature rises over two decades or longer have been the most rapid in the past two millennia, notes the third.

The authors say this highlights how unusual warming has become in recent years as a result of industrial emissions.

“There is no doubt left – as has been shown extensively in many other studies addressing many different aspects of the climate system using different methods and data sets,” said Stefan Brönnimann, from the University of Bern and the Pages 2K consortium of climate scientists.

Commenting on the study, other scientists said it was an important breakthrough in the “fingerprinting” task of proving how human responsibility has changed the climate in ways not seen in the past.

“This paper should finally stop climate change deniers claiming that the recent observed coherent global warming is part of a natural climate cycle. This paper shows the truly stark difference between regional and localised changes in climate of the past and the truly global effect of anthropogenic greenhouse emissions,” said Mark Maslin, professor of climatology at University College London.

Previous studies have shown near unanimity among climate scientists that human factors – car exhausts, factory chimneys, forest clearance and other sources of greenhouse gases – are responsible for the exceptional level of global warming.

A 2013 study in Environmental Research Letters found 97% of climate scientists agreed with this link in 12,000 academic papers that contained the words “global warming” or “global climate change” from 1991 to 2011. Last week, that paper hit 1m downloads, making it the most accessed paper ever among the 80+ journals published by the Institute of Physics, according to the authors.

The pushback has been political rather than scientific. In the US, the rightwing thinktank the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) is reportedly putting pressure on Nasa to remove a reference to the 97% study from its webpage. The CEI has received event funding from the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers and Charles Koch Institute, which have much to lose from a transition to a low-carbon economy.

But among academics who study the climate, the convergence of opinion is probably strengthening, according to John Cook, the lead author of the original consensus paper and a follow-up study on the “consensus about consensus” that looked at a range of similar estimates by other academics.

He said that at the end of his 20-year study period there was more agreement than at the beginning: “There was 99% scientific consensus in 2011 that humans are causing global warming.” With ever stronger research since then and increasing heatwaves and extreme weather, Cook believes this is likely to have risen further and is now working on an update.

“As expertise in climate science increases, so too does agreement with human-caused global warming,” Cook wrote on the Skeptical Science blog. “The good news is public understanding of the scientific consensus is increasing. The bad news is there is still a lot of work to do yet as climate deniers continue to persistently attack the scientific consensus.”



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2K4JZHn

This is a re-post from The Guardian by Jonathan Watts

The scientific consensus that humans are causing global warming is likely to have passed 99%, according to the lead author of the most authoritative study on the subject, and could rise further after separate research that clears up some of the remaining doubts.

Three studies published in Nature and Nature Geoscience use extensive historical data to show there has never been a period in the last 2,000 years when temperature changes have been as fast and extensive as in recent decades.

It had previously been thought that similarly dramatic peaks and troughs might have occurred in the past, including in periods dubbed the Little Ice Age and the Medieval Climate Anomaly. But the three studies use reconstructions based on 700 proxy records of temperature change, such as trees, ice and sediment, from all continents that indicate none of these shifts took place in more than half the globe at any one time.

The Little Ice Age, for example, reached its extreme point in the 15th century in the Pacific Ocean, the 17th century in Europe and the 19th century elsewhere, says one of the studies. This localisation is markedly different from the trend since the late 20th century when records are being broken year after year over almost the entire globe, including this summer’s European heatwave.

Major temperature shifts in the distant past are also likely to have been primarily caused by volcanic eruptions, according to another of the studies, which helps to explain the strong global fluctuations in the first half of the 18th century as the world started to move from a volcanically cooled era to a climate warmed by human emissions. This has become particularly pronounced since the late 20th century, when temperature rises over two decades or longer have been the most rapid in the past two millennia, notes the third.

The authors say this highlights how unusual warming has become in recent years as a result of industrial emissions.

“There is no doubt left – as has been shown extensively in many other studies addressing many different aspects of the climate system using different methods and data sets,” said Stefan Brönnimann, from the University of Bern and the Pages 2K consortium of climate scientists.

Commenting on the study, other scientists said it was an important breakthrough in the “fingerprinting” task of proving how human responsibility has changed the climate in ways not seen in the past.

“This paper should finally stop climate change deniers claiming that the recent observed coherent global warming is part of a natural climate cycle. This paper shows the truly stark difference between regional and localised changes in climate of the past and the truly global effect of anthropogenic greenhouse emissions,” said Mark Maslin, professor of climatology at University College London.

Previous studies have shown near unanimity among climate scientists that human factors – car exhausts, factory chimneys, forest clearance and other sources of greenhouse gases – are responsible for the exceptional level of global warming.

A 2013 study in Environmental Research Letters found 97% of climate scientists agreed with this link in 12,000 academic papers that contained the words “global warming” or “global climate change” from 1991 to 2011. Last week, that paper hit 1m downloads, making it the most accessed paper ever among the 80+ journals published by the Institute of Physics, according to the authors.

The pushback has been political rather than scientific. In the US, the rightwing thinktank the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) is reportedly putting pressure on Nasa to remove a reference to the 97% study from its webpage. The CEI has received event funding from the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers and Charles Koch Institute, which have much to lose from a transition to a low-carbon economy.

But among academics who study the climate, the convergence of opinion is probably strengthening, according to John Cook, the lead author of the original consensus paper and a follow-up study on the “consensus about consensus” that looked at a range of similar estimates by other academics.

He said that at the end of his 20-year study period there was more agreement than at the beginning: “There was 99% scientific consensus in 2011 that humans are causing global warming.” With ever stronger research since then and increasing heatwaves and extreme weather, Cook believes this is likely to have risen further and is now working on an update.

“As expertise in climate science increases, so too does agreement with human-caused global warming,” Cook wrote on the Skeptical Science blog. “The good news is public understanding of the scientific consensus is increasing. The bad news is there is still a lot of work to do yet as climate deniers continue to persistently attack the scientific consensus.”



from Skeptical Science https://ift.tt/2K4JZHn

Orion the Hunter returns before dawn

Meteors ahead! Everything you need to know: Perseid meteor shower

Around late July or early August, if you’re up early and have an unobstructed view to the east, be sure to look in that direction in the hour before dawn. You might find a familiar figure – a constellation that always returns to the sky around this time of year. It’s the beautiful constellation Orion the Hunter – recently behind the sun as seen from our earthly vantage point – now ascending once more in the east before sunrise.

The Hunter appears each northern winter as a mighty constellation arcing across the south during the evening hours. Many people see it then, and notice it, because the pattern of Orion’s stars is so distinctive.

But, at the crack of dawn in late summer, you can spot Orion in the east. Thus Orion has been called the ghost of the shimmering summer dawn.

The Hunter rises on his side, with his three Belt stars – Mintaka, Alnitak and Alnilam – pointing straight up.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Photo: bright stars of Orion seen to the side and over a round dark hill.

The constellation Orion as viewed at morning dawn in early August. Image via Flickr user Michael C. Rael.

Also, notice the star Aldebaran in the constellation Taurus the Bull. Aldebaran is the brightest star in Taurus the Bull. It’s said to be the Bull’s fiery red eye. See the V-shaped pattern of stars around Aldebaran? This pattern represents the Bull’s face. In skylore, Orion is said to be holding up a great shield … fending off the charging Bull. Can you imagine this by looking at the chart at top? It’s easy to imagine when you look at the real sky before dawn at this time of year.

Bottom line: The return of Orion and Taurus to your predawn sky happens around late July or early August every year. In the Northern Hemisphere, Orion is sometimes called the ghost of the summer dawn.

Donate: Your support means the world to us

EarthSky’s meteor shower guide for 2019



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2GBhcrM

Meteors ahead! Everything you need to know: Perseid meteor shower

Around late July or early August, if you’re up early and have an unobstructed view to the east, be sure to look in that direction in the hour before dawn. You might find a familiar figure – a constellation that always returns to the sky around this time of year. It’s the beautiful constellation Orion the Hunter – recently behind the sun as seen from our earthly vantage point – now ascending once more in the east before sunrise.

The Hunter appears each northern winter as a mighty constellation arcing across the south during the evening hours. Many people see it then, and notice it, because the pattern of Orion’s stars is so distinctive.

But, at the crack of dawn in late summer, you can spot Orion in the east. Thus Orion has been called the ghost of the shimmering summer dawn.

The Hunter rises on his side, with his three Belt stars – Mintaka, Alnitak and Alnilam – pointing straight up.

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

Photo: bright stars of Orion seen to the side and over a round dark hill.

The constellation Orion as viewed at morning dawn in early August. Image via Flickr user Michael C. Rael.

Also, notice the star Aldebaran in the constellation Taurus the Bull. Aldebaran is the brightest star in Taurus the Bull. It’s said to be the Bull’s fiery red eye. See the V-shaped pattern of stars around Aldebaran? This pattern represents the Bull’s face. In skylore, Orion is said to be holding up a great shield … fending off the charging Bull. Can you imagine this by looking at the chart at top? It’s easy to imagine when you look at the real sky before dawn at this time of year.

Bottom line: The return of Orion and Taurus to your predawn sky happens around late July or early August every year. In the Northern Hemisphere, Orion is sometimes called the ghost of the summer dawn.

Donate: Your support means the world to us

EarthSky’s meteor shower guide for 2019



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2GBhcrM

Chandrayaan-2 successfully completes 3rd orbit-raising maneuver

Mission sequence Chandrayaan-2

Mission sequence showing Chandrayaan-2’s trajectory. Image via ISRO.

India’s second spacecraft to the moon – an unprecedented attempt to soft-land on the lunar south pole – is steadily breaking free of Earth’s gravity. Chandrayaan-2, consisting of an orbiter, lander and rover, launched on July 22, 2019 from India’s spaceport in Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh.

Once launched, the spacecraft entered a highly elliptical orbit around Earth. Multiple orbit-raising maneuvers have been now steadily increasing its altitude until Earth’s gravitational force becomes weaker and the moon’s influence can begin to take over. The third such maneuver was carried out successfully today, according to ISRO:

Third earthbound orbit raising maneuver for Chandryaan-2 spacecraft has been performed successfully today (July 29, 2019) at 1512 hrs (IST) as planned, using the onboard propulsion system for a firing duration of 989 seconds. The orbit achieved is 276 x 71792 km. All spacecraft parameters are normal. The fourth orbit raising maneuver is scheduled on August 2, 2019, between 1400 – 1500 hrs (IST).

If everything goes well, Chandrayaan-2 will soon enter trans-lunar orbit and land on the moon on September 7, 2019.

The instruments onboard the spacecraft will study the moon’s topography, chemical composition, and map the abundance of lunar water, especially at the polar regions. Chandrayaan-2’s predecessor, Chandrayaan-1 that was launched back in 2008 had confirmed the presence of lunar water.

The moon is positioned in such a way that some parts of the polar regions are permanently shadowed. Chandrayaan-1 also provided evidence of ice being present in craters of the south pole. Places like these allow water to freeze and to remain frozen. Building upon its precursor’s findings, Chandrayaan-2 will land on a high plain in between two such craters in the southern hemisphere – Manzinus C and Simpelius N.

While the evidence of lunar water is not new knowledge, the south pole is still unfamiliar terrain. The complexity of such a mission is so huge that only three countries have been successful. If Chandrayaan-2 is successful, India will be the fourth country after the US, China, and Europe to soft-land on an extraterrestrial body. A recent attempt by Israeli group failed.

Chandrayaan-2 launch

Chandrayaan-2 sits atop the GSLV MkIII-M1 rocket at the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in India. Image via ISRO

Chandrayaan-2’s orbiter, rover, and lander are housed inside the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle MkIII-M1 – India’s most powerful rocket.

Soon, the spacecraft will enter a Lunar Bound Phase where its propulsion systems will be fired to slow it down and insert it into an orbit around the moon. On day 43, the lander, called Vikram, will separate from the orbiter from a distance of 62 miles (100 km).

The lander will then attempt to soft-land – a first of its kind for India – using complex breaking mechanisms. A few meters above the ground, all thrusters will shut off to allow a free fall. The quiet landing will ensure that the moon’s surface remains undisturbed and its dust unmoved, dust which could otherwise spurt all around the spacecraft due to the thrusters’ force and spoil its circuitry systems. 

Once firmly on the ground, the lander shall deploy its rover, called Pragyaan, which will perform on-site chemical analysis for 1 lunar day (14 earth days). Onboard Pragyaan, a suite of spectroscopic instruments will fire lasers at different locations on the lunar surface to analyze its chemical compositions. The rover will primarily hunt for major rock-forming minerals such as sodium, magnesium, and iron. The orbiter carries the highest number of instruments and is also responsible for a large chunk of information. 3D mapping of the lunar surface, solar radiation monitoring, and analyzing the moon’s ionosphere are crucial to understanding the moon’s evolution. 

All in all, Chandrayaan-2 will not only help us understand our natural satellite better, but will also inform future manned missions to the moon, such as NASA’s Artemis in 2024. 

Watch the complete Chandrayaan-2 launch here.

Bottom line: India’s second spacecraft to the moon – Chandrayaan-2 – is steadily breaking free of Earth’s gravity. If everything goes well, it will soon enter trans-lunar orbit and land on the moon on September 7, 2019.

Source: GSLC MkIII-M1 Successfully Launches Chandrayaan-2 Spacecraft.

Read more from ISRO



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2SUchqY
Mission sequence Chandrayaan-2

Mission sequence showing Chandrayaan-2’s trajectory. Image via ISRO.

India’s second spacecraft to the moon – an unprecedented attempt to soft-land on the lunar south pole – is steadily breaking free of Earth’s gravity. Chandrayaan-2, consisting of an orbiter, lander and rover, launched on July 22, 2019 from India’s spaceport in Sriharikota, Andhra Pradesh.

Once launched, the spacecraft entered a highly elliptical orbit around Earth. Multiple orbit-raising maneuvers have been now steadily increasing its altitude until Earth’s gravitational force becomes weaker and the moon’s influence can begin to take over. The third such maneuver was carried out successfully today, according to ISRO:

Third earthbound orbit raising maneuver for Chandryaan-2 spacecraft has been performed successfully today (July 29, 2019) at 1512 hrs (IST) as planned, using the onboard propulsion system for a firing duration of 989 seconds. The orbit achieved is 276 x 71792 km. All spacecraft parameters are normal. The fourth orbit raising maneuver is scheduled on August 2, 2019, between 1400 – 1500 hrs (IST).

If everything goes well, Chandrayaan-2 will soon enter trans-lunar orbit and land on the moon on September 7, 2019.

The instruments onboard the spacecraft will study the moon’s topography, chemical composition, and map the abundance of lunar water, especially at the polar regions. Chandrayaan-2’s predecessor, Chandrayaan-1 that was launched back in 2008 had confirmed the presence of lunar water.

The moon is positioned in such a way that some parts of the polar regions are permanently shadowed. Chandrayaan-1 also provided evidence of ice being present in craters of the south pole. Places like these allow water to freeze and to remain frozen. Building upon its precursor’s findings, Chandrayaan-2 will land on a high plain in between two such craters in the southern hemisphere – Manzinus C and Simpelius N.

While the evidence of lunar water is not new knowledge, the south pole is still unfamiliar terrain. The complexity of such a mission is so huge that only three countries have been successful. If Chandrayaan-2 is successful, India will be the fourth country after the US, China, and Europe to soft-land on an extraterrestrial body. A recent attempt by Israeli group failed.

Chandrayaan-2 launch

Chandrayaan-2 sits atop the GSLV MkIII-M1 rocket at the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in India. Image via ISRO

Chandrayaan-2’s orbiter, rover, and lander are housed inside the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle MkIII-M1 – India’s most powerful rocket.

Soon, the spacecraft will enter a Lunar Bound Phase where its propulsion systems will be fired to slow it down and insert it into an orbit around the moon. On day 43, the lander, called Vikram, will separate from the orbiter from a distance of 62 miles (100 km).

The lander will then attempt to soft-land – a first of its kind for India – using complex breaking mechanisms. A few meters above the ground, all thrusters will shut off to allow a free fall. The quiet landing will ensure that the moon’s surface remains undisturbed and its dust unmoved, dust which could otherwise spurt all around the spacecraft due to the thrusters’ force and spoil its circuitry systems. 

Once firmly on the ground, the lander shall deploy its rover, called Pragyaan, which will perform on-site chemical analysis for 1 lunar day (14 earth days). Onboard Pragyaan, a suite of spectroscopic instruments will fire lasers at different locations on the lunar surface to analyze its chemical compositions. The rover will primarily hunt for major rock-forming minerals such as sodium, magnesium, and iron. The orbiter carries the highest number of instruments and is also responsible for a large chunk of information. 3D mapping of the lunar surface, solar radiation monitoring, and analyzing the moon’s ionosphere are crucial to understanding the moon’s evolution. 

All in all, Chandrayaan-2 will not only help us understand our natural satellite better, but will also inform future manned missions to the moon, such as NASA’s Artemis in 2024. 

Watch the complete Chandrayaan-2 launch here.

Bottom line: India’s second spacecraft to the moon – Chandrayaan-2 – is steadily breaking free of Earth’s gravity. If everything goes well, it will soon enter trans-lunar orbit and land on the moon on September 7, 2019.

Source: GSLC MkIII-M1 Successfully Launches Chandrayaan-2 Spacecraft.

Read more from ISRO



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/2SUchqY

Late July and August guide to the bright planets

Click the name of a planet to learn more about its visibility in August 2019: Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Mars and Mercury.

Moon in Libra, to the west of Jupiter.

The moon will meet up with the king planet Jupiter on or near August 9, 2019. Moon passes by the planets Jupiter and Saturn. The moon will meet up with the king planet Jupiter on or near August 9, 2019. Read more. It’s this same bright, waxing moon that’ll drown out the peak of 2019’s Perseid meteor shower.

Jupiter – the second-brightest planet after Venus – reigns supreme in the late July and August 2019 night sky. With Venus lost in the sun’s glare now, dazzling Jupiter – the second-brightest planet after Venus – rules the night. It pops out at dusk – brighter than any star – and stays out until late night. Not sure which one is Jupiter? See the moon in Jupiter’s vicinity for several days, centered on or near August 9.

Jupiter’s yearly opposition was June 10, 2019. Then the planet was opposite the sun, rising at sunset, lighting up the night sky from dusk until dawn. Now, since Jupiter is already well up when night begins, it doesn’t stay out until dawn. From around the world in early August, Jupiter sets in the wee morning hours.

By the month’s end, at mid-northern latitudes, Jupiter will set around midnight (1 a.m. daylight time). By midnight, we mean the middle of the night, or midway between sunset and sunrise.

By the end of the month at temperate latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, Jupiter will set about one hour after the midnight hour.

That bright ruddy star rather close to Jupiter on our sky’s dome this year is Antares, the Heart of the Scorpion in the constellation Scorpius. In 2019, Jupiter can be seen to “wander” relative to this zodiac star. In other words, in the first three months of 2019, Jupiter was traveling eastward, away from Antares. But starting on April 10, 2019, Jupiter appeared to reverse course, moving toward Antares. For four months (April 10 to August 11, 2019), Jupiter will be traveling in retrograde (or westward), closing the gap between itself and the star Antares. Midway through this retrograde – on June 10, 2019 – Jupiter reached opposition.

Moon passes by the planets Jupiter and Saturn.

The nearly-full waxing gibbous moon will swing by the planets Jupiter and Saturn on August 9, 10 and 11, 2019. Read more.

Saturn reached its yearly opposition about a month behind Jupiter, on July 9, 2019. So you know these two worlds must be near each other in our sky. At opposition, Saturn rose in the east around sunset, climbed highest up for the night at midnight (midway between sunset and sunrise) and set in the west around sunrise. Like Jupiter now – since it’s still so near its time of opposition – Saturn is nearly at its brightest. Like Jupiter – since opposition came a few weeks back – Saturn is now rising shortly before sunset.

In August 2019, you can see Saturn pop out in the eastern part of the sky first thing at nightfall. This golden world still shines more brilliantly than a 1st-magnitude star, and, even now, stays out for most of the night. Around the world, Saturn sets at about the time of dawn’s first light (astronomical twilight) in early August. Want to know when astronomical twilight starts in your part of the world? Click here and remember to check the astronomical twilight box.

Viewing Saturn’s rings soon? Read me 1st

By the month’s end, at mid-northern latitudes, Saturn is highest in the east at nightfall and sets about one hour after midnight. This is happening because Earth is fleeing ahead of Saturn now, in the race of the planets around the sun.

By the end of the month at temperate latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, Saturn sets about 3 hours after the midnight hour.

You won’t mistake Jupiter for Saturn. Jupiter is brighter than Saturn. Jupiter is the fourth-brightest celestial object after the sun, moon and Venus, respectively, and it outshines Saturn by a good 10 times. What’s more, at nightfall and early evening in August 2019, Jupiter shines well to the west of Saturn.

Watch for the bright moon to couple up with Saturn on or near August 11, as shown on the sky chart above. If you’re in just the right spot in eastern Australia or northern New Zealand, you can actually watch the moon occult (cover over) Saturn for a portion of the night on August 11-12, 2019.

Occultation of Saturn August 12, 2019.

The occultation of Saturn happens in a nighttime sky in between the white lines, at dusk in between the blue lines, and in a daytime sky in between the dotted red lines. Worldwide map via IOTA.

We give the local times for the occultation for two localities:

Sydney, Australia (August 12, 2019)
Occultation begins (Saturn disappears): 6:34 p.m. local time
Occultation ends (Saturn reappears): 7:23 p.m. local time

Auckland, New Zealand (August 12, 2019)
Occultation begins (Saturn disappears): 9:16 p.m. local time
Occultation ends (Saturn reappears): 10:15 p.m. local time

Click here for the occultation times for numerous localities but remember to convert Universal Time to local time. Here’s how.

The planet Mercury lines up with the stars Castor and Pollux.

On or near August 11, 2019, the planet Mercury lines up with the Gemini stars, Castor and Pollux. Appreciably before that date, Mercury is still found near the ecliptic but to the west (right) of the Castor-Pollux line. Read more.

Mercury swept more or less in front of the sun at inferior conjunction on July 21, 2019, thereby transitioning out of the evening sky and into the morning sky. It’ll be a morning object all throughout August, yet this faint world will be rather hard to see in the early part of the month. Mercury’s waxing phase will cause this world to brighten dramatically all month long, but Mercury will sink too close to the sun to be visible during the final week of August.

Try catching Mercury an hour or more before sunrise, starting at the end of the first week of August. It should remain in pretty good view in the morning sky for another two weeks after that. Remember that binoculars always come in handy for any Mercury quest, since the solar system’s innermost planet oftentimes has to contend with the glow of twilight.

By the way, at Mercury’s most recent inferior conjunction on July 21, 2019, Mercury swung to the south of the sun’s disk as seen from Earth. But when Mercury reaches its next inferior conjunction on November 11, 2019, the innermost planet will swing directly in front of the sun, to stage a transit of Mercury. Transits of Mercury happen more frequently than transits of Venus; they happen 13 or 14 times per century. The last transit of Mercury happened on May 9, 2016, and – after the one on this upcoming November 11 – the next Mercury transit won’t be until November 13, 2032.

Diagram shows orbits with a planet passing behind the sun viewed from Earth.

Here’s a superior conjunction. The planet sweeps behind the sun as seen from Earth. Image via COSMOS.

Diagram of orbits. An inner planet is passing between the Earth and sun.

Here’s an inferior conjunction. The planet sweeps between the Earth and sun. As seen from Earth, only Venus and Mercury can have inferior conjunctions. Image via COSMOS.

Where is Venus? The brightest planet must contend with the sun’s glare throughout late July and August 2019. Venus begins August in the glare of sunrise and ends the month in the glare of sunset. In other words – on August 14, 2019 – Venus will reach superior conjunction, as it swings behind the sun in Earth’s sky. Superior conjunction for Venus marks the time of its transition from the morning to evening sky. Most of us will probably first see Venus as a bright evening “star” in the western sky after sunset in September or October 2019.

As seen from above the solar system, Venus is fleeing far ahead of Earth in the race of the planets around the sun. It has gotten so far ahead that it’s essentially “turned the corner” in front of us, so that the sun is now between us and Venus.

Where is Mars? The red planet sits way too close to the afterglow of sunset to be visible in August 2019. It’ll swing on the far side of the sun at superior conjunction on September 2, 2019, to transition from the evening to morning sky. For about six weeks or so on either side of that date, Mars is pretty much absent from our sky, hiding in the sun’s glare.

Look for Mars to return to visibility in the eastern sky before sunrise in November 2019.

What do we mean by bright planet? By bright planet, we mean any solar system planet that is easily visible without an optical aid and that has been watched by our ancestors since time immemorial. In their outward order from the sun, the five bright planets are Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. These planets actually do appear bright in our sky. They are typically as bright as – or brighter than – the brightest stars. Plus, these relatively nearby worlds tend to shine with a steadier light than the distant, twinkling stars. You can spot them, and come to know them as faithful friends, if you try.

silhouette of man against the sunset sky with bright planet and crescent moon.

Skywatcher, by Predrag Agatonovic.

Bottom line: In late July and August 2019, two planets – Jupiter and Saturn – are easy to see throughout the month. They both come out at nightfall and are out till late night. Mercury appears in the east before sunrise. Mars is lost in the afterglow of sunset, whereas Venus swings behind the sun, to transition from the morning to evening sky. Click here for recommended almanacs; they can help you know when the planets rise and set in your sky.

Don’t miss anything. Subscribe to EarthSky News by email

Visit EarthSky’s Best Places to Stargaze, and recommend a place we can all enjoy. Zoom out for worldwide map.

Help EarthSky keep going! Donate now.

Post your planet photos at EarthSky Community Photos



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/1YD00CF

Click the name of a planet to learn more about its visibility in August 2019: Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Mars and Mercury.

Moon in Libra, to the west of Jupiter.

The moon will meet up with the king planet Jupiter on or near August 9, 2019. Moon passes by the planets Jupiter and Saturn. The moon will meet up with the king planet Jupiter on or near August 9, 2019. Read more. It’s this same bright, waxing moon that’ll drown out the peak of 2019’s Perseid meteor shower.

Jupiter – the second-brightest planet after Venus – reigns supreme in the late July and August 2019 night sky. With Venus lost in the sun’s glare now, dazzling Jupiter – the second-brightest planet after Venus – rules the night. It pops out at dusk – brighter than any star – and stays out until late night. Not sure which one is Jupiter? See the moon in Jupiter’s vicinity for several days, centered on or near August 9.

Jupiter’s yearly opposition was June 10, 2019. Then the planet was opposite the sun, rising at sunset, lighting up the night sky from dusk until dawn. Now, since Jupiter is already well up when night begins, it doesn’t stay out until dawn. From around the world in early August, Jupiter sets in the wee morning hours.

By the month’s end, at mid-northern latitudes, Jupiter will set around midnight (1 a.m. daylight time). By midnight, we mean the middle of the night, or midway between sunset and sunrise.

By the end of the month at temperate latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, Jupiter will set about one hour after the midnight hour.

That bright ruddy star rather close to Jupiter on our sky’s dome this year is Antares, the Heart of the Scorpion in the constellation Scorpius. In 2019, Jupiter can be seen to “wander” relative to this zodiac star. In other words, in the first three months of 2019, Jupiter was traveling eastward, away from Antares. But starting on April 10, 2019, Jupiter appeared to reverse course, moving toward Antares. For four months (April 10 to August 11, 2019), Jupiter will be traveling in retrograde (or westward), closing the gap between itself and the star Antares. Midway through this retrograde – on June 10, 2019 – Jupiter reached opposition.

Moon passes by the planets Jupiter and Saturn.

The nearly-full waxing gibbous moon will swing by the planets Jupiter and Saturn on August 9, 10 and 11, 2019. Read more.

Saturn reached its yearly opposition about a month behind Jupiter, on July 9, 2019. So you know these two worlds must be near each other in our sky. At opposition, Saturn rose in the east around sunset, climbed highest up for the night at midnight (midway between sunset and sunrise) and set in the west around sunrise. Like Jupiter now – since it’s still so near its time of opposition – Saturn is nearly at its brightest. Like Jupiter – since opposition came a few weeks back – Saturn is now rising shortly before sunset.

In August 2019, you can see Saturn pop out in the eastern part of the sky first thing at nightfall. This golden world still shines more brilliantly than a 1st-magnitude star, and, even now, stays out for most of the night. Around the world, Saturn sets at about the time of dawn’s first light (astronomical twilight) in early August. Want to know when astronomical twilight starts in your part of the world? Click here and remember to check the astronomical twilight box.

Viewing Saturn’s rings soon? Read me 1st

By the month’s end, at mid-northern latitudes, Saturn is highest in the east at nightfall and sets about one hour after midnight. This is happening because Earth is fleeing ahead of Saturn now, in the race of the planets around the sun.

By the end of the month at temperate latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, Saturn sets about 3 hours after the midnight hour.

You won’t mistake Jupiter for Saturn. Jupiter is brighter than Saturn. Jupiter is the fourth-brightest celestial object after the sun, moon and Venus, respectively, and it outshines Saturn by a good 10 times. What’s more, at nightfall and early evening in August 2019, Jupiter shines well to the west of Saturn.

Watch for the bright moon to couple up with Saturn on or near August 11, as shown on the sky chart above. If you’re in just the right spot in eastern Australia or northern New Zealand, you can actually watch the moon occult (cover over) Saturn for a portion of the night on August 11-12, 2019.

Occultation of Saturn August 12, 2019.

The occultation of Saturn happens in a nighttime sky in between the white lines, at dusk in between the blue lines, and in a daytime sky in between the dotted red lines. Worldwide map via IOTA.

We give the local times for the occultation for two localities:

Sydney, Australia (August 12, 2019)
Occultation begins (Saturn disappears): 6:34 p.m. local time
Occultation ends (Saturn reappears): 7:23 p.m. local time

Auckland, New Zealand (August 12, 2019)
Occultation begins (Saturn disappears): 9:16 p.m. local time
Occultation ends (Saturn reappears): 10:15 p.m. local time

Click here for the occultation times for numerous localities but remember to convert Universal Time to local time. Here’s how.

The planet Mercury lines up with the stars Castor and Pollux.

On or near August 11, 2019, the planet Mercury lines up with the Gemini stars, Castor and Pollux. Appreciably before that date, Mercury is still found near the ecliptic but to the west (right) of the Castor-Pollux line. Read more.

Mercury swept more or less in front of the sun at inferior conjunction on July 21, 2019, thereby transitioning out of the evening sky and into the morning sky. It’ll be a morning object all throughout August, yet this faint world will be rather hard to see in the early part of the month. Mercury’s waxing phase will cause this world to brighten dramatically all month long, but Mercury will sink too close to the sun to be visible during the final week of August.

Try catching Mercury an hour or more before sunrise, starting at the end of the first week of August. It should remain in pretty good view in the morning sky for another two weeks after that. Remember that binoculars always come in handy for any Mercury quest, since the solar system’s innermost planet oftentimes has to contend with the glow of twilight.

By the way, at Mercury’s most recent inferior conjunction on July 21, 2019, Mercury swung to the south of the sun’s disk as seen from Earth. But when Mercury reaches its next inferior conjunction on November 11, 2019, the innermost planet will swing directly in front of the sun, to stage a transit of Mercury. Transits of Mercury happen more frequently than transits of Venus; they happen 13 or 14 times per century. The last transit of Mercury happened on May 9, 2016, and – after the one on this upcoming November 11 – the next Mercury transit won’t be until November 13, 2032.

Diagram shows orbits with a planet passing behind the sun viewed from Earth.

Here’s a superior conjunction. The planet sweeps behind the sun as seen from Earth. Image via COSMOS.

Diagram of orbits. An inner planet is passing between the Earth and sun.

Here’s an inferior conjunction. The planet sweeps between the Earth and sun. As seen from Earth, only Venus and Mercury can have inferior conjunctions. Image via COSMOS.

Where is Venus? The brightest planet must contend with the sun’s glare throughout late July and August 2019. Venus begins August in the glare of sunrise and ends the month in the glare of sunset. In other words – on August 14, 2019 – Venus will reach superior conjunction, as it swings behind the sun in Earth’s sky. Superior conjunction for Venus marks the time of its transition from the morning to evening sky. Most of us will probably first see Venus as a bright evening “star” in the western sky after sunset in September or October 2019.

As seen from above the solar system, Venus is fleeing far ahead of Earth in the race of the planets around the sun. It has gotten so far ahead that it’s essentially “turned the corner” in front of us, so that the sun is now between us and Venus.

Where is Mars? The red planet sits way too close to the afterglow of sunset to be visible in August 2019. It’ll swing on the far side of the sun at superior conjunction on September 2, 2019, to transition from the evening to morning sky. For about six weeks or so on either side of that date, Mars is pretty much absent from our sky, hiding in the sun’s glare.

Look for Mars to return to visibility in the eastern sky before sunrise in November 2019.

What do we mean by bright planet? By bright planet, we mean any solar system planet that is easily visible without an optical aid and that has been watched by our ancestors since time immemorial. In their outward order from the sun, the five bright planets are Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. These planets actually do appear bright in our sky. They are typically as bright as – or brighter than – the brightest stars. Plus, these relatively nearby worlds tend to shine with a steadier light than the distant, twinkling stars. You can spot them, and come to know them as faithful friends, if you try.

silhouette of man against the sunset sky with bright planet and crescent moon.

Skywatcher, by Predrag Agatonovic.

Bottom line: In late July and August 2019, two planets – Jupiter and Saturn – are easy to see throughout the month. They both come out at nightfall and are out till late night. Mercury appears in the east before sunrise. Mars is lost in the afterglow of sunset, whereas Venus swings behind the sun, to transition from the morning to evening sky. Click here for recommended almanacs; they can help you know when the planets rise and set in your sky.

Don’t miss anything. Subscribe to EarthSky News by email

Visit EarthSky’s Best Places to Stargaze, and recommend a place we can all enjoy. Zoom out for worldwide map.

Help EarthSky keep going! Donate now.

Post your planet photos at EarthSky Community Photos



from EarthSky https://ift.tt/1YD00CF