Astronomers detect earliest hydrogen

Hydrogen – whose atomic number is 1 – is the simplest element, the lightest element and the most abundant element in the universe. Shortly after the Big Bang, our universe is thought to have been made of mostly hydrogen, with a little helium and not much else. Not surprisingly, most stars are made mostly of hydrogen. So hydrogen is a key element in our universe, and in the theories of astronomers. That’s why it’s important to astronomers that they’ve now directly detected faint signals of hydrogen gas – via a table-sized radio antenna in a remote region of western Australia – in the universe as it existed only 100 million years after the Big Bang.

The study outlining this discovery is published February 28, 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature.

Astronomers said it’s the earliest evidence of hydrogen yet.

They said they found this hydrogen in a state that would have been possible only in the presence of the very first stars. Their statement explained:

These stars, blinking on for the first time in a universe that was previously devoid of light, emitted ultraviolet radiation that interacted with the surrounding hydrogen gas. As a result, hydrogen atoms across the universe began to absorb background radiation — a pivotal change that the scientists were able to detect in the form of radio waves.

The findings provide evidence that the first stars may have started turning on around 180 million years after the Big Bang.

Alan Rogers at MIT’s Haystack Observatory is a co-author on the new study. He said:

This is the first real signal that stars are starting to form, and starting to affect the [interstellar] medium around them. What’s happening in this period is that some of the radiation from the very first stars is starting to allow hydrogen to be seen. It’s causing hydrogen to start absorbing the background radiation, so you start seeing it in silhouette, at particular radio frequencies.

A key part of this study for scientists is what it reveals about the early universe. According to these astronomers’ statement:

Certain characteristics in the detected radio waves also suggest that hydrogen gas, and the universe as a whole, must have been twice as cold as scientists previously estimated, with a temperature of about 3 kelvins, or –454 degrees Fahrenheit. Rogers and his colleagues are unsure precisely why the early universe was so much colder, but some researchers have suggested that interactions with dark matter may have played some role.

Colin Lonsdale, director of Haystack Observatory, commented:

These results require some changes in our current understanding of the early evolution of the universe. It would affect cosmological models and require theorists to put their thinking caps back on to figure out how that would happen.

The scientists detected the primordial hydrogen gas using EDGES (Experiment to Detect Global EoR Signature), a small ground-based radio antenna located in western Australia. Rogers and his colleagues have been using EDGES to try to detect hydrogen that existed during the very early evolution of the universe, in order to pinpoint when the first stars turned on.

The researchers say this new detection lifts the curtain on a previously obscure phase in the evolution of the universe. Lonsdale said:

This is exciting because it is the first look into a particularly important period in the universe, when the first stars and galaxies were beginning to form. This is the first time anybody’s had any direct observational data from that epoch.

Artist’s concept of the early universe from Physics World.

Bottom line: Astronomers have made the earliest-yet detection of hydrogen in our universe, from a time only 180 million years after the Big Bang.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2Fbu4Fz

Hydrogen – whose atomic number is 1 – is the simplest element, the lightest element and the most abundant element in the universe. Shortly after the Big Bang, our universe is thought to have been made of mostly hydrogen, with a little helium and not much else. Not surprisingly, most stars are made mostly of hydrogen. So hydrogen is a key element in our universe, and in the theories of astronomers. That’s why it’s important to astronomers that they’ve now directly detected faint signals of hydrogen gas – via a table-sized radio antenna in a remote region of western Australia – in the universe as it existed only 100 million years after the Big Bang.

The study outlining this discovery is published February 28, 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature.

Astronomers said it’s the earliest evidence of hydrogen yet.

They said they found this hydrogen in a state that would have been possible only in the presence of the very first stars. Their statement explained:

These stars, blinking on for the first time in a universe that was previously devoid of light, emitted ultraviolet radiation that interacted with the surrounding hydrogen gas. As a result, hydrogen atoms across the universe began to absorb background radiation — a pivotal change that the scientists were able to detect in the form of radio waves.

The findings provide evidence that the first stars may have started turning on around 180 million years after the Big Bang.

Alan Rogers at MIT’s Haystack Observatory is a co-author on the new study. He said:

This is the first real signal that stars are starting to form, and starting to affect the [interstellar] medium around them. What’s happening in this period is that some of the radiation from the very first stars is starting to allow hydrogen to be seen. It’s causing hydrogen to start absorbing the background radiation, so you start seeing it in silhouette, at particular radio frequencies.

A key part of this study for scientists is what it reveals about the early universe. According to these astronomers’ statement:

Certain characteristics in the detected radio waves also suggest that hydrogen gas, and the universe as a whole, must have been twice as cold as scientists previously estimated, with a temperature of about 3 kelvins, or –454 degrees Fahrenheit. Rogers and his colleagues are unsure precisely why the early universe was so much colder, but some researchers have suggested that interactions with dark matter may have played some role.

Colin Lonsdale, director of Haystack Observatory, commented:

These results require some changes in our current understanding of the early evolution of the universe. It would affect cosmological models and require theorists to put their thinking caps back on to figure out how that would happen.

The scientists detected the primordial hydrogen gas using EDGES (Experiment to Detect Global EoR Signature), a small ground-based radio antenna located in western Australia. Rogers and his colleagues have been using EDGES to try to detect hydrogen that existed during the very early evolution of the universe, in order to pinpoint when the first stars turned on.

The researchers say this new detection lifts the curtain on a previously obscure phase in the evolution of the universe. Lonsdale said:

This is exciting because it is the first look into a particularly important period in the universe, when the first stars and galaxies were beginning to form. This is the first time anybody’s had any direct observational data from that epoch.

Artist’s concept of the early universe from Physics World.

Bottom line: Astronomers have made the earliest-yet detection of hydrogen in our universe, from a time only 180 million years after the Big Bang.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2Fbu4Fz

Emory team vies for best social bot via Amazon's Alexa Prize

Team leader Zihao Wang (center, bottom row) and faculty advisor Eugene Agichtein (far right) with the Mathematics and Computer Science student team who are working on creating a social bot to compete in Amazon's Alexa Prize. (Photo by Ann Borden, Emory Photo/Video)

By Carol Clark

“Alexa, when will you learn to chat with me like people I might meet at a party or a pub?”

“I couldn’t say.”

Alexa may be a popular talking bot, but she has not yet acquired the “social” skills to turn that query into a conversation. A team of Emory students from the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science are trying to help her develop those skills sooner, rather than later. They are among eight university teams selected from around the world to create a social bot and compete for this year’s Alexa Prize. Amazon is sponsoring the $3.5 million university challenge in order to advance the conversational capabilities of bots such as Alexa — Amazon’s “personal assistant” software that responds to voice commands through a growing list of devices.

“Conversational AI is one of the most difficult problems in the field of artificial intelligence,” says Zihao Wang, a graduate student and the leader of the Emory team. “Human language is so rich. We use combinations of words to form different expressions and idioms. It’s difficult to represent them in computer language.”

Wang’s teammates include Ali Ahmadvand, Sergey Volokhin and Harshita Sahijwani — all graduate students — and senior Mingyang Sun. The team’s faculty advisor is Eugene Agichtein, an associate professor of Mathematics and Computer Science.

Each of the university teams received a $250,000 research grant, Alexa-enabled devices, and other tools, data and support from Amazon. A $500,000 prize will be given next November to the team that creates the best social bot, while second- and third-place teams will receive $100,000 and $50,000.

Additionally, a $1 million research grant will be awarded to the winning team’s university if their social bot achieves the grand challenge — conversing coherently and engagingly with humans for 20 minutes with a user rating of 4.0 or higher.

“The contest is a wonderful way for students to get hands-on experience developing a social bot using state-of-the-art technology,” Agichtein says. “Their work will be tested out by millions of real-world consumers through Amazon. And Amazon provides support and training so they can get experience with data and computing environments that are usually only accessible to those within major corporations.”

Agichtein’s IR Lab is developing new techniques for intelligent information access, including Web search and automated question answering. Conversational search capabilities are a key emerging trend, he says.

He notes that his children love asking Alexa trivia questions or about music and sports. “It’s natural for them to talk to devices instead of having to type in a question because they’re growing up amid this technology,” Agichtein says. “And as time goes on, it’s clear that voice-based communication devices are going to keep improving and become more ubiquitous.”

Wang is a native of China who earned his master’s in civil engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. A robotics project sparked his interest in information retrieval powered by machine learning, leading him to Emory and Agichtein’s lab to work on his PhD.

“Machine learning is widely applied in the real world,” Wang says. “It’s changing peoples’ lives in every way.”

Autonomous vehicles, drones, online shopping mechanisms and robots designed to detect and remove dangerous objects are just a few examples of how machine learning is being applied.

 “The idea is to train an algorithm to ‘learn’ patterns embedded in data,” Wang explains.

While a machine learning algorithm to simulate natural, human conversation is a difficult challenge, Wang says it’s one well worth pursuing.

Possible healthcare uses for conversational social bots include providing companionship to isolated seniors, serving as therapeutic agents for people suffering from depression and conducting patient interviews to streamline admissions to a medical clinic.

Wang also led an Emory team in the inaugural Alexa contest last year, but the team did not make it to the finals. “We learned a lot from the experience,” he says.

The working title for the Emory social bot this year is IRIS, which stands for information retrieval and informative suggestion agent. “Our focus will be on the accuracy and usefulness of information that we provide to users,” Wang says. “And we will add conversational functionality to our design to make the responses as natural and engaging as possible.”

IRIS will incorporate “ideas from each member of the team,” he adds. “That’s one of the most fun things about the contest, is working as a team.”

Starting in May, the public can access competing bots to provide feedback and rate them by saying, “Alexa, lets chat,” to an Echo device, or to the Amazon mobile app. The bots will be randomly assigned and remain anonymous, so that people providing feedback cannot identify the university that generated them.

By August, Amazon will have used this feedback to winnow the contestants down to three finalists that will continue to get more consumer feedback until the winner is announced in November.

Other university teams competing this year include: Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, Scotland, Czech Technical University in Prague, Brigham Young University, UC Davis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, UC Santa Cruz, and Carnegie Mellon.

Related:
Raising IQ of web searches
Mouse trail leads to online shoppers

from eScienceCommons http://ift.tt/2oEymLs
Team leader Zihao Wang (center, bottom row) and faculty advisor Eugene Agichtein (far right) with the Mathematics and Computer Science student team who are working on creating a social bot to compete in Amazon's Alexa Prize. (Photo by Ann Borden, Emory Photo/Video)

By Carol Clark

“Alexa, when will you learn to chat with me like people I might meet at a party or a pub?”

“I couldn’t say.”

Alexa may be a popular talking bot, but she has not yet acquired the “social” skills to turn that query into a conversation. A team of Emory students from the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science are trying to help her develop those skills sooner, rather than later. They are among eight university teams selected from around the world to create a social bot and compete for this year’s Alexa Prize. Amazon is sponsoring the $3.5 million university challenge in order to advance the conversational capabilities of bots such as Alexa — Amazon’s “personal assistant” software that responds to voice commands through a growing list of devices.

“Conversational AI is one of the most difficult problems in the field of artificial intelligence,” says Zihao Wang, a graduate student and the leader of the Emory team. “Human language is so rich. We use combinations of words to form different expressions and idioms. It’s difficult to represent them in computer language.”

Wang’s teammates include Ali Ahmadvand, Sergey Volokhin and Harshita Sahijwani — all graduate students — and senior Mingyang Sun. The team’s faculty advisor is Eugene Agichtein, an associate professor of Mathematics and Computer Science.

Each of the university teams received a $250,000 research grant, Alexa-enabled devices, and other tools, data and support from Amazon. A $500,000 prize will be given next November to the team that creates the best social bot, while second- and third-place teams will receive $100,000 and $50,000.

Additionally, a $1 million research grant will be awarded to the winning team’s university if their social bot achieves the grand challenge — conversing coherently and engagingly with humans for 20 minutes with a user rating of 4.0 or higher.

“The contest is a wonderful way for students to get hands-on experience developing a social bot using state-of-the-art technology,” Agichtein says. “Their work will be tested out by millions of real-world consumers through Amazon. And Amazon provides support and training so they can get experience with data and computing environments that are usually only accessible to those within major corporations.”

Agichtein’s IR Lab is developing new techniques for intelligent information access, including Web search and automated question answering. Conversational search capabilities are a key emerging trend, he says.

He notes that his children love asking Alexa trivia questions or about music and sports. “It’s natural for them to talk to devices instead of having to type in a question because they’re growing up amid this technology,” Agichtein says. “And as time goes on, it’s clear that voice-based communication devices are going to keep improving and become more ubiquitous.”

Wang is a native of China who earned his master’s in civil engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. A robotics project sparked his interest in information retrieval powered by machine learning, leading him to Emory and Agichtein’s lab to work on his PhD.

“Machine learning is widely applied in the real world,” Wang says. “It’s changing peoples’ lives in every way.”

Autonomous vehicles, drones, online shopping mechanisms and robots designed to detect and remove dangerous objects are just a few examples of how machine learning is being applied.

 “The idea is to train an algorithm to ‘learn’ patterns embedded in data,” Wang explains.

While a machine learning algorithm to simulate natural, human conversation is a difficult challenge, Wang says it’s one well worth pursuing.

Possible healthcare uses for conversational social bots include providing companionship to isolated seniors, serving as therapeutic agents for people suffering from depression and conducting patient interviews to streamline admissions to a medical clinic.

Wang also led an Emory team in the inaugural Alexa contest last year, but the team did not make it to the finals. “We learned a lot from the experience,” he says.

The working title for the Emory social bot this year is IRIS, which stands for information retrieval and informative suggestion agent. “Our focus will be on the accuracy and usefulness of information that we provide to users,” Wang says. “And we will add conversational functionality to our design to make the responses as natural and engaging as possible.”

IRIS will incorporate “ideas from each member of the team,” he adds. “That’s one of the most fun things about the contest, is working as a team.”

Starting in May, the public can access competing bots to provide feedback and rate them by saying, “Alexa, lets chat,” to an Echo device, or to the Amazon mobile app. The bots will be randomly assigned and remain anonymous, so that people providing feedback cannot identify the university that generated them.

By August, Amazon will have used this feedback to winnow the contestants down to three finalists that will continue to get more consumer feedback until the winner is announced in November.

Other university teams competing this year include: Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, Scotland, Czech Technical University in Prague, Brigham Young University, UC Davis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, UC Santa Cruz, and Carnegie Mellon.

Related:
Raising IQ of web searches
Mouse trail leads to online shoppers

from eScienceCommons http://ift.tt/2oEymLs

This asteroid will pass closer than the moon on Friday

Near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1 will have an extremely close encounter with Earth on March 2, 2018. It will pass only 65,000 miles (105,000 km) above the Earth’s surface. That’s about one-third of the moon’s average distance from Earth. And it’s in contrast to last Sunday’s close approach of another asteroid, 2018 DU, which swept past at about 175,000 miles (284,000 km). No, there is nothing unusual happening, no swarm of asteroids striking Earth or about to strike. Like Sunday’s passage of 2018 DU, this asteroid will pass safely, astronomers say.

The fact is that small asteroids pass us all the time, and have been passing us for billions of years. 2018 DV1 will be the 18th known asteroid to flyby Earth within 1 lunar distance since the start of 2018 and 6th closest.

We’re just hearing about them more now, because astronomers are getting much better at detecting and reporting these relatively small space rocks. 2018 DV1 has an estimated diameter in the range of about 20 to 40 feet (5.6 to 12 meters). That means it will be visible only with powerful-enough telescopes.

The Virtual Telescope Project and Tenagra Observatories will show 2018 DV1 to you live, using the 16-inch robotic telescope available at Tenagra Observatories in Arizona.

Click here to visit Virtual Telescope Project’s viewing page

The Mt. Lemmon Survey in Arizona discovered near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1. The Minor Planet Center announced it on February 27, 2018.

Small asteroids don’t always just pass closely. They also sometimes whoosh into Earth’s atmosphere, creating atom-bomb-scale impacts. Fortunately, our atmosphere does a good job of protecting us from these events, although there are sometimes human effects as with the February 15, 2015 explosion of a small asteroid over Russia.

Bottom line: Information and links to live viewing of near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1, which will pass at about one-third of the moon’s distance on March 2, 2018.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2BYBASn

Near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1 will have an extremely close encounter with Earth on March 2, 2018. It will pass only 65,000 miles (105,000 km) above the Earth’s surface. That’s about one-third of the moon’s average distance from Earth. And it’s in contrast to last Sunday’s close approach of another asteroid, 2018 DU, which swept past at about 175,000 miles (284,000 km). No, there is nothing unusual happening, no swarm of asteroids striking Earth or about to strike. Like Sunday’s passage of 2018 DU, this asteroid will pass safely, astronomers say.

The fact is that small asteroids pass us all the time, and have been passing us for billions of years. 2018 DV1 will be the 18th known asteroid to flyby Earth within 1 lunar distance since the start of 2018 and 6th closest.

We’re just hearing about them more now, because astronomers are getting much better at detecting and reporting these relatively small space rocks. 2018 DV1 has an estimated diameter in the range of about 20 to 40 feet (5.6 to 12 meters). That means it will be visible only with powerful-enough telescopes.

The Virtual Telescope Project and Tenagra Observatories will show 2018 DV1 to you live, using the 16-inch robotic telescope available at Tenagra Observatories in Arizona.

Click here to visit Virtual Telescope Project’s viewing page

The Mt. Lemmon Survey in Arizona discovered near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1. The Minor Planet Center announced it on February 27, 2018.

Small asteroids don’t always just pass closely. They also sometimes whoosh into Earth’s atmosphere, creating atom-bomb-scale impacts. Fortunately, our atmosphere does a good job of protecting us from these events, although there are sometimes human effects as with the February 15, 2015 explosion of a small asteroid over Russia.

Bottom line: Information and links to live viewing of near-Earth asteroid 2018 DV1, which will pass at about one-third of the moon’s distance on March 2, 2018.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2BYBASn

Eating Disorders, Disordered Eating: A Look Into the Personal Struggle for Balance

Eating disorders, which are a mix of psychological, physiological, and behavioral factors, can affect every system in the body. This National Eating Disorders Awareness Week, learn a little more about the complex issues sufferers face.

from http://ift.tt/2BWgZxH
Eating disorders, which are a mix of psychological, physiological, and behavioral factors, can affect every system in the body. This National Eating Disorders Awareness Week, learn a little more about the complex issues sufferers face.

from http://ift.tt/2BWgZxH

Moon’s water might be widespread

Waxing moon – February 26, 2018 – via Vidhyacharan HR in Waltham, Massachusetts. If the moon has enough water, and if it’s reasonably convenient to access, future explorers might be able to use it as a resource.

Any liquid water on the moon’s surface would be quickly lost to outer space. But since the 1960s, scientists have suggested that water ice might exist in cold, permanently shadowed craters at the moon’s poles. Since then, scientists have been searching for lunar water via specially designed instruments aboard various space missions. Now a new study suggests that the moon’s water is widely distributed across its surface and not confined to a particular region or type of terrain. The water appears to be present day and night … but it’s not necessarily easily accessible. The study took the form of an analysis of data from two lunar missions. It was published February 12, 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Geoscience.

According to the researchers, the findings could help determine the origin of the moon’s water, and how easy it might be to use as a resource for future astronauts. If the moon has enough water, and if it’s reasonably convenient to access, future explorers might be able to use it as drinking water or to convert it into hydrogen and oxygen for rocket fuel or oxygen to breathe.

Joshua Bandfield is a senior research scientist with the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, and lead author of the new study. Bandfield said in a statement:

We find that it doesn’t matter what time of day or which latitude we look at, the signal indicating water always seems to be present. The presence of water doesn’t appear to depend on the composition of the surface, and the water sticks around.

The results contradict some earlier studies, which had suggested that more water was detected at the moon’s polar latitudes and that the strength of the water signal waxes and wanes according to the lunar day (29.5 Earth days). According to a NASA statement:

Taking these together, some researchers proposed that water molecules can “hop” across the lunar surface until they enter cold traps in the dark reaches of craters near the north and south poles. In planetary science, a cold trap is a region that’s so cold, the water vapor and other volatiles which come into contact with the surface will remain stable for an extended period of time, perhaps up to several billion years.

The new finding of widespread and relatively immobile water suggests that it may be present primarily as OH, a more reactive relative of H2O that is made of one oxygen atom and one hydrogen atom. OH, also called hydroxyl, doesn’t stay on its own for long, preferring to attack molecules or attach itself chemically to them. Hydroxyl would therefore have to be extracted from minerals in order to be used.

The research also suggests that any H2O present on the moon isn’t loosely attached to the surface. Michael Poston of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, said:

By putting some limits on how mobile the water or the OH on the surface is, we can help constrain how much water could reach the cold traps in the polar regions.

The researchers are still discussing what the findings tell them about the source of the moon’s water. They suggest that the OH and/or H2O might be created by the solar wind hitting the lunar surface, though the team didn’t rule out that OH and/or H2O could come from the moon itself, slowly released from deep inside minerals where it has been locked since the moon was formed.

Read more about this study from NASA

Bottom line: The moon’s water is widely distributed across its surface, says a new study.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2F8DOAy

Waxing moon – February 26, 2018 – via Vidhyacharan HR in Waltham, Massachusetts. If the moon has enough water, and if it’s reasonably convenient to access, future explorers might be able to use it as a resource.

Any liquid water on the moon’s surface would be quickly lost to outer space. But since the 1960s, scientists have suggested that water ice might exist in cold, permanently shadowed craters at the moon’s poles. Since then, scientists have been searching for lunar water via specially designed instruments aboard various space missions. Now a new study suggests that the moon’s water is widely distributed across its surface and not confined to a particular region or type of terrain. The water appears to be present day and night … but it’s not necessarily easily accessible. The study took the form of an analysis of data from two lunar missions. It was published February 12, 2018 in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Geoscience.

According to the researchers, the findings could help determine the origin of the moon’s water, and how easy it might be to use as a resource for future astronauts. If the moon has enough water, and if it’s reasonably convenient to access, future explorers might be able to use it as drinking water or to convert it into hydrogen and oxygen for rocket fuel or oxygen to breathe.

Joshua Bandfield is a senior research scientist with the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado, and lead author of the new study. Bandfield said in a statement:

We find that it doesn’t matter what time of day or which latitude we look at, the signal indicating water always seems to be present. The presence of water doesn’t appear to depend on the composition of the surface, and the water sticks around.

The results contradict some earlier studies, which had suggested that more water was detected at the moon’s polar latitudes and that the strength of the water signal waxes and wanes according to the lunar day (29.5 Earth days). According to a NASA statement:

Taking these together, some researchers proposed that water molecules can “hop” across the lunar surface until they enter cold traps in the dark reaches of craters near the north and south poles. In planetary science, a cold trap is a region that’s so cold, the water vapor and other volatiles which come into contact with the surface will remain stable for an extended period of time, perhaps up to several billion years.

The new finding of widespread and relatively immobile water suggests that it may be present primarily as OH, a more reactive relative of H2O that is made of one oxygen atom and one hydrogen atom. OH, also called hydroxyl, doesn’t stay on its own for long, preferring to attack molecules or attach itself chemically to them. Hydroxyl would therefore have to be extracted from minerals in order to be used.

The research also suggests that any H2O present on the moon isn’t loosely attached to the surface. Michael Poston of the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio, Texas, said:

By putting some limits on how mobile the water or the OH on the surface is, we can help constrain how much water could reach the cold traps in the polar regions.

The researchers are still discussing what the findings tell them about the source of the moon’s water. They suggest that the OH and/or H2O might be created by the solar wind hitting the lunar surface, though the team didn’t rule out that OH and/or H2O could come from the moon itself, slowly released from deep inside minerals where it has been locked since the moon was formed.

Read more about this study from NASA

Bottom line: The moon’s water is widely distributed across its surface, says a new study.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2F8DOAy

How naked mole rats stay cancer-free

If you like cute, naked mole rats might not be your favorite rodent. They have large buck teeth and wrinkled, hairless bodies. But researchers find them intriguing. That’s because naked mole rats have the longest lifespan of any rodent (average is 30 years), they’re resistant to a variety of age-related diseases – such as cancer – and tend to remain fit and active until very advanced ages. What’s their secret?

A new paper published December 28, 2017, in the journal PNAS suggests part of the answer might lie in an anticancer mechanism called cellular senescence, which, the researchers suggest, operates in a special way in mole rats.

Image via redbrick.

Cellular senescence is an evolutionary adaptation that prevents damaged cells from dividing out of control and developing into full-blown cancer. However, senescence has a negative side too: by stopping cell division in order to prevent potential tumors, it also accelerates aging.

Previous studies have indicated that when cells that had undergone senescence were removed from mice, the mice were less frail in advanced age as compared to mice that aged naturally with senescent cells intact.

But is eliminating senescence actually the key to preventing or reversing age-related diseases, namely cancer? Vera Gorbunov of the University of Rochester is a study author. She said in a statement:

In humans, as in mice, aging and cancer have competing interests. In order to prevent cancer, you need to stop cells from dividing. However, to prevent aging, you want to keep cells dividing in order to replenish tissues.

For the study, the researchers compared the senescence response of naked mole rats to that of mice, which live a tenth as long — only about two to three years. Researcher Andrei Seluanov is a University of Rochester biology professor. Seluanov said:

We wanted to look at these animals that pretty much don’t age and see if they also had senescent cells or if they evolved to get rid of cell senescence.

Their unexpected discovery? Naked mole rats do experience cellular senescence, yet they continue to live long, healthy lives; eliminating the senescence mechanism is not the key to their long life span. Gorbunova said:

It was surprising to us that despite its remarkable longevity the naked mole rat has cells that undergo senescence like mouse cells.

The researchers found that although naked mole rats exhibited cellular senescence similar to mice, their senescent cells also displayed unique features that may contribute to their cancer resistance and longevity.

The cellular senescence mechanism permanently arrests a cell to prevent it from dividing, but the cell still continues to metabolize. The researchers found that naked mole rats are able to more strongly inhibit the metabolic process of the senescent cells, resulting in higher resistance to the damaging effects of senescence. Gorbunova said:

In naked mole rats, senescent cells are better behaved. When you compare the signals from the mouse versus from the naked mole rat, all the genes in the mouse are a mess. In the naked mole rat, everything is more organized. The naked mole rat didn’t get rid of the senescence, but maybe it made it a bit more structured.

Although evolution of a long life span does not eliminate senescence, the more structured response to senescence may have an evolutionary basis, said Yang Zhao, lead author of the study.

We believe there was some strategy during the evolution of naked mole rats that allowed them to have more systematic changes in their genes and have more orchestrated pathways being regulated. We believe this is beneficial for longevity and cancer resistance.

Bottom line: New research into the puzzle of how naked mole rats stay so cancer-free.

Read more from the University of Rochester



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ovDS3t

If you like cute, naked mole rats might not be your favorite rodent. They have large buck teeth and wrinkled, hairless bodies. But researchers find them intriguing. That’s because naked mole rats have the longest lifespan of any rodent (average is 30 years), they’re resistant to a variety of age-related diseases – such as cancer – and tend to remain fit and active until very advanced ages. What’s their secret?

A new paper published December 28, 2017, in the journal PNAS suggests part of the answer might lie in an anticancer mechanism called cellular senescence, which, the researchers suggest, operates in a special way in mole rats.

Image via redbrick.

Cellular senescence is an evolutionary adaptation that prevents damaged cells from dividing out of control and developing into full-blown cancer. However, senescence has a negative side too: by stopping cell division in order to prevent potential tumors, it also accelerates aging.

Previous studies have indicated that when cells that had undergone senescence were removed from mice, the mice were less frail in advanced age as compared to mice that aged naturally with senescent cells intact.

But is eliminating senescence actually the key to preventing or reversing age-related diseases, namely cancer? Vera Gorbunov of the University of Rochester is a study author. She said in a statement:

In humans, as in mice, aging and cancer have competing interests. In order to prevent cancer, you need to stop cells from dividing. However, to prevent aging, you want to keep cells dividing in order to replenish tissues.

For the study, the researchers compared the senescence response of naked mole rats to that of mice, which live a tenth as long — only about two to three years. Researcher Andrei Seluanov is a University of Rochester biology professor. Seluanov said:

We wanted to look at these animals that pretty much don’t age and see if they also had senescent cells or if they evolved to get rid of cell senescence.

Their unexpected discovery? Naked mole rats do experience cellular senescence, yet they continue to live long, healthy lives; eliminating the senescence mechanism is not the key to their long life span. Gorbunova said:

It was surprising to us that despite its remarkable longevity the naked mole rat has cells that undergo senescence like mouse cells.

The researchers found that although naked mole rats exhibited cellular senescence similar to mice, their senescent cells also displayed unique features that may contribute to their cancer resistance and longevity.

The cellular senescence mechanism permanently arrests a cell to prevent it from dividing, but the cell still continues to metabolize. The researchers found that naked mole rats are able to more strongly inhibit the metabolic process of the senescent cells, resulting in higher resistance to the damaging effects of senescence. Gorbunova said:

In naked mole rats, senescent cells are better behaved. When you compare the signals from the mouse versus from the naked mole rat, all the genes in the mouse are a mess. In the naked mole rat, everything is more organized. The naked mole rat didn’t get rid of the senescence, but maybe it made it a bit more structured.

Although evolution of a long life span does not eliminate senescence, the more structured response to senescence may have an evolutionary basis, said Yang Zhao, lead author of the study.

We believe there was some strategy during the evolution of naked mole rats that allowed them to have more systematic changes in their genes and have more orchestrated pathways being regulated. We believe this is beneficial for longevity and cancer resistance.

Bottom line: New research into the puzzle of how naked mole rats stay so cancer-free.

Read more from the University of Rochester



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ovDS3t

When is the next leap year?

Earthly calendars have to work hard to stay in synch with the natural rhythms of Earth's orbit around the sun.

Earthly calendars have to work hard to stay in sync with the natural rhythms of Earth’s orbit around the sun.

The last leap year was 2016, and the next one is 2020! Leap days are extra days added to the calendar to help synchronize it with Earth’s orbit around the sun and the actual passing of the seasons. Why do we need them? Blame Earth’s orbit around the sun, which takes approximately 365.25 days. It’s that .25 that creates the need for a leap year every four years.

During non-leap years aka common years – like 2018 – the calendar doesn’t take into account the extra quarter of a day actually required by Earth to complete a single orbit around the sun. In essence, the calendar year, which is a human artifact, is faster than the actual solar year, or year as defined by our planet’s motion through space.

Over time and without correction, the calendar year would drift away from the solar year and the drift would add up quickly. For example, without correction the calendar year would be off by about one day after four years. It’d be off by about 25 days after 100 years. You can see that, if even more time were to pass without the leap year as a calendar correction, eventually February would be a summer month in the Northern Hemisphere.

During leap years, a leap day is added to the calendar to slow down and synchronize the calendar year with the seasons. Leap days were first added to the Julian Calendar in 46 B.C. by Julius Caesar at the advice of Sosigenes, an Alexandrian astronomer.

Celebrating the leap year? Take a moment to thank Christopher Clavius (1538 - 1612). This German mathematician and astronomer figured out how and where to place them in the Gregorian calendar. Image via Wikimedia Commons.

In 1582, Pope Gregory XIII revised the Julian calendar by creating the Gregorian calendar with the assistance of Christopher Clavius, a German mathematician and astronomer. The Gregorian calendar further stated that leap days should not be added in years ending in “00” unless that year is also divisible by 400. This additional correction was added to stabilize the calendar over a period of thousands of years and was necessary because solar years are actually slightly less than 365.25 days. In fact, a solar year occurs over a period of 365.2422 days.

Hence, according to the rules set forth in the Gregorian calendar leap years have occurred or will occur during the following years:

1600 1604 1608 1612 1616 1620 1624 1628 1632 1636 1640 1644 1648 1652 1656 1660 1664 1668 1672 1676 1680 1684 1688 1692 1696 1704 1708 1712 1716 1720 1724 1728 1732 1736 1740 1744 1748 1752 1756 1760 1764 1768 1772 1776 1780 1784 1788 1792 1796 1804 1808 1812 1816 1820 1824 1828 1832 1836 1840 1844 1848 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 2044 2048 2052 2056 2060 2064 2068 2072 2076 2080 2084 2088 2092 2096 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 2124 2128 2132 2136 2140 2144 2148 2152.

Notice that 2000 was a leap year because it is divisible by 400, but that 1900 was not a leap year.

Since 1582, the Gregorian calendar has been gradually adopted as a “civil” international standard for many countries around the world.

Bottom line: 2018 isn’t a leap year, because it isn’t evenly divisible by 4. The next leap day will be added to the calendar on February 29, 2020.

A fixed-date calendar and no time zones, researchers say

Should the leap second be abolished?



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1Df6OwH
Earthly calendars have to work hard to stay in synch with the natural rhythms of Earth's orbit around the sun.

Earthly calendars have to work hard to stay in sync with the natural rhythms of Earth’s orbit around the sun.

The last leap year was 2016, and the next one is 2020! Leap days are extra days added to the calendar to help synchronize it with Earth’s orbit around the sun and the actual passing of the seasons. Why do we need them? Blame Earth’s orbit around the sun, which takes approximately 365.25 days. It’s that .25 that creates the need for a leap year every four years.

During non-leap years aka common years – like 2018 – the calendar doesn’t take into account the extra quarter of a day actually required by Earth to complete a single orbit around the sun. In essence, the calendar year, which is a human artifact, is faster than the actual solar year, or year as defined by our planet’s motion through space.

Over time and without correction, the calendar year would drift away from the solar year and the drift would add up quickly. For example, without correction the calendar year would be off by about one day after four years. It’d be off by about 25 days after 100 years. You can see that, if even more time were to pass without the leap year as a calendar correction, eventually February would be a summer month in the Northern Hemisphere.

During leap years, a leap day is added to the calendar to slow down and synchronize the calendar year with the seasons. Leap days were first added to the Julian Calendar in 46 B.C. by Julius Caesar at the advice of Sosigenes, an Alexandrian astronomer.

Celebrating the leap year? Take a moment to thank Christopher Clavius (1538 - 1612). This German mathematician and astronomer figured out how and where to place them in the Gregorian calendar. Image via Wikimedia Commons.

In 1582, Pope Gregory XIII revised the Julian calendar by creating the Gregorian calendar with the assistance of Christopher Clavius, a German mathematician and astronomer. The Gregorian calendar further stated that leap days should not be added in years ending in “00” unless that year is also divisible by 400. This additional correction was added to stabilize the calendar over a period of thousands of years and was necessary because solar years are actually slightly less than 365.25 days. In fact, a solar year occurs over a period of 365.2422 days.

Hence, according to the rules set forth in the Gregorian calendar leap years have occurred or will occur during the following years:

1600 1604 1608 1612 1616 1620 1624 1628 1632 1636 1640 1644 1648 1652 1656 1660 1664 1668 1672 1676 1680 1684 1688 1692 1696 1704 1708 1712 1716 1720 1724 1728 1732 1736 1740 1744 1748 1752 1756 1760 1764 1768 1772 1776 1780 1784 1788 1792 1796 1804 1808 1812 1816 1820 1824 1828 1832 1836 1840 1844 1848 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 2044 2048 2052 2056 2060 2064 2068 2072 2076 2080 2084 2088 2092 2096 2104 2108 2112 2116 2120 2124 2128 2132 2136 2140 2144 2148 2152.

Notice that 2000 was a leap year because it is divisible by 400, but that 1900 was not a leap year.

Since 1582, the Gregorian calendar has been gradually adopted as a “civil” international standard for many countries around the world.

Bottom line: 2018 isn’t a leap year, because it isn’t evenly divisible by 4. The next leap day will be added to the calendar on February 29, 2020.

A fixed-date calendar and no time zones, researchers say

Should the leap second be abolished?



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1Df6OwH

Moon and Regulus on February 28

On February 28, 2018 – as darkness falls around the world – the star Regulus, aka the Heart of the Lion in the constellation Leo, appears near the moon. Although Regulus rates as a 1st-magnitude star (that is, one of the brightest stars in the sky), you might have difficulty spotting it in the glare of the waxing gibbous moon on this date.

The first of a monthly series of 19 lunar occultations of Regulus started on December 18, 2016, and will conclude on April 24, 2018. That means Regulus will be briefly hidden behind the moon – as seen from parts of the world – on this date. The February 28 (March 1), 2018 occultation of Regulus is visible from Greenland, northern Canada and Alaska.

Regulus is considered to be the most important of the four Royal Stars of ancient Persia.

These Royal Stars mark the four quadrants of the heavens. They are Regulus, Antares, Fomalhaut, and Aldebaran.

Four to five thousand years ago, the Royal Stars defined the approximate positions of equinoxes and solstices in the sky. Regulus reigned as the summer solstice star, Antares as the autumn equinox star, Fomalhaut as the winter solstice star, and Aldebaran as the spring equinox star. Regulus is often portrayed as the most significant Royal Star, possibly because it symbolized the height and glory of the summer solstice sun. Although the Royal Stars as seasonal signposts change over the long coarse of time, they still mark the four quadrants of the heavens.

An imaginary line drawn between the pointer stars in the Big Dipper – the 2 outer stars in the Dipper’s bowl – points in one direction toward Polaris, the North Star, and in the opposite direction toward Leo.

Regulus coincided with the summer solstice point some 4,300 years ago. In our time, the sun has its annual conjunction with Regulus on or near August 22, or about two months after the summer solstice – or alternatively, one month before the autumn equinox. Regulus will mark the autumn equinox point some 2,100 years into the future.

Bottom line: On the night of February 28, 2018, use the waxing gibbous moon to find the Royal Star Regulus!

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order today from the EarthSky store



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1RN1qFp

On February 28, 2018 – as darkness falls around the world – the star Regulus, aka the Heart of the Lion in the constellation Leo, appears near the moon. Although Regulus rates as a 1st-magnitude star (that is, one of the brightest stars in the sky), you might have difficulty spotting it in the glare of the waxing gibbous moon on this date.

The first of a monthly series of 19 lunar occultations of Regulus started on December 18, 2016, and will conclude on April 24, 2018. That means Regulus will be briefly hidden behind the moon – as seen from parts of the world – on this date. The February 28 (March 1), 2018 occultation of Regulus is visible from Greenland, northern Canada and Alaska.

Regulus is considered to be the most important of the four Royal Stars of ancient Persia.

These Royal Stars mark the four quadrants of the heavens. They are Regulus, Antares, Fomalhaut, and Aldebaran.

Four to five thousand years ago, the Royal Stars defined the approximate positions of equinoxes and solstices in the sky. Regulus reigned as the summer solstice star, Antares as the autumn equinox star, Fomalhaut as the winter solstice star, and Aldebaran as the spring equinox star. Regulus is often portrayed as the most significant Royal Star, possibly because it symbolized the height and glory of the summer solstice sun. Although the Royal Stars as seasonal signposts change over the long coarse of time, they still mark the four quadrants of the heavens.

An imaginary line drawn between the pointer stars in the Big Dipper – the 2 outer stars in the Dipper’s bowl – points in one direction toward Polaris, the North Star, and in the opposite direction toward Leo.

Regulus coincided with the summer solstice point some 4,300 years ago. In our time, the sun has its annual conjunction with Regulus on or near August 22, or about two months after the summer solstice – or alternatively, one month before the autumn equinox. Regulus will mark the autumn equinox point some 2,100 years into the future.

Bottom line: On the night of February 28, 2018, use the waxing gibbous moon to find the Royal Star Regulus!

Enjoying EarthSky so far? Sign up for our free daily newsletter today!

EarthSky astronomy kits are perfect for beginners. Order today from the EarthSky store



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1RN1qFp

Top 4 keys to mastering moon phases

The location of the sun with respect to the moon determines the moon phase in your night sky. Image via Ask.com

Artist’s concept of the moon, Earth and sun aligned in space. Image via Ask.com

Why does the moon seem to change its shape every night? Why can I see the moon in the daytime?

The answer to both questions is the same. It’s that the moon is a world in space, just as Earth is. Like Earth, the moon is always half illuminated by the sun; the round globe of the moon has a day side and a night side. And, like the Earth, the moon is always moving through space. From our earthly vantage point, as the moon orbits around Earth, we see varying fractions of its day and night sides. These are the changing phases of the moon. And the moon is in the daytime sky about half the time. It’s just that it’s sometimes it’s so near the sun we don’t notice it. How can you understand moon phases? Here are four things to remember:

1. When you see the moon, think of the whereabouts of the sun

2. The moon rises in the east and sets in the west, each and every day

3. The moon takes about a month (one moonth) to orbit the Earth

4. The moon’s orbital motion is toward the east

Moon phase composite via Fred Espenak. Read more about this image.

Moon phase composite via Fred Espenak. Read more about this image.

1. When you see the moon, think of the whereabouts of the sun. After all, it’s the sun that’s illuminating and creating the dayside of the moon.

Moon phases depend on where the moon is with respect to the sun in space. For example, do you see which moon phase is being shown in the illustration above? The answer is, it’s a full moon. The moon, Earth and sun are aligned with Earth in the middle. The moon’s fully illuminated half – its dayside – faces Earth’s night side. That’s always the case on the night of a full moon.

Don’t just take our word for it. Go outside. No matter what phase of the moon you see in your sky, think about where the sun is. It’ll help you begin to understand why the moon you see is in that particular phase.

The spin of the Earth causes the moon - like the sun - to rise in the east and set in the west each day. Image via Martin Cleburne's excellent article Where is the Moon?

Earth’s daily spin causes the moon – like the sun – to rise in the east and set in the west each day. Image via Martin Clebourne’s article Where is the Moon?

2. The moon rises in the east and sets in the west, each and every day. It has to. The rising and setting of all celestial objects is due to Earth’s continuous daily spin beneath the sky.

Just know that – when you see a thin crescent moon in the west after sunset – it’s not a rising moon. Instead, it’s a setting moon.

At the same time, though …

3. The moon takes about a month (one moonth) to orbit the Earth. Although the moon rises in the east and sets in the west each day (due to Earth’s spin), it’s also moving on the sky’s dome each day due to its own motion in orbit around Earth.

This is a slower, less noticeable motion of the moon. It’s a motion in front of the fixed stars. If you just glance at the moon one evening – and see it again a few hours later – you’ll notice it has moved westward. That westward motion is caused by Earth’s spin.

The moon’s own orbital motion can be detected in the course of a single night, too. But you have to watch the moon closely, with respect to stars in its vicinity, over several hours.

The moon’s eastward, orbital motion is easiest to notice from one day (or night) to the next. It’s as though the moon is moving on the inside of a circle of 360 degrees. The moon’s orbit carries it around Earth’s sky once a month, because the moon takes about a month to orbit Earth.

So that the moon moves – with respect to the fixed stars – by about 12-13 degrees each day.

The moon's orbital motion carries it to the east in Earth's sky. Image via cseligman.com.

The moon’s orbital motion carries it eastward in Earth’s sky. Image via cseligman.com.

4. The moon’s orbital motion is toward the east. Each day, as the moon moves another 12-13 degrees toward the east on the sky’s dome, Earth has to rotate a little longer to bring you around to where the moon is in space.

Thus the moon rises, on average, about 50 minutes later each day.

The later and later rising times of the moon cause our companion world to appear in a different part of the sky at each nightfall for the two weeks between new and full moon.

Then, in two weeks after full moon, you’ll find the moon rising later and later at night.

We have more details on individual moon phases at the links below. Follow the links to learn more about the various phases of the moon.

Waxing Crescent
First Quarter
Waxing Gibbous
Full Moon
Waning Gibbous
Last Quarter
Waning Crescent
New Moon

… and here are the names of all the full moons.

Earth and moon, via NASA

Earth and moon, via NASA.

Bottom line: Why the moon waxes and wanes in phase.

Help keep EarthSky going – donate via PayPal or send a check. Click here.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1iYdhDd
The location of the sun with respect to the moon determines the moon phase in your night sky. Image via Ask.com

Artist’s concept of the moon, Earth and sun aligned in space. Image via Ask.com

Why does the moon seem to change its shape every night? Why can I see the moon in the daytime?

The answer to both questions is the same. It’s that the moon is a world in space, just as Earth is. Like Earth, the moon is always half illuminated by the sun; the round globe of the moon has a day side and a night side. And, like the Earth, the moon is always moving through space. From our earthly vantage point, as the moon orbits around Earth, we see varying fractions of its day and night sides. These are the changing phases of the moon. And the moon is in the daytime sky about half the time. It’s just that it’s sometimes it’s so near the sun we don’t notice it. How can you understand moon phases? Here are four things to remember:

1. When you see the moon, think of the whereabouts of the sun

2. The moon rises in the east and sets in the west, each and every day

3. The moon takes about a month (one moonth) to orbit the Earth

4. The moon’s orbital motion is toward the east

Moon phase composite via Fred Espenak. Read more about this image.

Moon phase composite via Fred Espenak. Read more about this image.

1. When you see the moon, think of the whereabouts of the sun. After all, it’s the sun that’s illuminating and creating the dayside of the moon.

Moon phases depend on where the moon is with respect to the sun in space. For example, do you see which moon phase is being shown in the illustration above? The answer is, it’s a full moon. The moon, Earth and sun are aligned with Earth in the middle. The moon’s fully illuminated half – its dayside – faces Earth’s night side. That’s always the case on the night of a full moon.

Don’t just take our word for it. Go outside. No matter what phase of the moon you see in your sky, think about where the sun is. It’ll help you begin to understand why the moon you see is in that particular phase.

The spin of the Earth causes the moon - like the sun - to rise in the east and set in the west each day. Image via Martin Cleburne's excellent article Where is the Moon?

Earth’s daily spin causes the moon – like the sun – to rise in the east and set in the west each day. Image via Martin Clebourne’s article Where is the Moon?

2. The moon rises in the east and sets in the west, each and every day. It has to. The rising and setting of all celestial objects is due to Earth’s continuous daily spin beneath the sky.

Just know that – when you see a thin crescent moon in the west after sunset – it’s not a rising moon. Instead, it’s a setting moon.

At the same time, though …

3. The moon takes about a month (one moonth) to orbit the Earth. Although the moon rises in the east and sets in the west each day (due to Earth’s spin), it’s also moving on the sky’s dome each day due to its own motion in orbit around Earth.

This is a slower, less noticeable motion of the moon. It’s a motion in front of the fixed stars. If you just glance at the moon one evening – and see it again a few hours later – you’ll notice it has moved westward. That westward motion is caused by Earth’s spin.

The moon’s own orbital motion can be detected in the course of a single night, too. But you have to watch the moon closely, with respect to stars in its vicinity, over several hours.

The moon’s eastward, orbital motion is easiest to notice from one day (or night) to the next. It’s as though the moon is moving on the inside of a circle of 360 degrees. The moon’s orbit carries it around Earth’s sky once a month, because the moon takes about a month to orbit Earth.

So that the moon moves – with respect to the fixed stars – by about 12-13 degrees each day.

The moon's orbital motion carries it to the east in Earth's sky. Image via cseligman.com.

The moon’s orbital motion carries it eastward in Earth’s sky. Image via cseligman.com.

4. The moon’s orbital motion is toward the east. Each day, as the moon moves another 12-13 degrees toward the east on the sky’s dome, Earth has to rotate a little longer to bring you around to where the moon is in space.

Thus the moon rises, on average, about 50 minutes later each day.

The later and later rising times of the moon cause our companion world to appear in a different part of the sky at each nightfall for the two weeks between new and full moon.

Then, in two weeks after full moon, you’ll find the moon rising later and later at night.

We have more details on individual moon phases at the links below. Follow the links to learn more about the various phases of the moon.

Waxing Crescent
First Quarter
Waxing Gibbous
Full Moon
Waning Gibbous
Last Quarter
Waning Crescent
New Moon

… and here are the names of all the full moons.

Earth and moon, via NASA

Earth and moon, via NASA.

Bottom line: Why the moon waxes and wanes in phase.

Help keep EarthSky going – donate via PayPal or send a check. Click here.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1iYdhDd

Extragalactic supernova

The arrow is pointing to SN2018iq, a supernova in a distant galaxy. See how bright this one exploding star is, in contrast to its galaxy? Photo taken February 25, 2018 by Brian Ottum.

Brian Ottum submitted this image to EarthSky this week. It’s SN2018iq – a supernova in the distant galaxy NGC 2746. The supernova was discovered on January 19, 2018. It was brighter then, but now it’s fading. Brian wrote on his Instagram page:

… a supernova, where a white dwarf star sucks material from its larger companion star until it explodes. At the the time of discovery, this supernova was as bright as its entire galaxy, over 100 billion stars! As you can see, it has faded slightly, thought still obviously as bright as maybe 20 billion stars. Will disappear in a couple months.

I took this on February 25, despite a very bright moon close by.

He told EarthSky:

This supernova is well-placed for us in the Northern Hemisphere, above Ursa Major. There are also at least 2 other active and visible supernovae right now in Ursa Major or nearby!

Thank you, Brian! By the way, the coordinates of the supernova are right ascension 09h05m50s; declination +35°22′. You’ll find a chart showing its location here.

Bottom line: Photo of SN2018ig, a supernova in the galaxy NGC 2746.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2CnZ1oS

The arrow is pointing to SN2018iq, a supernova in a distant galaxy. See how bright this one exploding star is, in contrast to its galaxy? Photo taken February 25, 2018 by Brian Ottum.

Brian Ottum submitted this image to EarthSky this week. It’s SN2018iq – a supernova in the distant galaxy NGC 2746. The supernova was discovered on January 19, 2018. It was brighter then, but now it’s fading. Brian wrote on his Instagram page:

… a supernova, where a white dwarf star sucks material from its larger companion star until it explodes. At the the time of discovery, this supernova was as bright as its entire galaxy, over 100 billion stars! As you can see, it has faded slightly, thought still obviously as bright as maybe 20 billion stars. Will disappear in a couple months.

I took this on February 25, despite a very bright moon close by.

He told EarthSky:

This supernova is well-placed for us in the Northern Hemisphere, above Ursa Major. There are also at least 2 other active and visible supernovae right now in Ursa Major or nearby!

Thank you, Brian! By the way, the coordinates of the supernova are right ascension 09h05m50s; declination +35°22′. You’ll find a chart showing its location here.

Bottom line: Photo of SN2018ig, a supernova in the galaxy NGC 2746.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2CnZ1oS

Moon in front of Cancer on February 27

On February 27, 2018, the almost-full waxing gibbous moon puts the constellation Cancer in the spotlight, but out of view. Demure Cancer the Crab is the faintest of the 13 constellations of the zodiac. You can see Cancer only on dark, moonless nights.

The starry sky is like a great big connect-the-dots book, enabling stargazers to star-hop from brighter stars to more obscure nighttime treasures. And that’s why noticing the stars around the February 27, 2018, moon can be helpful. By around the end of the first week of March, when the moon drops out of the evening sky, Cancer the Crab will be showing its delicate starlit figurine in the region of sky in between the Leo star Regulus and the Gemini stars Castor and Pollux.

Identify Regulus, Castor and Pollux now, and you can use them for years to come to help you identify Cancer.

Our featured chart at top shows the moon and Cancer for North American mid-northern latitudes. At nightfall, at mid-northern latitudes from around the world, the stars and planets are similarly positioned. As seen from Europe and Asia, though, the moon on February 27, 2018, is offset toward the Gemini stars, Castor and Pollux. This difference in the moon’s position, relative to the backdrop stars of the zodiac, is due to the moon’s own motion in orbit around Earth.

The constellation Cancer via the International Astronomical Union (IAU). On a dark night, look for the Beehive star cluster (M44) to make a triangle with the Gemini stars, Castor and Pollux, and the bright star Procyon.

From the Southern Hemisphere, the differences are due in part to the moon’s movement, and in part to the difference in perspective from one hemisphere to the other. Still, we all live under the same sky, and no matter where you live worldwide, the moon beams in the vicinity of Cancer tonight, with the moon sandwiched in between Castor and Pollux on one side and the star Regulus on the other.

Just remember – although we outline Cancer for you on our chart, you’re not likely to see this constellation in the drenching moonlight on February 27. Notice the stars around it, and come back in 10 days so to find the faint Crab when the moon has moved on its way – and left the evening sky dark for stargazing.

Bottom line: The almost-full moon puts the constellation Cancer the Crab in the spotlight – but out of view – on the night of February 27, 2018.

Cancer? Here’s your constellation

Beehive cluster: 1,000 stars in Cancer



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1KxlIpG

On February 27, 2018, the almost-full waxing gibbous moon puts the constellation Cancer in the spotlight, but out of view. Demure Cancer the Crab is the faintest of the 13 constellations of the zodiac. You can see Cancer only on dark, moonless nights.

The starry sky is like a great big connect-the-dots book, enabling stargazers to star-hop from brighter stars to more obscure nighttime treasures. And that’s why noticing the stars around the February 27, 2018, moon can be helpful. By around the end of the first week of March, when the moon drops out of the evening sky, Cancer the Crab will be showing its delicate starlit figurine in the region of sky in between the Leo star Regulus and the Gemini stars Castor and Pollux.

Identify Regulus, Castor and Pollux now, and you can use them for years to come to help you identify Cancer.

Our featured chart at top shows the moon and Cancer for North American mid-northern latitudes. At nightfall, at mid-northern latitudes from around the world, the stars and planets are similarly positioned. As seen from Europe and Asia, though, the moon on February 27, 2018, is offset toward the Gemini stars, Castor and Pollux. This difference in the moon’s position, relative to the backdrop stars of the zodiac, is due to the moon’s own motion in orbit around Earth.

The constellation Cancer via the International Astronomical Union (IAU). On a dark night, look for the Beehive star cluster (M44) to make a triangle with the Gemini stars, Castor and Pollux, and the bright star Procyon.

From the Southern Hemisphere, the differences are due in part to the moon’s movement, and in part to the difference in perspective from one hemisphere to the other. Still, we all live under the same sky, and no matter where you live worldwide, the moon beams in the vicinity of Cancer tonight, with the moon sandwiched in between Castor and Pollux on one side and the star Regulus on the other.

Just remember – although we outline Cancer for you on our chart, you’re not likely to see this constellation in the drenching moonlight on February 27. Notice the stars around it, and come back in 10 days so to find the faint Crab when the moon has moved on its way – and left the evening sky dark for stargazing.

Bottom line: The almost-full moon puts the constellation Cancer the Crab in the spotlight – but out of view – on the night of February 27, 2018.

Cancer? Here’s your constellation

Beehive cluster: 1,000 stars in Cancer



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1KxlIpG

Where’s the moon? Waxing gibbous

February 26, 2018 waxing gibbous moon via Mohamed Laaifat Photographies in Normandy, France.

The moon is now in a waxing gibbous phase, rising between noon and sunset, setting in the wee hours after midnight. You’ll always see a waxing gibbous moon between a first quarter moon and full moon, and, it so happens, the upcoming full moon – on the night of March 1, 2018 is the first of two full moons for the month of March. The second full moon – coming up on March 31, 2018 – will be called by the name Blue Moon.

Any moon that appears more than half lighted but less than full is called a gibbous moon. The word gibbous comes from a root word that means hump-backed.

People often see a waxing gibbous moon in the afternoon, shortly after moonrise, while it’s ascending in the east as the sun is descending in the west. It’s easy to see a waxing gibbous moon in the daytime because, at this phase of the moon, a respectably large fraction of the moon’s dayside is now facing our way.

Read more: 4 keys to understanding moon phases.

Read more about Blue Moons

Point of interest on a waxing gibbous moon: Sinus Iridum (Bay of Rainbows) surrounded by the Jura Mountains. Photo by Lunar 101-Moon Book in Toronto, Canada.

As the moon orbits Earth, it changes phase in an orderly way. Follow these links to understand the various phases of the moon.

Four keys to understanding moon phases

Where’s the moon? Waxing crescent
Where’s the moon? First quarter
Where’s the moon? Waxing gibbous
What’s special about a full moon?
Where’s the moon? Waning gibbous
Where’s the moon? Last quarter
Where’s the moon? Waning crescent
Where’s the moon? New phase



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1j8UWzb

February 26, 2018 waxing gibbous moon via Mohamed Laaifat Photographies in Normandy, France.

The moon is now in a waxing gibbous phase, rising between noon and sunset, setting in the wee hours after midnight. You’ll always see a waxing gibbous moon between a first quarter moon and full moon, and, it so happens, the upcoming full moon – on the night of March 1, 2018 is the first of two full moons for the month of March. The second full moon – coming up on March 31, 2018 – will be called by the name Blue Moon.

Any moon that appears more than half lighted but less than full is called a gibbous moon. The word gibbous comes from a root word that means hump-backed.

People often see a waxing gibbous moon in the afternoon, shortly after moonrise, while it’s ascending in the east as the sun is descending in the west. It’s easy to see a waxing gibbous moon in the daytime because, at this phase of the moon, a respectably large fraction of the moon’s dayside is now facing our way.

Read more: 4 keys to understanding moon phases.

Read more about Blue Moons

Point of interest on a waxing gibbous moon: Sinus Iridum (Bay of Rainbows) surrounded by the Jura Mountains. Photo by Lunar 101-Moon Book in Toronto, Canada.

As the moon orbits Earth, it changes phase in an orderly way. Follow these links to understand the various phases of the moon.

Four keys to understanding moon phases

Where’s the moon? Waxing crescent
Where’s the moon? First quarter
Where’s the moon? Waxing gibbous
What’s special about a full moon?
Where’s the moon? Waning gibbous
Where’s the moon? Last quarter
Where’s the moon? Waning crescent
Where’s the moon? New phase



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/1j8UWzb

Ecosystems hanging by a thread

Emory disease ecologist Thomas Gillespie served on an international committee that developed best practice guidelines for health monitoring and disease control in great ape populations, part of a growing public education effort.

By Tony Rehagen
Emory Magazine

Thomas Gillespie’s parents and teachers always wanted him to go into medicine.

“Growing up in Rockford, Illinois, if you were smart and interested in biology, you were supposed to be a doctor,” he says.

Gillespie, meanwhile, was always more interested in primates. In seventh grade, he phoned animal psychologist Penny Patterson, famous for teaching the gorilla Koko how to use sign language, and interviewed the scientist about Koko’s diet while punching out notes on a typewriter. He was premed at the University of Illinois, but spent his internship at the Brookfield Zoo in Chicago, working in the “Tropic World” primate exhibit. His favorite undergrad course was biological anthropology, the study of biological and behavioral aspects of humans and nonhuman primates, looking at our closest relatives to better understand ourselves.

Gillespie eventually took a year off before graduate school to work with primate communities in the Peruvian Amazon. The apes finally won out — Gillespie would choose a doctorate in zoology over medical school.

But it wasn’t long before the two fields of study collided. While monitoring the group behavior of colobine monkeys in Africa, Gillespie observed that some of the animals were eating bark from the African cherry tree — not a typical food source for them. When he dug deeper, Gillespie learned that human doctors in the region used that same bark to treat parasites in their patients. The monkeys, he realized, were self-medicating.

“That discovery in these monkeys brought me back toward the health science side of biology,” says Gillespie.

Gillespie’s return to a medical approach to zoology came not a moment too soon—for the sake of the primates and maybe even all of humankind. As an associate professor in Emory’s Department of Environmental Sciences specializing in the disease ecology of primates, Gillespie and his team of researchers have helped uncover a crisis among our nearest taxonomic neighbors. According to an article coauthored by Gillespie and thirty other experts and published in the journal Science Advances, 75 percent of the world’s five-hundred-plus primate species are declining in population, and a whopping 60 percent face extinction, largely due to human encroachment.

Read more in Emory Magazine.

Related:
Experts warn of impending extinction of many of the world's primates
Chimpanzee studies highlight disease risks to all endangered wildlife

from eScienceCommons http://ift.tt/2EZhS7i
Emory disease ecologist Thomas Gillespie served on an international committee that developed best practice guidelines for health monitoring and disease control in great ape populations, part of a growing public education effort.

By Tony Rehagen
Emory Magazine

Thomas Gillespie’s parents and teachers always wanted him to go into medicine.

“Growing up in Rockford, Illinois, if you were smart and interested in biology, you were supposed to be a doctor,” he says.

Gillespie, meanwhile, was always more interested in primates. In seventh grade, he phoned animal psychologist Penny Patterson, famous for teaching the gorilla Koko how to use sign language, and interviewed the scientist about Koko’s diet while punching out notes on a typewriter. He was premed at the University of Illinois, but spent his internship at the Brookfield Zoo in Chicago, working in the “Tropic World” primate exhibit. His favorite undergrad course was biological anthropology, the study of biological and behavioral aspects of humans and nonhuman primates, looking at our closest relatives to better understand ourselves.

Gillespie eventually took a year off before graduate school to work with primate communities in the Peruvian Amazon. The apes finally won out — Gillespie would choose a doctorate in zoology over medical school.

But it wasn’t long before the two fields of study collided. While monitoring the group behavior of colobine monkeys in Africa, Gillespie observed that some of the animals were eating bark from the African cherry tree — not a typical food source for them. When he dug deeper, Gillespie learned that human doctors in the region used that same bark to treat parasites in their patients. The monkeys, he realized, were self-medicating.

“That discovery in these monkeys brought me back toward the health science side of biology,” says Gillespie.

Gillespie’s return to a medical approach to zoology came not a moment too soon—for the sake of the primates and maybe even all of humankind. As an associate professor in Emory’s Department of Environmental Sciences specializing in the disease ecology of primates, Gillespie and his team of researchers have helped uncover a crisis among our nearest taxonomic neighbors. According to an article coauthored by Gillespie and thirty other experts and published in the journal Science Advances, 75 percent of the world’s five-hundred-plus primate species are declining in population, and a whopping 60 percent face extinction, largely due to human encroachment.

Read more in Emory Magazine.

Related:
Experts warn of impending extinction of many of the world's primates
Chimpanzee studies highlight disease risks to all endangered wildlife

from eScienceCommons http://ift.tt/2EZhS7i

Does losing weight reduce the risk of cancer?

Family walk healthy

Obesity is the biggest cause of cancer in the UK, after smoking.

But this isn’t well known.

When people do hear this, we’re often asked: ‘I’m already overweight, will losing weight reduce my risk?’

And with 2 in 3 UK adults either overweight or obese, it’s an important question. But while it sounds logical that losing weight would reduce the risk, proving this isn’t easy.

When studying people, separating those who lose weight intentionally from those who lose it because they’re already ill can be tough. On top of that, losing weight and keeping it off is hard.

But this hasn’t stopped researchers from hunting for answers. And the good news is, research so far tells us that weight loss is beneficial when it comes to reducing cancer risk.

Understanding weight gain

Years of research have shown that the more weight gained, the higher the risk of cancer.

Most of this evidence comes from studies that have used body mass index (BMI) as a measure of body fat.

But BMI can only provide a snapshot of someone’s weight.

Other studies have looked at how long someone is overweight. And the results suggest that the longer someone is overweight, the higher their risk

Based on this, losing weight (and keeping it off) means you stop accumulating more risk, and reduce your risk compared to what it would be if you gained more weight. So losing weight does help, both with cancer risk and your general health.

But this doesn’t fully answer our question: can an increased risk go back down to the level it would have been had the extra weight never been there?

Weight loss through surgery

One of the most effective, although extreme, ways for people who are very overweight to lose weight is bariatric surgery. This covers a range of surgical techniques, such as stomach stapling or surgically bypassing large parts of the gut.

Because people lose a lot of weight after surgery, and keep most of it off, it’s more likely researchers will find an effect on cancer risk if it’s there.

It’s also more likely any effect would be due to weight loss itself, rather than lifestyle changes that reduce cancer risk. These studies also help untangle the effects of losing weight intentionally and weight loss due to illness.

Results from studies post-surgery are mixed, but overall they suggest that people who undergo bariatric surgery do have a reduced risk of cancer compared to those who don’t.

The strongest evidence so far is for women, but evidence is growing in men too.

A study that combined the results of 6 others found a staggering 45% reduction in cancer risk among formerly obese people who had bariatric surgery. But when they split the results by gender, this finding only remained in women.

A more recent US study, which included over 2500 cancer cases, also found a reduction in cancer risk in people who had surgery based on 3.5 years of follow up. And the reduced risk was seen for a range of cancers, including breast, colon, pancreatic and womb.

So the results so far are promising, and suggest weight loss can reverse increased cancer risk.

But there are limitations. Firstly, major surgery isn’t the solution for everyone. And it’s possible that people who have surgery differ in ways these studies don’t account for. And weight loss through surgery could have different effects to weight loss by other means.

Weight loss outside the operating room

A 2012 review looked at 6 weight loss studies and 5 of these linked intentional weight loss with a reduced risk of cancer.

But a more recent study, looking at the results of weight loss trials (mostly low-fat diets), didn’t find they reduced cancer risk. But the quality of evidence for cancer was rated as very low – overall the original trials only included a small number of cancer cases (103 in total) and the average amount of weight lost after 3 years was small.

These findings illustrate how difficult it is to study weight loss in the real world. So the evidence isn’t as strong. But what’s there is promising, although as with surgery studies the strongest evidence is for women – specifically for breast cancer.

How might weight loss help?

A rigorous 2016 review of how extra fat affects the body found good evidence that intentional weight loss affects key ways obesity is thought to cause cancer: namely hormones and inflammation.

And studies since have also found this.

But we don’t yet fully understand all the ways obesity causes cancer. So there’s still more to know about how weight loss could reverse these effects.

Why is there seemingly more of an effect in women?

There are many possible explanations. It could be that because these female cancers are common, there are more cases to study. This increases the chance of finding an effect if it’s there.

But it’s also possible that cancers strongly linked to sex hormones, such as womb and breast, are more quickly affected by weight loss, whereas for other cancers it may take longer to see an effect. For example, weight loss can quickly reduce levels of oestrogen in the body, and high levels of oestrogen are almost certainly how obesity causes womb and breast cancer.

Cancers more common in men, such as bowel cancer, may take longer to see an effect. This might explain why this study showed no impact of weight loss on bowel cancer risk after 7 years of follow up. This study also couldn’t distinguish between intentional and unintentional weight loss.

What’s likely is that weight loss affects different parts of the body in different ways, and this is reflected in how it might affect cancer risk. This makes sense, as weight gain affects cancer risk differently for different cancers. Studies in the future will need to take this into account.

Prevention is still best, but weight loss is worth it

So, the answer to our original question – does losing weight reduce cancer risk? – seems to be: yes.

If you are overweight, you can reduce your risk by avoiding gaining more weight.

And overall, all the research carried out so far suggests that an increased risk can start to fall with weight loss.

Plus, the best way to lose weight for most people is by eating and drinking healthily and moving more, all of which can reduce the risk of cancer independently.

But the fact remains that losing weight and keeping it off can be incredibly hard. So this must be supported by public health measures (like the sugary drinks tax) that make healthy choices easy for everyone, both to prevent weight gain, and to help those lose it who need to.

Never gaining extra weight in the first place is still best for reducing cancer risk. But we know that’s not possible for everyone – and it doesn’t help people who have already gained weight. So having evidence that weight loss could help is good news.

Emma Shields is a senior health information officer at Cancer Research UK



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog http://ift.tt/2ESxde3
Family walk healthy

Obesity is the biggest cause of cancer in the UK, after smoking.

But this isn’t well known.

When people do hear this, we’re often asked: ‘I’m already overweight, will losing weight reduce my risk?’

And with 2 in 3 UK adults either overweight or obese, it’s an important question. But while it sounds logical that losing weight would reduce the risk, proving this isn’t easy.

When studying people, separating those who lose weight intentionally from those who lose it because they’re already ill can be tough. On top of that, losing weight and keeping it off is hard.

But this hasn’t stopped researchers from hunting for answers. And the good news is, research so far tells us that weight loss is beneficial when it comes to reducing cancer risk.

Understanding weight gain

Years of research have shown that the more weight gained, the higher the risk of cancer.

Most of this evidence comes from studies that have used body mass index (BMI) as a measure of body fat.

But BMI can only provide a snapshot of someone’s weight.

Other studies have looked at how long someone is overweight. And the results suggest that the longer someone is overweight, the higher their risk

Based on this, losing weight (and keeping it off) means you stop accumulating more risk, and reduce your risk compared to what it would be if you gained more weight. So losing weight does help, both with cancer risk and your general health.

But this doesn’t fully answer our question: can an increased risk go back down to the level it would have been had the extra weight never been there?

Weight loss through surgery

One of the most effective, although extreme, ways for people who are very overweight to lose weight is bariatric surgery. This covers a range of surgical techniques, such as stomach stapling or surgically bypassing large parts of the gut.

Because people lose a lot of weight after surgery, and keep most of it off, it’s more likely researchers will find an effect on cancer risk if it’s there.

It’s also more likely any effect would be due to weight loss itself, rather than lifestyle changes that reduce cancer risk. These studies also help untangle the effects of losing weight intentionally and weight loss due to illness.

Results from studies post-surgery are mixed, but overall they suggest that people who undergo bariatric surgery do have a reduced risk of cancer compared to those who don’t.

The strongest evidence so far is for women, but evidence is growing in men too.

A study that combined the results of 6 others found a staggering 45% reduction in cancer risk among formerly obese people who had bariatric surgery. But when they split the results by gender, this finding only remained in women.

A more recent US study, which included over 2500 cancer cases, also found a reduction in cancer risk in people who had surgery based on 3.5 years of follow up. And the reduced risk was seen for a range of cancers, including breast, colon, pancreatic and womb.

So the results so far are promising, and suggest weight loss can reverse increased cancer risk.

But there are limitations. Firstly, major surgery isn’t the solution for everyone. And it’s possible that people who have surgery differ in ways these studies don’t account for. And weight loss through surgery could have different effects to weight loss by other means.

Weight loss outside the operating room

A 2012 review looked at 6 weight loss studies and 5 of these linked intentional weight loss with a reduced risk of cancer.

But a more recent study, looking at the results of weight loss trials (mostly low-fat diets), didn’t find they reduced cancer risk. But the quality of evidence for cancer was rated as very low – overall the original trials only included a small number of cancer cases (103 in total) and the average amount of weight lost after 3 years was small.

These findings illustrate how difficult it is to study weight loss in the real world. So the evidence isn’t as strong. But what’s there is promising, although as with surgery studies the strongest evidence is for women – specifically for breast cancer.

How might weight loss help?

A rigorous 2016 review of how extra fat affects the body found good evidence that intentional weight loss affects key ways obesity is thought to cause cancer: namely hormones and inflammation.

And studies since have also found this.

But we don’t yet fully understand all the ways obesity causes cancer. So there’s still more to know about how weight loss could reverse these effects.

Why is there seemingly more of an effect in women?

There are many possible explanations. It could be that because these female cancers are common, there are more cases to study. This increases the chance of finding an effect if it’s there.

But it’s also possible that cancers strongly linked to sex hormones, such as womb and breast, are more quickly affected by weight loss, whereas for other cancers it may take longer to see an effect. For example, weight loss can quickly reduce levels of oestrogen in the body, and high levels of oestrogen are almost certainly how obesity causes womb and breast cancer.

Cancers more common in men, such as bowel cancer, may take longer to see an effect. This might explain why this study showed no impact of weight loss on bowel cancer risk after 7 years of follow up. This study also couldn’t distinguish between intentional and unintentional weight loss.

What’s likely is that weight loss affects different parts of the body in different ways, and this is reflected in how it might affect cancer risk. This makes sense, as weight gain affects cancer risk differently for different cancers. Studies in the future will need to take this into account.

Prevention is still best, but weight loss is worth it

So, the answer to our original question – does losing weight reduce cancer risk? – seems to be: yes.

If you are overweight, you can reduce your risk by avoiding gaining more weight.

And overall, all the research carried out so far suggests that an increased risk can start to fall with weight loss.

Plus, the best way to lose weight for most people is by eating and drinking healthily and moving more, all of which can reduce the risk of cancer independently.

But the fact remains that losing weight and keeping it off can be incredibly hard. So this must be supported by public health measures (like the sugary drinks tax) that make healthy choices easy for everyone, both to prevent weight gain, and to help those lose it who need to.

Never gaining extra weight in the first place is still best for reducing cancer risk. But we know that’s not possible for everyone – and it doesn’t help people who have already gained weight. So having evidence that weight loss could help is good news.

Emma Shields is a senior health information officer at Cancer Research UK



from Cancer Research UK – Science blog http://ift.tt/2ESxde3

What are star trails, and how can I capture them?

Star trails over GMT summit by Yuri Beletsky Nightscapes.

Star trails over the planned site of the Giant Magellan Telescope in the Atacama Desert in Chile. Image via Yuri Beletsky Nightscapes.

Star trails are the continuous paths created by stars, produced during long-exposure photographs, as shown on this page. In other words, the camera doesn’t track along with the stars’ apparent motion as night passes. Instead, the camera stays fixed, while, as the hours pass, the stars move. The resulting photos show the nightly movement of stars on the sky’s dome.

Star trails reflect Earth’s rotation, or spin, on its axis. The Earth rotates full circle relative to the backdrop stars in a period of about 23 hours and 56 minutes. So, as seen from Earth, all the stars go full circle and return to the same place in sky after this period of time, which astronomers call a sidereal (stellar) day.

Star trails and meteor

View larger. | Star trails (plus meteor) photo taken by Guy Livesay. Thank you, Guy! If you aim your camera northward in a long-exposure photo, the star trails will be seen to track around the north celestial pole. In fact, the stars move counter-clockwise around the sky’s north pole in the course of every night.

Montauk Point lighthouse. Photo: Neeti Kumthekar

Montauk Point lighthouse. Photo via Neeti Kumthekar.

What this means is that, if you’re standing out under the stars, you see them move across the sky as night passes. Stars rise in the east, arc across the sky and set in the west, just as the sun does.

Stars near the celestial poles produce the smallest circles while those near the celestial equator produce the largest. The stars – like the sun during the daytime – move from east to west across the sky each and every night. Each and every star moves 15 degrees westward in one hour.

Star trails are really arcs, or partial circles, whose ever-circling motions forever tabulate the great passage of time.

Sometimes you can get cool non-star effects into your photo, as Michael A. Rosinski did in this August 2014 photo.

Sometimes you can get cool non-star effects into your shot, as Michael A. Rosinski did in this photo.

Ken Christison captured these glorious around Polaris, the North Star, on February 15, 2013. He wrote,

Ken Christison captured these glorious star trails around Polaris, the North Star. He wrote, “For the most common and often the most spectacular star trails, you want to locate Polaris and compose the image so it is centered horizontally and hopefully you can have a bit of foreground for reference.”

EarthSky Facebook friend Ken Christison has some wonderful photos of star trails. He said the equipment needed for making startrails is pretty simple:

First, a camera that allows manual settings so you can set your f/stop and shutter speeds, as well as ISO.

Next, a wide angle lens, the wider the better.

A good steady tripod is a must.

Some cameras will have a built in intervalometer which can be set to shoot the desirable number of frames. In some cases the intervalometer has a bit of lag between shots, which is the reason I use a separate, remote attached to the camera that holds the shutter down and when the camera is set in continuous shooting mode will shoot 100 frames in succession with very little gap.

The remote I use is a simple one that can be found on eBay and uses a couple AAA batteries that last quite a while. I just use the remote controller attached to the 10 pin connector. There is no need to use the wireless receiver in this case.

I use a shutter speed of 30 seconds, ISO of 400 to 800, and with my 14-24mm lens at 14mm, shoot it wide open at f/2.8.

Next, he said, you’re ready to capture your star trail:

Make sure the camera is level, and after focusing on a star, make sure the autofocus is turned off. Then, using the settings mentioned above, click the shutter and stay around long enough to know that the shutter is actually actuating. I normally go back in the house, set the timer on our kitchen stove for 45 minutes, and do other things while the camera does its work.

When the timer sounds, go back out and reset the remote by turning it off, waiting for the shutter to close, then reset quickly.

Finally, you’ll want to process your photo. Ken said:

This is one of the most important elements in making star trail images. The program I use is free, works well and is simple to use: http://www.startrails.de/html/software.html.

One other program that I have heard works well and is also free is StarStax: http://www.markus-enzweiler.de/software/software.html.

Thank you, Ken!

Visit Ken Christison’s Flickr page.

Read more: Long exposure star trail photography

A 2-hour-and-15-minute star trail image from March 21, 2014. Our friend Ken Christison in North Carolina captured this image. He wrote,

A 2-hour-and-15-minute star trail image from March 21, 2014. Our friend Ken Christison in North Carolina captured this image. Want to see what a single frame of this image looked like? See the photo below.

A single frame of the star trail image above, with the elements labeled. Thank you, Ken Christison of Conway, North Carolina!

A single frame of the star trail image above, with the elements labeled. Thank you, Ken Christison of Conway, North Carolina!

Star trails over Baja, California

Composite image of star trails over Baja, California, from EarthSky Facebook friend Sergio Garcia Rill. This image is the product of 80 separate photographs. Thank you, Sergio!

You can also create a star trail of sorts with our local star, the sun. EarthSky Facebook friend Matthew Chin in Hong Kong created this sun trail on October 5, 2013. Thank you, Matthew.

You can also create a star trail of sorts with our local star, the sun. EarthSky Facebook friend Matthew Chin in Hong Kong created this sun trail on October 5, 2013. Thank you, Matthew!

View larger. | Star trails over Monument Valley on September 27, 2013 from Victor Goodpasture. The bright object is the moon. Thank you, Victor!

View larger. | Or you can create a moon trail. Star trails and moon trail over Monument Valley from Victor Goodpasture. The bright object is the moon. See more from Victor at Professional Digital Photography on Facebook.

Bottom line: Star trails are the continuous paths created by stars, produced during long time exposure photographs, as shown in the photos on this page.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2cdDIYy
Star trails over GMT summit by Yuri Beletsky Nightscapes.

Star trails over the planned site of the Giant Magellan Telescope in the Atacama Desert in Chile. Image via Yuri Beletsky Nightscapes.

Star trails are the continuous paths created by stars, produced during long-exposure photographs, as shown on this page. In other words, the camera doesn’t track along with the stars’ apparent motion as night passes. Instead, the camera stays fixed, while, as the hours pass, the stars move. The resulting photos show the nightly movement of stars on the sky’s dome.

Star trails reflect Earth’s rotation, or spin, on its axis. The Earth rotates full circle relative to the backdrop stars in a period of about 23 hours and 56 minutes. So, as seen from Earth, all the stars go full circle and return to the same place in sky after this period of time, which astronomers call a sidereal (stellar) day.

Star trails and meteor

View larger. | Star trails (plus meteor) photo taken by Guy Livesay. Thank you, Guy! If you aim your camera northward in a long-exposure photo, the star trails will be seen to track around the north celestial pole. In fact, the stars move counter-clockwise around the sky’s north pole in the course of every night.

Montauk Point lighthouse. Photo: Neeti Kumthekar

Montauk Point lighthouse. Photo via Neeti Kumthekar.

What this means is that, if you’re standing out under the stars, you see them move across the sky as night passes. Stars rise in the east, arc across the sky and set in the west, just as the sun does.

Stars near the celestial poles produce the smallest circles while those near the celestial equator produce the largest. The stars – like the sun during the daytime – move from east to west across the sky each and every night. Each and every star moves 15 degrees westward in one hour.

Star trails are really arcs, or partial circles, whose ever-circling motions forever tabulate the great passage of time.

Sometimes you can get cool non-star effects into your photo, as Michael A. Rosinski did in this August 2014 photo.

Sometimes you can get cool non-star effects into your shot, as Michael A. Rosinski did in this photo.

Ken Christison captured these glorious around Polaris, the North Star, on February 15, 2013. He wrote,

Ken Christison captured these glorious star trails around Polaris, the North Star. He wrote, “For the most common and often the most spectacular star trails, you want to locate Polaris and compose the image so it is centered horizontally and hopefully you can have a bit of foreground for reference.”

EarthSky Facebook friend Ken Christison has some wonderful photos of star trails. He said the equipment needed for making startrails is pretty simple:

First, a camera that allows manual settings so you can set your f/stop and shutter speeds, as well as ISO.

Next, a wide angle lens, the wider the better.

A good steady tripod is a must.

Some cameras will have a built in intervalometer which can be set to shoot the desirable number of frames. In some cases the intervalometer has a bit of lag between shots, which is the reason I use a separate, remote attached to the camera that holds the shutter down and when the camera is set in continuous shooting mode will shoot 100 frames in succession with very little gap.

The remote I use is a simple one that can be found on eBay and uses a couple AAA batteries that last quite a while. I just use the remote controller attached to the 10 pin connector. There is no need to use the wireless receiver in this case.

I use a shutter speed of 30 seconds, ISO of 400 to 800, and with my 14-24mm lens at 14mm, shoot it wide open at f/2.8.

Next, he said, you’re ready to capture your star trail:

Make sure the camera is level, and after focusing on a star, make sure the autofocus is turned off. Then, using the settings mentioned above, click the shutter and stay around long enough to know that the shutter is actually actuating. I normally go back in the house, set the timer on our kitchen stove for 45 minutes, and do other things while the camera does its work.

When the timer sounds, go back out and reset the remote by turning it off, waiting for the shutter to close, then reset quickly.

Finally, you’ll want to process your photo. Ken said:

This is one of the most important elements in making star trail images. The program I use is free, works well and is simple to use: http://www.startrails.de/html/software.html.

One other program that I have heard works well and is also free is StarStax: http://www.markus-enzweiler.de/software/software.html.

Thank you, Ken!

Visit Ken Christison’s Flickr page.

Read more: Long exposure star trail photography

A 2-hour-and-15-minute star trail image from March 21, 2014. Our friend Ken Christison in North Carolina captured this image. He wrote,

A 2-hour-and-15-minute star trail image from March 21, 2014. Our friend Ken Christison in North Carolina captured this image. Want to see what a single frame of this image looked like? See the photo below.

A single frame of the star trail image above, with the elements labeled. Thank you, Ken Christison of Conway, North Carolina!

A single frame of the star trail image above, with the elements labeled. Thank you, Ken Christison of Conway, North Carolina!

Star trails over Baja, California

Composite image of star trails over Baja, California, from EarthSky Facebook friend Sergio Garcia Rill. This image is the product of 80 separate photographs. Thank you, Sergio!

You can also create a star trail of sorts with our local star, the sun. EarthSky Facebook friend Matthew Chin in Hong Kong created this sun trail on October 5, 2013. Thank you, Matthew.

You can also create a star trail of sorts with our local star, the sun. EarthSky Facebook friend Matthew Chin in Hong Kong created this sun trail on October 5, 2013. Thank you, Matthew!

View larger. | Star trails over Monument Valley on September 27, 2013 from Victor Goodpasture. The bright object is the moon. Thank you, Victor!

View larger. | Or you can create a moon trail. Star trails and moon trail over Monument Valley from Victor Goodpasture. The bright object is the moon. See more from Victor at Professional Digital Photography on Facebook.

Bottom line: Star trails are the continuous paths created by stars, produced during long time exposure photographs, as shown in the photos on this page.



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2cdDIYy

How many stars can you see?

'A nice West Texas sky from Mt. Locke, in the Davis Mountains near the McDonald Observatory ... Even from this remote location, you can see the light coming from Fort Davis on the bottom of the image. by EarthSky Facebook friend Sergio Garcia Rill

Sergio Garcia Rill wrote: “A west Texas sky from Mt. Locke in the Davis mountains near the McDonald Observatory … Even from this remote location, you can see the light coming from Fort Davis on the bottom of the image.”

What if you were far away from city lights, on a night with no moon and no clouds or haze. How many stars could you see with your unaided eye?

There’s really no definitive answer to this question. No one has counted all the stars in the night sky, and astronomers use different numbers as theoretical estimates.

Considering all the stars visible in all directions around Earth, the upper end on the estimates seems to be about 10,000 visible stars. Other estimates place the number of stars visible to the eye alone – surrounding the entire Earth – at more like 5,000. At any given time, half of Earth is in daylight. So only half the estimated number – say, between 5,000 and 2,500 stars – would be visible from Earth’s night side.

Plus, another fraction of those visible stars would be lost in the haze all around your horizon.

Chirag Upreti wrote on February 17, 2018: “Milky Way core, first light for 2018! A fortunate break in the weather coincided with a favorable moon phase today early morning. Impossible to resist, a buddy and I drove 3 hours to get to Montauk, the easternmost tip of New York State and the location of the Montauk Point Lighthouse. The night sky here is rated a Bortle Scale 4 (rural dark sky).”

Why can’t astronomers agree on the number of visible stars? It’s because we don’t all see the sky in the same way. Even under ideal conditions, there’s a fair amount of variation between how well people can see the stars – depending on things like the strength of your vision – and your age. As you get older, for example, your eyes become much less sensitive to faint light.

You also have to take into account the brightness of your night sky. Even on a moonless night, the glow of lights from Earth’s surface brightens the sky.

Still – far from city lights – under absolutely perfect conditions of darkness and sky clarity – a young to middle-aged person with normal vision should be able to see thousands of stars.

RodNell Barclay caught this image of the Milky Way in mid-February, 2018, while coming down from Ben Vrackie, a mountain in Scotland.

Bottom line: Estimates for the number of stars you can see with the eye alone on a dark moonless night vary, partly because eyesight and sky conditions vary.

Visit the International Dark-Sky Association

What Major World Cities Look Like at Night, Minus the Light Pollution



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ETNdZm
'A nice West Texas sky from Mt. Locke, in the Davis Mountains near the McDonald Observatory ... Even from this remote location, you can see the light coming from Fort Davis on the bottom of the image. by EarthSky Facebook friend Sergio Garcia Rill

Sergio Garcia Rill wrote: “A west Texas sky from Mt. Locke in the Davis mountains near the McDonald Observatory … Even from this remote location, you can see the light coming from Fort Davis on the bottom of the image.”

What if you were far away from city lights, on a night with no moon and no clouds or haze. How many stars could you see with your unaided eye?

There’s really no definitive answer to this question. No one has counted all the stars in the night sky, and astronomers use different numbers as theoretical estimates.

Considering all the stars visible in all directions around Earth, the upper end on the estimates seems to be about 10,000 visible stars. Other estimates place the number of stars visible to the eye alone – surrounding the entire Earth – at more like 5,000. At any given time, half of Earth is in daylight. So only half the estimated number – say, between 5,000 and 2,500 stars – would be visible from Earth’s night side.

Plus, another fraction of those visible stars would be lost in the haze all around your horizon.

Chirag Upreti wrote on February 17, 2018: “Milky Way core, first light for 2018! A fortunate break in the weather coincided with a favorable moon phase today early morning. Impossible to resist, a buddy and I drove 3 hours to get to Montauk, the easternmost tip of New York State and the location of the Montauk Point Lighthouse. The night sky here is rated a Bortle Scale 4 (rural dark sky).”

Why can’t astronomers agree on the number of visible stars? It’s because we don’t all see the sky in the same way. Even under ideal conditions, there’s a fair amount of variation between how well people can see the stars – depending on things like the strength of your vision – and your age. As you get older, for example, your eyes become much less sensitive to faint light.

You also have to take into account the brightness of your night sky. Even on a moonless night, the glow of lights from Earth’s surface brightens the sky.

Still – far from city lights – under absolutely perfect conditions of darkness and sky clarity – a young to middle-aged person with normal vision should be able to see thousands of stars.

RodNell Barclay caught this image of the Milky Way in mid-February, 2018, while coming down from Ben Vrackie, a mountain in Scotland.

Bottom line: Estimates for the number of stars you can see with the eye alone on a dark moonless night vary, partly because eyesight and sky conditions vary.

Visit the International Dark-Sky Association

What Major World Cities Look Like at Night, Minus the Light Pollution



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2ETNdZm

What’s the most distant human object from Earth?

On February 14, 1990, Voyager 1’s cameras pointed back toward the sun and took a series of pictures of the sun and the planets, making the first ever “portrait” of our solar system as seen from the outside. At that time, Voyager 1 was approximately 4 billion miles (6 billion km) away. Read more.

The most distant human-made object is the spacecraft Voyager 1, which – in late February 2018 – is over 13 billion miles (21 billion km) from Earth. Voyager 1 and its twin, Voyager 2, were launched 16 days apart in 1977. Both spacecraft flew by Jupiter and Saturn. Voyager 2 also flew by Uranus and Neptune. Now both Voyagers are heading out of our solar system, into the space between the stars. Voyager 1 officially became the first earthly craft to leave the solar system, crossing the heliopause, in 2012.

Both Voyager spacecraft were designed back in the early 1970s. They were built to take advantage of a rare grouping of planets on a single side of the sun in our solar system. This grouping, which happens only every 176 years, let the Voyagers slingshot from one planet to the next, via gravitational assists.

Infographic: unmanned Voyager 1 and 2 probes visited the outer planets of the solar system and are approaching the edge of our solar system.
Source SPACE.com.

The Voyagers began acquiring images of Jupiter in January 1979. Voyager 1 completed its Jupiter encounter in early April of that year. Voyager 2 picked up the baton in late April and its encounter continued into August. The two spacecraft took more than 33,000 pictures of Jupiter and its five major satellites.

And then the Voyagers went further. When they were launched, no spacecraft had gone as far as Saturn, which is 10 times as Earth’s distance from the sun. The four-year journey to Saturn was thus a major leap, with the Voyagers arriving Saturn nine months apart, in November 1980 and August 1981. Voyager 1 then began leaving the solar system, and Voyager 2 went on to an encounter with Uranus in January 1986 and with Neptune in August 1989.

Click here for images Voyager took of Jupiter

Click here for images Voyager took of Saturn

Click here for Voyager 2 images of Uranus.

Click here for Voyager 2 images of Neptune.

View larger. | Voyager 1’s trajectory in Earth’s sky from 1977-2030. Image via Tomruen/ Wikimedia Commons/ based on data exported from NASA.

Ed Stone – who was Project Scientist for the Voyager mission – told EarthSky some years ago:

We built the spacecraft with enough redundancy – that is backup systems – so that they could keep going.

And keep going they did! The Voyagers have now been traveling for 41 years.

In 2017, astronomers described using the Hubble Space Telescope to look along the Voyagers paths. In about 40,000 years, long after both spacecraft are no longer operational, Voyager 1 will pass within 1.6 light-years of the star Gliese 445, in the constellation Camelopardalis. Meanwhile, Voyager 2 is about 10.5 billion miles (17 billion km) from Earth. Voyager 2 will pass 1.7 light-years from the star Ross 248 in about 40,000 years.

Read more: Hubble peers along Voyagers’ future paths

View larger. | Artist’s concept of the paths of the Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft on their journey through our solar system and out into interstellar space. Image via NASA, ESA, and Z. Levay (STScI). Read more about this image.

Bottom line: Voyager 1 and its twin, Voyager 2, were launched 16 days apart in 1977. Voyager 1 is now the most distant spacecraft from Earth.

Mission status: Where are the Voyagers?



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2F3dFCZ

On February 14, 1990, Voyager 1’s cameras pointed back toward the sun and took a series of pictures of the sun and the planets, making the first ever “portrait” of our solar system as seen from the outside. At that time, Voyager 1 was approximately 4 billion miles (6 billion km) away. Read more.

The most distant human-made object is the spacecraft Voyager 1, which – in late February 2018 – is over 13 billion miles (21 billion km) from Earth. Voyager 1 and its twin, Voyager 2, were launched 16 days apart in 1977. Both spacecraft flew by Jupiter and Saturn. Voyager 2 also flew by Uranus and Neptune. Now both Voyagers are heading out of our solar system, into the space between the stars. Voyager 1 officially became the first earthly craft to leave the solar system, crossing the heliopause, in 2012.

Both Voyager spacecraft were designed back in the early 1970s. They were built to take advantage of a rare grouping of planets on a single side of the sun in our solar system. This grouping, which happens only every 176 years, let the Voyagers slingshot from one planet to the next, via gravitational assists.

Infographic: unmanned Voyager 1 and 2 probes visited the outer planets of the solar system and are approaching the edge of our solar system.
Source SPACE.com.

The Voyagers began acquiring images of Jupiter in January 1979. Voyager 1 completed its Jupiter encounter in early April of that year. Voyager 2 picked up the baton in late April and its encounter continued into August. The two spacecraft took more than 33,000 pictures of Jupiter and its five major satellites.

And then the Voyagers went further. When they were launched, no spacecraft had gone as far as Saturn, which is 10 times as Earth’s distance from the sun. The four-year journey to Saturn was thus a major leap, with the Voyagers arriving Saturn nine months apart, in November 1980 and August 1981. Voyager 1 then began leaving the solar system, and Voyager 2 went on to an encounter with Uranus in January 1986 and with Neptune in August 1989.

Click here for images Voyager took of Jupiter

Click here for images Voyager took of Saturn

Click here for Voyager 2 images of Uranus.

Click here for Voyager 2 images of Neptune.

View larger. | Voyager 1’s trajectory in Earth’s sky from 1977-2030. Image via Tomruen/ Wikimedia Commons/ based on data exported from NASA.

Ed Stone – who was Project Scientist for the Voyager mission – told EarthSky some years ago:

We built the spacecraft with enough redundancy – that is backup systems – so that they could keep going.

And keep going they did! The Voyagers have now been traveling for 41 years.

In 2017, astronomers described using the Hubble Space Telescope to look along the Voyagers paths. In about 40,000 years, long after both spacecraft are no longer operational, Voyager 1 will pass within 1.6 light-years of the star Gliese 445, in the constellation Camelopardalis. Meanwhile, Voyager 2 is about 10.5 billion miles (17 billion km) from Earth. Voyager 2 will pass 1.7 light-years from the star Ross 248 in about 40,000 years.

Read more: Hubble peers along Voyagers’ future paths

View larger. | Artist’s concept of the paths of the Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft on their journey through our solar system and out into interstellar space. Image via NASA, ESA, and Z. Levay (STScI). Read more about this image.

Bottom line: Voyager 1 and its twin, Voyager 2, were launched 16 days apart in 1977. Voyager 1 is now the most distant spacecraft from Earth.

Mission status: Where are the Voyagers?



from EarthSky http://ift.tt/2F3dFCZ